阵风与叶栅干涉噪声的数值模拟

李晓东; 林大楷

阵风与叶栅干涉噪声的数值模拟

北京航空航天大学能源与动力工程学院, 北京 100083

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金资助(10472010);航空科学基金资助(03A51004)

计量
- 文章访问数: 1783
- HTML浏览量: 171
- PDF量: 432
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2005-03-25
- 修回日期: 2005-06-13
- 刊出日期: 2006-02-28

Numerical Simulation of Gust-Cascade Interaction Noise

School of Jet Propulsion, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, China

摘要

摘要: 采用计算气动声学方法求解二维线化欧拉方程对阵风与叶栅的干涉噪声进行了数值模拟。为减少频散和耗散误差,采用七点四阶频散相关保持有限差分格式进行空间离散;时间推进采用优化的4/6低频散低耗散龙格库塔法;在各边界处均选择或建立了适当的边界条件。首先通过模拟阵风在自由空间中的传播验证了无反射边界条件的可靠性;然后对阵风与平板叶栅的干涉问题进行了模拟,数值结果与精确解符合得很好;最后给出了阵风与NACA-0012翼型叶栅干涉的数值模拟结果,显示了数值求解方法的可行性。
- 航空、航天推进系统 /
- 阵风与叶栅干涉 /
- 计算气动声学 /
- 数值模拟 /
- 无反射边界条件
Abstract: The gust-cascade interaction noise was numerically simulated using computational aeroacoustics by solving the two-dimensional linearized Euler equations.In order to minimize the dispersion and dissipation errors,the dispersion-relation-preserving scheme was applied to perform the spatial discretion and the optimized 4/6 low-dissipation and low-dispersion Runge-Kutta scheme was used for the time integration.Appropriate boundary conditions were prescribed or established for various boundaries.The non-reflecting boundary conditions were firstly validated by simulating gust convection in the free space.Then the interaction noise due to the gust/flat-plate cascade was simulated.The numerical results agree well with exact solutions.Finally the numerical results of the noise from the gust/cascade(with NACA-0012 airfoil) interaction are presented which demonstrates the feasibility of the numerical procedure.
- aerospace propulsion system /
- gust-cascade interaction /
- computational aeroacoustics /
- numerical simulation /
- non-reflecting boundary conditions

HTML

参考文献(16)

[1]	Kaji S,Okazaki T.Generation of Sound by Rotor-Stator Interaction[J].Journal of Sound and Vibration,1970,3 (3);281～307.
[2]	Smith S N.Discrete Frequency Sound Generation in Axial Flow Turbomachines[R].Aeronautical Research Council R & M 3709,1972.
[3]	Whitehead D S.Vibration and Sound Generation in a Cascade of Flat Plates in Subsonic Flows[R].Aeronautical Research Council R & M 3685,1972.
[4]	Hall K C,Verdon J M.Gust Response Analysis for Cascades Operating in Nonuiform Mean Flows[J].AIAA Journal,1991,29;1463～1471.
[5]	Ni R H,Sisto F.Numerical Computation of Nonstationary Aerodynamics of Flat Plate Cascades in Compressible Flow[J].Journal of Engineering for Power,1976,98;165 ～ 170.
[6]	Hall K C,Clark W.Lineared Euler Predictions of Unsteady Aerodynamic Loads in Cascades[J].AIAA Journal,1993,31;540～550.
[7]	Lorence C B,Hall K C.Sensitivity Analysis of the Aeroacoustic Response of Turbomachinery Blade Rows[R].AIAA Paper 95-0166.
[8]	Lockard D P,Morris P J.A Parallel Simulation of Gust/Cascade Interaction Noise[R].2nd CAA workshop on Benchmark Problems,edited by Tam C K W and Hardin J C.,NASA CP-1997-3352; 279～ 287.
[9]	Hu F Q,Manthey J L.Application of PML Absorbing Boundary Conditions to the Benchmark Problems of Computational Aeroacoustics[R].2nd CAA workshop on Benchmark Problems,Edited by Tam C K W and Hardin J C.,NASA CP-1997-3352;119～151.
[10]	Hixon R,Shih S H,Mankbadi R R.Evaluation of Boundary Conditions for the Gust-Cascade Problem[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power,2000,16(1) ;72～78.
[11]	李晓东,高军辉.二维平行剪切层声波产生和辐射的数值模拟[J].航空学报,2003,24(1);6～9.LI Xiao-dong,GAO Jun-hui.Numerical Simulation of Sound Generation and Radiation from a 2D Parallel Shear Layer[J].ACTA Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2003,24(1);6～9.
[12]	Tam C K W,Webb J C.Dispersion-Relation-Preserving Finite Difference Schemes for Computational Acoustics[J].Journal of Computational Physics,1993,107 ; 262 ～ 281.
[13]	Tam C K W.Computational Aeroacoustics;Issues and Methods[J].AIAA Journal,1995,33 ; 1788～1796.
[14]	Hu F Q,Hussaini M Y,Manthey J L.Low-Dissipation and Low-Dispersion Runge-Kutta Schemes for Computational Acoustics[J].Journal of Computational Physics,1996,124 ;177～191.
[15]	Tam C K W,Dong Z.Wall Boundary Conditions for HighOrder Finite-Difference Schemes in Computational Aeroacoustics[J].Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics,1994,(6); 303～322.
[16]	Tam C K W,Hardin J C,Eds.Second Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA) Workshop on Benchmark Problems[R].NASA CP-1997-3352.