留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于多重余弦函数的积垢建模及其对叶栅气动性能影响

高丽敏 涂盼盼 杨淞 魏沛羽

高丽敏, 涂盼盼, 杨淞, 等. 基于多重余弦函数的积垢建模及其对叶栅气动性能影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(9):20240379 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240379
引用本文: 高丽敏, 涂盼盼, 杨淞, 等. 基于多重余弦函数的积垢建模及其对叶栅气动性能影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(9):20240379 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240379
GAO Limin, TU Panpan, YANG Song, et al. Fouling modeling based on multiple cosine functions and its influence on aerodynamic performance of compressor cascade[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(9):20240379 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240379
Citation: GAO Limin, TU Panpan, YANG Song, et al. Fouling modeling based on multiple cosine functions and its influence on aerodynamic performance of compressor cascade[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(9):20240379 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240379

基于多重余弦函数的积垢建模及其对叶栅气动性能影响

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240379
基金项目: 国家科技重大专项(J2019-Ⅱ-0016-0037); 国家自然科学基金重大专项(51790512); 国家自然科学基金(52106057)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    高丽敏(1973-),女,教授、博士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为叶轮机械气动热力学。E-mail:gaolm@nwpu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: V231.3

Fouling modeling based on multiple cosine functions and its influence on aerodynamic performance of compressor cascade

  • 摘要:

    为了模拟压气机叶片表面积垢的不规则粗糙特征,针对压气机叶片积垢粗糙特征的关键参数,基于多重余弦函数建立了描述压气机叶栅不规则粗糙积垢的几何模型。以某扩压叶栅为研究对象,采用数值模拟手段研究了不同积垢粗糙结构参数对扩压叶栅气动性能的影响。结果表明:不规则粗糙叶栅积垢造成了气动性能退化,流动损失增加,且随着松散层积垢表面粗糙度的增加气动性能退化程度加剧,这一现象在负攻角工况尤为显著。相较于积垢表面粗糙度大小,积垢粗糙结构宽度对气动性能退化的影响相对较小。相较于压比,总压损失对叶栅积垢更加敏感,当积垢造成总压损失最大增加145.75%时相应的压比仅降低3.07%。

     

  • 图 1  积垢形貌特征示意图

    Figure 1.  Schematic diagram of fouling morphology

    图 2  NPU-A1叶栅型线及几何参数示意图

    Figure 2.  Schematic diagram of NPU-A1 cascade profile and geometric parameters

    图 3  积垢粗糙模型中余弦函数个数

    Figure 3.  Number of cosine functions in the fouling rough model

    图 4  不同积垢表面粗糙度的积垢叶型几何模型示意图

    Figure 4.  Schematic diagram of fouling profile geometry model with different fouling roughness

    图 5  不同积垢粗糙结构宽度的积垢叶型几何模型示意图

    Figure 5.  Schematic diagram of fouling profile geometry model with different fouling roughness structure widths

    图 6  干净叶栅数值结果与试验结果对比

    Figure 6.  Comparison of numerical results of clean cascade with experimental results

    图 7  积垢叶栅网格示意图

    Figure 7.  Schematic diagram of the fouling cascade

    图 8  网格无关性验证

    Figure 8.  Grid independence verification

    图 9  来流马赫数Main=0.5工况下粗糙积垢叶栅模型与等效沙砾模型的攻角特性曲线

    Figure 9.  Incidence characteristics of the model for the roughness fouling and the equivalent sand at Main=0.5

    图 10  Main=0.5工况下粗糙积垢叶栅模型与等效沙砾模型的叶片表面等熵马赫数沿弦长分布

    Figure 10.  Isentropic Mach number distribution along the chord length of the roughness fouling model and the equivalent sand model at Main=0.5

    图 11  Main=0.5工况下攻角i=−5°时粗糙积垢叶栅模型与等效沙砾模型的马赫数云图

    Figure 11.  Mach number cloud image of the roughness fouling model and the equivalent sand model for the case of i=−5°, Main=0.5

    图 12  Main=0.5工况下攻角i=7°时粗糙积垢叶栅模型与等效沙砾模型的马赫数云图

    Figure 12.  Mach number cloud image of the roughness fouling model and the equivalent sand model for the case of i=7°, Main=0.5

    图 13  Main=0.5时吸力面积垢表面粗糙度攻角特性曲线

    Figure 13.  Incidence characteristics of suction surfaces with different fouling roughness at Main=0.5

    图 14  Main=0.5工况下吸力面不同表面粗糙度的等熵马赫数沿弦长分布

    Figure 14.  Isentropic Mach number distribution along the chord length of the suction surface with different fouling roughness structure heights at Main=0.5

    图 15  Main=0.5工况下吸力面不同表面粗糙度的尾迹损失分布曲线

    Figure 15.  Distribution of wake loss for different fouling roughness on suction surface at Main=0.5

    图 16  Main=0.5工况下攻角i=−5°时吸力面不同表面粗糙度的马赫数云图

    Figure 16.  Mach number cloud image of the suction surface with different fouling roughness for the case of i=−5°, Main=0.5

    图 17  Main=0.5工况下攻角i=−5°时吸力面不同表面粗糙度间歇因子云图

    Figure 17.  Intermittency cloud image of the suction surface with different fouling roughness for the case of i=−5°, Main=0.5

    图 18  Main=0.5工况下吸力面不同积垢粗糙结构宽度的攻角特性曲线

    Figure 18.  Incidence characteristics of suction surfaces with fouling roughness structure widths at Main=0.5

    图 19  Main=0.5工况下吸力面不同积垢粗糙结构宽度的等熵马赫数沿弦长分布

    Figure 19.  Isentropic Mach number distribution along the chord length of the suction surface with different fouling roughness structure widths at Main=0.5

    图 20  Main=0.5工况下吸力面不同积垢粗糙结构宽度的尾迹损失分布曲线

    Figure 20.  Distribution of wake loss for different fouling roughness structure widths on suction surface at Main=0.5

    图 21  Main=0.5工况下攻角i=−5°时吸力面积垢粗糙结构宽度的马赫数云图

    Figure 21.  Mach number cloud image of the suction surface with different fouling roughness structure widths for the case of i=−5°, Main=0.5

    图 22  Main=0.5工况下攻角i=−5°时吸力面不同积垢粗糙结构宽度间歇因子云图

    Figure 22.  Intermittency cloud image of the suction surface with different fouling roughness structure widths for the case of i=−5°, Main=0.5

    表  1  叶栅几何设计参数

    Table  1.   Cascade geometry design parameters

    参数数值
    前缘半径/mm0.5205
    尾缘半径/mm0.5850
    弦长/mm69.9456
    栅距/mm30.4350
    最大厚度/mm3.5127
    安装角/(°)26.58
    几何进气角/(°)45.83
    几何出气角/(°)6.22
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  不同表面表面粗糙度控制参数Ak研究方案

    Table  2.   Research scheme of different fouling roughness control parameter Ak

    工况 A1 A2 A3 w1 w2 w3 φ1 φ2 φ3
    1 0.09 0.03 0.06 0.001 0.003 0.002 π/4 −3π/8 π/6
    2 0.11 0.05 0.08
    3 0.13 0.07 0.1
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  不同积垢粗糙结构宽度控制参数wk研究方案

    Table  3.   Research scheme of different fouling roughness structure widths wk

    工况 A1 A2 A3 w1 w2 w3 φ1 φ2 φ3
    2 0.11 0.05 0.08 0.001 0.003 0.002 π/4 −3π/8 π/6
    4 0.0015 0.0035 0.0025
    5 0.002 0.004 0.003
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] TARABRIN A P, SCHUROVSKY V A, BODROV A I, et al. An analysis of axial compressor fouling and a blade cleaning method[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1998, 120(2): 256-261. doi: 10.1115/1.2841400
    [2] 李本威, 李冬, 李姜华, 等. 单级压气机性能衰退定量研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2010, 25(7): 1588-1594. LI Benwei, LI Dong, LI Jianghua, et al. Quantitative research on performance degradation of single-stage compressor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2010, 25(7): 1588-1594. (in Chinese

    LI Benwei, LI Dong, LI Jianghua, et al. Quantitative research on performance degradation of single-stage compressor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2010, 25(7): 1588-1594. (in Chinese)
    [3] 高丽敏, 王浩浩, 杨光, 等. 关于叶片前缘加工缺陷及气动合格性的探讨[J]. 推进技术, 2023, 44(1): 22010031. GAO Limin, WANG Haohao, YANG Guang, et al. Discussion on machining defects of blade leading edge and aerodynamic qualification[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2023, 44(1): 22010031. (in Chinese

    GAO Limin, WANG Haohao, YANG Guang, et al. Discussion on machining defects of blade leading edge and aerodynamic qualification[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2023, 44(1): 22010031. (in Chinese)
    [4] WHEELER A P S, SOFIA A, MILLER R J. The effect of leading-edge geometry on wake interactions in compressors[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2007, 131(4): 1769-1779.
    [5] 王占学, 刘增文, 叶新农. 某型涡扇发动机部件老化对性能影响的分析与计算[J]. 航空动力学报, 2007, 22(5): 792-796. WANG Zhanxue, LIU Zengwen, YE Xinnong. Effect of component deterioration on turbofan engine performance[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2007, 22(5): 792-796. (in Chinese doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8055.2007.05.018

    WANG Zhanxue, LIU Zengwen, YE Xinnong. Effect of component deterioration on turbofan engine performance[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2007, 22(5): 792-796. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8055.2007.05.018
    [6] SUDER K L, CHIMA R V, STRAZISAR A J, et al. The effect of adding roughness and thickness to a transonic axial compressor rotor[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1995, 117(4): 491-505. doi: 10.1115/1.2836561
    [7] 高磊, 王子楠, 耿少娟, 等. 表面粗糙度对压气机叶栅损失特性影响的实验研究[J]. 推进技术, 2016, 37(7): 1263-1270. GAO Lei, WANG Zinan, GENG Shaojuan, et al. Experimental study for effects of surface roughness on compressor cascade loss characteristics[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2016, 37(7): 1263-1270. (in Chinese

    GAO Lei, WANG Zinan, GENG Shaojuan, et al. Experimental study for effects of surface roughness on compressor cascade loss characteristics[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2016, 37(7): 1263-1270. (in Chinese)
    [8] 孔纯彬. 表面粗糙度对扩压叶栅性能影响的试验研究[D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 2021. KONG Chunbin. Experimental study on the effect of roughness on diffuser cascade performance[D]. Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2021. (in Chinese

    KONG Chunbin. Experimental study on the effect of roughness on diffuser cascade performance[D]. Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2021. (in Chinese)
    [9] BACK S C, HOBSON G V, SONG S J, et al. Effect of surface roughness location and Reynolds number on compressor cascade performance[C]//Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Glasgow, UK: ASME, 2010: 121-128.
    [10] BACK S C, HOBSON G V, SONG S J, et al. Effects of Reynolds number and surface roughness magnitude and location on compressor cascade performance[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2012, 134(5): 051013. doi: 10.1115/1.4003821
    [11] OSVALDO V Z M. Analysis of gas turbine compressor fouling and washing on line[D]. Cranfield, UK: Cranfield University, 2007.
    [12] MORINI M, PINELLI M, SPINA P R, et al. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of fouling on axial compressor stages[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2010, 132(7): 072401. doi: 10.1115/1.4000128
    [13] ALDI N, MORINI M, PINELLI M, et al. Performance evaluation of nonuniformly fouled axial compressor stages by means of computational fluid dynamics analyses[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2014, 136(2): 021016. doi: 10.1115/1.4025227
    [14] 程泓智, 王名扬, 周创鑫, 等. 低雷诺数下高负荷轴流压气机表面表面粗糙度流动调控机制[J]. 航空动力学报, 2022, 37(2): 283-295. CHENG Hongzhi, WANG Mingyang, ZHOU Chuangxin, et al. Surface roughness flow control mechanism of highly-loaded axial compressor under low Reynolds number conditions[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2022, 37(2): 283-295. (in Chinese

    CHENG Hongzhi, WANG Mingyang, ZHOU Chuangxin, et al. Surface roughness flow control mechanism of highly-loaded axial compressor under low Reynolds number conditions[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2022, 37(2): 283-295. (in Chinese)
    [15] 孙爽, 雷志军, 卢新根, 等. 基于表面表面粗糙度的超高负荷低压涡轮叶片附面层控制[J]. 航空动力学报, 2016, 31(4): 836-846. SUN Shuang, LEI Zhijun, LU Xingen, et al. Boundary layer control of ultra-high-lift low pressure turbine blade with surface roughness[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2016, 31(4): 836-846. (in Chinese

    SUN Shuang, LEI Zhijun, LU Xingen, et al. Boundary layer control of ultra-high-lift low pressure turbine blade with surface roughness[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2016, 31(4): 836-846. (in Chinese)
    [16] 石慧, 陈绍文, 张辰, 等. 基于动叶污垢沉积的数值模拟[J]. 航空动力学报, 2012, 27(5): 1061-1067. SHI Hui, CHEN Shaowen, ZHANG Chen, et al. Numerical simulation of fouling deposition in compressor rotor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2012, 27(5): 1061-1067. (in Chinese

    SHI Hui, CHEN Shaowen, ZHANG Chen, et al. Numerical simulation of fouling deposition in compressor rotor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2012, 27(5): 1061-1067. (in Chinese)
    [17] 琚亚平, 张楚华. 积垢对离心压气机叶轮气动性能的影响[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2013, 34(7): 1262-1265. JU Yaping, ZHANG Chuhua. Impact of fouling on aerodynamic performance of centrifugal compressor impeller[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2013, 34(7): 1262-1265. (in Chinese

    JU Yaping, ZHANG Chuhua. Impact of fouling on aerodynamic performance of centrifugal compressor impeller[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2013, 34(7): 1262-1265. (in Chinese)
    [18] LAYCOCK R G, FLETCHER T H. Time-dependent deposition characteristics of fine coal fly ash in a laboratory gas turbine environment[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2013, 135(2): 021003. doi: 10.1115/1.4006639
    [19] WANG Lisong, WANG Zhongyi, WANG Yanhua, et al. Numerical simulation of low Reynolds number 2-d rough blade compressor cascade[J]. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2022, 10: 950559. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2022.950559
    [20] SUN Haiou, WANG Lisong, WANG Zhongyi, et al. Simulation of the effect of nonuniform fouling thickness on an axial compressor stage performance[J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 13(7): 1-11.
    [21] KIM T, BLOIS G, BEST J L, et al. PIV measurements of turbulent flow overlying large, cubic- and hexagonally-packed hemisphere arrays[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2020, 58(2): 363-383. doi: 10.1080/00221686.2019.1581671
    [22] VOLINO R J, SCHULTZ M P, FLACK K A. Turbulence structure in a boundary layer with two-dimensional roughness[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2009, 635: 75-101. doi: 10.1017/S0022112009007617
    [23] WU Y, CHRISTENSEN K T. Spatial structure of a turbulent boundary layer with irregular surface roughness[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 655: 380-418. doi: 10.1017/S0022112010000960
    [24] CLAUSER F H. Turbulent boundary layers in adverse pressure gradients[J]. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 1954, 21(2): 91-108. doi: 10.2514/8.2938
    [25] BONS J P. St and Cf augmentation for real turbine roughness with elevated freestream turbulence[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2002, 124(4): 632-644. doi: 10.1115/1.1505851
    [26] 于海峰, 陈卫, 程礼, 等. 航空发动机压气机叶片表面积垢行为[J]. 中国表面工程, 2021, 34(5): 188-197. YU Haifeng, CHEN Wei, CHENG Li, et al. Fouling behavior of aero-engine compressor blades surface[J]. China Surface Engineering, 2021, 34(5): 188-197. (in Chinese

    YU Haifeng, CHEN Wei, CHENG Li, et al. Fouling behavior of aero-engine compressor blades surface[J]. China Surface Engineering, 2021, 34(5): 188-197. (in Chinese)
    [27] RATH N, MISHRA R K, KUSHARI A. Investigation of performance degradation in a mixed flow low bypass turbofan engine[J]. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2023, 23(1): 378-388. doi: 10.1007/s11668-023-01590-2
    [28] GBADEBO S A, HYNES T P, CUMPSTY N A. Influence of surface roughness on three-dimensional separation in axial compressors[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2004, 126(4): 455-463. doi: 10.1115/1.1791281
    [29] TAYLOR R P. Surface roughness measurements on gas turbine blades[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1990, 112(2): 175-180. doi: 10.1115/1.2927630
    [30] BONS J P, TAYLOR R P, MCCLAIN S T, et al. The many faces of turbine surface roughness[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2001, 123(4): 739-748. doi: 10.1115/1.1400115
    [31] SUMAN A, VULPIO A, PINELLI M, et al. Microtomography of soil and soot deposits: analysis of three-dimensional structures and surface morphology[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2022, 144(10): 101010. doi: 10.1115/1.4055217
    [32] TURNER A B, TARADA F H A, BAYLEY F J. Effects of surface roughness on heat transfer to gas turbine blades: AGARD-CP-390 [R]. Brussels, Belgium: Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development, 1985.
    [33] YUAN J, PIOMELLI U. Estimation and prediction of the roughness function on realistic surfaces[J]. Journal of Turbulence, 2014, 15(6): 350-365. doi: 10.1080/14685248.2014.907904
    [34] FLACK K A, SCHULTZ M P. Review of hydraulic roughness scales in the fully rough regime[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2010, 132(4): 041203. doi: 10.1115/1.4001492
    [35] SIGAL A, DANBERG J E. New correlation of roughness density effect on the turbulent boundary layer[J]. AIAA Journal, 1990, 28: 554-556. doi: 10.2514/3.10427
    [36] DIRLING R. A method for computing roughwall heat transfer rates on reentry nosetips: AIAA1973-763[R]. Reston, US: AIAA, 1973.
    [37] BONS J. A critical assessment of Reynolds analogy for turbine flows[J]. Journal of Heat Transfer, 2005, 127(5): 472-485. doi: 10.1115/1.1861919
    [38] THAKKAR M, BUSSE A, SANDHAM N. Surface correlations of hydrodynamic drag for transitionally rough engineering surfaces[J]. Journal of Turbulence, 2017, 18(2): 138-169. doi: 10.1080/14685248.2016.1258119
    [39] NIKURADSE J. Strömungsgesetze in rauhen Rohren[J] Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 1933, 11(6): 409-411.
    [40] NIKURADSE J. Laws of flow in rough pipes: NACA-TM-1292[R]. Washington, US: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1950.
    [41] SCHLICHTING H. Experimentelle untersuchungen zum rauhigkeitsproblem[J]. Ingenieur-Archiv, 1936, 7(1): 1-34. doi: 10.1007/BF02084166
    [42] KADIVAR M, TORMEY D, MCGRANAGHAN G. A review on turbulent flow over rough surfaces: Fundamentals and theories[J]. International Journal of Thermofluids, 2021, 10: 100077. doi: 10.1016/j.ijft.2021.100077
    [43] 高丽敏, 蔡宇桐, 徐浩亮, 等. 压气机叶片加工误差影响不确定分析[J]. 航空动力学报, 2017, 32(9): 2253-2259. GAO Limin, CAI Yutong, XU Haoliang, et al. Uncertainty analysis of machining error influence of compressor blade[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(9): 2253-2259. (in Chinese

    GAO Limin, CAI Yutong, XU Haoliang, et al. Uncertainty analysis of machining error influence of compressor blade[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(9): 2253-2259. (in Chinese)
    [44] 高丽敏, 蔡宇桐, 曾瑞慧, 等. 叶片加工误差对压气机叶栅气动性能的影响[J]. 推进技术, 2017, 38(3): 525-531. GAO Limin, CAI Yutong, ZENG Ruihui, et al. Effects of blade machining error on compressor cascade aerodynamic performance[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2017, 38(3): 525-531. (in Chinese

    GAO Limin, CAI Yutong, ZENG Ruihui, et al. Effects of blade machining error on compressor cascade aerodynamic performance[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2017, 38(3): 525-531. (in Chinese)
    [45] 高丽敏, 郭彦超, 李瑞宇, 等. 高亚声速下附面层抽吸控制压气机叶栅流动分离的研究[J]. 推进技术, 2022, 43(4): 200604. GAO Limin, GUO Yanchao, LI Ruiyu, et al. Flow separation of compressor cascade controlled by boundary layer suction at high subsonic velocity[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2022, 43(4): 200604. (in Chinese

    GAO Limin, GUO Yanchao, LI Ruiyu, et al. Flow separation of compressor cascade controlled by boundary layer suction at high subsonic velocity[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2022, 43(4): 200604. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中
图(22) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  606
  • HTML浏览量:  226
  • PDF量:  39
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-06-11
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-09-26

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回