非对称地面效应对无尾飞机稳定性的影响

杨穆清; 马东立

非对称地面效应对无尾飞机稳定性的影响

北京航空航天大学航空科学与工程学院, 北京 100191

计量
- 文章访问数: 1279
- HTML浏览量: 70
- PDF量: 849
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2013-03-27
- 刊出日期: 2013-11-28

Effect of asymmetric ground effect on stabilitiy of tailless aircraft

School of Aeronautics Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191, China

摘要

摘要: 针对非对称地面效应,重点研究了非对称地面效应对飞机横向和航向气动特性的影响.采用计算流体力学(CFD)方法研究了机翼弦平面距甲板高度、雷诺数和甲板风速的影响,并通过与以往文献中的试验数据对比,验证了CFD方法的准确性.机翼弦平面高度是升力、滚转力矩和偏航力矩最主要的影响因素,降低机翼弦平面高度会减弱横向和航向稳定性.机翼弦平面高度从1.5m降低到1.2m和1.0m时,横向稳定性分别降低了2.8%和5.6%.增加雷诺数能够显著提高升力,但对偏航力矩影响不大.增加甲板风速度能提高升力和滚转力矩的绝对值.甲板风速从0m/s增加到15m/s,升力和滚转力矩仅变化1.1%和3.4%,因此甲板风速的作用是次要的.
- 无尾飞机 /
- 地面效应 /
- 气动特性 /
- 横向稳定性 /
- 航向稳定性
Abstract: The research focus was put on asymmetric ground effect, especially on the lateral and directional aerodynamic characteristics. Effects of height of wing chord plane to deck, Reynolds number and wind over deck (WOD) were studied. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method was used and validated by comparing with the experimental data presented in previous reports. Height of wing chord plane to deck is the most important factor that influences lift, rolling moment and yawing moment. Lateral and directional stabilities are weakened by reducing height of wing chord plane to deck. Lateral stability decreased 2.8% and 5.6% as the height of wing chord plane to deck was reduced from 1.5m to 1.2m and 1.0m, respectively. By increasin g Reynolds number, lift is increased significantly, while yawing moment is little influenced. Magnitudes of both lift and rolling moment are amplified slightly with the increase of WOD.When WOD varied from 0m/s to 15m/s, lift and rolling moment varied only within 1.1% and 3.4%, respectively. Thus the effect of WOD is found to be secondary.
- tailless aircraft /
- ground effect /
- aerodynamic characteristics /
- lateral stability /
- directional stability

HTML

参考文献(27)

[1]	Whittenbury J.Configuration design development of the navy UCAS-D X-47B.AIAA-2011-7041,2011.
[2]	Coulliette C,Plotkin A.Airfoil ground effect revisited.AIAA 95-1832-CP,1995.
[3]	Ahmed M R,Sharma S D.An investigation on the aerodynamics of a symmetrical airfoil in ground effect[J].Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science.2005,29(6):633-647.
[4]	Ahmed M R,Takasaki T,Kohama Y.Experiments on the aerodynamics of a cambered airfoil in ground effect.AIAA-2006-258,2006.
[5]	Ahmed M R,Takasaki T,Kohama Y.Aerodynamics of a NACA4412 airfoil in ground effect[J].AIAA Journal.2007,45(1):37-47.
[6]	Fink M P,Lastinger J L.Aerodynamic characteristics of low-aspect-ratio wings in close proximity to the ground.NASA TN D-926,1961.
[7]	Kjelgaard S Jr,Paulson J W.Effect of sweep and aspect ratio on the longitudinal aerodynamics of a span loader wing in-and out-of-ground effect.NASA TM-80199,1981.
[8]	Kjelgaard S Jr,Paulson J W.An experimental and theoretical investigation of thick wings at various sweep angles in and out of ground effect.NASA TP-2068,1982.
[9]	Zerihan J,Zhang X.Aerodynamics of a single element wing in ground effect[J].Journal of Aircraft,2000,37(6):1058-1064.
[10]	Zhang X,Zerihan J.Off-surface aerodynamic measurements of a wing in ground effect[J].Journal of Aircraft,2003,40(4):716-725.
[11]	Buell D A,Tinling B E.Ground effects on the longitudinal characteristics of two models with wings having low aspect ratio and pointed tips.NACA TN-4044,1957.
[12]	De Sievers A.Wind-tunnel tests of the ground effect on aircraft models.NASA TT F-9709,1965.
[13]	Fox C H Jr.An analytical method for predicting the lift and drag for slender sharp-edge delta wings in ground proximity.Blacksburg Virginia,US:Virginia Polytechnic Institute,1969.
[14]	Corsiglia V R,Koenig D G,Morelli J P.Large-scale tests of an airplane model with a double-delta wing,including longitudinal and lateral characteristics and ground effects.NASA TN D-5102,1969.
[15]	Fox C H Jr.Prediction of lift and drag for slender sharp-edge delta wings in ground proximity.NASA TN D-4891,1969.
[16]	Coe P L Jr,Thomas J L.Theoretical and experimental investigation of ground-induced effects for a low-aspect-ratio highly swept arrow-wing configuration.NASA TP-1508,1979.
[17]	Jones B,Franke M,Stephen E.Aerodynamic ground effects of a tailless chevron-shaped UCAV model.AIAA-2006-2832,2006.
[18]	In W.Experimental investigation into the aerodynamic ground effect of a tailless chevron and lambda-shaped UCAVs.Ohio:Air Force Institute of Technology,ADA451290,2006.
[19]	Mostaccio J T.Experimental investigation of the aerodynamic ground effect of a tailless lambda-shaped UCAV with wing flaps.Ohio:Air Force Institute of Technology,ADA453970,2006.
[20]	崔尔杰,韩光维.地面效应空气动力学研究//2003空气动力学前沿研究论文集.北京:中国航天科技集团公司第七零一所,2003:1-7.
[21]	张乃平,林国锋,何植岱.地面效应对舰载机起飞特性的影响[J].空气动力学学报,1992,10(4):451-457. ZHANG Naiping,LIN Guofeng,HE Zhidai.Ground effect on the take-off characteristics of sea-based aircraft[J].Acta Aerodynamica Sinica,1992,10(4):451-457.(in Chinese)
[22]	赵煦.无人机起飞时的地面效应研究[J].航空工程与维修,1999(1):43-44. ZHAO Xu.Research of ground effect influence on take-off of supersonic pilotless aircraft[J].Aviation Engineering,1999(1):43-44.(in Chinese)
[23]	李潜.地面效应对飞机动稳定性的影响// 大型飞机关键技术高层论坛暨中国航空学会2007年学术年会论文集.广东深圳:中国航天空气动力技术研究院,2007:1-6.
[24]	Laurence K.Loftin J,Poteat M I.Aerodynamic characteristics of several NACA airfoil sections at seven Reynolds numbers from 0.7×10⁶ to 9.0×10⁶.NACA RM-L8B02,1948.
[25]	Jacobs E N,Sherman A.Airfoil section characteristics as affected by variations of the Reynolds number.NACA TR-586,1939.
[26]	Ladson C L.Effects of independent variation of Mach and Reynolds numbers on the low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of the NACA 0012 airfoil section.NASA TM-4074,1988.
[27]	Laurence K.Loftin J,Bursnall W J.The effects of variations in Reynolds number between 3.0×10⁶ and 25.0×10⁶ upon the aerodynamic characteristics of a number of NACA 6-series airfoil sections.NACA TN-1733,1948.