主流压力梯度对气膜冷却效率影响的数值研究

王玮琪; 单勇; 廖华琳; 谭晓茗; 张靖周

doi:10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2017.08.012

主流压力梯度对气膜冷却效率影响的数值研究

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2017.08.012

1.
南京航空航天大学能源与动力学院江苏省航空动力系统重点实验室，南京 210016
2.
南京航空航天大学能源与动力学院江苏省航空动力系统重点实验室，南京 210016；中国航空发动机集团有限公司四川燃气涡轮研究院，成都 610500

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(51306088); 江苏省自然科学基金(BK20130790); 国家自然科学基金（U1508212）

计量
- 文章访问数: 1376
- HTML浏览量: 2
- PDF量: 853
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-12-12
- 刊出日期: 2017-08-28

Numerical research on film cooling effectiveness with different mainstream pressure gradient

摘要

摘要: 分别对收缩通道、扩张通道和直通道中亚声速主流条件下的气膜冷却进行数值模拟，对比分析了不同主流压力梯度、次流吹风比条件下的主流和次流流场、温度场特征。研究结果表明：引起气膜冷却效率变化和不同发展趋势的因素可归结为主流边界层厚度、主次流自由剪切混合程度、肾形涡的强度和位置等因素。相对于零压力梯度的主流条件，在吹风比较小(M=0.25)的情况下，主流的逆压力梯度一方面增厚边界层、增强了气膜射流对主流的穿透，另一方面减小了肾形涡的强度，综合作用的结果是气膜平均冷却效率提高了4.91%。在吹风比较大(M=2)的情况下，主流的顺压力梯度扼制主流边界层的发展、抑制气膜射流的穿透能力，降低肾形涡涡核的位置，从而提高气膜冷却效率达17.40%。
- 气膜冷却 /
- 压力梯度 /
- 加速因子 /
- 吹风比 /
- 冷却效率
Abstract: Numerical simulations of film cooling under the condition of subsonic mainstream in convergent channel, expanded channel and straight channel were conducted. The flow fields and temperature fields of the mainstream and secondary streams were investigated under different streamwise pressure gradients and different flow blowing radios. The results showed that the mainstream boundary layer thickness, mixing intensity of shear layer and the counter-rotating vortex pair intensity and distributions were the main factors contributing to the changes of the film cooling effectiveness. Compared with the zero pressure gradient case, adverse pressure gradient increased the boundary layer thickness and strengthened the penetration of the secondary flow for the low blowing ratio (M=0.25) cases. Meanwhile, the intensity of the counter-rotating vortex pair was weak. As a result, the averaged film cooling effectivenesd increases by 4.91% at the low blowing ratio. For the high blowing ratio case (M=2), favorable pressure gradient restrained the development of mainstream boundary layer and depressed the penetrating ability of the secondary flow. At the same time, the accelerated mainstream made the counter-rotating vortex pair closer to the wall. These caused the film cooling effectiveness increase by 17.40% at the high blowing ratio.
- film cooling /
- pressure gradient /
- acceleration parameter /
- blowing ratio /
- cooling effectiveness

HTML

参考文献(18)

[1]	HAN J C,DUTTA S,EKKAD S.Gas turbine heat transfer and cooling technology［M］.London：CRC Press,2012.
[2]	BUNKER R S.A review of shaped hole turbine film-cooling technology［J］.Journal of Heat Transfer,2005,127(4):441-453.
[3]	HAN Chang,REN Jing,JIANG Hongde.Multi-parameter influence on combined-hole film cooling system［J］.International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2012,55(15):4232-4240.
[4]	LAUNDER B E,YORK J.Discrete-hole cooling in the presence of free stream turbulence and strong favourable pressure gradient［J］.International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,1974,17(11):1403-1409.
[5]	ESCUDIER M P,WHLTELAW J H.The influence of strong adverse pressure gradients on the effectiveness of film cooling［J］.International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,1968,11(8):1289-1292.
[6]	HAY N,LAMPARD D,SALUJA C L.Effects of the condition of the approach boundary layer and of mainstream pressure gradients on the heat transfer coefficient on film-cooled surfaces［J］.Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power,1985,107(1):99-104.
[7]	TEEKARAM A J H,FORTH C J P,JONES T V.Film cooling in the presence of mainstream pressure gradients［J］.Journal of Turbomachinery,1991,113(3):484-492.
[8]	MAITEH B Y,JUBRAN B A.Effects of pressure gradient on film cooling effectiveness from two rows of simple and compound angle holes in combination［J］.Energy Conversion and Management,2004,45(9):1457-1469.
[9]	YANG C S,LIN C L,GAU C.Film cooling performance and heat transfer over an inclined film-cooled surface at different divergent angles with respect to highly turbulent mainstream［J］.Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science,2008,32(6):1313-1321.
[10]	JESSEN W,KONOPKA M,SCHROEDER W.Particle-image velocimetry measurements of film cooling in an adverse pressure gradient flow［J］.Journal of Turbomachinery,2012,134(2):021025.1-021025.13.
[11]	KONOPKA M,JESSEN W,MEINKE M,et al.Large-eddy simulation of film cooling in an adverse pressure gradient flow［J］.Journal of Turbomachinery,2013,135(3):031031.1-031031.13.
[12]	QIN Y,REN J,JIANG H.Effects of streamwise pressure gradient and convex curvature on film cooling effectiveness［C］∥ASME Turbo Expo 2014:Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition.Düsseldorf,Germany:American Society of Mechanical Engineers,2014:V05BT13A027-V05BT13A037.
[13]	LUTUM E,VON WOLFERSDORF J,WEIGAND B,et al.Film cooling on a convex surface with zero pressure gradient flow［J］.International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2000,43(16):2973-2987.
[14]	LUTUM E,VON WOLFERSDORF J,SEMMLER K,et al.An experimental investigation of film cooling on a convex surface subjected to favourable pressure gradient flow［J］.International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2001,44(5):939-951.
[15]	朱惠人,骆剑霞,黄小杨,等.主流压力梯度对气膜孔流量系数影响机理［J］.航空动力学报,2014,29(9):2142-2149.ZHU Huiren,LUO Jianxia,HUANG Xiaoyang,et al.Influence physics of mainstream pressure gradient on film hole discharge coefficient［J］.Journal of Aerospace Power，2014,29(9):2142-2149.(in Chinese)
[16]	彭威,姜培学.变截面主流加速对超音速气膜冷却的影响［J］.工程热物理学报,2008,29(2):313-316.PENG Wei,JIANG Peixue.Influence of ariable mainstream acceleration on the supersonic film cooling［J］.Journal of Engineering Thermophysics，2008,29(2):313-316.(in Chinese)
[17]	COLETTI F,ELKINS C J,EATON J K.Three-dimensional velocity measurements of film cooling flow under favorable pressure gradient［R］.ASME Paper GT2012-69402,2012.
[18]	COLETTI F,ELKINS C J,EATON J K.An inclined jet in crossflow under the effect of streamwise pressure gradients［J］.Experiments in Fluids,2013,54(9):1-16.