Volume 29 Issue 2
Feb.  2014
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
SONG Gang-lin, ZHANG Yan, WEI Bao-xi, TIAN Liang, XU Xu. Performance comparison of aero-ramp and transverse injector based on gas-pilot flame[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014, 29(2): 405-419. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2014.02.021
Citation: SONG Gang-lin, ZHANG Yan, WEI Bao-xi, TIAN Liang, XU Xu. Performance comparison of aero-ramp and transverse injector based on gas-pilot flame[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014, 29(2): 405-419. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2014.02.021

Performance comparison of aero-ramp and transverse injector based on gas-pilot flame

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2014.02.021
  • Received Date: 2012-12-21
  • Publish Date: 2014-02-28
  • A direct performance comparison between the four-hole aero-ramp injector and single transverse injector in a dual-mode scramjet combustor was conducted. The mixing characteristics of two injectors were calculated by solving the three-dimensional (3-D) compressible Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations (RANS), with the help of the shear-stress-transport (SST) k-ω turbulence model. The numerical results show that the far field mixing efficiency of the aero-ramp injector is higher than that of the single transverse injector. High enthalpy vitiated air was heated to a total temperature of 1200K by hydrogen-oxygen combustion, entering the isolator entrance at a Mach number of 2.0. Non-reacting experimental conditions involved sonic injection of nitrogen to safely simulate ethylene injected into the combustor at a jet-to-free stream momentum flux ratio of 2.6. Schlieren photographs were obtained to analyze the shock structure around the injectors. Reacting test conditions involved sonic injection of ethylene at the jet-to-free stream momentum flux ratios ranging from 0.5 to 2.7. High speed camera was used to capture the flame structures in the near-field combustion. The experimental results show that the aero-ramp injector produce sustained combustion over a wider range of fuel-air ratios than the single transverse injector. At the identical jet-to-free stream momentum flux ratio, the aero-ramp has a larger isolator margin than the single transverse injector, demonstrating a better ability for avoiding overflows. However, the air specific impulse and total temperature recovery of two injectors, which are calculated by the one-dimensional (1-D) performance analysis code, are almost identical.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    Ben-Yakar B, Hanson K.Cavity flame-holders for ignition and flame stabilization in scramjets:an overview[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2001, 17(3):869-876.
    [2]
    Lin K C, Tam C J.Flame characteristics and fuel entrainment inside a cavity flame holder in a scramjet combustor[R].AIAA 2007-5381, 2007.
    [3]
    Gruber M R, Carter C D.Experimental studies of pylon-aided fuel injection into a supersonic crossflow[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2008, 24(3):460-470.
    [4]
    Fuller R P, Wu P K.Comparison of physical and aerodynamic ramps as fuel injectors in supersonic flow[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1998, 14(2):135-145.
    [5]
    Abbitt J D, Segal C, McDaniel J C, et al.Experimental supersonic hydrogen combustion employing staged injection behind a rearward-facing step[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1993, 9(3):472-479.
    [6]
    Riggins D W, McClinton C R, Rogers R C, et al.Investigation of scramjet injection strategies for high mach number flows[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1995, 11(3):409-418.
    [7]
    McMillin B K, Seitzman J M, Hanson R K.Comparison of NO and OH planar fluorescence temperature measurements in scramjet model flow[R].AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(10):1945-1952.
    [8]
    Cox S K, Fuller R P, Schetz J A.Vortical interactions generated by an injector array to enhance mixing in a supersonic flow[R].AIAA 94-0708, 1994.
    [9]
    Fuller R P, Wu P K, Nejad A S, et al.Fuel-vortex interactions for enhanced mixing in supersonic flow[R].AIAA 96-2661, 1996.
    [10]
    Eklund D R, Gruber M R.Study of a supersonic combustor employing an aerodynamic ramp pilot injector[R].AIAA 99-2249, 1999.
    [11]
    Anderson C D, Schetz J A.Liquid-fuel aeroramp injector for scramjets[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2005, 21(2):371-374.
    [12]
    Olmstead D T, Gruber M R, Collatz M K.Cavity coupled aeroramp injector combustion study[R].AIAA 2009-5227, 2009.
    [13]
    Jacobsen L S, Gallimore S D, Schetz J A, et al.An improved aerodynamic ramp injector in supersonic flow[R].AIAA 2001-0518, 2001.
    [14]
    Maddalena L, Campioli T L, Schetz J A.Experimental and computational investigation of light-gas injectors in Mach 4.0 crossflow[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2006, 22(5):1027-1037.
    [15]
    BonanosA M, Schetz J A, OBrien W F.Dual-mode combustion experiments with an integrated aeroramp-injector/plasma-torch igniter[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2008, 24(2):267-273.
    [16]
    Jacobsen L S, Gallimorel S D, Schetz J A, et al.An integrated aeroramp injector/plasma-igniter for hydrocarbon fuels in a supersonic flow[R].AIAA 2001-1766, 2001.
    [17]
    YAN Minglei.Supersonic combustion experiments with an integrated aeroramp-injector/gas-portfire[D].Beijing:Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2011.(in Chinese)
    [18]
    Bonanos A M, Schetz J A, OBrien W F.Scramjet operability range studies of a multifuel integrated aeroramp injector/plasma igniter[R].AIAA 2005-3425, 2005.
    [19]
    Smith S, Scheid A, Eklund D, et al.Supersonic combustion research laboratory uncertainty analysis[R].AIAA-2008-5065, 2008.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1247) PDF downloads(882) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return