Research on the effect of leading edge shape on the performance of variable inlet guide vanes
-
摘要:
为优化前缘提升可变弯度导叶气动性能，将圆形前缘改为椭圆型前缘和曲率连续前缘，通过数值模拟分析比对了不同前缘可变弯度导叶在不同工况下的性能，结果表明改型前缘产生的前缘吸力峰强度更低，使得叶片表面附面层流动状态更好，从而降低总压损失。前缘形状的影响随着后叶转角角度的变化而变化，小转角状态下，改型前缘可有效增大低损失攻角范围；大转角状态下，改型前缘在正攻角状态下优化效果明显，在来流攻角为4°时，改型前缘导叶的总压损失最多降低32.6%，负攻角状态则影响较小，在来流攻角为−4°时最多降低9.9%。说明前缘改型可有效提升可变弯度导叶的性能。
Abstract:To optimize the aerodynamic performance of variable-camber guide vanes with leading-edge modifications, the circular leading edges were redesigned into elliptical and continuously curved leading edges. Numerical simulations were conducted to analyze and compare the performance of these modified vanes under various operating conditions. The results showed that the modified leading edges generated lower suction peak intensity on the leading edge, leading to better boundary layer flow and consequently lower total pressure loss. The impact of leading-edge shape varied with changes in the rear leaf deflection angle. At small deflection angles, the modified leading edge can effectively increase the range of low-loss attack angles. At large deflection angles, the optimization effect of the modified leading edge was significant at positive attack angles. The total pressure loss of the modified leading-edge guide vane was reduced by up to 32.6% at an incoming attack angle of 4°, while the effect was less impactful at negative attack angles, with a maximum reduction of 9.9% at an incoming attack angle of −4°. The results indicate that the modification of the leading edge can effectively enhance the performance of variable-camber guide vanes.
-
图 5 不同后叶转角情况下VIGV的总压损失对比
Figure 5. Comparison of total pressure loss of VIGV under different rear leaf angles
图 6 典型工况下VIGV性能对比
Figure 6. Comparison of VIGV performance under typical operating conditions
图 7 α=0°情况下不同前缘$ {C}_{p} $对比
Figure 7. Comparison of $ {C}_{p} $ for different leading edges under α=0°
图 8 Ma=0.60, α=0°工况下马赫数云图
Figure 8. Mach number contour map under condition Ma=0.60, α=0°
图 9 Ma=0.6，α=0°工况下来流攻角为6°时前叶附面层参数对比
Figure 9. Comparison of boundary layer parameters for the front vane when Ma=0.6, α=0° and the incoming flow attack angle is 6°
图 10 来流Ma=0.6，α=0°条件下来流攻角为0°时前叶附面层参数对比
Figure 10. Comparison of boundary layer parameters for the front vane when Ma=0.6, α=0° and the incoming flow attack angle is 0°
图 11 来流Ma=0.485, α=25°情况下，圆形前缘VIGV不同来流攻角工况下流动状态对比
Figure 11. Comparison of flow states under different angles of attack for a circular leading edge VIGV with incoming flow Ma=0.485, α=25°
图 12 后叶转角α 为25°，Ma为0.35不同来流攻角工况下熵增云图
Figure 12. Entropy increase contour map under different incoming flow attack angles when the back vane rotation angleα is 25° Ma is 0.3
图 13 来流Ma=0.35，α=25°条件下来流攻角为4°时后叶附面层参数对比
Figure 13. Comparison of boundary layer parameters for the back vane when Ma=0.35, α=25° and the incoming flow attack angle is 4°
图 14 来流Ma=0.35，α=25°条件下来流攻角为−4°时后叶附面层参数对比
Figure 14. Comparison of boundary layer parameters for the back vane when Ma=0.35, α=25° and the incoming flow attack angle is −4°
表 1 某压气机典型工况
Table 1. Typical working conditions of a compressor
压气机转速/% 后叶转角/（°） 进口马赫数 100 0 0.6 85 13 0.485 80 25 0.35 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 VIGV几何参数
Table 2. Geometric parameters of VIGV
参数 数值 弦长$ C $/mm 146.1 栅距$ b $/mm 100.62 稠度$ \tau $ 1.452 进口几何角$ {\beta }_{1} $/（°） 0 出口几何角$ {\beta }_{2} $/（°） −6.53 最大相对厚度$ {t}_{\max } $ 0.06 最大厚度相对位置e 0.41
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 刘波, 张国臣, 巫骁雄, 等. 可调弯度进口导叶在对转压气机中的应用[J]. 航空动力学报, 2015, 30(5): 1184-1191. Liu Bo, Zhang Guochen, Wu Xiaoxiong, et al. Application of variable-camber inlet guide vanes in counter-rotating compressor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2015, 30(5): 1184-1191. (in Chinese doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2015.05.021Liu Bo, Zhang Guochen, Wu Xiaoxiong, et al. Application of variable-camber inlet guide vanes in counter-rotating compressor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2015, 30(5): 1184-1191. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2015.05.021 [2] Reed V L, Schneider P W. Part-span variable inlet guide vanes for V/STOL fan thrust modulation[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1982, 19(1): 52-57. doi: 10.2514/6.1980-1248 [3] 方昌德. 变循环发动机[J]. 燃气涡轮试验与研究, 2004, 17(3): 1-5. Fang Changde. Variable cycle engines[J]. Gas Turbine Experiment and Research, 2004, 17(3): 1-5. (in ChineseFang Changde. Variable cycle engines[J]. Gas Turbine Experiment and Research, 2004, 17(3): 1-5. (in Chinese) [4] Rajesh E, Roy B. Numerical study of variable camber inlet guide vane on low speed axial compressor[C]//Proceedings of the ASME 2015 Gas Turbine India Conference. ASME 2015 Gas Turbine India Conference.Hyderabad, India: ASME, 2016: V001T01A022. [5] 周莉, 刘东, 王占学. 进口导叶形式对核心机驱动风扇级的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2018, 33(7): 1676-1684. Zhou Li, Liu Dong, Wang Zhanxue. Influence of inlet guide vanes type on core driven fan stage[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2018, 33(7): 1676-1684. (in ChineseZhou Li, Liu Dong, Wang Zhanxue. Influence of inlet guide vanes type on core driven fan stage[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2018, 33(7): 1676-1684. (in Chinese) [6] Boehle M, Cagna M, Itter L. Compressible flow in inlet guide vanes with mechanical flaps[C]//ASME Turbo Expo 2004: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Vienna, Austria: ASME, 2008: 341-349. [7] 刘宝杰, 尉洋, 于贤君. 可变弯度导叶不同缝隙结构形式特性分析[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2018, 39(5): 960-969. Liu Baojie, Yu Yang, Yu Xianjun. Analysis of characteristic of different slot forms for variable camber inlet guide vane[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2018, 39(5): 960-969. (in ChineseLiu Baojie, Yu Yang, Yu Xianjun. Analysis of characteristic of different slot forms for variable camber inlet guide vane[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2018, 39(5): 960-969. (in Chinese) [8] 尉洋, 刘宝杰, 于贤君. 可变弯度导叶缝道优化设计及分析[J]. 推进技术, 2021, 42(2): 281-289. Yu Yang, Liu Baojie, Yu Xianjun. Optimization design and analysis of variable inlet guide vane’s slot form[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2021, 42(2): 281-289. (in Chinese doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.190663Yu Yang, Liu Baojie, Yu Xianjun. Optimization design and analysis of variable inlet guide vane’s slot form[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2021, 42(2): 281-289. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.190663 [9] 王前, 胡骏, 屠宝锋, 等. 核心机驱动风扇级可变弯度导叶设计方法[J]. 推进技术, 2016, 37(10): 1855-1859. Wang Qian, Hu Jun, Tu Baofeng, et al. Method of variable camber inlet guide vanes design on core driven fan stage[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2016, 37(10): 1855-1859. (in Chinese doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2016.10.007Wang Qian, Hu Jun, Tu Baofeng, et al. Method of variable camber inlet guide vanes design on core driven fan stage[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2016, 37(10): 1855-1859. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2016.10.007 [10] 段耒. 椭圆形前缘对压气机静叶性能影响的研究[D]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2018. Duan Lei. Effect of elliptical leading edge on the aerodynamic performance of compressor static blade[D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2018. (in ChineseDuan Lei. Effect of elliptical leading edge on the aerodynamic performance of compressor static blade[D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2018. (in Chinese) [11] Goodhand M N, Miller R J. Compressor leading edge spikes: a new performance criterion[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2011, 133(2): 021006. doi: 10.1115/1.4000567 [12] 宋寅, 顾春伟. 曲率连续的压气机叶片前缘设计方法[J]. 推进技术, 2013, 34(11): 1474-1481. Song Yin, Gu Chunwei. Continuous curvature leading edge of compressor blading[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2013, 34(11): 1474-1481. (in ChineseSong Yin, Gu Chunwei. Continuous curvature leading edge of compressor blading[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2013, 34(11): 1474-1481. (in Chinese) [13] 施恒涛, 刘宝杰, 于贤君. 基于多项式的曲率连续前缘造型方法及应用[J]. 航空动力学报, 2020, 35(2): 397-409. Shi Hengtao, Liu Baojie, Yu Xianjun. Polynomial-based continuous-curvature leading edge design method and its application[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2020, 35(2): 397-409. (in ChineseShi Hengtao, Liu Baojie, Yu Xianjun. Polynomial-based continuous-curvature leading edge design method and its application[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2020, 35(2): 397-409. (in Chinese) [14] 赵天铭, 侯杰萱, 柳阳威. 曲率连续造型方法对激波噪声的影响机理[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2023, 49(4): 922-931. Zhao Tianming, Hou Jiexuan, Liu Yangwei. Influence mechanism of continuous curvature shaping method on buzz-saw noise[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2023, 49(4): 922-931. (in Chinese doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2021.0342Zhao Tianming, Hou Jiexuan, Liu Yangwei. Influence mechanism of continuous curvature shaping method on buzz-saw noise[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2023, 49(4): 922-931. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2021.0342 [15] 辛建池, 刘向阳, 田志涛, 等. 前缘开槽对可调导叶气动性能的影响[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2024, 45(7): 1338-1345. Xin Jianchi, Liu Xiangyang, Tian Zhitao, et al. Effect of leading edge slotting on aerodynamic performance of variable inlet guide vanes[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2024, 45(7): 1338-1345. (in Chinese doi: 10.11990/jheu.202204016Xin Jianchi, Liu Xiangyang, Tian Zhitao, et al. Effect of leading edge slotting on aerodynamic performance of variable inlet guide vanes[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2024, 45(7): 1338-1345. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11990/jheu.202204016 [16] 雷鹏, 金东海, 桂幸民. 前后可调变弯度导叶在高负荷风扇中的应用[J]. 航空动力学报, 2019, 34(1): 177-188. Lei Peng, Jin Donghai, Gui Xingmin. Application of variable inlet guide vane with adjustable front and back vane parts in highly loaded fan[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2019, 34(1): 177-188. (in ChineseLei Peng, Jin Donghai, Gui Xingmin. Application of variable inlet guide vane with adjustable front and back vane parts in highly loaded fan[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2019, 34(1): 177-188. (in Chinese) [17] De Boor C, Höllig K, Sabin M. High accuracy geometric Hermite interpolation[J]. Computer Aided Geometric Design, 1987, 4(4): 269-278. doi: 10.1016/0167-8396(87)90002-1 [18] 刘宝杰, 徐晓斌, 于贤君, 等. CDA叶型前缘流动的实验和数值研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2019, 40(8): 1767-1774. Liu Baojie, Xu Xiaobin, Yu Xianjun, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation on the flow near the leading-edge of controlled diffusion airfoil[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2019, 40(8): 1767-1774. (in ChineseLiu Baojie, Xu Xiaobin, Yu Xianjun, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation on the flow near the leading-edge of controlled diffusion airfoil[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2019, 40(8): 1767-1774. (in Chinese) [19] Shi Hengtao, Liu Baojie, Yu Xianjun. Criteria for designing low-loss and wide operation range variable inlet guide vanes[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 80: 177-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.07.015 [20] Denton J D. The 1993 IGTI scholar lecture: loss mechanisms in turbomachines[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1993, 115(4): 621-656. doi: 10.1115/1.2929299 -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 497
- HTML浏览量: 214
- PDF量: 40
- 被引次数: 0