留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于临界面法的燕尾榫连接结构微动疲劳寿命预测

徐友良 崔海涛 陈伟

徐友良, 崔海涛, 陈伟. 基于临界面法的燕尾榫连接结构微动疲劳寿命预测[J]. 航空动力学报, 2013, 28(3): 489-493.
引用本文: 徐友良, 崔海涛, 陈伟. 基于临界面法的燕尾榫连接结构微动疲劳寿命预测[J]. 航空动力学报, 2013, 28(3): 489-493.
XU You-liang, CUI Hai-tao, CHEN Wei. Fretting fatigue life prediction based on critical plane approach for dovetail joint[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2013, 28(3): 489-493.
Citation: XU You-liang, CUI Hai-tao, CHEN Wei. Fretting fatigue life prediction based on critical plane approach for dovetail joint[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2013, 28(3): 489-493.

基于临界面法的燕尾榫连接结构微动疲劳寿命预测

Fretting fatigue life prediction based on critical plane approach for dovetail joint

  • 摘要: 以航空发动机叶片/轮盘之间的燕尾榫连接结构为研究对象,分析了燕尾榫连接结构接触应力与应变的变化.根据多轴疲劳临界损伤平面原理,在燕尾榫连接结构的微动疲劳寿命预测研究中引入多轴临界平面法的疲劳损伤参数CCB (Chu-Conle-Bonnen),FS (Fatemi-Socie),MSSR (modified shear stress rang)和SWT (Smith-Watson-Topper).将预测寿命与试验寿命进行对比,结果表明:在预测微动疲劳寿命时,4个参数中寿命预测的最大误差为23%,可较好地预测低周微动疲劳寿命.其中基于临界平面法的SWT参数预测误差最小,为1.23%;4个参数均预测裂纹萌生位置在接触区末端,与试验结果一致.在预测裂纹萌生角度上,FS,MSSR,SWT参数预测结果与试验较一致,CCB参数预测结果与试验结果相差较大.说明基于临界平面法的寿命预测模型具有较好的预测能力.

     

  • [1] Conner B P,Nicholas T.Using a dovetail fixture to study fretting fatigue and fretting palliatives[J].Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power,2006,128(1):133-141.
    [2] 古远兴, 温卫东, 崔海涛.高低周载荷作用下燕尾榫结构的微动疲劳寿命预测[J]. 推进技术, 2008, 29(2):240-243. GU Yuanxing,WEN Weidong,CUI Haitao.Fretting fatigue prediction of dovetail fixture under high cycle load and low cycle load[J].Journal of Propulsion Technology,2008,29(2):240-243.(in Chinese)
    [3] Golden P J,Calcaterra J R.A fracture mechanics life prediction methodology applied to dovetail fretting[J].Tribology International,2006,39(10):1172-1180.
    [4] Brown M W,Miller K J.A theory for fatigue failure under multiaxial stress and strain conditions[J].Proceedings of the Institute of Mechanical Engineers,1973,187(5):745-755.
    [5] 尚德广,王德俊.多轴疲劳强度[M].北京:科学出版社,2007.
    [6] Socie D F.Critical plane approaches for multiaxial fatigue damage assessment[C]//McDowell D L,Ellis R.Advances in multiaxial fatigue.Philadelphia,PA:ASTM,1993:7-36.
    [7] Fatemi A,Socie D F.A critical plane approach to multiaxial fatigue damage including out-of-phase loading[J].Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures,1988,11(3):149-165.
    [8] Namjoshi S A,Mall S,Jain V K,et al.Fretting fatigue crack initiation mechanism in Ti-6Al-4V[J].Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures,2002,25(10):955-964.
    [9] Lykins C D,Mall S, Jain V.A shear stress-based parameter for fretting fatigue crack initiation[J].Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures,2001,24(3):461-473.
    [10] Sabelkin V,Martinez S A,Mall S,et al.Effects of shot-peening intensity on fretting fatigue crack-initiation behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V[J].Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures,2005,28(2):321-332.
    [11] Smith K N,Watson P,Topper T H.A stress strain function for the fatigue of metals[J].Journal of Mechanics,1970,15(4):767-778.
    [12] Szolwinski M P,Harish G,Farris T N.Comparison of fretting fatigue crack nucleation experiments to multiaxial fatigue theory life predictions[C]//Proceedings of the ASME Symposium on High Cycle Fatigue,Dallas,US:[s.n.],1997:449-457.
    [13] Farris T N,Murthy H.High-temperature fretting fatigue of single-crystal nickel[R].AFRL-ML-WP-TR-2006-4081,2006.
    [14] 汪震.燕尾榫结构微动疲劳寿命可靠性分析研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2008. WANG Zhen.Fretting fatigue life reliability analysis of dove-tail fixture[D].Nanjing:Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2008.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1948
  • HTML浏览量:  133
  • PDF量:  1347
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-07-09
  • 刊出日期:  2013-03-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回