基于发动机与飞机的藻基航空燃料全生命周期分析

阿鲁斯; 温孟阳; 郭放; 杨晓奕

doi:10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2018.06.005

基于发动机与飞机的藻基航空燃料全生命周期分析

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2018.06.005

北京航空航天大学能源与动力工程学院能源与环境国际中心,北京 100191

基金项目: 国际合作创新中心国家重点研究和发展计划(2016YFE0120100）

计量
- 文章访问数: 861
- HTML浏览量: 81
- PDF量: 524
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-08-26
- 刊出日期: 2018-06-28

Life cycle assessment of algae based aviation fuel on basis of engine type and related aircraft

摘要

摘要: 讨论了基于发动机类别及其飞机的藻基航空替代燃料与常规航空燃料对全生命周期的影响。基于GREET（the greenhouse gases,regulated emissions,and energy use in transportation）模型,依据平均载荷、最大航程,将民航客机分为单通道窄体、双通道中型、双通道大型、巨型、支线和公务机等6类。起飞、爬升、进近、滑行、巡航过程的燃料消耗及排放采用国际民用航空组织、美国NASA-AAFEX实验、欧洲EASA适航条例提供的数据。计算了6类发动机-飞机的气体排放、能量消耗情况。在双通道大型客机中藻基航空替代燃料制备过程的温室气体排放仅为0.2351g/(kg·km),原因为该类客机与小型飞机相比有更好的发动机效率和运输效率。然而由于起飞降落过程排放比例较大,单通道窄体客机在航程上对温室气体排放变化更为敏感。
- 藻 /
- 替代燃料 /
- 排放 /
- 能耗 /
- 全生命周期分析 /
- 航程
Abstract: Consolidated discussion of life cycle assessment on algae based aviation fuel in combustion emissions on the basis of engine type and related aircraft was conducted by comparing with conventional jet fuel. Using the GREET （the greenhouse gases,regulated emissions,and energy use in transportation） model, passenger aircrafts were divided into six classes including single aisle, small twin aisle, large twin aisle, large quad, regional jet, and business jet. Each aircraft class was characterized by its average payload, potential flight range, and fuel consumption and emissions during landing, takeoff, taxiing, climbing referred to in the database of NASA-AAFEX, EASA, and CAAC. Also the emissions and energy input were discussed. The pump-to-wheel stage of algae based jet fuel in large twin aisle aircraft shows the least amount of greenhouse gases emission at 0.2351g/(kg·km) because larger aircraft has lower greenhouse gases emissions values than smaller aircraft due to higher engine efficiency and higher payload, however single aisle aircraft appears to be more sensitive to greenhouse gases emission in flight range than larger aircraft due to higher contribution of landing and takeoff.
- algae /
- alternative fuel /
- emission /
- energy input /
- life cycle assessment (LCA) /
- flight range

HTML

参考文献(38)

[1]	国家统计局．中国统计年鉴:2015［M］.北京：中国统计出版社,2016.
[2]	美国能源部生物质项目署.藻类生物质能源：基本原理、关键技术与发展路线图［M］.胡洪营，李鑫，于茵，等，译.北京:科学出版社,2011.
[3]	中国民航总局发展计划司.2012年民航行业发展统计公报［EB/OL］.［2016-10-18］.http://www.caac.gov.cn/XXGK/XXGK/TJSJ/201511/t20151102_8822.html000014170/2013-00037.
[4]	ELGOWAINY A,HAN J,WANG M,et al.Life-cycle analysis of alternative aviation fuels in GREET［R］.Chicago:Office of Scientific and Technical Information Technical Reports,2012.
[5]	HILEMAN J I,DONOHOO P E,STRATTON R W.Energy content and alternative jet fuel viability［J］.Journal of Propulsion and Power,2010,26(6):1184-1196.
[6]	中国交通年鉴社.中国交通年鉴:2013［M］.北京：中国交通年鉴社,2014.
[7]	HAN J,ELGOWAINY A,CAI H,et al.Life-cycle analysis of bio-based aviation fuels［J］.Bioresource Technology,2013,150(4):447-456.
[8]	ICAO.Engine exhaust emissions databank［R］.the Convention on International Civil Aviation,9646-AN/943，1995.
[9]	BOEING.Next-generation 737 design highlights［EB/OL］.［2016-10-18］.http:∥www.boeing.com/commercial/737ng/.
[10]	BOEING.787 dreamliner family［EB/OL］.［2016-10-18］.http:∥www.boeing.com/commercial/787/.
[11]	BOEING.777 design highlights［EB/OL］.［2016-10-18］.http:∥www.boeing.com/commercial/777/#/design-highlights/unmatched-capabilities/longer-range/.
[12]	AIRBUS.A380 range and performance［EB/OL］.［2016-10-18］.http:∥www.airbus.com/aircraftfamilies/passengeraircraft/a380family/performance/.
[13]	EMBRAER.Specifications ERJ 145［EB/OL］.［2016-10-18］.http:∥www.embraercommercialaviation.com/Pages/ERJ-145.aspx.
[14]	GULFSTREA M.The G550 in motion distance times speed equals time saved［EB/OL］.［2016-10-18］.http:∥www.gulfstream.com/aircraft/gulfstream-g550.
[15]	EASA.Type certificate data sheet IM A 120［R］.EASA TCDS-IM A 120,2015.
[16]	EASA.Typecertificate data sheet IM A 115［R］.EASA TCDS-IM A 115,2015.
[17]	EASA.Type certificate data sheet IM A 003［R］.EASA TCDS-IM A 003,2015.
[18]	EASA.Typecertificate data sheet IM A 110［R］.EASA TCDS-IM A 110,2007.
[19]	EASA.Typecertificate data sheet IM A 032［R］.EASA TCDS-IM A 032,2015.
[20]	EASA.Typecertificate data sheet IM A 070［R］.EASA TCDS-IM A 070,2016.
[21]	柴志勇.基于GREET模型的车用生物质燃料能耗及排放研究［D］.长春：吉林大学,2007.CHAI Zhiyong.Research on vehicular biofuels energy consumption and emission based on GREET model［D］.Changchun：Jilin University,2007.(in Chinese)
[22]	OU Xunmin,ZHANG Xiliang,CHANG Shiyan.Alternative fuel buses currently in use in China:life-cycle fossil energy use,GHG emissions and policy recommendations［J］.Energy Policy,2010,38(1):406-418.
[23]	国家统计局.中国统计年鉴:2014［M］.北京：中国统计出版社,2016.
[24]	田会,才庆祥,甄选.中国露天采煤事业的发展展望［J］.煤炭工程,2014,46(10):11-14.TIAN Hui,CAI Qingxiang,ZHEN Xuan.Developing prospects of surface coal mining industry in China［J］.Coal Engineering,2014,46(10):11-14.(in Chinese)
[25]	张庭婷,谢晓敏,黄震.微藻生物柴油全生命周期分析［J］.上海交通大学学报,2014,48(6):750-755.ZHANG Tingting,XIE Xiaomin,HUANG Zhen.Life cycle analysis of microalgae biodiesel in China［J］.Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University,2014,48(6):750-755.(in Chinese)
[26]	中国电力企业联合会统计信息部.2012年电力统计基本数据一览表.［EB/OL］.［2016-10-18］.http:∥www.cec.org.cn/guihuayutongji/tongjxinxi/niandushuju/2013-11-07/111737.html.
[27]	赵晶,郭放,阿鲁斯,等.未来航空燃料原料可持续性研究［J］.北京航空航天大学学报,2015,41(1):2378-2385.ZHAO Jing,GUO Fang,A Lusi,et al.GHG emissions of different sources alternative aviation fuels during their life cycles［J］.Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2015,41(1):2378-2385.(in Chinese)
[28]	FRANK E D,ELGOWAINY A,HAN J,et al.Life cycle comparison of hydrothermal liquefaction and lipid extraction pathways to renewable diesel from algae［J］.Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension,2013,22(5):504-510.
[29]	FRANK E,HAN J,PALOU-RIVERA I,et al.Life-cycle analysis of algal lipid fuels with the greet model［R］.Chicago：Center for Transportation Research,2011.
[30]	ZHAO B,WANG Z,LIU Z,et al.Two-stage upgrading of hydrothermal algae biocrude to kerosene-range biofuel［J］.Green Chemistry,2016,18(19):5254-5265.
[31]	ASTM.Aviation turbine fuel containing synthesized hydrocarbons：ASTM D7566-15［S］.West Conshohocken,PA:ASTM,2015:16-17.
[32]	CARTER N A,STRATTON R W,BREDEHOEFT M K,et al.Energy and environmental viability of select alternative jet fuel pathways［R］.AIAA-2011-5968,2011.
[33]	ANDERSON B E,BEYERSDORF A J,HUDGINS C H,et al.Alternative aviation fuel experiment (AAFEX)［R］.NASA/TM-2011-217059,2011.
[34]	BOLAOS ALOMA A M,MERCHANCANO ROSERO J D,ARCILA GONZLEZ M B,et al.Gaseous and particulate emissions results of the NASA alternative aviation fuel experiment (AAFEX)［R］.ASME Paper GT2010-23524,2010.
[35]	LOBO P,HAGEN D E,WHITEFIELD P D.Comparison of PM emissions from a commercial jet engine burning conventional,biomass,and fischer-tropsch fuels［J］.Environmental Science and Technology,2011,45(24):10744.1-10744.9.
[36]	LOKESH K,SETHI V,NIKOLAIDIS T,et al.Life cycle greenhouse gas analysis of biojet fuels with a technical investigation into their impact on jet engine performance［J］.Biomass and Bioenergy,2015,77:26-44.
[37]	RAHMES T F,KINDER J D,HENRY T M,et al.Sustainable bio-derived synthetic paraffinic kerosene (bio-SPK) jet fuel flights and engine tests program results［R］.AIAA-2009-7002,2009.
[38]	CHAN T W,CHISHTY W A,CANTEENWALLA P,et al.Characterization of emissions from the use of alternative aviation fuels［R］.ASME Paper GT2015-42122,2015.