基于阶跃响应的飞行器单独静、动导数数值求解方法

米百刚; 詹浩; 陈森林; 饶丹

doi:10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2016.10.024

基于阶跃响应的飞行器单独静、动导数数值求解方法

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2016.10.024

西北工业大学航空学院, 西安 710072

基金项目:

航空科学基金（2015ZA53013）

详细信息

作者简介:
米百刚(1989-),男,陕西富平人,博士生,主要从事飞行器气动设计及数值模拟研究.

中图分类号: V211.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 835
- HTML浏览量: 2
- PDF量: 501
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-01-28
- 刊出日期: 2016-10-28

Calculating single static and dynamic derivatives of aircraft with step response method

School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China

摘要

摘要: 基于阶跃响应方法，结合刚性动网格技术，对飞行器的单独静、动导数的精细化数值计算进行了研究.以纵向为例，通过给物面施加恒定附加攻角，求解得到阶跃响应运动过程的非定常气动力，求导得到静导数.同样给物面施加恒定的俯仰角速度，并同时强迫物面平动以抵消俯仰转动产生的附加攻角影响，可由非定常气动力求导得到动导数值.分别利用NACA0012翼型和三维SACCON飞翼无人机进行了计算验证，各攻角下的静、动导数值与文献、试验结果吻合得很好，最大误差不超过5%.结论表明：基于阶跃响应的单独静、动导数直接模拟方法计算耗时仅为传统强迫振动方法的21%，效率相对较高，且可推广到横航向的动导数计算，为飞行器的稳定性研究提供参考.
- 阶跃响应 /
- 刚性动网格 /
- 静导数 /
- 动导数 /
- 非定常气动力
Abstract: Based on step response method and rigid moving mesh techniques, the fine single static and dynamic derivatives of aircraft were simulated. Longitudinal derivatives were taken as examples to represent these methods. Firstly a constant additional angle of attack was applied on the aircraft, and the unsteady aerodynamic force was calculated during the step response process, then the static derivative can be identified from the derivation of aerodynamic force; similar to static derivative, a constant pitching angular velocity was used to force the aircraft pitching around the reference point, and also a translate speed should be considered at the same time to eliminate the effect of additional angle of attack generated from the pitching angular velocity. NACA0012 airfoil and SACCON fly wing unmanned combat aerial vehicle were used to test the methods, both the static and dynamic derivatives of the two configurations agreed well with the reference and wind tunnel test results,with the maximum error no more than 5%. The research shows that the computational time of direct single static and dynamic derivatives simulation methods based on step response is nearly 21% of the of traditional oscillation method, with relatively higher effectiveness; this can be used in analysis of lateral and directional derivatives as well as longitudinal ones, providing technical reference for aircraft stability.
- step response /
- rigid moving mesh /
- static derivative /
- dynamic derivative /
- unsteady aerodynamic force

HTML

参考文献(18)

[1]	方振平,陈万春,张曙光.航空飞行器飞行动力学[M].北京:北京航空航天大学出版社,2005.
[2]	Kay J.Acquiring and modeling unsteady aerodynamic characteristics[R].AIAA-2000-3907,2000.
[3]	Scott M M,Eloret C. A reduced-frequency approach for calculating dynamic derivatives[R].AIAA-2005-840,2005.
[4]	Greenwell D L.Frequency effects on dynamic stability derivatives obtained from small-amplitude oscillatory testing[J].Journal of Aircraft,1998,35(5):776-783.
[5]	Ronch A D,Vallespin D.Computation of dynamic derivatives using CFD[R].AIAA-2010-4817,2010.
[6]	范晶晶,阎超,李跃军.飞行器大迎角下俯仰静、动导数的数值计算[J].航空学报,2009,30(10):1846-1850. FAN Jingjing,YAN Chao,LI Yuejun.Computation of vehicle pitching static and dynamic derivatives at high angles of attack[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2009,30(10):1846-1850.(in Chinese)
[7]	袁先旭,张涵信,谢昱飞.基于CFD方法的俯仰静,动导数数值计算[J].空气动力学学报,2005,23(4):458-463. YUAN Xianxu,ZHANG Hanxin,XIE Yufei.The pitching static/dynamic derivatives computation based on CFD methods[J].Acta Aerodynamica Sinca,2005,23(4):458-463.(in Chinese)
[8]	卢学成,叶正寅,张伟伟.超音速、高超声速飞行器动导数的高效计算方法[J].航空计算技术,2008,38(3):28-31. LU Xuecheng,YE Zhengyin,ZHANG Weiwei.A high efficient method for computing dynamic derivatives of supersonic/hypersonic aircraft[J].Aeronautical Computing Technique,2008,38(3):28-31.(in Chinese)
[9]	史爱明,杨永年,叶正寅.结合CFD技术的跨音速动导数计算方法研究[J].西北工业大学学报,2008,26(1):11-14. SHI Aiming,YANG Yongnian,YE Zhengyin.A more accurate method for calculating transonic dynamic derivatives (TDDs) using present state-of-the-art CFD[J].Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University,2008,26(1):11-14.(in Chinese)
[10]	孙涛,高正红,黄江涛.基于CFD的动导数计算与减缩频率影响分析[J].飞行力学,2011,29(4):15-18. SUN Tao,GAO Zhenghong,HUANG Jiangtao.Identify of aircraft dynamic derivatives based on CFD technology and analysis of reduce frequency[J].Flight Dynamics,2011,29(4):15-18.(in Chinese)
[11]	陶洋,范召林,赵忠良.基于CFD的带控制舵导弹的动导数计算[J].航空动力学报,2010,25(1):102-106. TAO Yang,FAN Zhaolin,ZHAO Zhongliang.Predictions of dynamic damping coefficients of basic finner based on CFD[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2010,25(1):102-106.(in Chinese)
[12]	叶川,马东立.利用CFD技术计算飞行器动导数[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2013,39(2):196-200. YE Chuan,MA Dongli.Aircraft dynamic derivatives calculation using CFD techniques[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2013,39(2):196-200.(in Chinese)
[13]	孙智伟,程泽荫,白俊强,等.基于准定常的飞行器动导数的高效计算方法[J].飞行力学,2010,28(2):28-30. SUN Zhiwei,CHENG Zeyin,BAI Junqiang,et al.A high efficient method for computing dynamic derivatives of aircraft based on quasi-steady CFD method[J].Flight Dynamics,2010,28(2):28-30.(in Chinese)
[14]	Soo H P,Yoonsik K,Jang H K.Prediction of dynamic damping coefficients using unsteady dual-time stepping method[R].AIAA-2002-0715,2002.
[15]	Roy J F L,Morgand S,Farcy D.Static and dynamic derivatives on generic UCAV without and with leading edge control[R].AIAA-2014-2391,2014.
[16]	Roy J F L,Morgand S.SACCON CFD static and dynamic derivatives using elsA[R].AIAA-2010-4562,2010.
[17]	Mehdi G,Adam J,Russell M C.Computational investigation into the use of response functions for aerodynamic load modeling[J].AIAA Journal,2012,50(6):1314-1327.
[18]	Dan D V,Thomas D L,Anderas S.SACCON forced oscillation tests at DNW-NWB and NASA Langley 14×22-foot tunnel[R].AIAA-2010-4394,2010.