基于贝叶斯模型平均的航空发动机可靠性分析

王华伟; 高军; 吴海桥

doi:10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2014.02.009

基于贝叶斯模型平均的航空发动机可靠性分析

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2014.02.009

1.
南京航空航天大学民航学院, 南京 210016
2.
中国人民解放军军械工程学院装备指挥与管理系, 石家庄 050005

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金与中国民航局联合资助项目（U1233115，60879001）；江苏省青蓝工程优秀青年骨干教师资助项目

计量
- 文章访问数: 1801
- HTML浏览量: 14
- PDF量: 1150
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2013-07-06
- 刊出日期: 2014-02-28

Reliability analysis on aero-engine using Bayesian model averaging

1.
College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
2.
Department of Equipment Command and Management, Ordnance Engineering College, the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Shijiazhuang 050005, China

摘要

摘要: 针对不同失效模式的特点，利用航空发动机状态监测信息，分别采用Gamma过程、Wiener过程和Weibull分布建立可靠性分析模型.采用贝叶斯模型平均（BMA）方法，分析不同失效模式对可靠性影响，对航空发动机可靠性进行集成分析.通过算例跟踪某在翼航空发动机可靠性水平，基于贝叶斯模型平均的航空发动机可靠性模型的计算误差率低于单一可靠性分析模型，计算结果误差率低于1%.说明多模型集成可靠性技术在复杂系统运行可靠性分析中的有效性和准确性.
- 可靠性分析 /
- 航空发动机 /
- 贝叶斯模型平均(BMA) /
- 多失效模式 /
- 模型集成
Abstract: Considering the characteristics of different failure modes with use of monitoring information, Gamma process, Wiener process and Weibull distribution were selected to build the reliability analysis models on aero-engine. Bayesian model averaging (BMA) was used to integrate different models into one framework for reliability analysis on aero-engines, given its function for dynamically evaluating different failure mode effects. The reliability of some onwing aero-engine was analyzed by numerical example, showing that the reliability analysis model using BMA had less error than single reliability analysis model, and computation error rate of BMA was less than 1%. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the reliability analysis of multi-model integration.
- reliability analysis /
- aero-engine /
- Bayesian model averaging(BMA) /
- multi-failure modes /
- model integration

HTML

参考文献(18)

[1]	XIAO Ningcong, HUANG Hongzhong, LI Yanfeng, et al.Multiple failure mode analysis and weighted risk priority number evaluation in FMEA[J].Engineering Failure Analysis, 2011, 18(4):1162-1170.
[2]	Boutsikas M V, Koutras M V.On a class of multiple failure mode systems[J].Naval Research Logistics, 2002, 49(2):167-185.
[3]	Pickard K, Müller P, Bertsche B.Multiple failure mode and effects analysis:an approach to risk assessment of multiple failures with FMEA[C]//Reliability and Maintainability Symposium.Annual, Piscataway:Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc, 2005:457-462.
[4]	YANG Qingyu, HONG Yili, CHEN Yong, et al.Failure profile analysis of complex repairable systems with multiple failure modes[J].IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2012, 61(1):180-191.
[5]	HANG Feng, LU Zhenzhou, CUI Lijie.Reliability sensitivity algorithm based on stratified importance sampling method for multiple failure modes systems[J].Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2010, 23(6):660-669.
[6]	Milienos F S, Koutras M V.A lower bound for the reliability function of multiple failure mode systems[J].Statistics & Probability Letters, 2008, 78(12):1639-1648.
[7]	WANG Wenbin, Banjevic D, Pecht M.A multi-component and multi-failure mode inspection model based on the delay time concept[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2010, 95(8):912-920.
[8]	Bichon B J, McFarland J M, Mahadeven S.Efficient surrogate models for reliability analysis of systems with multiple failure modes[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2011, 96(10):1386-1395.
[9]	王大伟, 王伟, 冯振宇.基于模糊积分的航空发动机MTBF动态评估方法[J].航空动力学报, 2013, 28(5):983-988. WANG Dawei, WANG Wei, FENG Zhenyu.Dynamic assessment model for MTBF of aero-engine based on fuzzy integral[J].Journal of Aerospace Power, 2013, 28(5):983-988.(in Chinese)
[10]	傅惠民, 岳晓蕊, 张勇波.极小失效数据的可靠性评估和寿命预测[J].航空动力学报, 2010, 25(8):1855-1859. FU Humin, YUE Xiaorui, ZHANG Yongbo.Reliability assessment and life prediction for very few failure data[J].Journal of Aerospace Power, 2013, 25(8):1855-1859.(in Chinese)
[11]	王燕萍, 吕震宙, 赵新攀.基于Markov chain Monte Carlo的幂律过程的Bayesian分析[J].航空动力学报, 2010, 25(1):152-159. WANG Yanping, LV Zhenzhou, ZHAO Xinpan.Bayesian analysis for the power law process based on Markov chain Monte Carlo[J].Journal of Aerospace Power, 2010, 25(1):152-159.(in Chinese)
[12]	Volponi A.Data fusion for enhanced aircraft engine prognostics and health management:task 14 program plan development[R].NASA/CR-2005-214055, 2005.
[13]	Chinnam R B.On-line reliability estimation for individual components using statistical degradation signal models[J].Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2002, 18(1):53-73.
[14]	Naeem M, Singh R, Probert D.Consequences of aero-engine deteriorations for military aircraft[J].Applied Energy, 2001, 70(2):103-133.
[15]	朱磊, 左洪福, 蔡景.基于Wiener过程的民航航空发动机性能可靠性预测[J].航空动力学报, 2013, 28(5):1006-1012. ZHU lei, ZUO Hongfu, CAI Jing.Performance reliability prediction for civil aviation aircraft engine based on Winener process[J].Journal of Aerospace Power, 2013, 28(5):1006-1012.(in Chinese)
[16]	Raftery A E, Gneiting T, Balabdaoui F, et al.Using Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles[J].Monthly Weather Review, 2005, 133(5):1155-1174.
[17]	GUAN Xuefei, Jha R, LIU Yongming.Model selection, updating, and averaging for probabilistic fatigue damage prognosis[J].Structural Safety, 2011, 33(2):242-249.
[18]	Goldstein M, Wooff D.Bayes linear statistics, theory and methods[M].Chichester:John Wiley, 2007.