留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

直升机桨距主动控制对旋翼性能的影响

王超 陆洋 陈仁良

王超, 陆洋, 陈仁良. 直升机桨距主动控制对旋翼性能的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2014, (8): 1922-1929. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2014.08.021
引用本文: 王超, 陆洋, 陈仁良. 直升机桨距主动控制对旋翼性能的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2014, (8): 1922-1929. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2014.08.021
WANG Chao, LU Yang, CHEN Ren-liang. Effect of active blade pitch control on helicopter rotor performance[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014, (8): 1922-1929. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2014.08.021
Citation: WANG Chao, LU Yang, CHEN Ren-liang. Effect of active blade pitch control on helicopter rotor performance[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014, (8): 1922-1929. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2014.08.021

直升机桨距主动控制对旋翼性能的影响

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2014.08.021
基金项目: 

南京航空航天大学基本科研业务费(56XAA13002);江苏高校优势学科建设工程

详细信息
    作者简介:

    王超(1985-),男,山东菏泽人,博士生,研究方向为直升机飞行动力学。

    通讯作者:

    陆洋(1977-),男,江苏大丰人,教授,博士,研究方向为直升机动力学及其控制.E-mail:luyang@nuaa.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: V211.1

Effect of active blade pitch control on helicopter rotor performance

  • 摘要: 为摸索直升机桨距主动控制对旋翼性能的影响规律并揭示其机理,首先建立能够考虑2阶谐波桨距控制影响的旋翼气动力模型,进一步建立相应的直升机飞行动力学模型,将旋翼需用功率作为性能评估的依据,在全机配平状态下开展2阶谐波桨距控制对旋翼性能的影响研究.对于样例直升机,前进比为0.2时,施加任何2阶谐波桨距控制均使旋翼需用功率增加;前进比为0.35时,施加幅值为1.5°、初相位为90°的2阶谐波桨距控制使旋翼需用功率降低约5%.通过分析样例直升机桨盘平面迎角分布和阻力系数分布,总结出利用2阶谐波桨距控制提升旋翼性能的物理本质: 当直升机处于高速、大载荷飞行状态时,施加适当的2阶谐波桨距控制可以改善桨盘平面迎角分布,推迟后行边桨叶失速,从而降低旋翼需用功率,有效提升旋翼性能.

     

  • [1] Dadone L U.Design and analytical study of a rotor airfoil[R].NASA CR 2988,1978.
    [2] Harrison R,Stacey S,Hansford B.Berp Ⅳ:the design,development and testing of an advanced rotor blade[C]//Proceedings of American Helicopter Society 64th Annual Forum.New York:Curran Associates Inc,2008:2524-2543.
    [3] 王博,徐国华,招启军.翼型对旋翼悬停气动性能影响的CFD模拟分析[J].南京航空航天大学学报,2012,44(4):478-484. WANG Bo,XU Guohua,ZHAO Qijun.CFD simulation of airfoil effect on hovering rotor aerodynamic performance[J].Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2012,44(4):478-484.(in Chinese)
    [4] Kessler C.Active rotor control for helicopters:motivation and survey on higher harmonic control[J].Council of European Aerospace Societies Aeronautical Journal,2011,1(1/2/3/4):3-22.
    [5] Kessler C.Active rotor control for helicopters:individual blade control and swashplateless rotor designs[J].Council of European Aerospace Societies Aeronautical Journal,2011,1(1/2/3/4):23-54.
    [6] Steward W.Second harmonic control on the helicopter rotor[R].[S.l.]:Aeronautical Research Council Reports and Memoranda,Nr 2997,1952.
    [7] Nguyen K,Chopra I.Effects of higher harmonic control on rotor performance and control loads[R].AIAA 90-1158,1990.
    [8] Jacklin S A,Lau B H,Nguyen K.Full scale wind tunnel test of the McDonnell Douglas five bladed advanced bearingless rotor:performance,stability,loads,control power,vibration and HHC data[R].NASA TM 112094,1994.
    [9] Yeo H.Assessment of active controls for rotor performance enhancement[J].Journal of American Helicopter Society,2008,53(2):152-163.
    [10] Cheng R P,Celi R.Optimum 2/rev inputs for improved rotor performance[J].Journal of Aircraft,2005,42(6):1409-1417.
    [11] Arnold U T P,Fuerst D.Closed loop IBC results from CH-53G flight tests[J].Aerospace Science and Technology,2005,9(5):421-435.
    [12] Yeo H,Romander E A,Norman T R.Investigation of rotor performance and loads of a UH-60A individual blade control system[J].Journal of American Helicopter Society,2011,56(4):1-18.
    [13] He C J.Development and application of a generalized dynamic wake theory for lifting rotors[D].Atlanta:Georgia Institute of Technology,1989.
    [14] Peters D A,Boyd D D,He C J.Finite state induced flow model for rotors in hover and forward flight[J].Journal of American Helicopter Society,1989,34(4):5-17.
    [15] Lieshman J G.Principles of helicopter aerodynamics[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2006.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1340
  • HTML浏览量:  3
  • PDF量:  880
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2013-05-10
  • 刊出日期:  2014-08-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回