Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Jie Yang, Qian Yang, Pengcheng Chen, et al. Rapid prediction of anti-icing surface temperature and runback water via point-cloud slice attention network[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2026, 42(X):20260196 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20260196
Citation: Jie Yang, Qian Yang, Pengcheng Chen, et al. Rapid prediction of anti-icing surface temperature and runback water via point-cloud slice attention network[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2026, 42(X):20260196 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20260196

Rapid prediction of anti-icing surface temperature and runback water via point-cloud slice attention network

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20260196
  • Available Online: 2026-10-14
  • To evaluate the performance of engine inlet hot-air anti-icing systems under different structural designs, a mesh-independent point-cloud slice attention network (PSANet) was developed for rapid pointwise prediction of the surface temperature and runback water distribution over the inlet. In this method, the anti-icing surface was represented as a point cloud, and six-dimensional structural design parameters of the piccolo tube were used as inputs. Multi-band Fourier feature mapping, conditional modulation, slice attention, and vector-gated reconstruction were introduced, and a multi-task learning strategy was adopted to jointly predict the temperature distribution and the mass flow rate distribution of runback water. Based on an in-house numerical simulation method for anti-icing, 5 000 cases of anti-icing surface temperature and runback water mass flow rate under different piccolo-tube structural designs were generated. These cases were randomly divided into training, validation, and test sets, with each case containing 23 958 surface points. The test results show that the mean absolute error and root mean square error for temperature prediction were 0.503 K and 0.841 K, respectively; the mean absolute error and root mean square error for runback water mass flow rate prediction were 0.011 mg/s and 0.018 mg/s, respectively. The prediction time for a single case was 38.57 ms, representing an acceleration of approximately 6, 880 times compared with the anti-icing numerical simulation method. Overall, the PSANet method achieves high prediction accuracy and computational efficiency, and can be applied to sensitivity analysis of structural design parameters and iterative design of hot-air anti-icing systems.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    桑为民, 蔡旸, 鲁天. 变形破碎特性对SLD结冰过程影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2017, 32(7): 1537-1544. Sang Weimin, Cai Yang, Lu Tian. Effect of deformation and breakup characteristic on supercooled large droplet icing process[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(7): 1537-1544. (in Chinese doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2017.07.001

    Sang Weimin, Cai Yang, Lu Tian. Effect of deformation and breakup characteristic on supercooled large droplet icing process[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(7): 1537-1544. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2017.07.001
    [2]
    Tetteh E, Loth E, Neuteboom M O, et al. In-flight gas turbine engine icing: review[J]. AIAA Journal, 2022, 60(10): 5610-5632. doi: 10.2514/1.J061523
    [3]
    Zhang Yue, Narayanasamy K, Sandel W, et al. A three-layer model for ice crystal icing in aircraft engines[C]//SAE Technical Paper Series, 2023, 1: 2023-1-1481.
    [4]
    Qi Haifeng, Chang Shinan, Yang Yinglin, et al. Numerical investigations on aero-engine icing characteristics at mixed phase conditions[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2024, 238: 122044. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.122044
    [5]
    常士楠, 杨波, 冷梦尧, 等. 飞机热气防冰系统研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2017, 32(5): 1025-1034. Chang Shinan, Yang Bo, Leng Mengyao, et al. Study on bleed air anti-icing system of aircraft[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(5): 1025-1034. (in Chinese doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2017.05.001

    Chang Shinan, Yang Bo, Leng Mengyao, et al. Study on bleed air anti-icing system of aircraft[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(5): 1025-1034. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2017.05.001
    [6]
    朱永峰, 方玉峰, 封文春. 某型飞机发动机短舱防冰系统设计计算[J]. 航空动力学报, 2012, 27(6): 1326-1331. Zhu Yongfeng, Fang Yufeng, Feng Wenchun. Design and calculation of aircraft nacelle anti-icing system[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2012, 27(6): 1326-1331. (in Chinese doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2012.06.029

    Zhu Yongfeng, Fang Yufeng, Feng Wenchun. Design and calculation of aircraft nacelle anti-icing system[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2012, 27(6): 1326-1331. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2012.06.029
    [7]
    Jing Shuliang, Hu Yaping, Chen Weijian. Numerical simulation of hot air anti-icing characteristics for intake components of aeronautical engine[J]. Aerospace, 2025, 12(9): 753. doi: 10.3390/aerospace12090753
    [8]
    冉林, 熊建军, 赵照, 等. 结冰风洞小流量发动机进气部件防冰试验技术[J]. 航空动力学报, 2024, 39(4): 1-7. Ran Lin, Xiong Jianjun, Zhao Zhao, et al. Anti-icing test technology of low-flow engine intake components in icing wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2024, 39(4): 1-7. (in Chinese doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210576

    Ran Lin, Xiong Jianjun, Zhao Zhao, et al. Anti-icing test technology of low-flow engine intake components in icing wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2024, 39(4): 1-7. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210576
    [9]
    赵照, 熊建军, 冉林, 等. 大型结冰风洞热气供气防除冰试验技术[J]. 航空动力学报, 2024, 39(5): 11-17. Zhao Zhao, Xiong Jianjun, Ran Lin, et al. Hot air supply anti/de-icing test technology in large-scale icing wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2024, 39(5): 11-17. (in Chinese doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210582

    Zhao Zhao, Xiong Jianjun, Ran Lin, et al. Hot air supply anti/de-icing test technology in large-scale icing wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2024, 39(5): 11-17. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210582
    [10]
    Chen Ningli, Yi Xian, Wang Qiang, et al. A literature review on numerical simulation of thermal anti-icing[J]. Aerospace, 2025, 12(2): 83. doi: 10.3390/aerospace12020083
    [11]
    Bidwell C S. Icing analysis of a swept NACA 0012 wing using LEWICE3D version 3.48[R]. AIAA-2014-2200, 2014.
    [12]
    Habashi W G, Aubé M, Baruzzi G, et al. FENSAP-ICE: a fully-3D in-flight icing simulation system for aircraft, rotorcraft and UAVs[C]//24th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences. Bonn, Germany: International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, 2004: 1-10.
    [13]
    Bu Xueqin, Lin Guiping, Shen Xiaobin, et al. Numerical simulation of aircraft thermal anti-icing system based on a tight-coupling method[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 148: 119061. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.119061
    [14]
    Yang Qian, Zheng Haoran, Guo Xiaofeng, et al. Experimental validation and tightly coupled numerical simulation of hot air anti-icing system based on an extended mass and heat transfer model[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2023, 217: 124645. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.124645
    [15]
    Jia Xuyi, Gong Chunlin, Ji Wen, et al. An accuracy-enhanced transonic flow prediction method fusing deep learning and a reduced-order model[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 36(5): 056101. doi: 10.1063/5.0204152
    [16]
    Wang Jincheng, Hu Haiyang, He Ping, et al. A machine learning study to predict wind-driven water runback characteristics[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35(10): 102104. doi: 10.1063/5.0167545
    [17]
    Wang Jincheng, He Ping, Hu Hui. Predicting interfacial shear stress distributions of wind-driven water runback flows using physics-informed neural networks[R]. AIAA-2024-3932, 2024.
    [18]
    杨倩, 郭晓峰, 李芹, 等. 基于POD和代理模型的热气防冰性能预测方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 142-156. Yang Qian, Guo Xiaofeng, Li Qin, et al. Hot air anti-icing performance estimation method based on POD and surrogate model[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(1): 142-156. (in Chinese

    Yang Qian, Guo Xiaofeng, Li Qin, et al. Hot air anti-icing performance estimation method based on POD and surrogate model[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(1): 142-156. (in Chinese)
    [19]
    楚紫滢, 耿技, 杨倩, 等. 基于神经网络与遗传算法的热气防冰结构优化[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2026, 44(4): 18-28. Chu Ziying, Geng Ji, Yang Qian, et al. Optimization of hot-air anti-icing structures based on neural networks and genetic algorithms[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2026, 44(4): 18-28. (in Chinese doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0211

    Chu Ziying, Geng Ji, Yang Qian, et al. Optimization of hot-air anti-icing structures based on neural networks and genetic algorithms[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2026, 44(4): 18-28. (in Chinese) doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2024.0211
    [20]
    Sanchez-Gonzalez A, Godwin J, Pfaff T, et al. Learning to simulate complex physics with graph networks[C]//Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning. New York: ACM, 2020: 8459-8468.
    [21]
    Pfaff T, Fortunato M, Sanchez-Gonzalez A, et al. Learning mesh-based simulation with graph networks[C]// International Conference on Learning Representations. Virtual: ICLR, 2020.
    [22]
    Zhao Hengshuang, Jiang Li, Jia Jiaya, et al. Point transformer[C]//2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. Piscataway, US: IEEE, 2021: 16239-16248.
    [23]
    VASWANI A, SHAZEER N, PARMAR N, et al. Attention is all you need[C]//Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Red Hook, US: Curran Associates Inc, 2017, 30: 5998-6008.
    [24]
    Hirose N, Asai K, Ikawa K. Transonic 3-D Euler analysis of flows around fan-jet engine and T. P. S. (Turbine Powered Simulator)[R]. NAL-TR-1045, 1989.
    [25]
    Domingos R. Computational methodology for bleed air ice protection system parametric analysis[D]. Wichita, US: Wichita State University, 2010.
    [26]
    杨倩. 飞机结防冰数值模拟及热气防冰优化设计方法研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2023. YANG Qian. Research on numerical simulation of aircraft icing and anti-icing and optimization design method of hot-air anti-icing[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2023. (in Chinese

    YANG Qian. Research on numerical simulation of aircraft icing and anti-icing and optimization design method of hot-air anti-icing[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2023. (in Chinese)
    [27]
    Xu Shengfeng, Dai Yuanjun, Yan Chang, et al. On the preprocessing of physics-informed neural networks: How to better utilize data in fluid mechanics[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2025, 528: 113837. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2025.113837
    [28]
    Yu Linqi, Yousif M Z, Zhou Dan, et al. Self-supervised learning for effective denoising of flow fields[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 36(10): 105159. doi: 10.1063/5.0231805
    [29]
    Charles R Q, Hao Su, Mo Kaichun, et al. PointNet: deep learning on point sets for 3D classification and segmentation[C]//2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway, US: IEEE, 2017: 77-85.
    [30]
    Qi C R, Yi Li, Su Hao, et al. PointNet++: deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space[C]//Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Red Hook, US: Curran Associates Inc, 2017, 30: 5099-5108.
    [31]
    Tancik M, Srinivasan P, Mildenhall B, et al. Fourier features let networks learn high frequency functions in low dimensional domains[C]//Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Red Hook, US: Curran Associates Inc, 2020: 7537-7547.
    [32]
    RAHAMAN N, BARATIN A, ARPIT D, et al. On the spectral bias of neural networks[C]// Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning. Long Beach, US: PMLR, 2019: 5301-5310.
    [33]
    Jaegle A, Gimeno F, Brock A, et al. Perceiver: general perception with iterative attention[C]//Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning. Virtual: PMLR, 2021: 4651-4664.
    [34]
    Perez E, Strub F, De Vries H, et al. FiLM: visual reasoning with a general conditioning layer[C]//Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Palo Alto, US: AAAI Press, 2018: 3942-3951.
    [35]
    He Kaiming, Zhang Xiangyu, Ren Shaoqing, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition[C]//2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway, US: IEEE, 2016: 770-778.
    [36]
    Deng Zhiwen, Wang Jing, Liu Hongsheng, et al. Prediction of transonic flow over supercritical airfoils using geometric-encoding and deep-learning strategies[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35(7): 075146. doi: 10.1063/5.0155383
    [37]
    Li Cong, Liang Jichen, Ni Zhou, et al. Wavelet-enhanced attention fusion model for airfoil flow field prediction[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2025, 37(9): 093607. doi: 10.1063/5.0284080
    [38]
    Nemati Taher F, Subaşı A. A fast three-dimensional flow field prediction around bluff bodies using deep learning[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 36(2): 025101. doi: 10.1063/5.0188603
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (18) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return