留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于表面“凹槽”与“陷窝”技术的低雷诺数涡轮流动损失控制

杨林 乔渭阳 母忠强 罗华玲 侯伟涛

杨林, 乔渭阳, 母忠强, 罗华玲, 侯伟涛. 基于表面“凹槽”与“陷窝”技术的低雷诺数涡轮流动损失控制[J]. 航空动力学报, 2013, 28(4): 893-902.
引用本文: 杨林, 乔渭阳, 母忠强, 罗华玲, 侯伟涛. 基于表面“凹槽”与“陷窝”技术的低雷诺数涡轮流动损失控制[J]. 航空动力学报, 2013, 28(4): 893-902.
YANG Lin, QIAO Wei-yang, MU Zhong-qiang, LUO Hua-ling, HOU Wei-tao. Flow loss control of turbine based on “groove” and “dimple” technology with low Reynolds number[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2013, 28(4): 893-902.
Citation: YANG Lin, QIAO Wei-yang, MU Zhong-qiang, LUO Hua-ling, HOU Wei-tao. Flow loss control of turbine based on “groove” and “dimple” technology with low Reynolds number[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2013, 28(4): 893-902.

基于表面“凹槽”与“陷窝”技术的低雷诺数涡轮流动损失控制

Flow loss control of turbine based on “groove” and “dimple” technology with low Reynolds number

  • 摘要: 分别基于“凹槽”和“陷窝”技术对低雷诺数条件下涡轮流动损失控制计算研究.对于“凹槽”技术,采用三维大涡模拟数值方法深入分析凹槽位置、雷诺数等因素对控制效果的影响,同时采用实验分析的方法针对陷窝流动控制技术展开了深入地研究.结果表明:①增大扰动波幅值或选择合适的扰动波频率均可获得明显的控制效果;②二维展向凹槽处理扮演着“扰动发生器”的角色;③三维球窝不但扮演着“扰动发生器”的作用,还扮演着“旋涡发生器”的角色.球窝尾流区内高频率的旋涡形成与脱落,不但产生了加强流动掺混所需的旋涡,也产生了促进分离泡转捩所需的扰动.

     

  • [1] Volino R J.Passive flow control on low-pressure turbine airfoils[J].ASME Journal of Turbomachinery,2003,125(4):754-764.
    [2] Bons J P,Sondergaard R,Rivir R B.Turbine separation control using pulsed vortex generator jets[J].ASME Journal of Turbomachinery,2001,123(2):198-206.
    [3] Bons J P,Sondergaard R,Rivir R B.Control of low pressure turbine separation using vortex generator jets [R].AIAA-1999-367,1999.
    [4] Volino R J.Separation control on low-pressure turbine airfoils using synthetic vortex generator jets[J].ASME Journal of Turbomachinery,2003,125(4):765-777.
    [5] Huang J H,Thomas C C,Thomas F O.Plasma actuators for separation control of low-pressure turbine blades [J].AIAA Journal,2006,44(7):1477-1487.
    [6] Suzen Y B, Huang P G.Simulations of flow separation control using plasma actuators [R].AIAA-2006-877,2006.
    [7] Bloxham M,Reimann D,Crapo K.Synchronizing separation flow control with unsteady wakes in a low-pressure turbine cascade[J].ASME Journal of Turbomachinery,2009,131(2):021019.
    [8] Chen F,Tang Y P,Chen M Z.An experimental investigation of loss reduction with riblets on cascade blade surface and isolated airfoils [R].ASME-1990-207,1990.
    [9] Lake J P, King P I, Rivir R B.Reduction of separation losses on a turbine blade with low Reynolds number [R].AIAA-1999-242,1999.
    [10] Lake J P,King P I,Rivir R B.Low Reynolds number loss reduction on turbine blades with dimples and V-grooves [R].AIAA-2000-738,2000.
    [11] Casey J P,King P I,Sonderaggrd R.Parameterization of boundary layer control dimples on a low pressure turbine blade [R].AIAA- 2004-3570,2004.
    [12] Howell R J,Ramesh O N,Hodson H P,et al.High lift and aft loaded profiles for low pressure turbines[J].Journal of Turbomachinery,2001,123(2):181-188.
    [13] Volino R J, Hultgren L S.Measurements in separated and transitional boundary layers under low-pressure turbine airfoil conditions[J].Journal of Turbomachinery,2001,123(2):189-197.
    [14] List J,Byerley A R,McLaughlin T E,et al.Using a plasma actuator to control laminar separation on a linear cascade turbine blade [R].AIAA -2003-1026,2003.
    [15] Luo H,Qiao W,Xu K.Investigation of mechanisms for separated flow transition control using surface grooves on a high-lift low-pressure turbine profile[J].Journal of Power and Energy,2009,223(7):873-886.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1403
  • HTML浏览量:  2
  • PDF量:  899
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-03-30
  • 刊出日期:  2013-04-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回