S弯扩压器中四种湍流模型的比较

张丽芬; 刘振侠; 吕亚国

S弯扩压器中四种湍流模型的比较

西北工业大学动力与能源学院, 西安 710072

计量
- 文章访问数: 1759
- HTML浏览量: 91
- PDF量: 459
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2007-10-15
- 修回日期: 2008-02-20
- 刊出日期: 2008-10-28

Comparison of four turbulence models in diffusing S-duct

School of Power and Energy, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China

摘要

摘要: 采用Realizable^κ-ε,S-A(Spalart-Allmaras),SST(Shear stress transport剪切应力输运),RSM(Reynolds stress equation model雷诺应力模型)四种湍流模型对S弯扩压器内的分离流动进行了模拟,分析了不同湍流模型对计算结果的影响.将不同轴向位置的表面压力系数、分离区的大小、马赫数等三个量的实验值与计算值进行了比较,结果表明:分离区湍流模型对表面压力分布影响较大,未分离区不同湍流模型模拟精度相当;S-A模型对分离区的模拟较保守,RSM模型对分离的模拟精度较高,SST与RSM模拟结果很接近;各湍流模型计算的高速区域均比实验值大.扩压器的平均总压恢复系数受湍流模型影响不大,和实验结果吻合较好.
- 湍流模型 /
- S弯扩压器 /
- Realizable^κ-ε /
- S-A(Spalart-Allmaras) /
- SST(Shear stress transport剪切应力输送) /
- RSM(Reynolds stressequation model雷诺应力模型)
Abstract: Four turbulence models: Realizable ^κ-ε,S-A(Spalart-Allmaras),SST(Shear stress transport) and RSM(Reynolds stress equation model),were compared by simulating separated flow in a diffusing S-duct.The numerical results show the capability of each turbulence model in dealing with separation.Before separation,the predicted results agree well with experiment for four models,but in separated region,the turbulence model has important effect in simulating separation.SST model is compared to RSM in simulating separation and pressure coefficient,however not as clearly as RSM.S-A model under predict the separation and the separated region is smaller than experiment.Mach number is higher than experimental data for four models.Pressure recoveries are similar for different models,and are within 0.7% agreement with experimental data.
- turbulence model /
- diffusing S-duct /
- Realizable^κ-ε /
- S-A(Spalart-Allmaras) /
- SST(Shear stress transport) /
- RSM(Reynolds stress equation model)

HTML

参考文献(12)

[1]	Ellington C P.The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight.Ⅱ.Morphological parameters[J].Phil Trans R Soc Lond.B,1984,305:17240.
[2]	Rayner J M V.A new app roach to animal flight mechanics[J].Exp.Biol.,1979,80:17 254.
[3]	Blake R W.Hovering performance of a negatively buoyant fish[J].Can.J.Zool.,1983,61:2629 22630.
[4]	Ellington C P.The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight.I.The quasi 2steady analysis[J].Phil.Trans.R.Soc. Lond.B.,1984,305:1215.
[5]	Weis2Fogh T.Flapping flight and power in birds and in2 sect s,conventional and novel mechanisms[J].Swimming and Flying in Nat ure,1975,12:7292762.
[6]	邵立民,宋笔锋,熊超,等.微型扑翼飞行器风洞试验初步研究[J].航空学报,2007,28(2):2752280.SHAO Limin,SON G Bifeng,XION G Chao,et al.Exper2imental investigation of flapping 2wing MAV in wind tunnel[J].Acta Aeronautica et Ast ronautica Sinica,2007,28(2):2752280.(in Chinese)
[7]	Liu H,Ellington C P,Kawachi K,et al.A co mp utational fluid dynamic st udy of hawkmot h hovering[J].Exp.Biol.,1998,201:461 2477.
[8]	孙茂,熊燕.微型飞行器的仿生力学———蜜蜂悬停飞行的动稳定性研究[J].航空学报,2005,26(4):3852391.SU N Mao,XION G Yan.Biomimetic mechanics of micro2 air vehicles—Dynamic flight stabilit y of a hovering honey2bee[J].Acta Aeronautica et Ast ronautica Sinica,2005,26(4):3852391.(in Chinese)
[9]	曾锐,昂海松.仿鸟复合振动的扑翼气动分析[J].南京航空航天大学学报,2003,35(1):6212.ZEN G Rui,AN G Haisong.Aerodynamic co mp utation of one flapping-Wing simulating bird wings[J].Acta of Nanjing Universit y of Aeronautics and Ast ronautics,2003,35(1):6212.(in Chinese)
[10]	DeLaurier J D.An aerodynamic model for flapping2wing flight[J].Aeronaut,1993,97:125 2130.
[11]	Wu J H,Sun M.Unsteady aerodynamic forces of a flap2ping wing[J].Exp.Biol.,2004,207:141321427.
[12]	Combes S A,Daniel T L.Shape,flapping and flexion:Wing and fin design for forward flight[J].The Journal ofExperimental Biology,2001,204:2073 22085.