“蚌式”进气道附面层扫除特性风洞试验

赵海刚; 刘雨; 任丁丁

doi:10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2020.09.012

“蚌式”进气道附面层扫除特性风洞试验

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2020.09.012

计量
- 文章访问数: 252
- HTML浏览量: 2
- PDF量: 416
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-02-19
- 刊出日期: 2020-09-28

Boundary layer blowing characteristics of bump inlet by wind-tunnel test

Chinese Flight Test Establishment,Aviation Industry Corporation of China,Limited,Xi’an 710089,China

摘要

摘要: 以某低、高速风洞为平台,设计搭建了“蚌式”进气道附面层扫除特性测量试验系统,进行了不同流量系数和来流马赫数下进气道鼓包表面附面层扫除特性的风洞试验,通过对试验数据的整理、计算和对比分析同型号的飞行试验结果,研究了“蚌式”进气道鼓包表面附面层扫除特性。研究结果表明:在相同的来流马赫数下,随着流量系数的增大,鼓包表面附面层的扫除能力逐渐减弱;在亚声速工况的绝大多数流量范围内,鼓包表面压力系数沿鼓包中心线对称分布、压力梯度变化明显,且在不同截面沿主流方向具有增大的特征,鼓包构型对附面层扫除效果较强;超声速工况下具有明显附面层扫除能力的流量范围明显小于亚声速工况,进气道唇口形成的弓形激波是影响鼓包表面不同位置压力梯度变化的主要因素,进而决定着附面层扫除特性。在接近来流马赫数18及以上飞行工况下,附面层的扫除能力减弱,附面层分离加强,进而会造成较大的进气压力损失和畸变。
- 风洞试验 /
- “蚌式”进气道 /
- 附面层扫除特性 /
- 来流马赫数 /
- 流量系数
Abstract: Based on the low and high speed wind tunnel，a test system for measuring the boundary layer blowing characteristics of the bump inlet at a wind tunnel was designed and set up. The boundary layer blowing characteristics were studied by test at different incoming Mach numbers and flow ratios. Through analysis of the test data, calculation and comparison of the flight test results of the same type, the boundary layer blowing characteristics of the bump inlet were studied. Results showed that the boundary layer blowing ability of the bump inlet gradually decreased with the increase of the flow ratio at the same incoming Mach number.Within the wide range of the flow ratio at subsonic, the pressure coefficient of the bump inlet surface was symmetric along the center line with high pressure gradient, and it increased along the mainstream. The bulge structure showed a relatively strong blowing ability of the boundary layer. The flow ratio range with effective blowing ability at supersonic was significantly smaller than that at subsonic. At supersonic the bow-shaped shock wave of the inlet lip was the main factor affecting the pressure gradient change at different positions on the bump surface and the boundary layer blowing ability. Under the flight conditions near Mach number 18 and above, the boundary layer blowing ability was decreased, and the separation of the boundary layer flowing was strengthened, causing large loss and distortion of the inlet pressure.
- wind-tunnel test /
- bump inlet /
- boundary layer blowing characteristics /
- ,incoming Mach number /
- flow ratio

HTML

参考文献(19)

[1]	GRIDLEY M C,CAHILL M J.ACIS air induction system trade study［R］.AIAA-96-2644,1996.
[2]	杨应凯,李玉璞.JSF X-35的一绝:无附面层隔道超音速进气道［J］.国际航空,2001(8):13-15. YANG Yingkai,LI Yupu.Diverterless supersonic inlet of JSF X-35［J］.International Aviation,2001(8):13-15.(in Chinese)
[3]	YOUNG D D,JENKINS S A.A investigation of active flowfield control for inlet shoek and boundary layer interaction［R］.AIAA-2005-4020,2005.
[4]	TINDELL R,WILLIS B.Experimental investigation of blowing for controlling obique shock/boundary layer interactions［R］.AIAA-97-2642,1999.
[5]	JENKINS L N,GORTON J L,ANDERS S G.Flow control device evaluation for an internal flow with adverse pressure gradlent［R］.AIAA-2002-0266,2002.
[6]	TOURNIER S E,PADUANO J D.Flow control in a transonic inlet［R］.AIAA-2006-3883,2006.
[7]	BOYCE R R,PAULL A.Scramjet intake and exhaust CFD studies for the HyShot scramjet flight experiment［R］.AIAA-2001-1891,2001.
[8]	AMITAY M,HONOHAN A M,TRAUTMAN M,et al.Modification of the aerodynamic characteristic of bluff bodies using fluidic actuators［R］.AIAA-97-2004,1997.
[9]	SUN Shu,GUO Rongwei.The serpentine inlet performance enhancement using vortex generator based flow control［J］.Chinese Journal of Aeronautics,2006,27(1):10-16.
[10]	RABE A,ANDESON J.A facility for active flow control research in serpentine inlets［R］.AIAA-2002-0510,2002.
[11]	WALLIS V C,ROBERT B,STEARNS N H,et al.Advanced propulsion system design and integration for a turbojet powered unmanned aerial vehicle［R］.AIAA-2003-0415,2003.
[12]	靖建朋,郭荣伟.蛇形进气道地面工作状态附面层抽吸试验研究［J］.南京航空航天大学学报,2007,39(1):30-36. JING Jianpeng,GUO Rongwei.Experiment of boundary layer suction in serpentine inlet under ground running［J］.Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2007,39(1):30-36.(in Chinese)
[13]	梁德旺,李博.无隔道进气道反设计及附面层排除机理分析［J］.航空学报,2005,26(3):286-289. LIANG Dewang,LI Bo.Reverse design of diverterless inlet and mechanism of diversion of boundary layer［J］.Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2005,26(3):286-289.(in Chinese)
[14]	王龙,钟易成,杨应凯,等.双锥bump压缩面设计及气动特性［J］.航空动力学报,2013,28(12):82-89. WANG Long,ZHONG Yicheng,YANG Yingkai,et al.Bipyramid bump compression surface design and aerodynamic characteristics［J］.Journal of Aerospace Power,2013,28(12):82-89.(in Chinese)
[15]	张悦,谭慧俊,张启帆,等.一种进气道内激波/边界层干扰控制的新方法及其流动机理［J］.宇航学报,2012,33(2):265-274. ZHANG Yue,TAN Huijun,ZHANG Qifan,et al.A new method and its flow mechanism for control of shock/boundary layer interaction in hypersonic inlet［J］.Journal of Astronautics,2012,33(2):265-274.(in Chinese)
[16]	丁晨,刘猛,张继华,等.变马赫数条件下进气道边界层扫除法数值模拟［J］.推进技术,2013,34(10):1310-1315. DING Chen,LIU Meng,ZHANG Jihua,et al.Numerical simulation on blowing method for controlling boundary layer interaction in supersonic inlet at different Mach number［J］.Journal of Propulsion Technology,2013,34(10):1310-1315.(in Chinese)
[17]	何鹏,董金钟.合成射流方向布局对Ｓ形进气道分离控制的效应［J］.航空动力学报,2015,30(2):306-314. HE Peng,DONG Jinzhong.Effect of slot orientation on synthetic jet-based separation control in a serpentine inlet［J］.Journal of Aerospace Power,2015,30(2):306-314.(in Chinese)
[18]	钟易成,余少志,吴晴.凸包(Bump)进气道/DSI模型设计及气动特性研究［J］.航空动力学报,2005,20(5):470-475. ZHONG Yicheng,YU Shaozhi,WU Qing.Research of bump inlet (DSI) model design and its aerodynamic properties［J］.Journal of Aerospace Power,2005,20(5):470-475.(in Chinese)
[19]	杨应凯.Bump进气道设计与试验研究［J］.空气动力学学报,2007,25(3):336-339. YANG Yingkai.Research of bump inlet design and test［J］.Acta Aerodynamica Sinica,2007,25(3):336-339.(in Chinese)