Experiment of particle rebound characteristics for impingement on resin coated/Al/alloy steel plate
-
摘要: 为了精准探索直升机进气粒子分离器性能,研究了砂粒撞击不同壁面材料的反弹特性。采用粒径为600~800μm的砂粒撞击树脂涂层/铝/合金钢板开展试验探究。设计的试验系统可实现单颗粒子撞击板面。撞击角度在10°~80°范围内变化,撞击前后的速度矢量由高速摄影仪拍摄获得。结果表明:撞击树脂涂层板时,法向恢复系数要高于撞击铝板及合金钢板的法向恢复系数。切向恢复系数主要受摩擦力的影响。同时由于阴影效应的影响,在接近切向/法向撞击时,切向/法向恢复系数分别出现大于1的现象。不同扫气比(SCR)下,应用砂粒撞击铝板的切向/法向恢复系数对粒子分离器进行数值模拟的分离效率与已有的分离器试验结果最接近。
-
关键词:
- 粒子-壁面碰撞 /
- 反弹 /
- 砂粒 /
- 进气粒子分离器(IPS) /
- 恢复系数
Abstract: In order to accurately explore the helicopter performance of inlet particle separator, the rebound characteristics of sand impinging different material surfaces were studied. The experiment of particle diameters of 600-800μm sands impacting resin coated/Al/alloy steel plate was conducted. A self-designed experimental system can realize the single particle impact plate. The velocity vectors before and after impact were measured with the high speed camera, within a range of impact angle from 10° to 80°. Results showed that the normal restitution coefficient with sand impinging resin coated plate was higher than that with sand impinging Al/alloy steel plate, while the tangential restitution coefficient was mainly affected by the friction. At the same time, due to the influence of the shadow effect, the normal restitution coefficient or tangential restitution coefficient was more than 1 respectively when the impact angle was close to tangential or normal impact direction. At different scavenging ratio(SCR), the separation efficiency of simulation using the restitution coefficient of sand impinging Al plate was closest to the result of recent experiment on inlet particle separator.-
Key words:
- particle-wall collision /
- rebound /
- sand /
- inlet particle separator(IPS) /
- restitution coefficient
-
[1] 李立国,王锁芳.直升机发动机的进气防护[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2009. [2] TABAKOFF W.Measurements of particles rebound characteristics on materials used in gas turbines[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power,1995,7(5):805-813. [3] MAW N,BARBER J R,FAWCETT J N.The oblique impact of elastic spheres[J].Wear,1976,38(1):101-114. [4] KRUGGEL-EMDEN H,STURM M,WIRTZ S,et al.Selection of an appropriate time integration scheme for the discrete element method (DEM)[J].Computers and Chemical Engineering,2008,32(10):2263-2279. [5] GHAEDNIA H,POPE S A,JACKSON R L,et al.A comprehensive study of the elasto-plastic contact of a sphere and a flat[J].Tribology International,2016,93:78-90. [6] KRUGGEL-EMDEN H,WIRTZ S,SCHERER V.An analytical solution of different configurations of the linear viscoelastic normal and frictional-elastic tangential contact model[J].Chemical Engineering Science,2007,62(23):6914-6926. [7] THORNTON C,CUMMINS S J,CLEARY P W.An investigation of the comparative behaviour of alternative contact force models during inelastic collisions[J].Powder Technology,2013,233(3):30-46. [8] KRUGGEL-EMDEN H,RICKELT S,WIRTZ S,et al.A study on the validity of the multi-sphere discrete element method[J].Powder Technology,2008,188(2):153-165. [9] GHEADNIA H,CERMIK O,MARGHITU D B.Experimental and theoretical analysis of the elasto-plastic oblique impact of a rod with a flat[J].International Journal of Impact Engineering,2015,86:307-317. [10] GUI N,YANG X,TU J,et al.A generalized particle-to-wall collision model for non-spherical rigid particles[J].Advanced Powder Technology,2015,27(1) :154-163. [11] SOMMERFELD M,HUBER N.Experimental analysis and modelling of particle-wall collisions[J].International Journal of Multiphase Flow,1999,25(6):1457-1489. [12] GORHAM D A,KHARAZ A H.The measurement of particle rebound characteristics[J].Powder Technology,2000,112(3):193-202. [13] 徐义华,胡春波,李江.炭化层对粒子反弹系数测量试验研究[J].弹箭与制导学报,2011,31(1):119-122.XU Yihua,HU Chunbo,LI Jiang.The experimental research on measurement of rebound coefficient for particle impacting charring-layer[J].Journal of Projectiles,Rockets,Missiles and Guidance,2011,31(1):119-122.(in Chinese) [14] 吴铁鹰,赵梦熊.颗粒-壁面碰撞建模与数据处理[J].振动工程学报,2014,27(4):589-597.WU Tieying,ZHAO Mengxiong.Data processing and modeling of particle-wall collision[J].Journal of Vibration Engineering,2014,27(4):589-597.(in Chinese) [15] WAKEMAN T,TABAKOFF W.Measured particle rebound characteristics useful for erosion prediction[R].ASME Paper 82-GT-170,1982. [16] 蔡锴,王建梅,张新生,等.引风机叶片磨蚀原因分析和防止措施[J].电站系统工程,2001,17(4):207-210.CAI Kai,WANG Jianmei,ZHANG Xinsheng,et al.Erosion analysis of induced draft fan blade and countermeasures[J].Power System Engineering,2001,17(4):207-210.(in Chinese) [17] 侯凌云,严传俊.二维粒子分离器的流场及分离效率的数值模拟[J].航空动力学报,1997,12(4):374-376.HOU Lingyun,YAN Chuanjun.Numerical simulation of two-dimensional flow field in particle separator[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,1997,12(4):374-376.(in Chinese) [18] 况开鑫,王锁芳.分流器对进气粒子分离器性能的影响[J].航空动力学报,2012,27(7):1542-1548.KUANG Kaixin,WANG Suofang.Effect of splitter on performance of inlet particle separator[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2012,27(7):1542-1548.(in Chinese) [19] 曾平君,孙姝,黄河峡,等.直升机/粒子分离器一体化流场特性:第一部分 前进比的影响[J].航空动力学报,2014,29(4):858-866.ZENG Pingjun,SUN Shu,HUANG Hexia,et al.Integrated flow field characteristics of helicopter/particle separator:Part 1 influence of advance ratio[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2014,29(4):858-866.(in Chinese) [20] GOLDSMITH W,FRASIER J T.Impact:the theory and physical behavior of colliding solids[J].Journal of Applied Mechanics,1961,28(4):639. [21] 李洁琼,王锁芳,董伟林,等,整体式粒子分离器性能的试验研究[J].推进技术,2016,37(9):1617-1623.LI Jieqiong,WANG Suofang,DONG Weilin,et al.Experimental study on performance of inertial particle separator[J].Journal of Propulsion Technology,2016,37(9):1617-1623.(in Chinese) [22] DONG H,MOYS M H.Experimental study of oblique impacts with initial spin[J].Powder Technology,2006,161(1):22-31. [23] MUSGROVE G O,BARRINGER M D,THOLE K A,et al.Computationaldesign of a louver particle separator for gas turbine engines[R].ASME Paper GT2009-60199,2009.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 782
- HTML浏览量: 5
- PDF量: 551
- 被引次数: 0