留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

旋流器仿生叶片对流场特征的调控机制数值计算

班润泽 董林 李鹿辉 彭海涛 戴今 孙磊 魏静文

班润泽, 董林, 李鹿辉, 等. 旋流器仿生叶片对流场特征的调控机制数值计算[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 41(X):20250335 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20250335
引用本文: 班润泽, 董林, 李鹿辉, 等. 旋流器仿生叶片对流场特征的调控机制数值计算[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 41(X):20250335 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20250335
BAN Runze, DONG Lin, RINOSHIKA Akira, et al. Numerical simulation of flow-field regulation mechanisms in swirlers via bionic blades[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 41(X):20250335 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20250335
Citation: BAN Runze, DONG Lin, RINOSHIKA Akira, et al. Numerical simulation of flow-field regulation mechanisms in swirlers via bionic blades[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 41(X):20250335 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20250335

旋流器仿生叶片对流场特征的调控机制数值计算

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20250335
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金重点项目(12232002); 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金(12002199); 国家自然科学基金面上项目(12072017)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    班润泽(1998-),男,硕士生,研究领域为航空发动机燃烧室孔系与旋流器。E-mail:www.woshiban@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    董林(1985-),女,副教授,博士,研究领域为航空发动机燃烧室旋流控制等。E-mail:donglin16@163.com

  • 中图分类号: V231.2

Numerical simulation of flow-field regulation mechanisms in swirlers via bionic blades

  • 摘要:

    新型旋流器研发是提升燃烧室贫油熄火边界、优化典型工作工况中火焰稳定性的关键突破口。基于数值计算方法系统研究了一种融合翼果仿生特征的双级反向旋流器在燃烧室冷态流场中的特性演化规律,通过解析主燃级与值班级叶片设计类型对中心回流区的调控机制,揭示了不同叶片组合及后缘厚度变化对冷态流场的拓扑特征影响规律。结果显示:主燃级与值班级的叶片组合方案显著影响中心回流区涡核范围与速度分布,当叶片后缘削薄率为40%~60%临界值时,涡核区域面积及回流速度的增长率随削薄率增加呈非线性衰减趋势,但仍维持正相关性。其中,当主燃级叶片采用仿生设计时,有助于扩大涡核区域并提高回流速度,对中心回流区的影响范围集中于0.3≤x/D≤1.2与−0.3≤z/D≤0.3的空间区域;值班级叶片为仿生设计时,对涡心区域的扩展产生增强效应。

     

  • 图 1  双级旋流器模型与剖视图

    Figure 1.  Sectional view and two-stage counter-rotating swirler model

    图 2  旋流叶片引入翼果外形特征设计示意图

    Figure 2.  Schematic diagram of swirler blade improvement

    图 3  带仿生叶片的双级反向旋流器3D打印实物模型

    Figure 3.  3D-printed physical prototype of a dual-stage counter-swirling bionic-blade assembly

    图 4  流体域网格划分示意图

    Figure 4.  Computational grid generation for fluid region

    图 5  不同网格数目对应的轴向速度

    Figure 5.  Axial velocities corresponding to different numbers of grids

    图 6  y=0 mm截面轴向速度vx/u云图

    Figure 6.  Contours of axial velocity vx/u at y=0 mm section

    图 7  数值计算与 PIV 数据的中心线轴向速度对比分析

    Figure 7.  Comparative analysis of numerical calculations and PIV data for centerline axial velocity

    图 8  涡核区域示意图

    Figure 8.  Schematic diagram of the vortex core region

    图 9  不同叶片组合方案在x-z截面轴向速度云图

    Figure 9.  Axial velocity contours of different blade combination schemes in the x-z section

    图 10  不同方案中心轴线处的平均速度分布

    Figure 10.  Average velocity distribution at the central axes of different schemes

    图 11  不同方案中燃烧室头部轴向速度云图

    Figure 11.  Axial velocity contours of the combustion chamber head in different schemes

    图 12  不同方案对应的X-Z截面轴向平均速度分布云图

    Figure 12.  Contour plots of axial velocity distribution on the X-Z sections for different schemes

    图 13  各仿生方案中心线处的轴向速度分布及其局部放大图

    Figure 13.  Axial velocity distribution at the centerline of each bionic scheme and its local magnified images

    图 14  y-z平面下x/D=0.82处轴向时均速度vx/u分布云图

    Figure 14.  Contours of the axial velocity vx/u distribution at x/D=0.82 in the y-z section

    图 15  不同仿生方案的涡心周向中心线上轴向速度分布

    Figure 15.  Axial velocity distribution on the circumferential center line of the vortex core in different bionic schemes

    图 16  各方案回流速度3D等值面结构分布图

    Figure 16.  Three-dimensional iso-surface characterization of reflux velocity structures for different schemes

    表  1  翼果静态特征测量参数

    Table  1.   Static characteristic measurement parameters of samaras

    参数数值
    叶弦长度/mm20
    后缘厚度/mm0.2
    前缘厚度/mm0.5
    叶凹凸幅度/mm0.15
    叶凹凸高度/mm0.18
    翼果质量/mg49
    叶脉数量48
    叶片宽度/mm7.5
    叶片长度/mm16
    果实长度/mm8
    果实厚度/mm3.5
    前后缘厚度差/mm0.3
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  叶片组合方案

    Table  2.   Blade combination scheme

    组合
    方案
    叶片类型 旋流数
    值班级
    叶片
    主燃级
    叶片
    值班级
    叶片
    主燃级
    叶片
    标准方案 S S 0.6830 1.3379
    Bio-A B S 0.6830 1.2356
    Bio-B S B 0.6359 1.3379
    Bio-C B B 0.6359 1.2356
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  仿生叶片后缘厚度分配方案

    Table  3.   Thickness distribution scheme of the trailing edge of bionic blades

    分配
    方案
    叶片类型 最大削薄量/mm
    值班级 主燃级 前缘厚度 后缘厚度
    方案A B B 1.5 0.6
    方案B B B 1.5 0.9
    方案C B B 1.5 1.2
    方案D S S 1.5 1.5
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  不同方案主燃级和值班级对应旋流数

    Table  4.   Corresponding swirl numbers for the main stage and the Pilot stage in different schemes

    分配方案旋流数Sn
    值班级叶片主燃级叶片
    方案A0.62681.2222
    方案B0.64511.2592
    方案C0.66381.2977
    方案D0.68301.3379
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 金如山, 索建秦. 先进燃气轮机燃烧室[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2016. JIN Rushan, SUO Jianqin. Advanced gas turbine combustor[M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2016. (in Chinese

    JIN Rushan, SUO Jianqin. Advanced gas turbine combustor[M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2016. (in Chinese)
    [2] 林宇震, 许全宏, 刘高恩. 燃气轮机燃烧室[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2008: 40. LIN Yuzhen, XU Quanhong, LIU Gaoen. Gas turbine combustor[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2008: 40. (in Chinese

    LIN Yuzhen, XU Quanhong, LIU Gaoen. Gas turbine combustor[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2008: 40. (in Chinese)
    [3] DHANUKA S K, TEMME J E, DRISCOLL J F, et al. Vortex-shedding and mixing layer effects on periodic flashback in a lean premixed prevaporized gas turbine combustor[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2009, 32(2): 2901-2908.
    [4] HADEF R, LENZE B. Effects of co- and counter-swirl on the droplet characteristics in a spray flame[J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 2008, 47(12): 2209-2217.
    [5] BEÉR J M, CHIGIER N A. Combustion Aerodynamics[M]. London: Applied Science Publishers Limited, 1972.
    [6] SCHMID P J. Nonmodal stability theory[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2007, 39: 129-162.
    [7] BULAT G, JONES W P, NAVARRO-MARTINEZ S. Large eddy simulations of isothermal confined swirling flow in an industrial gas-turbine[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2015, 51: 50-64.
    [8] 党新宪, 赵坚行, 张欣, 等. 应用PIV技术测试模型环形燃烧室流场[J]. 航空动力学报, 2009, 24(7): 1470-1475. DANG Xinxian, ZHAO Jianxing, ZHANG Xin, et al. Measurements of the flow fields in a model annular combustor using particle image velocimetry[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2009, 24(7): 1470-1475. (in Chinese doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2009.07.007

    DANG Xinxian, ZHAO Jianxing, ZHANG Xin, et al. Measurements of the flow fields in a model annular combustor using particle image velocimetry[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2009, 24(7): 1470-1475. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2009.07.007
    [9] 李乐, 李前东, 朱鹏飞, 等. 旋流器关键参数对双旋流冷态流场特性的影响[J]. 推进技术, 2022, 43(5): 210189. LI Le, LI Qiandong, ZHU Pengfei, et al. Effects of key parameters of swirler on non-reaction flow field characteristics generated by double-swirler[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2022, 43(5): 210189. (in Chinese doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.210189

    LI Le, LI Qiandong, ZHU Pengfei, et al. Effects of key parameters of swirler on non-reaction flow field characteristics generated by double-swirler[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2022, 43(5): 210189. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.210189
    [10] 韩启祥, 许铁军, 黄健. 双旋流器单头部模型燃烧室冷态流场试验[J]. 航空动力学报, 2008, 23(8): 1370-1374. HAN Qixiang, XU Tiejun, HUANG Jian. Experimental study of flow field of a model combustor with two swirlers[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2008, 23(8): 1370-1374. (in Chinese doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2008.08.018

    HAN Qixiang, XU Tiejun, HUANG Jian. Experimental study of flow field of a model combustor with two swirlers[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2008, 23(8): 1370-1374. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2008.08.018
    [11] 顾大鹏, 胡文成, 窦义涛. 基于PIV技术的双旋流燃烧室冷态流场测量[J]. 航空发动机, 2019, 45(5): 87-92. GU Dapeng, HU Wencheng, DOU Yitao. Measurements of two-stage swirler combustor cold flow field based on PIV technology[J]. Aeroengine, 2019, 45(5): 87-92. (in Chinese doi: 10.13477/j.cnki.aeroengine.2019.05.016

    GU Dapeng, HU Wencheng, DOU Yitao. Measurements of two-stage swirler combustor cold flow field based on PIV technology[J]. Aeroengine, 2019, 45(5): 87-92. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13477/j.cnki.aeroengine.2019.05.016
    [12] 曾青华, 孔文俊, 艾育华, 等. 旋流器结构对贫油直喷燃烧室的性能影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2014, 29(8): 1775-1781. ZENG Qinghua, KONG Wenjun, AI Yuhua, et al. Effects of swirler structure on the performance of lean-direct-injection combustor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014, 29(8): 1775-1781. (in Chinese doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2014.08.003

    ZENG Qinghua, KONG Wenjun, AI Yuhua, et al. Effects of swirler structure on the performance of lean-direct-injection combustor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014, 29(8): 1775-1781. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2014.08.003
    [13] 陈炫午, 曾青华, 甘晓华. 航空发动机高温升燃烧室技术分析[J]. 推进技术, 2023, 44(2): 2208054. CHEN Xuanwu, ZENG Qinghua, GAN Xiaohua. Analysis of combustion technology of high temperature rise for aero engines[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2023, 44(2): 2208054. (in Chinese doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2208054

    CHEN Xuanwu, ZENG Qinghua, GAN Xiaohua. Analysis of combustion technology of high temperature rise for aero engines[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2023, 44(2): 2208054. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2208054
    [14] 于涵, 索建秦, 朱鹏飞, 等. 中心分级贫油直喷(LDI)燃烧室流动及污染排放特性研究[J]. 西北工业大学学报, 2018, 36(5): 816-823. YU Han, SUO Jianqin, ZHU Pengfei, et al. The characteristic of flow field and emissions of a concentric staged lean direct injection(LDI) combustor[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2018, 36(5): 816-823. (in Chinese doi: 10.1051/jnwpu/20183650816

    YU Han, SUO Jianqin, ZHU Pengfei, et al. The characteristic of flow field and emissions of a concentric staged lean direct injection(LDI) combustor[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2018, 36(5): 816-823. (in Chinese) doi: 10.1051/jnwpu/20183650816
    [15] 赵自强, 何小民, 丁国玉, 等. 外旋流器旋流数对三级旋流流场特性的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2017, 32(2): 306-313. ZHAO Ziqiang, HE Xiaomin, DING Guoyu, et al. Effects of outer swirl number on flow characteristics of triple-swirlers[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(2): 306-313. (in Chinese

    ZHAO Ziqiang, HE Xiaomin, DING Guoyu, et al. Effects of outer swirl number on flow characteristics of triple-swirlers[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(2): 306-313. (in Chinese)
    [16] 许昕婷, 曾文, 刘凯, 等. 双级轴向旋流燃烧室流场特性的试验测试与数值计算[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(10): 20230776. XU Xinting, ZENG Wen, LIU Kai, et al. Experimental testing and numerical calculation of flow field characteristics in a double stage axial swirl combustor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(10): 20230776. (in Chinese doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230776

    XU Xinting, ZENG Wen, LIU Kai, et al. Experimental testing and numerical calculation of flow field characteristics in a double stage axial swirl combustor[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(10): 20230776. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230776
    [17] 胡建, 郑婷婷, 胡好生, 等. 双级旋流器偏心对出口流场影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2020, 35(7): 1447-1456. HU Jian, ZHENG Tingting, HU Haosheng, et al. Double-swirler misalignment effect on outlet flow field[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2020, 35(7): 1447-1456. (in Chinese doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2020.07.012

    HU Jian, ZHENG Tingting, HU Haosheng, et al. Double-swirler misalignment effect on outlet flow field[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2020, 35(7): 1447-1456. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2020.07.012
    [18] 蒋尧, 胡建, 胡好生. 偏心对双级旋流器出口流场影响数值模拟[J]. 航空动力学报, 2015, 30(12): 2919-2924. JIANG Yao, HU Jian, HU Haosheng. Numerical simulation on the effect of misalignment on outlet flow field of double-swirler[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2015, 30(12): 2919-2924. (in Chinese doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2015.12.015

    JIANG Yao, HU Jian, HU Haosheng. Numerical simulation on the effect of misalignment on outlet flow field of double-swirler[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2015, 30(12): 2919-2924. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2015.12.015
    [19] 汤姣. 双级径向叶片式涡流器优化设计及试验研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2017. TANG Jiao. Optimize design and experimental study the dual-stage radial vanes swirler[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2017. (in Chinese

    TANG Jiao. Optimize design and experimental study the dual-stage radial vanes swirler[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2017. (in Chinese)
    [20] 马德鹏, 王建鑫, 李江恒, 等. 旋流器结构参数对高温升燃烧室性能的影响[J]. 应用科技, 2022, 49(4): 119-128. MA Depeng, WANG Jianxin, LI Jiangheng, et al. Study on the influence of swirler structure parameters on the performance of a high temperature rising combustor[J]. Applied Science and Technology, 2022, 49(4): 119-128. (in Chinese doi: 10.11991/yykj.202204023

    MA Depeng, WANG Jianxin, LI Jiangheng, et al. Study on the influence of swirler structure parameters on the performance of a high temperature rising combustor[J]. Applied Science and Technology, 2022, 49(4): 119-128. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11991/yykj.202204023
    [21] SCHAEFFER B M, TRUMAN S S, TRUSCOTT T T, et al. Maple samara flight is robust to morphological perturbation and united by a classic drag model[J]. Communications Biology, 2024, 7: 248. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-05913-3
    [22] EZRA Z, LEVAVI L, BAR-ON B. The load-bearing mechanism of plant wings: a multiscale structural and mechanical analysis of the T. tipu samara[J]. Acta Biomaterialia, 2023, 158: 423-434.
    [23] KELLAS A D. The guided samara: design and development of a controllable single-bladed autorotating vehicle[D]. Cambridge, US: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007.
    [24] 董林, 温国安, 雷紫薇, 等. 种子叶片自旋下落过程涡系的PIV实验研究[J]. 实验流体力学, 2021, 35(5): 54-60. DONG Lin, WEN Guoan, LEI Ziwei, et al. PIV experimental study on vortex structures induced by free autorotation fall of a samaras[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2021, 35(5): 54-60. (in Chinese doi: 10.11729/syltlx20200004

    DONG Lin, WEN Guoan, LEI Ziwei, et al. PIV experimental study on vortex structures induced by free autorotation fall of a samaras[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2021, 35(5): 54-60. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11729/syltlx20200004
    [25] ZHOU Yuyang, DONG Ling, SHANG Mingtao, et al. Tomographic particle image velocimetry measurement on three-dimensional swirling flow in dual-stage counter-rotating swirler[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(3): 7-20.
    [26] 丁明杰, 董林, 班润泽, 等. 双级旋流器仿生叶片影响流场形态的数值模拟研究[J]. 推进技术, 2025, 46(4): 2401005. DING Mingjie, DONG Lin, BAN Runze, et al. Numerical simulation study on flow field morphology influenced by bionic vanes of a dual-stage swirler[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2025, 46(4): 2401005. (in Chinese doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2401005

    DING Mingjie, DONG Lin, BAN Runze, et al. Numerical simulation study on flow field morphology influenced by bionic vanes of a dual-stage swirler[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2025, 46(4): 2401005. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2401005
    [27] CHIGIER N A, BEE´R J M. Velocity and static-pressure distributions in swirling air jets issuing from annular and divergent nozzles[J]. Journal of Basic Engineering, 1964, 86(4): 788-796. doi: 10.1115/1.3655954
    [28] 何小民, 张净玉, 韩启祥, 等. 航空发动机燃烧室原理[M]. 2版. 北京: 北京航空航天大学出版社, 2024. HE Xiaomin, ZHANG Jingyu, HAN Qixiang, et al. Principle of aero-engine combustion chamber[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Beijing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics Press, 2024. (in Chinese

    HE Xiaomin, ZHANG Jingyu, HAN Qixiang, et al. Principle of aero-engine combustion chamber[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Beijing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics Press, 2024. (in Chinese)
    [29] 彭云晖, 林宇震, 许全宏, 等. 双旋流空气雾化喷嘴喷雾、流动和燃烧性能[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(1): 1-14. PENG Yunhui, LIN Yuzhen, XU Quanhong, et al. Atomization, aerodynamics and combustion performance of swirl cup[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2008, 29(1): 1-14. (in Chinese

    PENG Yunhui, LIN Yuzhen, XU Quanhong, et al. Atomization, aerodynamics and combustion performance of swirl cup[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2008, 29(1): 1-14. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中
图(16) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  413
  • HTML浏览量:  243
  • PDF量:  58
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-07-16
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-12-08

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回