留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

变工况下超高负荷低压涡轮叶片边界层被动控制

张波 李伟 卢新根 朱俊强

张波, 李伟, 卢新根, 朱俊强. 变工况下超高负荷低压涡轮叶片边界层被动控制[J]. 航空动力学报, 2012, 27(12): 2805-2813.
引用本文: 张波, 李伟, 卢新根, 朱俊强. 变工况下超高负荷低压涡轮叶片边界层被动控制[J]. 航空动力学报, 2012, 27(12): 2805-2813.
ZHANG Bo, LI Wei, LU Xin-gen, ZHU Jun-qiang. Ultra-high-lift low-pressure turbine blade boundary layer passive control in different flow conditions[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2012, 27(12): 2805-2813.
Citation: ZHANG Bo, LI Wei, LU Xin-gen, ZHU Jun-qiang. Ultra-high-lift low-pressure turbine blade boundary layer passive control in different flow conditions[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2012, 27(12): 2805-2813.

变工况下超高负荷低压涡轮叶片边界层被动控制

基金项目: 国际科技合作项目(2010DFB70620); 国家自然科学基金(51176187)

Ultra-high-lift low-pressure turbine blade boundary layer passive control in different flow conditions

  • 摘要: 以某超高负荷低压涡轮叶型为研究对象,利用数值模拟的方法通过改变来流雷诺数、自由来流湍流强度和攻角等工况,研究了其对叶片边界层特性的影响,并通过在叶片吸力面加凹槽、矩形拌线、圆形拌线等被动控制方式来改善叶型性能,结果表明:随着雷诺数的增大叶型损失逐渐降低;随着自由来流湍流强度的增加叶型损失先减小后增大;随着攻角向负攻角方向变大叶型损失先减小后增大,向正攻角方向变大时叶型损失迅速增大;在雷诺数和湍流强度变化时表面凹槽的控制方式较好,而攻角变化时加矩形拌线和圆形拌线的控制方式较好.3种被动控制方式促发转捩提前发生抑制分离泡,但都会引起湍流湿面积的增加.

     

  • [1] Paloma G,Mikel L,Victor O.Low pressure turbine design for Rolls-Royce trent 900 turbofan[R].ASME paper GT-2006-90997,2006.
    [2] Curtis J D,Hodson H P,Banieghbal M R,et al.Development of blade profiles for low-pressure turbine applications[J].ASME Journal of Turbomachinery,1997,119(3):531-538.
    [3] Bons J P,Sondergaard R,Rivir R B.Turbine separation control using pulsed vortex generator jets[J].ASME Journal of Turbomachinery,2001,123(2):198-206.
    [4] Bons J P,Sondergaard R,Rivir R B.The fluid dynamics of LPT blade separation control using pulsed jets[R].ASME paper GT-2001-0190,2001.
    [5] Volino R J.Separation control on low-pressure turbine airfoils using synthetic vortex generator jets[R].ASME Paper GT-2003-38729,2003.
    [6] Lake J P,King P I,Rivir R B.Low Reynolds number loss reduction on turbine blades with dimples and V-grooves[R].AIAA-2000-0738,2000.
    [7] Volino R J.Passive flow control on low-pressure turbine airfoils[R].ASME Paper GT-2003-38728,2003.
    [8] ZHANG Xuefeng,Vera M,Hodson H P,et al.Separation and transition control on an aft-loaded ultra-high-lift LP turbine blade at low Reynolds numbers:low-speed investigation[J].ASME Journal of Turbomachinery,2007,129(2):340-347.
    [9] ZHANG Xuefeng,Hodson H P.The combined effects of surface trips and unsteady wakes on the boundary layer development of an ultra-high-lift LP turbine blade[R].ASME Paper GT-2004-53081,2004.
    [10] ZHANG Xuefeng.Separation and transition control on ultra-high-lift low pressure turbine blades in unsteady flow[D].Cambridge:Cambridge University,2005.
    [11] Robarge T W,Stark A M,Min S K,et al.Design considerations for using indented surface treatments to control boundary layer separation[R].AIAA-2004-425,2004.
    [12] Menter F R,Langtry R B.A correlation-based transition model using local variables: Part Ⅰmodel formulation[R].ASME Paper GT-2004-53452,2004.
    [13] Langtry R B,Menter F R.A correlation-based transition model using local variables: Part Ⅱtest cases and industry applications[R].ASME Paper GT-2004-53454,2004.
    [14] 雷志军,王明杰,朱俊强.低速压气机叶栅吸力面附面层分离的实验研究[J].工程热物理学报,2008,29(11):1839-1843.LEI Zhijun,WANG Mingjie,ZHU Jun qiang.Experimental investigation on the suction surface boundary layer separation of a low-speed compressor cascade[J].Journal of Engineering Thermophysics,2008,29(11):1839-1843.(in Chinese)
    [15] Denton J D.Loss mechanisms in turbomachines[J].ASME Journal of Turbomachinery,1993,115(4):621-656.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1635
  • HTML浏览量:  90
  • PDF量:  1201
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2011-11-23
  • 刊出日期:  2012-12-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回