涡轮叶片多重精度MDO方法

王荣桥; 贾志刚; 胡殿印; 樊江; 申秀丽

涡轮叶片多重精度MDO方法

北京航空航天大学能源与动力工程学院, 北京 100191

计量
- 文章访问数: 1863
- HTML浏览量: 102
- PDF量: 1122
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2012-04-14
- 刊出日期: 2013-05-28

Multiple precision MDO strategy for turbine blade

School of Energy and Power Engineering, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191, China

摘要

摘要: 考虑到多学科优化设计(multidisciplinary design optimization,MDO)的效率和精度,充分发挥当前涡轮叶片各种精度分析方法的优势,提出了涡轮叶片的多重精度多学科优化设计策略.利用协同优化策略在学科解耦和协调方面的能力,引入包括流固紧密耦合分析、流固热松散耦合分析和近似方程在内的涡轮叶片设计中的多种精度模型,结合两点式标度函数和优化过程阶段性收敛后更新,改进可变复杂度建模方法处理多重精度模型的能力,研究结果表明:仅调用9次高精度流固耦合分析就能确保涡轮带冠叶片多学科优化设计的效率和精度.
- 多学科优化设计 /
- 可变复杂度建模 /
- 协同优化策略 /
- 涡轮 /
- 两点式标度函数
Abstract: Based on kinds of different precise analysis methods on the turbine design,the multiple precision strategy was put forward in order to balance the cost and the precision on turbine MDO.This strategy studied the variable complexity method (VCM) which was improved by the two-point scale function, the new updating technology and three kinds of precise models including the fluid-solid closely couple analysis,the fluid-solid-thermal loosely couple analysis and the approximate equation.The strategy solves the difficulty of disciplinary decoupling and coordination by the collaborative optimization (CO) strategy.Finally,using 9 high precision fluid-solid coupling analysis,the new strategy can finish the turbine MDO with acceptable performance.
- multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) /
- variable complexity method (VCM) /
- collaborative optimization (CO) strategy /
- turbine design /
- two-point scale function

HTML

参考文献(15)

[1]	Hirt C W,Amsden A A,Cook J L.An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian computing method for all flow speeds[J].Journal of Computational Physics,1974,14(3):227-253.
[2]	Carstens V,Kemme R,Schmitt S.Coupled simulation of flow-structure interaction in turbomachinery[J].Aerospace Science and Technology,2003,7(4):298-306.
[3]	王荣桥,贾志刚,樊江,等.复杂构件MDO六面体网格重构方法[J].航空动力学报,2011,26(9):2032-2038. WANG Rongqiao,JIA Zhigang,FAN Jiang,et al.Hexahedral mesh regeneration method for MDO on complex aero-engine components[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2011,26(9):2032-2038.(in Chinese)
[4]	Singh G,Grandhi R V.Mixed-variable optimization strategy employing multifidelity simulation and surrogate models[J].AIAA Journal,2010,48(1):215-223.
[5]	Baker M L, Munson M J, Alston K Y, et al. Integrated hypersonic aeromechanics tool (IHAT)[R].AIAA-2003-6952,2003.
[6]	Kaufman M,Balabanov V,Giunta A A,et al.Variable-complexity response surface approximations for wing structural weight in HSCT design[J].Computational Mechanics,1996,18(2):112-126.
[7]	Macmillin P E.Trim,control,and performance effects in variable-complexity high-speed civil transport design[D].Norfolk, Virginia:Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,1996.
[8]	Shanno D F.Conditioning of quasi-Newton methods for function minimization[J].Mathematics of Computation,1970,24(111):647-656.
[9]	Goldfarb D.A family of variable metric methods derived by variational means[J].Mathematics of Computation,1970,24(109):23-26.
[10]	Broyden C G.The convergence of a class of double-rank minimization algorithms 1:general considerations[J].Journal of Applied Mathematics,1970,6(1):76-90.
[11]	Eldred M S,Giunta A A,Collis S S,et al.Second-order corrections for surrogate-based optimization with model hierarchies[R].AIAA 2004-4457,2004.
[12]	Kroo I,Altus S,Braun R,et al.Multidisciplinary optimization methods for aircraft preliminary design[J].AIAA 94-4325,1994.
[13]	Ruben P,Liu H.Evaluation of multidisciplinary optimization approaches for aircraft conceptual design[R].AIAA-2004-4537,2004.
[14]	Sangook J,Young-Hee J,Rho A J,et al.Application of collaborative optimization using response surface methodology to an aircraft wing design[R].AIAA-2004-4442,2004.
[15]	王荣桥,贾志刚,杨俊杰,等.基于多层优化策略的涡轮盘叶设计研究[J].航空动力学报,2012,27(6):1201-1209. WANG Rongqiao,JIA Zhigang,YANG Junjie,et al.Study on disk and blade design based on multi-layer optimization strategy[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2012,27(6):1201-1209.(in Chinese)