Volume 34 Issue 5
May  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Effects of incoming flow total temperature on mode transition boundary in dual mode scramjet combustor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2019, 34(5): 1119-1126. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2019.05.018
Citation: Effects of incoming flow total temperature on mode transition boundary in dual mode scramjet combustor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2019, 34(5): 1119-1126. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2019.05.018

Effects of incoming flow total temperature on mode transition boundary in dual mode scramjet combustor

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2019.05.018
  • Received Date: 2018-11-07
  • Publish Date: 2019-05-28
  • To estimate the effects of incoming flow total temperatures on mode transition boundary in a kerosene-fueled dual mode combustor, an test study was conducted using a direct-connected methane combustion heating test facility. The values of incoming flow total pressure at the isolator inlet should be kept at 1.05 MPa, the Mach number was about 2.0, the incoming flow total temperatures were 885, 1 085, 1 285 K, respectively. Combustor wall pressures were measured by pressure sensors; the mode of combustion was identified by calculating the Mach number at the isolator exit using a one-dimensional model. Test results indicated that, the locations of the combustor peak wall pressure were the same at different incoming flow total temperatures; there was a one-to-one relationship between the combustor peak pressure value, isolator near wall pressure distribution and shock train leading edge location; with the increase of incoming flow total temperature, the equivalence ratio of mode transition from supersonic to subsonic combustion rose up; under the same kerosene equivalence ratio, as the incoming flow total temperature increased, the combustor wall pressure dropped, the length of shock train got shorter.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    ANDREADIS D.Scramjet engines enabling the seamless integration of air & space operations[J].Industrial Physicist,2004,10(4):24-27.
    [2]
    TURNERJ C,SMART M K.Mode change characteristics of a three-dimensional scramjet at Mach 8[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power,2013,29(4):982-990.
    [3]
    FOTIA M L.Experimental study of shock-train/combustion coupling and flame dynamics in a heated supersonic flow[D].Ann Arbor,US:The University of Michigan,2012.
    [4]
    WALTRUP P J,BILLIG F S.Structure of shock waves in cylindrical ducts[J].AIAA Journal,1973,11(10):1404-1418.
    [5]
    田野,肖保国,张顺平,等.双模态冲压发动机燃烧性能初步研究[J].航空动力学报,2016,31(12):2921-2927.TIAN Ye,XIAO Baoguo,ZHANG Shunping,et al.Preliminary study on combustion performance of dual-mode scramjet engine[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2016,31(12):2921-2927.(in Chinese)
    [6]
    李俊红,潘宏禄,沈清,等.超燃冲压发动机燃烧室的燃烧特性[J].航空动力学报,2014,29(1):14-22.LI Junhong,PAN Honglu,SHEN Qing,et al.Combustion characteristics of scramjet combustor[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2014,29(1):14-22.(in Chinese)
    [7]
    MATSUO K,MIYAZATO Y,KIM H D.Shock train and pseudo-shock phenomena in internal gas flows[J].Progress in Aerospace Sciences,1999,35(1):33-100.
    [8]
    GNANI F,ZARE-BEHTASH H,KONTIS K.Pseudo-shock waves and their interactions in high-speed intakes[J].Progress in Aerospace Sciences,2016,82:36-56.
    [9]
    FOTIA M L,DRISCOLL J F.Isolator-combustor interactions in a direct-connect ramjet-scramjet experiment[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power,2012,28(1):83-95.
    [10]
    FOTIA M L,DRISCOLL J F.Ram-scram transition and flame/shock-train interactions in a model scramjet experiment[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power,2013,29(1):261-273.
    [11]
    MASUMOTO R,TOMIOKA S,KUDO K,et al.Experimental study on combustion modes in a supersonic combustor[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power,2011,27(2):346-355.
    [12]
    SHCHETINKOV E S.Piecewise-one-dimensional models of supersonic combustion and pseudo shock in a duct[J].Combustion,Explosion and Shock Waves,1975,9(4):409-417.
    [13]
    VINOGRADOV V A,SERGEY A.Experimental investigation of kerosene fuel combustion in supersonic flow[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power,1995,11(1):130-134.
    [14]
    王宇航,宋文艳,白菡尘,等.反压诱导方式对超燃冲压发动机隔离段流动特性影响[J].航空动力学报,2016,31(11):2595-2603.WANG Yuhang,SONG Wenyan,BAI Hanchen,et al.Effects of back pressure induction methods on scramjet isolator flow characteristics[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2016,31(11):2595-2603.(in Chinese)
    [15]
    张岩,朱韶华,刘刚,等.双模态冲压发动机中的模态转换研究综述[J].推进技术,2013,34(12):1719-1727.ZHANG Yan,ZHU Shaohua,LIU Gang,et al.An overview on mode transition in dual mode ramjet[J].Journal of Propulsion Technology,2013,34(12):1719-1727.(in Chinese)
    [16]
    ZHANG Yan,CHEN Bing,LIU Gang,et al.Influencing factors on the mode transition in a dual-mode scramjet[J].Acta Astronautica,2014,103:1-15.
    [17]
    李大鹏.煤油双模态冲压发动机燃烧室工作过程研究[D].长沙: 国防科学技术大学,2006.LI Dapeng.Study of kerosenen fueled dual-mode ramjet combustor operation process[D].Changsha:National University of Defense Technology,2006.(in Chinese)
    [18]
    肖保国,晏至辉,田野,等.超燃发动机燃烧模态判别准则初步研究[J].推进技术,2015,36(8):1121-1126.XIAO Baoguo,YAN Zhihui,TIAN Ye,et al.Preliminary study on criterion of indentifying combustion mode for scramjet[J].Journal of Propulsion Technology,2015,36(8):1121-1126.(in Chinese)
    [19]
    黄兴.超燃冲压发动机特性计算与一体化设计技术研究[D].西安:西北工业大学,2014.HUANG Xing.The characteristic simulation of scramjet and the integration design research[D].Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University,2014.(in Chinese)
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (811) PDF downloads(432) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return