Fatigue test of electron beam welding for TA19 in civil aircraft engine
-
摘要: 针对民用航空发动机钛合金整体叶盘常用材料TA19开展其母材试件与电子束焊焊接试件在20,300,450℃的疲劳试验,通过焊接试件的焊缝材料断口与母材断口形貌的比较探讨了焊缝材料的疲劳破坏机理,并在104~106循环的疲劳寿命区间内采用Basquin模型分别建立了焊缝材料和母材的应力-疲劳寿命(S-N)曲线,结果显示母材试件与焊接试件的试验疲劳寿命大部分都落在了对应模型计算疲劳寿命的2倍线之内,表明试验得到的S-N曲线是合理的.焊接试件与母材试件的S-N曲线的对比分析表明,20℃时焊接试件的疲劳性能比母材试件略高,而在300℃和450℃时焊接试件与母材试件的疲劳性能差异随应力水平发生变化.但总地说来,在所关注疲劳寿命区间内,母材试件与焊接试件的计算疲劳寿命差异也在2倍线以内,初步表明两者的疲劳性能相当.Abstract: Fatigue test for welding specimen of electron beam welding and base metal specimen of TA19, which was made of titanium-based alloy often used in the blisk of civil aircraft engine, was performed at temperature 20, 300, 450℃. Fracture mechanism of welded joint was discussed by comparing the fracture face microstructures of welded metal with that of base metal. Then the stress-fatigue life (S-N) curves of both base metal and welded metal were created based on Basquin model in the fatigue life range of 104 to 106 cycles, showing that few test data of fatigue life can go beyond the two times error margin in the corresponding models, which indicates that the S-N curve obtained by test is reasonable. Through comparison of the S-N curves of welding specimen and base metal specimen, it can be seen that fatigue performance of welding specimen is higher than that of base metal specimen at temperature 20℃, while the differences of the fatigue performance between welding specimen and base metal specimen vary with the stress amplitude at temperature 300℃ and 450℃. Also, in above fatigue life range, the differences of calculated life prediction for welding specimen and base metal specimen are within the two times error margin. Thereby, the conclusion can be drawn that the fatigue performances of both are closer.
-
Key words:
- TA19 /
- electron beam welding /
- fatigue test /
- Basquin model /
- S-N curve
-
[1] ZHANG Jing,TAN Chengwen,REN Yu,et al.Quasi-static and dynamic tensile behaviors in electron beam welded Ti-6Al-4V alloy[J].Transaction of Nonferrous Metals Society of China,2011,21(1):39-44. [2] Suresh D,Mohandas M T.A comparative evaluation of friction and electron beam welds of near-α titanium alloy[J].Materials and Design,2010,31(4):2245-2252. [3] Sun Z,Karppi R.The application of electron beam welding for the joining of dissimilar metals:an overview[J].Materials Processing Technology,1996,59(3):257-267. [4] Saresh N,Pillai M G,Mathew J.Investigations into the effects of electron beam welding on thick Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy[J].Materials Processing Technology,2007,192/193(1):83-88. [5] Mohandas T,Varma V K,Kutumbarao V V.Low cycle fatigue behaviour of electron beam and friction welded joints of an α-β titanium alloy[J].Scripta Materialia,1996,35(2):187-192. [6] 李晓延,巩水利,陈俐.TC4钛合金薄板高能束焊接接头疲劳性能研究[J].航空材料学报,2005,25(4):26-29. LI Xiaoyan,GONG Shuili,CHEN Li.A study of fatigue life of TC4 titanium alloy sheet and its high density beams welded joints[J].Journal of Aeronautical Materials,2005,25(4):26-29.(in Chinese) [7] 齐红宇,李少林,杨晓光,等.锻造TC4钛合金电子束焊接接头的疲劳破坏机制[J].航空动力学报,2013,28(2):264-269. QI Hongyu,LI Shaolin,YANG Xiaoguang,et al.Fatigue fracture mechanical of forged TC4 alloy joints by electron beam welding[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2013,28(2):264-269.(in Chinese) [8] 武奇,邱惠清,郭海丁.TC11钛合金焊接接头低周疲劳分形损伤演化研究[J].航空动力学报,2008,23(4):730-736. WU Qi,QIU Huiqing,GUO Haiding.Studying for low-cycle fatigue fractal damage evolution on TC11 Ti alloy welded joint[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2008,23(4):730-736.(in Chinese) [9] 郭海丁,邬华芝,刘观日,等.TC4钛合金焊接接头疲劳损伤演变模型研究[J].航空动力学报,2003,18(2):206-210. GUO Haiding,WU Huazhi,LIU Guanri,et al.A research of fatigue damage evolution of TC4 alloy welded joint[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2003,18(2):206-210.(in Chinese) [10] 王卫国,古远兴,鲁东胜,等.电子束焊接整体叶盘结构验证件设计和试验研究[J].航空制造技术,2007(增刊):422-425. WANG Weiguo,GU Yuanxing,LU Dongsheng,et al.Design and experimental investigation of blisk research structure with electron beam welding[J].Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology,2007(suppl.):422-425.(in Chinese) [11] 刘小刚,郭海丁,汪邦中,等.TC11焊接接头髙周疲劳分形损伤模型[J].航空动力学报,2011,26(2):355-361. LIU Xiaogang,GUO Haiding,WANG Bangzhong,et al.Study on high cycle fatigue fractal damage model of TC11 alloy welded joint[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2011,26(2):355-361.(in Chinese) [12] 罗刚,范引鹤,梁尤疆.高温合金焊接接头应力分析与疲劳寿命预测[J].航空动力学报,2007,22(2):327-331. LUO Gang,FAN Yinhe,LIANG Youjiang,et al.Stress analysis and fatigue life estimation of four kinds of super-alloy welded joints[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2007,22(2):327-331.(in Chinese) [13] 吴冰,刘昕,唐振云,等.大厚度钛合金电子束焊接接头的低周疲劳行为[J].航空制造技术,2007(增刊):368-370. WU Bing,LIU Xin,TANG Zhenyun,et al.Low-cycle fatigue performance on the large thickness titanium alloy joints of electron beam welding[J].Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology,2007(suppl.):368-370.(in Chinese) [14] 钟玉,屈金山,陈文静,等.TC4钛合金的电子束焊[J].热加工工艺,2007,36(15):24-26. ZHONG Yu,QU Jinshan,CHEN Wenjing,et al.Electron beam welding of TC4 alloy[J].Hot Working Technology,2007,36(15):24-26.(in Chinese) [15] 李行志,胡树兵,肖建中,等.TA15钛合金电子束焊接接头不同区域的疲劳裂纹扩展行为研究[J].航空材料学报,2010,30(1):52-56. LI Xingzhi,HU Shubing,XIAO Jianzhong,et al.Study on fatigue crack propagation in different zones of TA15 electron beam welded joint[J].Journal of Aeronautical Materials,2010,30(1):52-56.(in Chinese) [16] 唐振云,毛智勇,李晋炜,等.TC4-DT合金电子束焊接接头低周疲劳性能研究[J].航空制造技术,2011(16):111-115. TANG Zhenyun,MAO Zhiyong,LI Jinwei,et al.Research on EBW joint low cycle fatigue property of TC4-DT alloy[J].Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology,2011(16):111-115.(in Chinese) [17] 许鸿吉,尹丽香,李晋炜,等.TC4钛合金电子束焊接接头组织和性能[J].焊接学报,2005,26(11):43-46. XU Hongji,YIN Lixiang,LI Jinwei,et al.Microstructures and properties of TC4 alloy joints welded by the electron beam welding[J].Transactions of the China Welding Institution,2005,26(11):43-46.(in Chinese) [18] 尹丽香,许鸿吉,魏志宇,等.TC4钛合金电子束焊接接头高温性能与组织[J].焊接学报,2007,28(10):49-52. YIN Lixiang,XU Hongji,WEI Zhiyu,et al.Microstructures and high-temperature properties of TC4 titanium alloy joints welded by electron beam[J].Transactions of the China Welding Institution,2007,28(10):49-52.(in Chinese)
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1844
- HTML浏览量: 3
- PDF量: 935
- 被引次数: 0