基于Hopkinson技术的CMDB推进剂动态起裂韧性实验

郑健; 汪文强; 陈雄; 周长省; 许进升

doi:10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2016.10.028

基于Hopkinson技术的CMDB推进剂动态起裂韧性实验

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2016.10.028

1. 南京理工大学机械工程学院, 南京 210094;
2. 中国兵器装备集团公司武汉滨湖电子有限责任公司, 武汉 430077

基金项目:

预研项目（20101019）

详细信息

作者简介:
郑健(1978-)男,浙江台州人,副教授,博士,主要研究方向为固体火箭发动机总体技术.E-mail:zhengjian@njust.edu.cn

中图分类号: V435
计量
- 文章访问数: 892
- HTML浏览量: 1
- PDF量: 466
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-01-21
- 刊出日期: 2016-10-28

Experiment on dynamic fracture initiation toughness of CMDB propellant based on Hopkinson technology

1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China;
2. Wuhan Binhu Electronic Limited Liability Company, China South Industries Group Corporation, Wuhan 430077, China

摘要

摘要: 为了研究改性双基（CMDB）推进剂的动态起裂韧性，利用Hopkinson实验技术对CMDB推进剂的含切缝半圆形（NSCB）试件进行了冲击实验.运用脉冲整形技术，获得了CMDB推进剂的载荷-位移曲线.采用改进型柔度变化率法得到NSCB推进剂试件的起裂点.通过ABAQUS有限元软件对NSCB试件的无量纲结构因子进行了标定，并获得了NSCB的动态起裂韧性.利用电镜扫描设备分析了NSCB试件断裂的微观机理，研究结果表明：在加载率为5.41×10⁵~8.94×10⁵MPa·m^1/2·s^-1范围内，CMDB推进剂的动态起裂韧性具有显著的加载率敏感性.结合电镜扫描图分析，随着加载率的增大，断面内部颗粒微观结构的破坏形貌逐渐恶化，消耗的能量相应增大.
- 改性双基推进剂 /
- Hopkinson实验技术 /
- 动态起裂韧性 /
- 柔度变化率法 /
- 加载率敏感性
Abstract: To obtain the dynamic fracture initiation toughness of composite modified double-base (CMDB) propellant, impact experiments of notched semi-circular bend (NSCB) specimens were performed by Hopkinson experimental technology. Pulse shaping technology was applied to obtain the load-displacement curve of CMDB propellant. The modified compliance changing rate method was used to determine the crack initiation point of the NSCB specimen. Finite element software ABAQUS was adopted to calculate the dimensionless structure factor of the NSCB specimen, and the dynamic fracture initiation toughness of the CMDB propellant was determined. The scanning electron microscope imaging technique was used to investigate the fracture micro-mechanisms of the NSCB specimen. Research results show that the dynamic fracture initiation toughness is dependent on the loading rate sensitivity significantly within the range of 5.41×10⁵~8.94×10⁵MPa·m^1/2·s^-1. With the increase of the loading rate sensitivity, the failure morphology of the particles in the cross section is gradually deteriorated, and the energy consumption is increased through the analysis of the scanning electron microscope.
- CMDB propellant /
- Hopkinson experimental technology /
- dynamic fracture initiation toughness /
- compliance changing rate method /
- loading rate sensitivity

HTML

参考文献(18)

[1]	Smith C W,Liu C T.Effects of near-tip behavior of particulate composites on classical concepts[J].Composites Engineering,1991,1(4):249-257.
[2]	Liu C T.Crack growth behavior in a solid propellant[J].Engineering Fracture Mechanics,1997,56(1):127-135.
[3]	Tussiwand G S,Saouma V,Terzenbach R,et al.Fracture mechanics of composite solid rocket propellant grains:material testing[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power,2009,25(1):60-73.
[4]	Knauss W G.Fracture and failure at and near interfaces under pressure[R].California:California Institute of Technology Pasadena Graduate Aeronautical Labs,ADA348939,1998.
[5]	Ho S Y,Fong C W.Temperature dependence of high strain-rate impact fracture behavior in highly filled polymeric composite and plasticized thermoplastic propellants[J].Journal of Materials Science,1987,22(8):3023-3031.
[6]	刘朝丰,陈飞,阳建红.固体推进剂断裂韧性试验方法研究[J].宇航学报,2007,27(增刊1):186-189. LIU Chaofeng,CHEN Fei,YANG Jianhong.Test method research on solid propellant fracture toughness[J].Journal of Astronautics,2007,27(Suppl.1):186-189.(in Chinese)
[7]	韩波,鞠玉涛,周长省.HTPB 推进剂粘聚区本构模型反演识别研究[J].兵工学报,2012,33(11):1335-1341. HAN Bo,JU Yutao,ZHOU Changsheng.Inversion identification of constitutive model of cohesive zone in HTPB propellant[J].Acta Armamentarii,2012,33(11):1335-1341.(in Chinese)
[8]	韩波,鞠玉涛,周长省.HTPB 推进剂粘聚断裂研究[J].固体火箭技术,2013,36(1):89-93. HAN Bo,JU Yutao,ZHOU Changsheng.Cohesive fracture investigation of HTPB propellant[J].Journal of Solid Rocket Technology,2013,36(1):89-93.(in Chinese)
[9]	胡少青,鞠玉涛,韦震,等.双基推进剂的切口强度及切口敏感性[J].航空动力学报,2014,29(8):2012-2016. HU Shaoqing,JU Yutao,WEI Zhen,et al.Notch strength and notch sensitivity of double base propellant[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2014,29(8):2012-2016.(in Chinese)
[10]	汪文强,郑健,陈雄,等.基于扩展有限元的改性双基推进剂的开裂过程模拟研究[J].推进技术,2015,36(1):149-155. WANG Wenqiang,ZHENG Jian,CHEN Xiong,et al.Numerical simulation of crack propagation in CMDB propellant based on extended finite element method[J].Journal of Propulsion Technology,2015,36(1):149-155.(in Chinese)
[11]	Zhang Q B,Zhao J.Determination of mechanical properties and full-field strain measurements of rock material under dynamic loads[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2013,60:423-439.
[12]	Wang Q Z,Feng F,Ni M,et al.Measurement of mode Ⅰ and mode Ⅱ rock dynamic fracture toughness with cracked straight through flattened Brazilian disc impacted by split Hopkinson pressure bar[J].Engineering Fracture Mechanics,2011,78(12):2455-2469.
[13]	Foster J T,Chen W,Luk V K.Dynamic crack initiation toughness of 4340 steel at constant loading rates[J].Engineering Fracture Mechanics,2011,78(6):1264-1276.
[14]	陈荣.一种 PBX 炸药试样在复杂应力动态加载下的力学性能实验研究[D].长沙:国防科学技术大学,2010. CHEN Rong.Experimental studies on mechanical properties of a PBX under various dynamic loading conditions[D].Changsha:National University of Defense Technology,2010.(in Chinese)
[15]	Kobayashi T,Yamamoto I,Niinomi M.Introduction of a new dynamic fracture toughness evaluation system[J].Journal of Testing and Evaluation,1993,21(3):145-153.
[16]	Zhang Q B,Zhao J.Effect of loading rate on fracture toughness and failure micro-mechanisms in marble[J].Engineering Fracture Mechanics,2013,102(2):288-309.
[17]	Chong K P,Kuruppu M D.New specimen for fracture toughness determination for rock and other materials[J].International Journal of Fracture,1984,26(2):59-62.
[18]	Lim I L,Johnston I W,Choi S K.Stress intensity factors for semi-circular specimens under three-point bending[J].Engineering Fracture Mechanics,1993,44(3):363-382.