反压对隔离段激波串结构的影响

何粲; 邢建文; 肖保国; 刘伟雄

doi:10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2016.05.028

反压对隔离段激波串结构的影响

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2016.05.028

中国空气动力研究与发展中心超高速空气动力研究所高超声速冲压发动机技术重点实验室, 四川绵阳 621000

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(51376193)

详细信息

作者简介:
何粲(1992-),女,安徽安庆人,硕士生,主要从事吸气式高超声速推进技术研究.

中图分类号: V235.21
计量
- 文章访问数: 789
- HTML浏览量: 3
- PDF量: 516
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-09-12
- 刊出日期: 2016-05-28

Influence of back pressure on shock train structure in isolator

Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory, Hypersonic Aerodynamics Institute, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang Sichuan 621000, China

摘要

摘要: 采用不同的无黏通量格式与湍流模型组合对轴对称圆截面隔离段进行了数值计算,选取与试验结果最匹配的组合研究隔离段在反压作用下的流场结构及参数特性.对不同反压下的独立隔离段模型和隔离段燃烧室模型进行了三维模拟,分析了隔离段反压比对其流场结构、出口参数及其中激波串形态的影响.针对该轴对称隔离段提出了其可承受的极限反压.比较了冷态均匀反压与燃烧诱导反压下的隔离段流场.结果表明:无黏通量格式与湍流模型的选择影响着激波串的形态和长度,对于隔离段数值模拟十分关键;隔离段出口参数受反压影响,出口处在激波串区域时,附近截面上静压分布的不均匀性较大,出口处在混合区时压力分布则相对更均匀,激波串发展程度影响隔离段出口压力均匀性;对于该圆截面隔离段及燃烧室,直接给定均匀的平面冷态反压所产生的激波串与燃烧反压下的激波串在结构形态和起始位置上未见明显差异.
- 圆截面 /
- 激波串 /
- 隔离段 /
- 燃烧室 /
- 反压
Abstract: In order to investigate the characteristics of axisymmetric cylindrical isolator under different back pressures, the flow field of the isolator was simulated with different inviscid flux schemes and turbulence models. Compared with the experimental data, the most suitable model and scheme were chosen. Three-dimensional simulations of the isolator and combustor were employed to study the flow field structure, exit parameter and shock train under different back pressure ratios. The limit back pressure was found. The structures of the shock train under two kinds of back pressure were compared. Results show that the inviscid flux scheme and turbulence model, which are critical for the isolator simulation, have a significant impact on the structure and length of the shock train. The parameter of the isolator exit is affected by the back pressure. When the exit of the isolator is in the mixing region, the static pressure distribution is more uniform. And when the exit is in the shock train region, the pressure is non-uniform. For this axisymmetric cylindrical isolator and combustor, there is no obvious difference on structure and initial position of the shock trains respectively induced by the combustion back pressure and cold back pressure.
- cylindrical /
- shock train /
- isolator /
- combustor /
- back pressure

HTML

参考文献(30)

[1]	何粲,邢建文,肖保国.圆截面隔离段抗反压特性研究[R].河南洛阳:第十六届全国激波与激波串学术会议,2014.
[2]	何粲.双模态超燃冲压发动机隔离段流动特性研究[D].四川绵阳:中国空气动力研究与发展中心,2015. HE Can.Investigation of flow characteristics in the dual-mode scramjet isolator[D].Mianyang Sichuan:China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center,2015.(in Chinese)
[3]	Waltrup P J,Billig F S.Structure of shock waves in cylindrical ducts[J].AIAA Journal,1973,11(10):1404-1408.
[4]	Bement D A,Stevens J R,Thompson M W.Measured operating characteristics of a rectangular combustor/inlet isolator[R].AIAA 90-2221,1990.
[5]	Lin P,Rao G V R,O'Connor G M.Numerical analysis of normal shock train in a constant area isolator[R].AIAA 91-2162,1991.
[6]	Hoeger T C,King P I.2-D transient CFD model of an isolator shock train[R].AIAA-2011-2221,2011.
[7]	Hoeger T C.CFD transient simulation of an isolator shock train in a scramjet engine[D].Dayton,Ohio:Air Force Institute of Technology,2012.
[8]	Paek R I.Back-pressure effect on shock-train location in a scramjet engine isolator[D].Dayton,Ohio:Air Force Institute of Technology,2010.
[9]	Hutzel J R,Decker D D.Scramjet isolator shock-train leading-edge location modeling[R].AIAA-2011-2223,2011.
[10]	SU Weiyi,ZHANG Kunyuan.Back-pressure effects on the hypersonic inlet-isolator pseudoshock motions[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power,2013,29(6):1391-1399.
[11]	梁德旺,李博.高超声速进气道隔离段反压的前传模式及最大工作反压[J].空气动力学学报,2006,24(4):454-460. LIANG Dewang,LI Bo.Back pressure propagation mode and maximum working back pressure of hypersonic inlet isolator[J].Acta Aerodynamica Sinica,2006,24(4):454-460.(in Chinese)
[12]	李博,袁化成,梁德旺.高超声速进气道等直隔离段的反压特性研究[J].宇航学报,2008,29(1):78-83. LI Bo,YUAN Huacheng,LIANG Dewang.Research on characteristics of back pressure performance for constant area isolator of a hypersonic inlet[J].Journal of Astronautics,2008,29(1):78-83.(in Chinese)
[13]	冯锦虎,高峰,刘华,等.反压对超燃冲压发动机隔离段内流场的影响[J].空军工程大学学报,2009,10(4):20-23. FENG Jinhu,GAO Feng,LIU Hua,et al.Influence of back pressure on the inner flow field in scramjet isolator[J].Journal of Air Force Engineering University,2009,10(4):20-23.(in Chinese)
[14]	金亮,吴先宇,罗世彬,等.隔离段反压对激波串起始位置的影响[J].推进技术,2008,29(1):54-57. JIN Liang,WU Xianyu,LUO Shibin,et al.Influence of back pressure on location of shock train in isolator[J].Journal of Propulsion Technology,2008,29(1):54-57.(in Chinese)
[15]	袁化成,梁德旺,郭荣伟,等.反压作用下等直隔离段性能估算[J].航空动力学报,2009,24(11):2421-2428. YUAN Huacheng,LIANG Dewang,GUO Rongwei,et al.Predicting method for the performance of constant area isolator under back pressure[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2009,24(11):2421-2428.(in Chinese)
[16]	Melvin J B,Adam S.The rebirth of round hypersonic propulsion[R].AIAA-2006-5035,2006.
[17]	Lin P.Geometric effects on precombustion shock train in constant area isolators[R].AIAA 93-1838,1993.
[18]	Lin K C,Tam C J,Jackson K R,et al.Characterization of shock train structures inside constant-area isolators of model scramjet combustors[R].AIAA-2006-816,2006.
[19]	田野,乐嘉陵,杨顺华,等.空气节流对超燃冲压发动机燃烧室起动点火影响的数值研究[J].航空动力学报,2013,28(7):1496-1502. TIAN Ye,LE Jialing,YANG Shunhua,et al.Numerical study on air throttling influence of ignition transient on the scramjet combustor[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2013,28(7):1496-1502.(in Chinese)
[20]	邢建文,肖保国.H₂O污染对煤油燃料超燃冲压发动机燃烧室性能影响的数值模拟[J].航空动力学报,2012,27(11):2408-2413. XING Jianwen,XIAO Baoguo.Numerical simulation of H₂O vitiation effects on kerosene-fueled scramjet combustor performance[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2012,27(11):2408-2413.(in Chinese)
[21]	赵慧勇.超燃冲压整体发动机并行数值研究[D].四川绵阳:中国空气动力研究与发展中心,2005. ZHAO Huiyong.Parallel numerical study of whole scramjet engine[D].Mianyang Sichuan:China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center,2005.(in Chinese)
[22]	Baurle R A,Middleton T F,Wilson L G,et al.Reynolds-averaged turbulence model assessment for a highly back-pressured isolator flowfield[R].Hampton:Hypersonic Airbreathing Propulsion Branch,NASA Langley Research Center,2012.
[23]	Jones W P,Launder B E.The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence[J].International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,1972,15:301-314.
[24]	Kok J C.Resolving the dependence on free-stream values for the k-ω turbulence model[R].Nationaal Luchten Ruimtevaartlaboratorium,NLR-TP-99295,1999.
[25]	Menter F R.Improved two-equation k-ω turbulence models for aerodynamic flows[R].NASA TM-103975,1992.
[26]	Wilcox D C.Reassessment of the scale determining equation for advanced turbulence models[J].AIAA Journal,1988,26(11):1299-1310.
[27]	Wilcox D C.The remarkable ability of turbulence model equations to describe transition[R].Long Beach:The Fifth Symposium on Numerical and Physical Aspects of Aerodynamic Flows,1992.
[28]	邢建文,肖保国,何粲,等.超燃冲压发动机流道气动-推进性能的快速评估方法研究[R].河南洛阳:第十六届全国激波与激波串学术会议,2014.
[29]	王培勇,陈明,邢菲,等.Hyshot超燃冲压发动机的CFD数值模拟[J].航空动力学报,2014,29(5):1020-1028. WANG Peiyong,CHEN Ming,XING Fei,et al.CFD numerical simulation of Hyshot scramjet[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2014,29(5):1020-1028.(in Chinese)
[30]	金志光,张堃元.变后掠角+变侧压角曲面压缩的高超侧压式进气道数值仿真[J].航空动力学报,2009,24(10):2176-2182. JING Zhiguang,ZHANG Kunyuan.Numerical simulations of curved surface sidewall compression scramjet inlets with varied sweep angle and sidewall compression angle[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2009,24(10):2176-2182.(in Chinese)