Influence of axial wide of pressure relief chamber on leakage characteristics and hysteresis of brush seals
-
摘要: 对减压腔轴向宽度分别为0、04 mm和06 mm的基本型和两种低滞后刷式密封结构进行了静态和动态下压差升降和转子转速升降循环试验,并对其泄漏特性和滞后效应进行了研究。研究结果表明:压差大于02 MPa后,同一压差下的动态泄漏系数比静态降低约14%~20%;低滞后结构的密封性能优于基本型,其泄漏系数最高比基本型降低约20%;静态压差升降循环中,减压腔轴向宽度为06 mm的低滞后结构的滞后效应最强;动态的压差升降循环中,基本型结构的滞后效应最强。转子转速升降循环前后,w为06 mm结构泄漏系数减小约15%,滞后效应最强,减压腔轴向宽度为04 mm结构几乎不存在滞后效应;三种结构中,减压腔轴向宽度为04 mm的结构密封性能最优,滞后效应也最弱。Abstract: The leakage characteristics and hysteresis effect of different axial width of pressure relief chamber of 0, 04 mm and 06 mm with the conventional and low hysteresis brush seals were studied under the static and dynamic tests of pressure difference rise and drop and the rotor speed rise and drop. The results showed that: the dynamic leakage coefficient was about 14%-20% lower than the static one, when the pressure drop was more than 02MPa. The sealing performance of low hysteresis brush seals was better, and the leakage coefficient was up to about 20% lower than the conventional brush seal. The hysteresis effect was the strongest in the process of pressure difference rise and drop cycle with the static condition when axial width of pressure relief chamber was 06 mm. The hysteresis effect of conventional brush seal was the strongest in the process of pressure difference rise and drop cycle with the dynamic condition. After the rotor speed rise and drop cycle, the leakage coefficient decrease by about 15% when the axial width of pressure relief chamber was 06 mm, and there was basically no hysteresis effect when the axial width was 04 mm. In addition, for the three structures, the brush seal with the axial width 04 mm had the best sealing performance and the weakest hysteresis effect.
-
[1] 李军,李志刚,张元桥,等.刷式密封技术的研究进展[J].航空发动机,2019,45(2):74-84. LI Jun,LI Zhigang,ZHANG Yuanqiao,et al.Research progress of brush seal technology[J].Aeroengine,2019,45(2):74-84.(in Chinese) [2] CHUPP R E,GHASRIPOOR F,TURNQUIST N A,et al.Advanced seals for industrial turbine applications:dynamic seal development[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power,2002,18(6):1260-1266. [3] ZHAO Haifang,STANGO R J.Analytical approach for investigating bristle/backplate hysteresis phenomenon in brush seals[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power,2007,23(2):273-282. [4] BASU P,DATTA A,LOEWENTHAL R,et al.Hysteresis and bristle stiffening effects in brush seals[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power,1994,10(4):569-575. [5] SHORT J,BASU P,DATTA A,et al.Advanced brush seal development[R].AIAA 96-2907,1996. [6] DEVILLE L,ARGHIR M.Experimental analysis of small diameter brush seals and comparisons with theoretical predictions[J].Journal of Tribology,2019,141(1):012201.1-012201.10. [7] 杜春华,吉洪湖,胡娅萍,等低前挡板型小尺寸刷式封严泄漏特性的试验[J].航空动力学报,2017,32(2):298-305. DU Chunhua,JI Honghu,HU Yaping,et.al.Experimental investigation on leakage characteristic of small size brush with low front plate[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2017,32(2):298-305.(in Chinese) [8] 曹广州.刷式封严结构的泄漏特性研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2006. CAO Guangzhou.Investigation on leakage characteristics of brush seals[D].Nanjing:Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2006.(in Chinese) [9] 周坤,力宁,郭徽,等.低滞后刷式密封泄漏特性试验研究[J].润滑与密封,2017,42(4):132-136. ZHOU Kun,LI Ning,GUO Hui,et al.Experimental investigation on leakage characteristics of low hysteresis brush seals[J].Lubrication Engineering,2017,42(4):132-136.(in Chinese) [10] DOGU Y.Investigation of brush seal flow characteristics using bulk porous medium approach[J].Journal of the Electrochemical Society,2005,153(10):136-144. [11] ARORA G R,PROCTOR M P.JTAGG Ⅱ brush seal test results[R].NASA TM-107448,1997. [12] 王之栎,梁小峰,黄其武.刷式密封二维模型数值计算[J].航空动力学报,2008,23(8):1461-1465. WANG Zhili,LIANG Xiaofeng,HUANG Qiwu.Two-dimensional model mathematical simulation of brush seals[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2008,23(8):1461-1465.(in Chinese) [13] 李理科,王之栎,宋飞,等.刷式密封温度场数值研究[J].航空动力学报,2010,25(5):1018-1024. LI Like,WANG Zhili,SONG Fei,et al.Numerical investigation of temperature field in brush seals[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2010,25(5):1018-1024.(in Chinese) [14] 张艾萍,张帅,李相通,等.低滞后刷式密封泄漏流动数值模拟及结构优化[J].润滑与密封,2015,40(2):67-72. ZHANG Aiping,ZHANG Shuai,LI Xiangtong,et al.Numerical simulation on leakage flow characteristics and optimization on structure of low hysteresis brush seal[J].Lubrication Engineering,2015,40(2):67-72.(in Chinese) [15] 张元桥,王妍,晏鑫,等.刷式密封泄漏流动及传热特性的研究:第一部分 泄漏特性[J].工程热物理学报,2017,38(3):482-489. ZHANG Yuanqiao,WANG Yan,YAN Xin,et al.Investigations on the leakage and heat transfer characteristics of brush seal:Part 1 leakage characteristics[J].Journal of Engineering Thermophysics,2017,38(3):482-489.(in Chinese) [16] 黄阳子,李军.低迟滞刷式密封泄漏特性的数值研究[J].广东电力,2012,25(3):10-14. HUANG Yangzi,LI Jun.Numerical investigation of sealing clearance on leakage flow characteristics of low-hysteresis brush seal[J].Guangdong Electric Power,2012,25(3):10-14.(in Chinese) [17] 杜春华,吉洪湖,胡娅萍,等.刷式封严磨损特性及其对泄漏影响的试验研究[J].推进技术,2017,38(11):202-210. DU Chunhua,JI Honghu,HU Yaping,et al.Experimental investigation on wearing characteristics and effects on leakage of brush seal[J].Journal of Propulsion Technology,2017,38(11):202-210.(in Chinese) [18] 钱大帅.航空发动机转子-刷式密封系统动力学特性研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2008. QIAN Dashuai.Research on dynamic characteristics of aeroengine rotor-brush-seal system[D].Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology,2008.(in Chinese) [19] ARORA G K,PROCTOR M P.JTAGG II brush seal test results[R].AIAA 1997-2632,1997. [20] 李国勤,孙丹,刘永泉等.基于ALE流固耦合方法的刷式密封泄漏特性理论与实验研究[J/OL].推进技术:1-11.[2019-12-09].https:∥doi.org/10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.1903 54. LI Guoqin,SUN Dan,LIU Yongquan,et al.Theortical and experimental study on leakage characteristics of brush seal based on ale fluid-structure compled metnodology[J/OL].Journal of Propulsion Technology:1-11[2019-12-09].https:∥doi.org/10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.1903 54.(in Chinese)
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 244
- HTML浏览量: 1
- PDF量: 416
- 被引次数: 0