Influence of alternative fuels on the main combustion performance of RP-3 aviation kerosene and its blended fuels
-
摘要:
为了降低污染物排放,满足日益严格的环保要求,同时减少对RP-3航空煤油的依赖,发展航空替代燃料正在成为航空业的迫切需求。为探究RP-3航空煤油与加氢催化生物柴油替代燃料不同掺混比的燃烧作用机制,现对某型号航空发动机燃烧3种燃料(RP-3航空煤油、70% RP-3航空煤油/30%加氢催化生物柴油、50% RP-3航空煤油/50%加氢催化生物柴油)的燃烧过程进行数值模拟计算,并分析燃用不同燃料时燃烧室的燃烧和排放特性。结果表明:与RP-3航空煤油相比,燃用两种混合燃料时燃烧室内流场分布特性基本相同,主燃区的高温区域明显延长,燃烧室内最高温度分别下降9 K和13 K,燃烧室出口截面平均温度分别上升1 K和4 K,3种燃料的出口温度分布系数均符合规定;燃烧室污染物排放分布特性基本相同,其中CO排放分别降低5%和6.4%,CO2排放分别降低2.9%和7.8%,NO排放分别降低4.2%和5.8%,碳烟排放分别降低3.2%和4.7%。
Abstract:In order to reduce the emission of pollutants, meet the increasingly strict environmental requirements, and reduce the dependence on RP-3 aviation kerosene, the development of aviation alternative fuels is emerging as an urgent necessity for the global aviation industry. To investigate the combustion mechanisms of RP-3 aviation kerosene blended with hydrogenated catalytic biodiesel at varying blending ratios, numerical simulations of the combustion process of a certain type of aero-engine burning three kinds of fuels (RP-3 aviation kerosene, 70% RP-3 aviation kerosene/30% hydrogenated catalytic biodiesel, and 50% RP-3 aviation kerosene/50% hydrogenated catalytic biodiesel) were carried out to compare and analyze the combustion and emission characteristics of the combustion chambers when different fuels were burned. The results showed that, compared with RP-3 aviation kerosene, the flow field distribution characteristics in the combustion chamber were basically the same when the two blended fuels were burned, the high temperature region of the main combustion zone was obviously extended, the maximum temperature in the combustion chamber decreased by 9 K and 13 K, respectively, the average temperature of the combustion chamber outlet cross-section rose by 1 K and 4 K, and the exit temperature distribution coefficients of the three fuels were compliant with the regulations; the pollutant emission distribution characteristics in the combustion chamber were basically the same, in which the CO emissions were reduced by 5% and 6.4%, CO2 emissions reduced by 2.9% and 7.8%, NO emissions reduced by 4.2% and 5.8%, and carbon smoke emissions reduced by 3.2% and 4.7%.
-
表 1 燃料的物理和化学性质
Table 1. Physical and chemical properties of the fuels
燃料 RP-3
(C12H26)HCB
(C16H34)K70H30
混合物K50H50
混合物密度/(kg/m3) 780 820 792 800 黏度/10−3 (Pa·s) 1.3 2.1 1.5 1.7 比热容/(kJ/(kg·K)) 2.1 2.0 2.05 2.05 相对分子质量 /(g/mol) 170 226 188 198 表 2 元素组成与热值
Table 2. Elemental composition and calorific values
燃料 质量分数/% 高热值/
(MJ/kg)低热值/
(MJ/kg)C H O N RP-3 86.1 13.3 0.6 0 46.2 43.2 HCB 83.0 15.0 2.0 0 44.5 42.5 K70H30 85.2 13.8 1.0 0 45.6 42.99 K50H50 84.1 14.2 1.5 0 45.1 42.85 表 3 燃烧室的最高温度和出口截面平均温度
Table 3. Maximum temperature of the combustion chamber and average temperature of the outlet section
K 燃料 燃烧室最高温度 出口截面平均温度 K100 1 994 1285 K70H30 1 985 1286 K50H50 1 981 1289 表 4 燃烧室CO的最大质量分数
Table 4. Maximum mass fraction of combustion chamber CO
燃料 最大质量分数 K100 0.1404 K70H30 0.1397 K50H50 0.1395 表 5 燃烧室CO2的最大和平均质量分数
Table 5. Maximum and average mass fraction of CO2 in combustion chamber
燃料 最大质量分数 K100 0.1005 K70H30 0.0976 K50H50 0.0926 表 6 燃烧室NO的最大质量分数
Table 6. Maximum mass fraction of NO in combustion chamber
燃料 最大质量分数/10−8 K100 8.799 K70H30 8.430 K50H50 8.286 表 7 燃烧室碳烟的最大质量分数
Table 7. Maximum mass fraction of carbon smoke in the combustion chamber
燃料 最大质量分数/10−9 K100 2.330 K70H30 2.255 K50H50 2.220 -
[1] 黄业千. 走进燃料新时代的航空燃油[J]. 科技导报, 2014, 32(27): 88. HUANG Yeqian. Aviation fuel in the new era of fuel[J]. Science and Technology Review, 2014, 32(27): 88. (in ChineseHUANG Yeqian. Aviation fuel in the new era of fuel[J]. Science and Technology Review, 2014, 32(27): 88. (in Chinese) [2] 姚长鑫, 禹进. RP-3航空煤油物理替代燃料模型及应用研究[J]. 推进技术, 2020, 41(4): 934-941. YAO Changxin, YU Jin. A physical surrogate fuel model for RP-3 aviation kerosene and applications[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2020, 41(4): 934-941. (in ChineseYAO Changxin, YU Jin. A physical surrogate fuel model for RP-3 aviation kerosene and applications[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2020, 41(4): 934-941. (in Chinese) [3] 石油输出国组织(OPEC). 2025年6月月度石油市场报告[R]. 维也纳: 石油输出国组织(OPEC) 2025. Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). Monthly oil market report for June 2025 [R]. Vienna: Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). 2025. (in ChineseOrganization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). Monthly oil market report for June 2025 [R]. Vienna: Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). 2025. (in Chinese) [4] 颜应文, 戴超, 李井华. RP-3航空煤油替代燃料简化机理及其验证[J]. 航空动力学报, 2016, 31(12): 2878-2887. YAN Yingwen, DAI Chao, LI Jinghua. Reduced mechanism of surrogate fuel for RP-3 aviation kerosene and verification[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2016, 31(12): 2878-2887. (in ChineseYAN Yingwen, DAI Chao, LI Jinghua. Reduced mechanism of surrogate fuel for RP-3 aviation kerosene and verification[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2016, 31(12): 2878-2887. (in Chinese) [5] 马洪安, 解茂昭, 曾文, 等. 航空发动机燃烧室燃烧过程与排放物生成的反应动力学数值模拟[J]. 航空动力学报, 2013, 28(2): 297-306. MA Hongan, XIE Maozhao, ZENG Wen, et al. Reaction kinetic numerical simulation of combustion process and emission formation in aero-engine combustor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2013, 28(2): 297-306. (in ChineseMA Hongan, XIE Maozhao, ZENG Wen, et al. Reaction kinetic numerical simulation of combustion process and emission formation in aero-engine combustor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2013, 28(2): 297-306. (in Chinese) [6] ZHANG Chi, HUI Xin, LIN Yuzhen, et al. Recent development in studies of alternative jet fuel combustion: Progress, challenges, and opportunities[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 54: 120-138. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.056 [7] 刘国库, 曾文, 郑玮琳. 航空煤油/甲烷混合燃料航空发动机燃烧室燃烧与排放特性分析[J]. 沈阳航空航天大学学报, 2022, 39(4): 10-18. LIU Guoku, ZENG Wen, ZHENG Weilin. Combustion and emission characteristics analysis of aero-engine combustor burning kerosene/methane[J]. Journal of Shenyang Aerospace University, 2022, 39(4): 10-18. (in ChineseLIU Guoku, ZENG Wen, ZHENG Weilin. Combustion and emission characteristics analysis of aero-engine combustor burning kerosene/methane[J]. Journal of Shenyang Aerospace University, 2022, 39(4): 10-18. (in Chinese) [8] 席双惠, 李浩洋, 侯军兴, 等. RP-3航空煤油替代燃料骨架机理开发及验证[J]. 郑州航空工业管理学院学报, 2024, 42(6): 38-45. XI Shuanghui, LI Haoyang, HOU Junxing, et al. Development and verification of skeletal mechanism for RP-3 aviation kerosene alternative fuel[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, 2024, 42(6): 38-45. (in ChineseXI Shuanghui, LI Haoyang, HOU Junxing, et al. Development and verification of skeletal mechanism for RP-3 aviation kerosene alternative fuel[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, 2024, 42(6): 38-45. (in Chinese) [9] 刘国栋. 航空活塞发动机燃烧过程和特性的模拟研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2013. LIU Guodong. Numerical simulation of combustion process and characteristics in aviation piston engine[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013. (in ChineseLIU Guodong. Numerical simulation of combustion process and characteristics in aviation piston engine[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013. (in Chinese) [10] 王朝晖, 王成军, 王丹丹, 等. 燃气轮机燃烧室燃烧气体燃料的数值模拟[J]. 沈阳航空工业学院学报, 2010, 27(2): 11-14. Chinese) WANG Zhaohui, WANG Chengjun, WANG Dandan, et al. Combusting gas fuel simulation for the combustor of gas turbine engine[J]. Journal of Shenyang Institute of Aeronautical Engineering, 2010, 27(2): 11-14. (in ChineseWANG Zhaohui, WANG Chengjun, WANG Dandan, et al. Combusting gas fuel simulation for the combustor of gas turbine engine[J]. Journal of Shenyang Institute of Aeronautical Engineering, 2010, 27(2): 11-14. (in Chinese) [11] ZHANG Yanzhi, ZHAN Liangliang, HE Zhixia, et al. An investigation on gasoline compression ignition (GCI) combustion in a heavy-duty diesel engine using gasoline/hydrogenated catalytic biodiesel blends[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 160: 113952. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113952 [12] ZHONG Wenjun, YUAN Qifei, LIAO Jingjing, et al. Experimental and modeling study of the autoignition characteristics of gasoline/hydrogenated catalytic biodiesel blends over low-to-intermediate temperature[J]. Fuel, 2022, 313: 122919. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122919 [13] 杨晓军, 郑佳伦, 杨志衡, 等. 航空替代燃料燃烧特性及碳烟生成数值模拟[J]. 航空动力学报, 2023, 38(10): 2317-2327. YANG Xiaojun, ZHENG Jialun, YANG Zhiheng, et al. Numerical simulation of combustion characteristics and carbon smoke generation of aviation alternative fuels[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2023, 38(10): 2317-2327. (in ChineseYANG Xiaojun, ZHENG Jialun, YANG Zhiheng, et al. Numerical simulation of combustion characteristics and carbon smoke generation of aviation alternative fuels[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2023, 38(10): 2317-2327. (in Chinese) [14] Air Force Research Laboratory. Air force demonstrates rocket engine preburner for advanced liquid rocket engines[R]. Edwards Air Force Base, US: Air Force Research Laboratory, 2019. [15] 曹礼轩, 王谦, 钟汶君, 等. 冷态下喷油策略对双燃料发动机燃烧特性影响的可视化研究[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学), 2023, 37(3): 138-146. CAO Lixuan, WANG Qian, ZHONG Wenjun, et al. Visual study on the effect of fuel injection strategies on combustion characteristics of dual-fuel engines under cold conditions[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (Natural Science), 2023, 37(3): 138-146. (in ChineseCAO Lixuan, WANG Qian, ZHONG Wenjun, et al. Visual study on the effect of fuel injection strategies on combustion characteristics of dual-fuel engines under cold conditions[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (Natural Science), 2023, 37(3): 138-146. (in Chinese) [16] 李文豪. 甲醇/正辛醇/加氢催化生物柴油光学发动机低温燃烧模式碳烟生成特性研究[D]. 江苏 镇江: 江苏大学, 2023. LI Wenhao. Optical diagnostic on soot formation characteristics of ternary hydrogenated catalytic biodiesel/methanol/N-octanol blends in low temperature combustion mode in optical engine[D]. Zhenjiang Jiangsu: Jiangsu University, 2023. (in ChineseLI Wenhao. Optical diagnostic on soot formation characteristics of ternary hydrogenated catalytic biodiesel/methanol/N-octanol blends in low temperature combustion mode in optical engine[D]. Zhenjiang Jiangsu: Jiangsu University, 2023. (in Chinese) [17] 展亮亮, 张延志, 钟汶君, 等. 加氢催化生物柴油对GCI发动机燃烧与排放影响[J]. 内燃机学报, 2020, 38(2): 119-125. ZHAN Liangliang, ZHANG Yanzhi, ZHONG Wenjun, et al. Effect of hydrogenation catalyzed biodiesel on combustion and emissions of GCI engines[J]. Transactions of CSICE, 2020, 38(2): 119-125. (in ChineseZHAN Liangliang, ZHANG Yanzhi, ZHONG Wenjun, et al. Effect of hydrogenation catalyzed biodiesel on combustion and emissions of GCI engines[J]. Transactions of CSICE, 2020, 38(2): 119-125. (in Chinese) [18] BOHL T, SMALLBONE A, TIAN Guohong, et al. Particulate number and NOx trade-off comparisons between HVO and mineral diesel in HD applications[J]. Fuel, 2018, 215: 90-101. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.11.023 [19] ZHONG Wenjun, XUAN Tiemin, HE Zhixia, et al. Experimental study of combustion and emission characteristics of diesel engine with diesel/second-generation biodiesel blending fuels[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 121: 241-250. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.05.033 [20] PACHIANNAN T, ZHONG Wenjun, XUAN Tiemin, et al. Simultaneous study on spray liquid length, ignition and combustion characteristics of diesel and hydrogenated catalytic biodiesel in a constant volume combustion chamber[J]. Renewable Energy, 2019, 140: 761-771. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.063 [21] ZHONG Wenjun, PACHIANNAN T, LI Zilong, et al. Combustion and emission characteristics of gasoline/hydrogenated catalytic biodiesel blends in gasoline compression ignition engines under different loads of double injection strategies[J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 251: 113296. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.099 [22] 李嘉斌, 丁思宇, 储旭, 等. 航改燃机燃烧室掺氢燃烧特性研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2025, 45(2): 443-452. LI Jiabin, DING Siyu, CHU Xu, et al. Combustion characteristics of hydrogen-mixed methane in aeroderivative gas turbine combustors[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2025, 45(2): 443-452. (in ChineseLI Jiabin, DING Siyu, CHU Xu, et al. Combustion characteristics of hydrogen-mixed methane in aeroderivative gas turbine combustors[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2025, 45(2): 443-452. (in Chinese) [23] 王慧汝, 金捷, 柳杨. 采用详细化学反应机理的火焰面模型模拟煤油两相燃烧流场[J]. 航空动力学报, 2011, 26(7): 1471-1479. WANG Huiru, JIN Jie, LIU Yang. Flamelet modeling of two-phase kerosene combustion flow fields using a detailed chemical reaction mechanism[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2011, 26(7): 1471-1479. (in ChineseWANG Huiru, JIN Jie, LIU Yang. Flamelet modeling of two-phase kerosene combustion flow fields using a detailed chemical reaction mechanism[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2011, 26(7): 1471-1479. (in Chinese) [24] 曾文, 徐紫馨, 张鑫炜, 等. RP-3航空煤油/O2的简化反应机理优化与验证[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2024, 30(6): 539-549. ZENG Wen, XU Zixin, ZHANG Xinwei, et al. Optimization and verification of reduced reaction mechanism of RP-3 kerosene/oxygen[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2024, 30(6): 539-549. (in ChineseZENG Wen, XU Zixin, ZHANG Xinwei, et al. Optimization and verification of reduced reaction mechanism of RP-3 kerosene/oxygen[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2024, 30(6): 539-549. (in Chinese) [25] LIU Ping, GONG Xiangkui, DENG Tao, et al. Study on a novel methodology for developing the skeletal mechanism of RP-3 aviation kerosene[J]. ACS Omega, 2023, 8(40): 37282-37292. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c05087 -

下载: