Volume 40 Issue 1
Jan.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
HE Meng, ZHANG Liu, JIANG Yubiao, et al. Lift enhancement study for upper surface blowing technology of blended wing-body layout aircraft[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(1):20220882 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220882
Citation: HE Meng, ZHANG Liu, JIANG Yubiao, et al. Lift enhancement study for upper surface blowing technology of blended wing-body layout aircraft[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(1):20220882 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220882

Lift enhancement study for upper surface blowing technology of blended wing-body layout aircraft

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220882
  • Received Date: 2022-11-19
    Available Online: 2024-05-10
  • Considering the scheme of the rectangular nozzle of the engine embedded on the wing of the blended wing-body layout aircraft, a control strategy based on the modification of the engine nozzle was proposed. The flow fields of blended wing-body layout aircraft were simulated numerically based on Reynolds average Navier-Stokes equation. The effects of jet pressure ratio, flap deflection angle, flap leading edge radius, upward deflection flaps and combined flaps on the lift-enhancing effect of blended wing-body layout aircraft were analyzed. The results showed that when the flap deflection angle was 40° and the jet drop pressure ratio was large, the negative pressure peak of the leading edge of the flaps decreased and the jet flow separated prematurely at the leading edge of the flap. Increasing the leading edge radius of the flap could help reduce the centripetal force required for deflection and promote jet adhesion. The design of upward deflection flaps and combined flaps at the engine nozzle weakened the influence of the right vortex and surface cross flow on the jet adhesion, which can promote the adhesion of the jet under large drop pressure ratio and large flap angle. Compared with the unmodified nozzle configuration, the combined flap design can achieve an average net thrust deflection angle of 56.10° and the lift coefficient increased by 0.16 when jet drop pressure ratio was 1.45 and angle of attack was 0°, and the lift coefficient increment was kept stable within the range of the calculated angle of attack.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    张刘,姜裕标,何萌,等. 内吹式襟翼控制机理和失速特性[J]. 空气动力学学报,2021,39(5): 53-62. ZHANG Liu,JIANG Yubiao,HE Meng,et al. Stall characteristics and circulation control of internally blown flap[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica,2021,39(5): 53-62. (in Chinese

    ZHANG Liu, JIANG Yubiao, HE Meng, et al. Stall characteristics and circulation control of internally blown flap[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2021, 39(5): 53-62. (in Chinese)
    [2]
    何萌,张刘,赵垒,等. 前缘下垂结合内吹式襟翼失速特性研究[J]. 航空工程进展,2022,13(3): 96-107. HE Meng,ZHANG Liu,ZHAO Lei,et al. Research on stall characteristics of droop leading edge combined with internal-blowing flaps[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering,2022,13(3): 96-107. (in Chinese

    HE Meng, ZHANG Liu, ZHAO Lei, et al. Research on stall characteristics of droop leading edge combined with internal-blowing flaps[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2022, 13(3): 96-107. (in Chinese)
    [3]
    GIBSON J S,SEARLE N. Characteristics of USB noise[R]. NASA-19780016118,1976.
    [4]
    MAITA M,TORISAKI T. Acoustic characteristics of the external upper surface blowing propulsive-lif t configuration[J]. Journal of Aircraft,1981,18(8): 695-701. doi: 10.2514/3.57546
    [5]
    SALIKUDDIN M,BROWN W H,AHUJA K K. Noise from a circulation control wing with upper surface blowing[J]. Journal of Aircraft,1987,24(1): 55-64. doi: 10.2514/3.45410
    [6]
    MAY F,BEAN G. Aerodynamic design of the Boeing YC-14 advanced medium STOL transport (AMST)[R]. AIAA1975-1015,1975.
    [7]
    SHOVLIN M D,COCHRANE J. An overview of the quiet short-haul research aircraft program[R]. NASA-TM-78545,1978.
    [8]
    COCHRANE J,RIDDLE D,STEVENS V. Quiet Short-Haul Research Aircraft-the first 3 years of flight research[R]. AIAA1981-2625,1981.
    [9]
    COCHRANE J A,CARROS R J. Hybrid upper surface blown flap propulsive-lift concept for the QSRLP[J]. Journal of Aircraft,1976,13(11): 855-860. doi: 10.2514/3.58722
    [10]
    YAMATO H,OKADA N,BANDO T. Flight test of the Japanese Upper Surface Blowing STOL experimental aircraft ASKA[J]. Journal of Aircraft,1991,28(10): 630-637. doi: 10.2514/3.46075
    [11]
    AOYAGI K,FALARSKI M D,KOENIG D G. Wind tunnel investigation of a large-scale upper surface blown-flap transport model having two engines[R]. NASA-TM-X-62296,1973.
    [12]
    AOYAGI K,FALARSKI M,KOENIG D G. Wind tunnel investigation of a large-scale upper surface blown-flap model having four engines[R]. NASA-TM-X-62419,1975.
    [13]
    KOENIG D,AOYAGI K. Maximum lift of upper surface blowing STOL aircraft with swept wings[R]. AIAA1975-868,1975.
    [14]
    JOHNSON J,PHELPS A. Low-speed aerodynamics of the upper-surface blown jet flap[C]// National Air Transportation Meeting. Dallas,US: SAE,1974: 740470.
    [15]
    SLEEMAN W C Jr,HOHLWEG W C. Low speed wind tunnel investigation of a four-engine upper surface blown model having swept wing and rectangular and D-shaped exhaust nozzles[R]. NASA-TN-D-8061,1975.
    [16]
    HIRT W J,GROTZ C A. Method of and apparatus for enhancing Coanda flow attachment over a wing and flap surface: US4019696[P]. 1977-04-26.
    [17]
    MELEASON E T. Effects of nozzle design and power on cruise drag for upper-surface-blowing aircraft[R]. NASA-19780016115,1976.
    [18]
    SAWADA K,TAKANASHI S. A numerical investigation on wing/nacelle interferences of USB configuration[R]. AIAA1987-455,1987.
    [19]
    MARCOS J M. Computational and experimental comparison of a powered lift,upper surface blowing configuration[D]. San Luis Obispo,US: California Polytechnic State University,2013.
    [20]
    赵国昌,邢仕廷,宋丽萍,等. 机翼上表面吹气动力增升简化模型[J]. 飞行力学,2018,36(4): 39-43. ZHAO Guochang,XING Shiting,SONG Liping,et al. Simplified model of wing upper surface blowing dynamic lift enhancement[J]. Flight Dynamics,2018,36(4): 39-43. (in Chinese

    ZHAO Guochang, XING Shiting, SONG Liping, et al. Simplified model of wing upper surface blowing dynamic lift enhancement[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2018, 36(4): 39-43. (in Chinese)
    [21]
    XIAO Tianhang,ZHU Zhenhao,DENG Shuanghou,et al. Effects of nozzle geometry and active blowing on lift enhancement for upper surface blowing configuration[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology,2021,111: 106536. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.106536
    [22]
    汪军,赖庆仁,康洪铭,等. 基于螺旋襟翼的喷流偏转实验研究[J]. 实验流体力学,2021,35(5): 47-53. WANG Jun,LAI Qingren,KANG Hongming,et al. Experimental study on jet turning based on spiral flap[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics,2021,35(5): 47-53. (in Chinese

    WANG Jun, LAI Qingren, KANG Hongming, et al. Experimental study on jet turning based on spiral flap[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2021, 35(5): 47-53. (in Chinese)
    [23]
    张刘,姜裕标,赖庆仁,等. 一种矩形喷管推力矢量偏转控制装置: CN112145315B[P]. 2021-08-10. ZHANG Liu,JIANG Yubiao,LAI Qingren,et al. Rectangular nozzle thrust vector deflection control device: CN112145315B[P]. 2021-08-10. (in Chinese

    ZHANG Liu, JIANG Yubiao, LAI Qingren, et al. Rectangular nozzle thrust vector deflection control device: CN112145315B[P]. 2021-08-10. (in Chinese)
    [24]
    MANLEY D J,KUTZMANN A J,GREGG III R,et al. Aircraft configuration utilizing fuselage,wing,empennage,and exhaust flow control devices: US8061655[P]. 2011-11-22.
    [25]
    HARRISON N,VASSBERG J,DEHAAN M,et al. The design and test of a swept wing upper surface blowing concept[R]. AIAA2013-1102,2013.
    [26]
    SLOTNICK J,HANNON J,CHAFFIN M. Overview of the 1st AIAA CFD high lift prediction workshop[R]. AIAA2011-862,2011.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1128) PDF downloads(120) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return