低前挡板型小尺寸刷式封严泄漏特性的试验

杜春华; 吉洪湖; 胡娅萍; 马丹; 罗贵火; 罗健; 汤丽萍; 廖凯

doi:10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2017.02.006

低前挡板型小尺寸刷式封严泄漏特性的试验

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2017.02.006

1.
南京航空航天大学能源与动力学院，南京 210016
2.
中国航空发动机集团有限公司商用航空发动机有限责任公司，上海 200241

基金项目: 国家重点基础研究发展计划（1234AB5678）；国家自然科学基金（12345678）

计量
- 文章访问数: 839
- HTML浏览量: 6
- PDF量: 433
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-06-10
- 刊出日期: 2017-02-28

Experimental investigation on leakage characteristics of small size brush seal with low front plate

摘要

摘要: 对间隙、过渡、过盈3种配合状态的低前挡板型小尺寸刷式封严的转子轴心轨迹和泄漏特性进行了实验研究.转子的轴心位移采用电涡流传感器进行测量，其测量结果表明:压差小于0.4MPa时，转子轴心位移随压差的增大略有减小；当压差达到0.4MPa后，其轴心位移范围不再随压差而变化；在不考虑磨损的情况下轴心位移对不同配合状态的封严泄漏特性基本没有影响.由此确保了封严试验台的安全性和有效性.在此基础上，试验研究了转子转速、上下游压差以及封严间隙对泄漏特性的影响.结果表明:泄漏系数随转速增加略有减小；间隙配合下有明显的滞后，过盈配合下滞后不明显；磨损对泄漏的影响在过盈配合下比较显著；间隙配合下压差在0.1～0.2MPa泄漏系数随压差的升高而增大，压差为0.3MPa时泄漏系数降低，0.3MPa以后泄漏系数变化趋于稳定；过盈配合下泄漏系数随压差的升高总体呈增大趋势，压差在0.3～0.5MPa时增大的趋势较小，泄漏系数较为稳定.
- 刷式封严 /
- 泄漏特性 /
- 转子轴心轨迹 /
- 封严间隙 /
- 泄漏系数
Abstract: Experimental research on rotors axis locus and leakage characteristics of brush seal with low front plate at clearance/transition/interference fit states was carried out. The rotors axis locus was measured by using eddy current sensor. The results showed that: rotors axis locus became smaller with increase of differential pressure when the differential pressure was less than 0.4MPa. Rotor's axis locus didn't vary with differential pressure when the differential pressure exceeded 0.4MPa. Rotor's axis locus didn't affect the leakage characteristics of brush seals for different fit states if wear was not taken into account. This could ensure the safety and effectiveness of the experiment rig. Based on this, the effects of rotational speed, differential pressure and sealing clearance on leakage characteristics were studied. The result shows that: leakage coefficients increase with the increment of the rotational speed. Brush seals have obvious hysteresis under clearance fit and inconspicuous hysteresis under interference fit. The effect of wear on leakage characteristics is obvious at interference fit state. Leakage coefficients of brush seal increase with the increment of differential pressure ranging from 0.1 to 0.2MPa under clearance fit, and decrease when the differential pressure is 0.3MPa, and tend to be stable when the differential pressure exceeds 0.3MPa. Leakage coefficients of brush seal show an increasing trend with the increment of differential pressure under clearance fit, and the increasing trend slows down and leakage coefficients enter into a stable state when the differential pressure ranges from 0.3 to 0.5MPa.
- brush seal /
- leakage characteristics /
- rotor's axis locus /
- sealing clearance /
- leakage coefficient

HTML

参考文献(23)

[1]	Steinetz B M,Hendricks R C.Advanced seal technology role in meeting next generation turbine engine goal［R］.NASA/TM-1998-206961,1998.
[2]	Steinetz B M,Hendricks R C.Engine seal technology requirements to meet nasas advanced subsonic technology program goals［R］.AIAA 94-2698,1994.
[3]	Troha W A,Sousa M P,Butler G L.Jiont turbine advanced gas generator (JTAGG)Ⅲ:technology development status［R］.Washington,DC:57th AHS International Annual Forum,2001.
[4]	Sturgess G J.Application of CFD to gas turbine engine secondary flow system［R］.AIAA 88-3203,1988.
[5]	Chupp R,Raymond E,Nelson P.Evaluation of brush seals for limitedlife engines［J］.Journal of Propulsion and Power,1993,9(1):113-119.
[6]	Dudriavtsev V,Braun M.Model development of the brush seal numerical simulation［J］.Journal of Propulsion and Power,1996,12(1):193-201.
[7]	Chupp R,Loewenthal R G E.Brush seals can improve power plant efficiency by one fourth of a percentage point yielding huge annual savings［J］.Lubrication Engineering,1997,53(6):10-14.
[8]	Lattime S B,Braun M J,Choy F K,et al.Continued evaluation of the hybrid floating brush seal (HFBS)［R］.AIAA 99-2688,1999.
[9]	Dinc S,Demiroglu M,Turnquist N.Fundamental design issues of brush seals for industrial applications［J］.Journal of Turbomachinery,2002,124(2):293-300.
[10]	王之栎,梁小峰,黄其武.刷式密封二维模型数值计算［J］.航空动力学报,2008,23(8):1461-1465. WANG Zhili,LIANG Xiaofeng,HUANG Qiwu.Two-dimensional model mathematical simulation of brush seal［J］.Journal of Aerospace Power,2008,23(8):1461-1465.(in Chinese)
[11]	迟佳栋,王之栎.前板结构对低滞后刷式密封性能影响分析［J］.航空动力学报,2012,27(8):1902-1906. CHI Jiadong,WANG Zhili.Analysis of front plates effect on low hysteresis brush seal［J］.Journal of Aerospace Power,2012,27(8):1902-1906.(in Chinese)
[12]	Dinc S,Reluzco G,Tumquist N A,et al.Advanced seals for GE industrial gas turbine applications［J］.Journal of Propulsion and Power,2002,18(6):1260-1266.
[13]	Arora G R,Proctor M P.JTAGG Ⅱ brush seal test results［R］.NASA TM-107448,1997.
[14]	Lattime S B,Braun M J,Choy F K,et al.Advances in hybrid floating brush seals［R］.AIAA 98-3171,1998.
[15]	Lattime S B,Braun M J,Choy F K,et al.Continued evaluation of the hybrid floating brush seal (HFBS)［R］.NASA/CP-2000-210472/1,2000.
[16]	朱宗举,陈国林,林基恕.刷密封的静动态泄漏特性［J］.航空发动机,1995,23(3):39-44. ZHU Zongju,CHEN Guolin,LIN Jishu.Dynamic and static leakage characteristics of brush seal［J］.Aeroengine,1995,23(3):39-44.(in Chinese)
[17]	孙晓萍.刷式密封性能和耐久性试验研究［J］.航空发动机,2002,26(3):37-41. SUN Xiaoping.Experimental investigation of performance and durability of brush seal［J］.Aeroengine,2002,26(3):37-41.(in Chinese)
[18]	孙晓萍,李卫东,刘晓远.刷式密封设计与试验研究［J］.航空发动机,2005,31(2):17-19. SUN Xiaoping,LI Weidong,LIU Xiaoyuan.Design and test of brush seal［J］.Aeroengine,2005,31(2):17-19.(in Chinese)
[19]	曹广州,吉洪湖,纪国剑.刷式封严初期使用特性的试验和数值研究［J］.推进技术,2010,31(4):478-482. CAO Guangzhou,JI Honghu,JI Guojian.Experimental and numerical study on the leakage characteristics of brush seal at the early stage of operating［J］.Journal of Propulsion Technology,2010,31(4):478-482.(in Chinese)
[20]	田朝阳,孔祥林,周伟九.刷式汽封性能试验分析［J］.东方汽轮机,2013,2(6):23-25. TIAN Chaoyang,KONG Xinglin,ZHOU Weijiu.Performance test and analysis of brush steam seal［J］.Dong Fang Turbine,2013,2(6):23-25.(in Chinese)
[21]	杜春华,吉洪湖,胡娅萍,等.指尖封严的转子轴心轨迹与泄漏特性实验研究［J］.航空动力学报,2016,31(11):2575-2584. DU Chunhua,JI Honghu,HU Yaping,et al.Experimental investigation on the axis locus of rotor and leakage characteristics of finger seal［J］.Journal of Aerospace Power,2016,31(11):2575-2584.(in Chinese)
[22]	Crudgington P F,Bowsher A.Brush seal pack hysteresis［R］.AIAA-2002-3794,2002.
[23]	Zhao H,Stango R J.Role of distributed interbristle friction force on brush seal hysteresis［J］.Journal of Tribology,2007,129(1):199-204.