留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

喷管间距对双喷流啸音影响的实验

武鹏 高军辉

武鹏, 高军辉. 喷管间距对双喷流啸音影响的实验[J]. 航空动力学报, 2018, 33(1): 124-130. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2018.01.015
引用本文: 武鹏, 高军辉. 喷管间距对双喷流啸音影响的实验[J]. 航空动力学报, 2018, 33(1): 124-130. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2018.01.015
Experiment of the effect of nozzle spacing on twinjet screech tones[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2018, 33(1): 124-130. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2018.01.015
Citation: Experiment of the effect of nozzle spacing on twinjet screech tones[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2018, 33(1): 124-130. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2018.01.015

喷管间距对双喷流啸音影响的实验

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2018.01.015
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(51376015,51411130130)

Experiment of the effect of nozzle spacing on twinjet screech tones

  • 摘要: 实验详细测量了完全膨胀马赫数范围为110~160、喷管间距为16到32倍喷管出口直径的超声速双喷流近声场,分析了两个喷流各自发出的啸音在近声场的相位关系,研究了喷管间距对双喷流耦合的影响。结果表明:对比单喷流,双喷流耦合啸音在A模态时,呈现出反对称或对称模式,在反对称模式下,喷管中间区域啸音强度减小,对称模式下,双喷流中间区域啸音强度略大于单喷流啸音;B模态时,两个处于摆动模态的喷流啸音在喷管中间区域同相而发生耦合,极大地增强了B模态的幅值,达到160dB;C模态的相位关系还需进一步研究。对比不同喷管间距下的双喷流近声场,发现喷管间距过小或过大均不利于B模态的耦合;喷管间距对C模态影响最大,当喷管间距变大时,C模态幅值及主导马赫数范围均增大。

     

  • [1] BERNDT D E.Dynamic pressure fluctuations in the internozzle region of a twin jet nacelle[R].SAE Technical Paper 841540,1984.
    [2] HARPERBOURNE M,FISHER M J.The noise from shock waves in supersonic jets[C]∥Proceedings of Agard Conference on Noise Mechanisms.Brussels:AGARD,1973:1-13.
    [3] POWELL A.On the mechanism of choked jet noise[J].Proceedings of the Physical Society,1953,66(12):1039-1056
    [4] TAM C K W,SEINER J M,YU J C.Proposed relationship between broadband shock associated noise and screech tones[J].Journal of Sound and Vibration,1986,110(2):309-321.
    [5] RAMAN G.Advances in understanding supersonic jet screech[J].Progress in Aerospace Sciences,1998,34(1/2):45-106.
    [6] RAMAN G.Supersonic jet screech:halfcentury from powell to the present[J].Journal of Sound and Vibration,1999,225(3):543-571.
    [7] SEINER J M,MANNING J C,PONTON M K.Dynamic pressure loads associated with twin supersonic plume resonance[J].AIAA Journal,1986,26(8):954-960.
    [8] SEINER J M,MANNING J C,CAPONEF J,et al.Study of external dynamic flap loads on a 6 percent B1B model[J].Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power,1991,114(4):816-828.
    [9] NORUM T D,SHEARIN J H.Dynamic loads on twin jet exhaust nozzles due to shock noise[J].Journal of Aircraft,1986,23(9):728-729
    [10] WLEZIEN R W.Nozzle geometry effects on supersonic jet interaction[J].AIAA Journal,1989,27(10):1361-1367.
    [11] ALKISLAR M B,KROTHAPALLI A,CHOUTAPALLI I,et al.Structure of supersonic twin jets[J].AIAA Journal,2005,43(11):2309-2318.
    [12] TAM C K W,SEINER J M.Analysis of twin supersonic plume resonance[R].AIAA 87-2695,1987.
    [13] MORRIS P J.Instability waves in twin supersonic jets[J].Journal of Fluid Mechanics,1990,220:293-307.
    [14] GAO Junhui,XU Xin,LI Xiaodong.Numerical simulation of supersonic twinjet noise with high order finite difference scheme[R].AIAA2016-2938,2016.
    [15] SHAW L.Twinjet screech suppression[J].Journal of Aircraft,1990,27(8):708-715.
    [16] SEINER J M,JANSEN B,MURRAY N.Aeroperformance efficient noise suppression of a supersonic model twin jet nacelle[R].AIAA2009-3130,2009.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  658
  • HTML浏览量:  3
  • PDF量:  494
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-06-11
  • 刊出日期:  2018-01-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回