留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

非均匀来流下喷注方案对超声速燃烧室燃烧特性影响研究

张冬青 裴崇志 时文 杨志伟 李季

张冬青, 裴崇志, 时文, 等. 非均匀来流下喷注方案对超声速燃烧室燃烧特性影响研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2026, 41(10):20250286 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20250286
引用本文: 张冬青, 裴崇志, 时文, 等. 非均匀来流下喷注方案对超声速燃烧室燃烧特性影响研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2026, 41(10):20250286 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20250286
Zhang Dongqing, Pei Chongzhi, Shi Wen, et al. Impact of fuel injection schemes on combustion characteristics in supersonic combustors with non-symmetric inflow[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2026, 41(10):20250286 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20250286
Citation: Zhang Dongqing, Pei Chongzhi, Shi Wen, et al. Impact of fuel injection schemes on combustion characteristics in supersonic combustors with non-symmetric inflow[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2026, 41(10):20250286 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20250286

非均匀来流下喷注方案对超声速燃烧室燃烧特性影响研究

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20250286
基金项目: 冲压发动机技术全国重点实验室资助项目(WDZC6142703202404)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    张冬青(1989-),男,副研究员,博士,主要从事高超声速推进技术研究。E-mail:dongqing202203@163.com

    通讯作者:

    裴崇志(1992-),男,助理研究员,硕士,主要从事高超声速推进技术研究。E-mail:1641066180@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: V231.1

Impact of fuel injection schemes on combustion characteristics in supersonic combustors with non-symmetric inflow

  • 摘要:

    针对一种S形隔离段-超声速燃烧室构型开展了不同喷注方案下的燃烧流场数值模拟研究,并与作为基准的等直隔离段-超声速燃烧室进行了对比,分析了S形隔离段对燃烧特性影响及隔离段内的反压前传过程,比较了不同构型和喷注方案的燃烧室冷态流场,燃烧流场与燃烧性能。研究结果表明:冷态条件下,S形隔离段对燃料的混合特性影响不大;但在燃烧条件下,强耦合的非线性系统会放大来流的非对称程度,进而造成燃烧场非均匀程度极具变化,同时降低了燃烧效率,由82%下降到65%。针对燃烧条件下的非均匀来流,优化了喷注方案,结合支板喷注,在燃烧室壁面增加了额外的喷注位置,提高了燃烧场的均匀性与燃烧效率。燃烧室的出口燃烧效率由65%达到了85%,总温分布系数由64%下降到26%,达到了均匀来流下的燃烧效率和燃烧场均匀程度。

     

  • 图 1  方案1构型示意图

    Figure 1.  Configuration diagram of Case 1

    图 2  方案2构型示意图

    Figure 2.  Configuration diagram of Case 2

    图 3  两种喷注方案示意图

    Figure 3.  Schematic diagram of two injection schemes

    图 4  计算的壁面压力与试验结果对比[19]

    Figure 4.  Comparison between calculated wall pressure and experimental results[19]

    图 5  计算网格

    Figure 5.  Computational mesh

    图 6  网格无关性验证

    Figure 6.  Mesh independence verification

    图 7  方案1马赫数云图及流线图(对称面)

    Figure 7.  Mach number map and streamline diagram(symmetry plane) of Case 1

    图 8  方案1静温云图(对称面)

    Figure 8.  Static temperature map (symmetry plane) of Case 1

    图 9  方案1静压云图(对称面)

    Figure 9.  Static temperature map (symmetry plane) of Case 1

    图 10  方案1煤油质量分数云图(对称面)

    Figure 10.  Kerosene mass fraction map (symmetry plane) of Case 1

    图 11  方案1煤油质量分数云图(不同轴向位置)

    Figure 11.  Kerosene mass fraction map (different axial positions) of Case 1

    图 12  方案2马赫数云图及流线图(对称面)

    Figure 12.  Mach number map and streamline diagram(symmetry plane) of Case 2

    图 13  方案2静温云图(对称面)

    Figure 13.  Static temperature map (symmetry plane) of Case 2

    图 14  方案2静压云图(对称面)

    Figure 14.  Static temperature map (symmetry plane) of Case 2

    图 15  方案2 煤油质量分数云图(对称面)

    Figure 15.  Kerosene mass fraction map (symmetry plane) of Case 2

    图 16  方案2 煤油质量分数云图(不同轴向位置)

    Figure 16.  Kerosene mass fraction map (different axial positions) of Case 2

    图 17  弯曲隔离段出口静压云图

    Figure 17.  Static pressure map at the outlet of the curved isolation section

    图 18  弯曲隔离段出口静温云图

    Figure 18.  Static temperature map at the outlet of the curved isolation section

    图 19  弯曲隔离段出口轴向速度云图

    Figure 19.  Axial velocity map at the outlet of the curved isolation section

    图 20  两种方案混合效率对比

    Figure 20.  Comparison of mixing efficiency between two configurations

    图 21  方案1 燃烧状态静压云图(对称面)

    Figure 21.  Static pressure map of combustion state (symmetry plane) of Case 1

    图 22  方案1 燃烧状态静温云图(对称面)

    Figure 22.  Static temperature map of combustion state (symmetry plane) of Case 1

    图 23  方案1 燃烧状态马赫数云图(对称面)

    Figure 23.  Mach number map of combustion state (symmetry plane) of Case 1

    图 24  方案1 燃烧状态不同轴向位置截面总温云图

    Figure 24.  Total temperature map at different axial positions of combustion state of Case 1

    图 25  方案2 燃烧状态静压云图(对称面)

    Figure 25.  Static pressure map of combustion state (symmetry plane) of Case 2

    图 26  方案2 燃烧状态静温云图(对称面)

    Figure 26.  Static temperature map of combustion state (symmetry plane) of Case 2

    图 27  方案2 燃烧状态马赫数云图(对称面)

    Figure 27.  Mach number map of combustion state (symmetry plane) of Case 2

    图 28  方案2 燃烧状态不同轴向位置截面总温云图

    Figure 28.  Total temperature map at different axial positions of combustion state of Case 2

    图 29  S型隔离段在不同反压作用下的流动分离情况

    Figure 29.  Flow separation of S-shaped isolation section under different back pressures

    图 30  S型隔离段在不同反压作用下马赫数云图

    Figure 30.  Mach number map of S-shaped isolation section under different back pressures

    图 31  喷注支板附近燃料穿透情况

    Figure 31.  Fuel penetration near the injection support plate

    图 32  方案3 燃烧状态静压云图(对称面)

    Figure 32.  Static pressure map of combustion state(symmetry plane) of Case 3

    图 33  方案3 燃烧状态静温云图(对称面)

    Figure 33.  Static temperature map of combustion state (symmetry plane) of Case 3

    图 34  方案3 燃烧状态马赫数云图(对称面)

    Figure 34.  Mach number map of combustion state(symmetry plane) of Case 3

    图 35  方案3 燃烧状态不同轴向位置截面总温云图

    Figure 35.  Total temperature map at different axial positions of combustion state of Case 3

    表  1  燃烧室构型几何特征

    Table  1.   Geometric characteristics of combustion chamber configuration

    几何参数 方案1 方案 2
    L1/D1 6.0 6.0
    L2/D1 2.0 2.0
    L3/D1 2.0 2.0
    D1/D1 1.0 1.0
    D2/D1 1.0 1.0
    D3/D1 1.7 1.7
    D4/D1 1.3 1.3
    D5/D1 1.7 1.7
    H/D1 0.3
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  飞行马赫数6对应的隔离段进口参数

    Table  2.   Isolation section inlet parameters corresponding to flight Mach 6

    隔离段进口参数 数值
    Mai 2.8
    T/K 700
    p/kPa 51
    Tt/K 1600
    pt/MPa 1.49
    Tf/K 300
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  燃烧室出口燃烧效率和总温分布系数

    Table  3.   Combustion efficiency and total temperature distribution coefficient at the outlet of the combustion chamber %

    方案 ηc FOTD
    1 82 31
    2 65 64
    3 85 26
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Gusev V, Blagoveshchenskij N, Zadonskij S. The integration of a hypersonic vehicle airframe with an airbreathing engine[R]. AIAA 1993-5034, 1993.
    [2] Lockwood M K, Petley D H, Hunt J L, et al. Airbreathing hypersonic vehicle design and analysis methods[J]. Progress in Aerospace Science, 1999(35): 1-32. doi: 10.2514/6.1996-381
    [3] Gruber M, Hagenmaier M, Mathur T. Simulating inlet distortion effects in a direct-connect scramjet combustor[R]. AIAA 2006-4680, 2006.
    [4] Ombrello T, Peltier S, Carter C D. Effects of inlet distortion on cavity ignition in supersonic flow[R]. AIAA-2015-0882, 2015.
    [5] Etheridge S, Lee J G, Carter C, et al. Effect of flow distortion on fuel/air mixing and combustion in an upstream-fueled cavity flameholder for a supersonic combustor[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2017, 88: 461-471. doi: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2017.06.013
    [6] Mcgann B, Lee T, Ombrello T, et al. Inlet distortion effects on fuel distribution and ignition in scramjet cavity flameholder[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2019, 35(3): 601-613. doi: 10.2514/1.B37204
    [7] Choi J Y, Ma Fuhua, Yang V. Combustion oscillations in a scramjet engine combustor with transverse fuel injection[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2005, 30(2): 2851-2858. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.250
    [8] Jin Liang, Lei Jing, Huang Wei, et al. Numerical investigation on hydrogen combustion in a scramjet with 3D sidewall compression inlet[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2014, 105(1): 298-310. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2014.09.008
    [9] Mai T, Sakimitsu Y, Nakamura H, et al. Effect of the incident shock wave interacting with transversal jet flow on the mixing and combustion[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2011, 33(2): 2335-2342. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2010.07.056
    [10] 丁猛, 梁剑寒, 刘卫东, 等. 碳氢燃料超燃冲压发动机进气道与燃烧室匹配性能试验研究[J]. 航空学报, 2005, 26(1): 27-31. Ding Meng, Liang Jianhan, Liu Weidong, et al. Experimental study on the interaction between inlet and combustor of hydrocarbon fueled scramjet[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2005, 26(1): 27-31. (in Chinese doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6893.2005.01.006

    Ding Meng, Liang Jianhan, Liu Weidong, et al. Experimental study on the interaction between inlet and combustor of hydrocarbon fueled scramjet[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2005, 26(1): 27-31. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6893.2005.01.006
    [11] 汤涛, 于江飞, 黄玉辉, 等. 圆截面超声速燃烧室乙烯燃料喷注火焰结构和模式分析[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(11): 528880. Tang Tao, Yu Jiangfei, Huang Yuhui, et al. Analysis of structure and regime of ethylene fuel injection flame in circular-section supersonic combustor [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(11): 528880. (in Chinese

    Tang Tao, Yu Jiangfei, Huang Yuhui, et al. Analysis of structure and regime of ethylene fuel injection flame in circular-section supersonic combustor [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(11): 528880. (in Chinese)
    [12] Tang Tao, Wang Zhenguo, Yu Jiangfei, et al. Investigation of multi-scale flow structures and combustion characteristics in a cavity-enhanced circular scramjet[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2024, 264: 113431. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2024.113431
    [13] Tang Tao, Sun Mingbo, Yan Bo, et al. Flow structures and combustion regimes in an axisymmetric scramjet combustor with high Reynolds number[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2024, 1000: A3. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2024.827
    [14] Yan Bo, Sun Mingbo, Tang Tao, et al. Flameholding characteristics of a circular scramjet combustor with an asymmetric supersonic inflow[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2024, 40(1/2/3/4): 105306. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2024.105306
    [15] Barth J E, Wise D J, Wheatley V, et al. Tailored fuel injection for performance enhancement in a Mach 12 scramjet engine[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2019, 35(1): 72-86. doi: 10.2514/1.B36794
    [16] 潘余, 王振国. 激波对超声速流中横向射流的影响[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学 , 2007. Pan Yu, Wang Zhenguo. The effects of shock waves on transverse jets in supersonic flows [D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2007. (in Chinese

    Pan Yu, Wang Zhenguo. The effects of shock waves on transverse jets in supersonic flows [D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2007. (in Chinese)
    [17] Blazek J. Computational fluid dynamics: principles and applications[M]. 2nd ed. Amsterdam; Oxford: Elsevier Science, 2005.
    [18] Franzelli B, Riber E, Sanjosé M, et al. A two-step chemical scheme for kerosene–air premixed flames[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2010, 157(7): 1364-1373. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.03.014
    [19] Zhang Dongqing, Song Wenyan. Experimental study of cone-struts and cavity flameholders in a kerosene-fueled round scramjet combustor[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2017, 139: 24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.06.025
    [20] 高桂雲. 并联凹腔超声速燃烧室中的火焰不稳定机理研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2018. Gao Jiayun. Study on mechanism of flame instability in supersonic combustor with parallel cavities [D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2018. (in Chinese

    Gao Jiayun. Study on mechanism of flame instability in supersonic combustor with parallel cavities [D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2018. (in Chinese)
    [21] 高天运. 超声速扩张流道内分离区不稳定问题研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2015. Gao Tianyun. Study on instability of separation region in supersonic diverging channel [D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2015. (in Chinese

    Gao Tianyun. Study on instability of separation region in supersonic diverging channel [D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2015. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中
图(35) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  105
  • HTML浏览量:  75
  • PDF量:  9
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-06-15
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-07-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回