面向一体化计算的整体式液体冲压发动机建模及性能评估

韩永恒; 李高春; 强洪夫

doi:10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2020.03.016

面向一体化计算的整体式液体冲压发动机建模及性能评估

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2020.03.016

计量
- 文章访问数: 450
- HTML浏览量: 21
- PDF量: 430
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-08-13
- 刊出日期: 2020-03-28

Integration algorithm oriented modeling and performance evaluation on integrated liquid fuel ramjet

1.
Military Representative Bureau of Naval Armament Department in Beijing Region,the Chinese People’s Liberation Amry,Beijing 100071,China
2.
Naval Aviation University,Yantai Shandong 264001,China
3.
Rocket Force University of Engineering,Xi‘an 710025,China

摘要

摘要: 为发展冲压发动机性能工程预估方法,建立了面向一体化计算的整体式液体冲压发动机性能计算模型,并使其兼容基团贡献算法,提高了拓展性。利用模型分析了冲压发动机在攻角0°～6°、高度0～18km、马赫数2.0～3.5、余气系数1.0～2.9范围工况多维度连续变化下，比冲、推力系数和燃油质量流量的速度-高度特性、高度-节流特性、节流-速度特性以及攻角特性。研究结果表明:性能计算模型可在一体化计算条件下、基团贡献算法允许范围内,不依赖试验数据对冲压发动机性能预估,计算结果与技术参考值相比相对误差均小于14%。推力系数和比冲具有基本一致的速度-高度特性和相似的高度-节流特性,受燃气组分影响,推力系数和比冲的节流-速度特性差异明显。燃油质量流量的变化规律不同于比冲和推力系数，在进入平流层后呈现折缓趋势,而呈现连续性,速度越大、高度越低、余气系数越小，燃油质量流量越高,反之则越小。引入攻角以后,攻角越大,比冲和推力系数越低，进气道起动马赫数越高;攻角-起动马赫数曲线小范围内近似线性,攻角超过5.6°非线性加剧。
- 一体化计算 /
- 整体式液体冲压发动机 /
- 比冲 /
- 推力系数 /
- 燃油质量流量
Abstract: The engineering prediction method of ramjet performance was developed,and an integration algorithm oriented model of integrated liquid fuel ramjet was established,which was compatible with group contribution method. The velocity-altitude characteristic,altitude-throttle characteristic,throttle-velocity characteristic and angle of attack characteristic of the specific impulse, thrust coefficient and fuel mass flow rate of the ramjet at angles of attack 0°~6°,altitude 0~18km,Mach number 2.0~3.5 and excess air coefficient 1.0~2.9 were analyzed. Results showed that,the model can predict the performance of ramjet engine without depending on the test data under the condition of integrated algorithm and within the allowable range of group contribution method. The relative error between the calculated results and the technical reference values was less than 14%. Thrust coefficient and specific impulse had basically the same velocity-altitude characteristics and similar altitude-throttle characteristics. The difference between throttle-velocity characteristics of thrust coefficient and specific impulse were obvious under the influence of gas composition.Different from the change of specific impulse and thrust coefficient showing a slowing trend after entering the stratosphere, fuel mass flow rate showed continuity.The higher the velocity, the lower the altitude and the smaller the excess air coefficient was,the higher the fuel mass flow rate was, and vice versa.Taking the angle of attack into account ,the larger the angle of attack was, the lower the specific impulse,thrust coefficient and the higher the inlet start Mach number was.The angle of attack-start Mach number curve was approximately linear in a small range,and the non-linearity was intensified when the angle of attack exceeded 5.6°.
- integration algorithm /
- integrated liquid fuel ramjet /
- specific impulse /
- thrust coefficient /
- fuel mass flow rate

HTML

参考文献(27)

[1]	郑日恒.冲压发动机技术的发展动向与评论［J］.飞航导弹,2004(1):44-48.
[2]	WALTRUP P J,WHITE M E,ZARLINGO E,et al.History of U.S. navy ramjet,scramjet,and mixed-cycle propulsion development［J］.Journal of Propulsion and Power,2002,18(1):14-27.
[3]	RONALD S F.A century of ramjet propulsion technology evolution［J］.Journal of Propulsion and Power,2004,20(1):27-58.
[4]	吴颖川,贺元元,贺伟,等.吸气式高超声速飞行器机体推进一体化技术研究进展［J］.航空学报,2015,36(1):245-260. WU Yingchuan,HE Yuanyuan,HE Wei,et al.Progress in airframe-propulsion integration technology of air-breathing hypersonic vehicle［J］.Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2015,36(1):245-260.(in Chinese)
[5]	赵保平,张韬.超声速飞行器环境工程中的力学问题［J］.中国科学(物理学·力学·天文学),2019,49(2):44-53. ZHAO Baoping,ZHANG Tao.Mechanical problems in supersonic vehicle environmental engineering［J］.Scientia Sinica Physica,Mechanica and Astronomica,2019,49(2):44-53 (in Chinese)
[6]	胡建新,张为华,夏智勋,等.冲压推进技术［M］.长沙:国防科技大学出版社,2013.
[7]	田野,肖保国,张顺平,等.双模态冲压发动机燃烧性能初步研究［J］.航空动力学报,2016,31(12):2921-2927. TIAN Ye,XIAO Baoguo,ZHANG Shunping,et al.Preliminary study on combustion performance of dual-model scramjet engine［J］.Journal of Aerospace Power,2016,31(12):2921-2927.(in Chinese)
[8]	SARAVANAN R,DESIKAN S L N,MURUGANANDAM T M.Effect of back pressure and freestream dynamic pressure on a typical ramjet engine duct under realistic supersonic inlet condition［J］.The Aeronautical Journal,2018,122(1247):83-103.
[9]	郭帅涛,李祝飞,高文智,等.攻角与马赫数对进气道起动影响的可比拟性［J］.推进技术,2017,38(5):983-991. GUO Shuaitao,LI Zhufei,GAO Wenzhi,et al.Analogy between effects of attack angle and Mach number on inlet starting［J］.Journal of Propulsion Technology,2017,38(5):983-991.(in Chinese)
[10]	袁书生,王玉峰,李高春,等.冲压发动机燃烧室三维流场数值模拟［J］.航空动力学报,2005,20(5):841-846. YUAN Shusheng,WANG Yufeng,LI Gaochun,et al.Numerical simulation of three-dimensional flows in a ramjet combustor［J］.Journal of Aerospace Power,2005,20(5):841-846.(in Chinese)
[11]	MURTY M S R C,DEBASIS C.Coupled external and internal flow simulation of a liquid fuelled ramjet vehicle［J］.Aerospace Science and Technology,2014,36:1-4.
[12]	秦飞,何国强,刘佩进.突扩燃烧室低频燃烧不稳定形成机理分析［J］.推进技术,2010,31(5):523-528. QIN Fei,HE Guoqiang,LIU Peijin.Investigation on mechanism of low frequency combustion instabilities in a dump combustor［J］.Journal of Propulsion Technology,2010,31(5):523-528.(in Chinese)
[13]	刘兴洲.飞航导弹动力装置(上)［M］.北京:宇航出版社,1992.
[14]	CHIANG H R.A computer based model for the performance analysis of a scramjet propulsion system［D］.Cambridge,US:Massachusetts Institute of Technology,1989.
[15]	PETTERS D P,LEINGANG J L.Rapid computer simulation of ramjet performance［R］.AIAA 93-2049,1993.
[16]	段晰怀,郑日恒,李立翰.基于亚燃的高超声速冲压发动机内流道研究［J］.航空学报,2015,36(1):232-244. DUAN Xihuai,ZHENG Riheng,LI Lihan.Internal flowpath for hypersonic ramjet based on subsonic combustion［J］.Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica sinica,2015,36(1):232-244.(in Chinese)
[17]	徐旭.冲压发动机原理及技术［M］.北京:北京航空航天大学出版社,2014.
[18]	刘凯礼,张堃元.二元高超声速进气道动态攻角特性风洞实验［J］.推进技术,2012,33(1):14-19.LIU Kaili,ZHANG Kunyuan.Experiment of 2-D hypersonic inlet on dynamic characteristic with angle-of-attack［J］.Journal of Propulsion Technology,2012,33(1):14-19.(in Chinese)
[19]	谢文忠,郭荣伟.4种布局形式下超声速飞行器进气道气动特性实验对比［J］.南京航空航天大学学报,2011,43(1):13-17. XIE Wenzhong,GUO Rongwei.Mixed-compression supersonic inlets based on four air-breathing aircraft configurations［J］.Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2011,43(1):13-17.(in Chinese)
[20]	刘锬韬.某型冲压发动机进气道流场数值模拟［D］.山东烟台:海军航空工程学院,2014. LIU Tantao.Numerical research of flow field of a certain type ramjet intake［D］.Yantai Shandong:Naval Aeronautical Engineering Insititute,2014.(in Chinese)
[21]	原渭兰,吕卫民,贾忠湖.气体动力学［M］.北京:科学出版社,2013.
[22]	乐川,徐大军,蔡国飙.超声速溢流条件下二元超声速进气道附加阻力计算［J］.航空动力学报,2010,25(11):2431-2436. YUE Chuan,XU Dajun,CAI Guobiao.Calculation of additional drag coefficient of supersonic inlet under supersonic spillage condition［J］.Journal of Aerospace Power,2010,25(11):2431-2436.(in Chinese)
[23]	杨月诚,宁超.火箭发动机理论基础［M］.西安:西北工业大学出版社,2016.
[24]	TURNS S R.An introduction to combustion:concepts and applications［M］.Boston,US:McGraw-Hill Book Company,2011.
[25]	OSMONT A,GKALP I,CATOIRE L.Evaluating missile fuels［J］.Propellants,Explosives,Pyrotechnics,2006,31(5):343-354.
[26]	CHOPEY N P,HICKS T G.Handbook of chemical engineering calculations［M］.New York:McGraw-Hill Book Company,Inc.,2012.
[27]	刘小勇,张香文,方文军,等.吸气式发动机燃料研究进展及展望［J］.推进技术,2018,39(10):2191-2195.