Application of compressibility corrected γ-Reθt transition model in turbomachinery
-
摘要:
基于原始的
γ-Re θt 转捩模型,开展了两种可压缩修正方法在叶轮机械内流领域中边界层转捩预测的应用研究。第1种方法考虑马赫数和温度,对边界层中的涡量雷诺数Re v 与动量厚度雷诺数Re θ 的关系式进行可压缩修正,并利用雷诺数可压缩比拟关系f Re 修正原始的不可压转捩关联函数。第2种方法考虑高马赫数效应对压力梯度参数的影响以及实际流动中湍流普朗特数的可变性,对两个关键参数进行可压缩修正。基于团队自研求解器实现两种修正方法,然后采取3个典型叶轮机械算例进行转捩预测,并与原始转捩模型进行对比分析。结果表明:在叶轮机械内流领域中,第1种修正方法改善效果显著,第2种修正方法与原始模型差异不大,但是在面对由流动分离诱导出的边界层转捩时,两者预测结果与原始模型几乎一致。-
关键词:
- 叶轮机械 /
- 边界层转捩 /
- 流动分离 /
- γ-Reθt转捩模型 /
- 可压缩修正
Abstract:Two compressibility corrected methods developed from the original
γ-Re θt transition model were applied to predict the boundary layer transition in internal flow of turbomachinery. The first method considers Mach number and temperature, it corrects the functional relationship between the vorticity Reynolds number (Re v ) and the momentum thickness Reynolds number (Re θ ) in the boundary layer, and uses the compressible Reynolds number analogy relationf Re to correct the original incompressible transition correlation function. The second method considers the influence of high Mach number effects on the pressure gradient parameter, as well as the variability of turbulent Prandtl number in actual flow, and then corrects these two key parameters. The two corrected methods were implemented on our team’s in-house solver, and transition predictions were conducted using three typical turbomachinery cases, followed by a comparative analysis with the original transition model. The results indicate that in internal flow of turbomachinery, the first correction method shows a significant improvement, while the second one exhibits little difference from the original model. However, when dealing with boundary layer transition induced by flow separation, both methods yield predictions that are nearly identical to those of the original model. -
表 1 VKI叶型主要几何参数
Table 1. Main geometric parameters of VKI
参数 数值 弦长 C/mm 67.647 栅距 t/mm 57.5 展高 h/mm 50 安装角 α/(°) 55 前缘半径 R1/mm 4.126 尾缘半径 R2/mm 0.710 表 2 VKI边界条件设置
Table 2. Boundary condition settings for VKI
参数 MUR247 MUR241 入口湍流度 Tuinlet/% 1 6 入口黏度比 Rt-inlet 18 60 入口总压$p^*_1 $/kPa 339.5 325.7 入口总温$T^*_1 $/K 416.2 416.4 入口马赫数 Ma1 0.15 0.15 出口马赫数 Ma2 0.922 1.089 出口静压 p2/kPa 196 154.7 壁面温度 Tw/K 302.15 299.75 表 3 试验与计算转捩起始、结束位置对比
Table 3. Comparison of experimental and computational transition start and end positions
转捩模型 起始位置/mm 误差δc/% 结束位置/mm 误差δc/% 试验 计算 试验 计算 γ-Reθt 61.2 66.1 7.24 70.8 74.7 5.77 γ-Reθt-M1 61.2 62.2 1.48 70.8 68.9 2.81 γ-Reθt-M2 61.2 67.2 8.87 70.8 74.7 5.77 表 4 试验与计算转捩起始、结束位置对比
Table 4. Comparison of experimental and computational transition start and end positions
转捩模型 起始位置/mm 误差δc/% 结束位置/mm 误差δc/% 试验 计算 试验 计算 γ-Reθt 40.2 58.1 26.46 57.2 75.1 26.46 γ-Reθt-M1 40.2 43.4 4.73 57.2 60.7 5.17 γ-Reθt-M2 40.2 53.3 19.37 57.2 76.9 29.12 表 5 UKG0303叶型主要几何参数
Table 5. Main geometric parameters of UKG0303
参数 数值 弦长 C/mm 75 栅距 t/mm 58.5 展高 h/mm 190 安装角 α/(°) 13.57 弯角 η/(°) 47.0 气流折转角 β/(°) 38.6 表 6 UKG0303边界条件设置
Table 6. Boundary condition settings for UKG0303
参数 数值 入口湍流度 Tuinlet/% 1 入口黏度比 Rt-inlet 10 入口总压$p^*_1 $/kPa 111 入口静压 p1/kPa 87.025 入口总温$T^*_1 $/K 301.45 入口马赫数 Ma1 0.6 出口静压 p2/kPa 95 绝热壁面 表 7 STFF叶型主要几何参数
Table 7. Main geometric parameters of STFF
参数 数值 弦长 C/mm 100.3 栅距 t/mm 30.2 展高 h/mm 152 安装角 α/(°) 22.6 弯角η/(°) 21.6 进口气流角α1k/(°) 37 出口气流角 α2k/(°) 11 表 8 STFF边界条件设置
Table 8. Boundary condition settings for STFF
参数 数值 入口湍流度 Tuinlet/% 1 入口总压$p_1^* $/kPa 400 入口静压 p1/kPa 30.5 入口总温$T_1^* $/K 285 入口马赫数 Ma1 2.33 出口静压p2/kPa 22.0 绝热壁面 -
[1] 杨琳, 邹正平, 宁方飞, 等. 边界层转捩的数值模拟[J]. 航空动力学报, 2005, 20(3): 355-360. YANG Lin, ZOU Zhengping, NING Fangfei, et al. Simulation of boundary layer transition[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2005, 20(3): 355-360. (in Chinese doi: 10.19596/j.cnki.1001-246x.8600YANG Lin, ZOU Zhengping, NING Fangfei, et al. Simulation of boundary layer transition[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2005, 20(3): 355-360. (in Chinese) doi: 10.19596/j.cnki.1001-246x.8600 [2] 王文涛, 王子楠, 张宏武, 等. 压气机静叶栅层流分离泡转捩与角区分离数值模拟与实验[J]. 航空动力学报, 2017, 32(9): 2273-2282. WANG Wentao, WANG Zinan, ZHANG Hongwu, et al. Numerical simulation and experiment of laminar separation bubble transition and corner separation of compressor stator cascade[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(9): 2273-2282. (in Chinese doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2017.09.028WANG Wentao, WANG Zinan, ZHANG Hongwu, et al. Numerical simulation and experiment of laminar separation bubble transition and corner separation of compressor stator cascade[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(9): 2273-2282. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2017.09.028 [3] CHOI H, MOIN P. Grid-point requirements for large eddy simulation: Chapman’s estimates revisited[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2012, 24: 011702. doi: 10.1063/1.3676783 [4] WALKER G J. The role of laminar-turbulent transition in gas turbine engines: a discussion[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1993, 115(2): 207-216. doi: 10.1115/92-gt-301 [5] VAN INGEN J. The eN method for transition prediction. historical review of work at TU delft: AIAA 2008-3830 [R]. Seattle, Washington: 38th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, 2008. [6] ABU-GHANNAM B J, SHAW R. Natural transition of boundary layers: the effects of turbulence, pressure gradient, and flow history[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 1980, 22(5): 213-228. [7] DUNN M G. Convective heat transfer and aerodynamics in axial flow turbines[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2001, 123(4): 637-686. doi: 10.1115/1.1397776 [8] WALTERS D K, LEYLEK J H. A new model for boundary layer transition using a single-point RANS approach[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2004, 126(1): 193-202. doi: 10.1115/1.1622709 [9] LANGTRY R B, MENTER F R, LIKKI S R, et al. A correlation-based transition model using local variables: Part Ⅱ test cases and industrial applications[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2006, 128(3): 423-434. doi: 10.1115/1.2184353 [10] WALTERS D K, COKLJAT D. A three-equation eddy-viscosity model for Reynolds-averaged navier-stokes simulations of transitional flow[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2008, 130(12): 121401. doi: 10.1115/1.2979230 [11] FU Song, WANG Liang. RANS modeling of high-speed aerodynamic flow transition with consideration of stability theory[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2013, 58: 36-59. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2012.08.004 [12] MENTER F R, SMIRNOV P E, LIU Tao, et al. A one-equation local correlation-based transition model[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2015, 95(4): 583-619. doi: 10.1007/s10494-015-9622-4 [13] 夏陈超, 姜婷婷, 郭中州, 等. 压缩性修正对γ-Reθ转捩模型的影响研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2015, 33(5): 603-609. XIA Chenchao, JIANG Tingting, GUO Zhongzhou, et al. Effects of compressibility correction on γ-Reθ transition model[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2015, 33(5): 603-609. (in Chinese doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2014.0068XIA Chenchao, JIANG Tingting, GUO Zhongzhou, et al. Effects of compressibility correction on γ-Reθ transition model[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2015, 33(5): 603-609. (in Chinese) doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2014.0068 [14] 张毅锋, 何琨, 张益荣, 等. Menter转捩模型在高超声速流动模拟中的改进及验证[J]. 宇航学报, 2016, 37(4): 397-402. ZHANG Yifeng, HE Kun, ZHANG Yirong, et al. Improvement and validation of menter’s transition model for hypersonic flow simulation[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2016, 37(4): 397-402. (in Chinese doi: 10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2016.04.004ZHANG Yifeng, HE Kun, ZHANG Yirong, et al. Improvement and validation of menter’s transition model for hypersonic flow simulation[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2016, 37(4): 397-402. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2016.04.004 [15] WANG Yutian, LI Yiwen, XIAO Lianghua, et al. Similarity-solution-based improvement of γ-Re model for hypersonic transition prediction[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 124: 491-503. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.03.092 [16] 刘清扬, 雷娟棉, 刘周, 等. 适用于可压缩流动的γ-Reθt-fRe转捩模型[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 321-331. LIU Qingyang, LEI Juanmian, LIU Zhou, et al. γ-Reθt-fRe transition model for compressible flow[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(8): 321-331. (in ChineseLIU Qingyang, LEI Juanmian, LIU Zhou, et al. γ-Reθt-fRe transition model for compressible flow[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(8): 321-331. (in Chinese) [17] 向星皓, 张毅锋, 袁先旭, 等. C-γ-Reθ高超声速三维边界层转捩预测模型[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 188-196. XIANG Xinghao, ZHANG Yifeng, YUAN Xianxu, et al. C-γ-Reθ model for hypersonic three-dimensional boundary layer transition prediction[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(9): 188-196. (in ChineseXIANG Xinghao, ZHANG Yifeng, YUAN Xianxu, et al. C-γ-Reθ model for hypersonic three-dimensional boundary layer transition prediction[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(9): 188-196. (in Chinese) [18] ECKERT E R G. Engineering relations for heat transfer and friction in high-velocity laminar and turbulent boundary-layer flow over surfaces with constant pressure and temperature[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1956, 78(6): 1273-1283. doi: 10.1115/1.4014011 [19] ARTS T, LAMBERT DE ROUVROIT M, RUTHERFORD A W. Aero-thermal investigation of a highly loaded transonic linear turbine guide vane cascade. A Test Case for Inviscid and Viscous Flow Computations[J]. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N, 1990, 91: 23437. doi: 10.1115/90-gt-358 [20] 郭隽, 刘丽平, 徐晶磊, 等. γ-Reθt转捩模型在跨声速涡轮叶栅中的应用[J]. 推进技术, 2018, 39(9): 1994-2001. GUO (Juan| Jun), LIU Liping, XU Jinglei, et al. Application of γ-(R)eθt transition model in transonic turbine cascades[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2018, 39(9): 1994-2001. (in Chinese doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2018.09.009GUO (Juan| Jun), LIU Liping, XU Jinglei, et al. Application of γ-(R)eθt transition model in transonic turbine cascades[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2018, 39(9): 1994-2001. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2018.09.009 [21] CHESNAKAS C J. Experimental studies in a supersonic through-flow fan blade cascade[D]. Blacksburg, US : Virginia Tech, 1991. -

下载: