主流攻角对双射流孔气膜冷却特性的影响

何建宏; 张科; 杨玺

doi:10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2020.03.005

主流攻角对双射流孔气膜冷却特性的影响

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2020.03.005

何建宏^1,2,
张科^1,2,
杨玺^1,2

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（51776153, 11402191）；高等学校学科创新引智计划（B18040）；西安科技计划项目（201805034YD12CG18(3)）

计量
- 文章访问数: 581
- HTML浏览量: 4
- PDF量: 564
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-08-29
- 刊出日期: 2020-03-28

Effects of mainstream angles of attack on film cooling characteristics of double-jet film cooling holes

HE Jianhong^1,2,
ZHANG Ke^1,2,
YANG Xi^1,2

1.
State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures,School of Aerospace,Xi‘an Jiaotong University,Xi’an 710049,China
2.
National Demonstration Center for Experimental Mechanics Education,School of Aerospace,Xi‘an Jiaotong University,Xi’an 710049,China

摘要

摘要: 应用压力敏感漆技术,在平板上测量了不同主流攻角(i=-30°,-20°,-10°,0°,10°,20°,30°)下双射流孔的气膜冷却效率,并利用计算流体动力学(CFD)计算得到的流场对气膜冷却效率的规律进行了解析。所研究的双射流孔结构的孔间无量纲横向距离为0.5,孔间无量纲流向距离为3;射流与主流密度比为1.0,吹风比分别为0.5、1.0、1.5、2.0。结果表明小的主流攻角(i=-10°,0°,10°)下,流场中存在反肾型涡对或挤压作用,气膜层与壁面贴附良好,气膜冷却效率最高;大正值攻角(i=20°,30°)下,虽然气膜覆盖面积大,但反肾型涡对退化,气膜冷却效率下降;大负值攻角(i=-20°,-30°)下,流场中有肾型涡对,且气膜横向覆盖受限,气膜冷却效率最低。
- 双射流 /
- 气膜冷却效率 /
- 主流攻角 /
- 压力敏感漆 /
- 计算流体动力学
Abstract: Film cooling effectiveness of double-jet film cooling holes was measured using pressure sensitive paint at various mainstream angles of attack (i=-30°, -20°, -10°, 0°, 10°, 20°, 30°) on a flat plate, and the flow field obtained by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to analyze the film cooling effectiveness. The dimension less spanwise distance was 0.5, the dismension less streamwise distance was 3; the density ratio was 1.0, and the blowing ratio varied as 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0. The results showed that, at small mainstream angles of attack (i=-10°, 0°, 10°), the film layer attached well with wall because of the anti-kidney vortex pair or the pressing effect in the flow field, contributing to the highest film cooling effectiveness; at large positive angles of attack (i=20°, 30°), the anti-kidney vortex pair degenerated though the coverage area of film was the largest, the film cooling effectiveness became lower; at large negative angles of attack (i=-20°, -30°), there existed kidney vortex pair, the lateral coverage of the film was limited and the film cooling effectiveness was lowest.
- double-jet /
- film cooling effectiveness /
- mainstream angles of attack /
- pressure sensitive paint /
- computational fluid dynamics

HTML

参考文献(17)

[1]	HAN J C,DUTTA S,EKKAD S.Gas turbine heat transfer and cooling technology［M］.2nd ed.New York:CRC Press,2012.
[2]	WALTERS D K,LEYLEK J H.A detailed analysis of film-cooling physics:Part Ⅰ streamwise injection with cylindrical holes［J］.Journal of Turbomachinery,2000,122(1):102-112.
[3]	GOLDSTEIN R J,JIN P.Film cooling downstream of a row of discrete holes with compound angle［J］.Journal of Turbomachinery,2000,122(2):222-230.
[4]	MCGOVERN K T,LEYLEK J H.A detailed analysis of film cooling physics:Part Ⅱ compound-angle injection with cylindrical holes［J］.Journal of Turbomachinery,1997,119(1):113-121.
[5]	SCHMIDT D L,SEN B,BOGARD D G.Film cooling with compound angle holes:adiabatic effectiveness［J］.Journal of Turbomachinery,1996,118(4):807-813.
[6]	KUSTERER K,BOHN D,SUGIMOTO T,et al.Double-jet ejection of cooling air for improved film cooling［J］.Journal of Turbomachinery,2007,129(4):809-815.
[7]	YAO Jiaxu,XU Jin,ZHANG Ke,et al.Effect of density ratio on film-cooling effectiveness distribution and its uniformity for several hole geometries on a flat plate［J］.Journal of Turbomachinery,2019,141(5):051008.1-051008.10.
[8]	KUSTERER K,ELYAS A,BOHN D,et al.Film cooling effectiveness comparison between shaped-and double jet film cooling holes in a row arrangement［C］∥Proceeing of ASME Turbo Expo 2010:Power for Land,Sea,and Air.Glasgow,UK:ASME,2010:1503-1515.
[9]	WANG Zhan,LIU Jianjun,ZHANG Chao.Impacts of geometric parameters of double-jet film cooling on anti-kidney vortex structure and cooling effectiveness［R］.ASME Paper 2013-GT-94038,2013.
[10]	WANG Zhan,LIU Jianjun,AN Baitao,et al.Effects of axial row-spacing for double-jet film-cooling on the cooling effectiveness［R］.ASME Paper GT2011-46055,2011.
[11]	YAO Jiaxu,XU Jin,ZHANG Ke,et al.Interaction of flow and film-cooling effectiveness between double-jet film-cooling holes with various spanwise distances［J］.Journal of Turbomachinery,2018,140(12):121011.1-121011.8.
[12]	KUSTERER K,ELYAS A,BOHN D,et al.A parametric study on the influence of the lateral ejection angle of double-jet holes on the film cooling effectiveness for high blowing ratios［R］.ASME Paper 2009-GT-59321,2009.
[13]	CHO M Y,SEO H S,KIM Y J.Effect of hole pitch ratio and compound angle on the thermal flow fields of double-jet film cooling hole［R］.ASME Paper 2014-FEDSM-21479,2014.
[14]	YAO Jiaxu,LEI Jiang,WU Junmei,et al.Effects of streamwise distance and density ratio on film-cooling effectiveness for double-jet film-cooling on a flat plate［R］.ASME Paper 2018-GT-75456,2018.
[15]	LIAO Gaoliang,WANG Xinjun,LI Jun,et al.Effects of curvature on the film cooling effectiveness of double-jet film cooling［R］.ASME Paper 2014-GT-26263,2014.
[16]	SUN Xiaokai,PENG Wei,WANG Jie,et al.Effect of internal crossflow on double jet film cooling holes of helium turbine blades［R］.ASME Paper 25-ICONE-67058,2017.
[17]	HAN J C,RALLABANDI P A.Turbine blade film cooling using PSP technique［J］.Frontiers in Heat and Mass Transfer,2010,1(1):1-16.