横向间距与密度比对双射流气膜冷却特性影响

姚家旭; 徐进; 张科; 武俊梅; 雷蒋

doi:10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2018.06.007

横向间距与密度比对双射流气膜冷却特性影响

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2018.06.007

姚家旭^1,2,
徐进^1,2,
张科^1,2,
武俊梅^1,2,
雷蒋^1,2

1.
西安交通大学航天航空学院机械结构强度与振动国家重点实验室,西安 710049
2.
西安交通大学航天航空学院陕西省先进飞行器服役环境与控制重点实验室,西安 710049

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（11402191）；陕西省自然科学基础研究计划（2014JQ1029）

计量
- 文章访问数: 850
- HTML浏览量: 55
- PDF量: 534
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-05-11
- 刊出日期: 2018-06-28

Effects of spanwise distance and density ratio on the characteristic of double-jet film-cooling

摘要

摘要: 使用压力敏感漆（PSP)测量技术对平板上的双射流气膜冷却结构进行了研究。双射流孔间横向距离分别为0、0.5、1.0;孔间流向距离保持为3.0。密度比分别为1.0、1.5、2.5,吹风比分别为0.5、1.0、1.5、2.0。研究了孔间横向距离与密度比对双射流气膜冷却效率的影响。结果表明：双射流孔间横向距离为0时,气膜横向覆盖受限;随横向距离增大,气膜覆盖范围增加;但在横向距离过大时,气膜覆盖变差。随密度比增加,射流吹离减弱,气膜冷却效率提高。在高密度比下,横向距离较大的双射流孔气膜冷却效率较高。
- 气膜冷却 /
- 双射流 /
- 压力敏感漆(PSP) /
- 气膜冷却效率 /
- 密度比
Abstract: Double-jet film-cooling geometries on a flat plate were investigated using pressure sensitive paint (PSP) measurement technique. The spanwise distance between the double-jet film-cooling holes varied as 0, 0.5 and 1.0, while the streamwise distance was kept as 3.0. The density ratio was 1.0, 1.5 and 2.5, while the blowing ratio was 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0. The effects of spanwise distance and density ratio on the effectiveness of double-jet film-cooling holes were studied. The results showed, at spanwise distance of 0, the lateral coverage of the film was suppressed. As the spanwise distance increased, the film covered more areas. However, while the spanwise distance was too large, the film coverage degraded. With the increase of density ratio, the lifting-off of the jets weakened, and the film-cooling effectiveness improved. At high density ratios, higher film-cooling effectiveness was achieved by the double-jet film-cooling holes with larger spanwise distance.
- film-cooling /
- double-jet /
- pressure sensitive paint (PSP) /
- film-cooling effectiveness /
- density ratio

HTML

参考文献(21)

[1]	HAN J C,DUTTA S,EKKAD S.Gas turbine heat transfer and cooling technology［M］.Boca Raton,FL:CRC Press,2012.
[2]	BOGARD D G,THOLE K A.Gas turbine film cooling［J］.Journal of Propulsion and Power,2006,22(2):249-270.
[3]	HAVEN B,YAMAGATA D,KUROSAKA M,et al.Anti-kidney pair of vortices in shaped holes and their influence on film cooling effectiveness［R］.ASME Paper 97-GT-045,1997.
[4]	SINHA A K,BOGARD D G,CRAWFORD M E.Film-cooling effectiveness downstream of a single row of holes with variable density ratio［J］.Journal of Turbomachinery,1991,113(3):442-449.
[5]	WALTERS D K,LEYLEK J H.A detailed analysis of film-cooling physics:Part Ⅰ streamwise injection with cylindrical holes［J］.Journal of Turbomachinery,2000,122(1):102-112.
[6]	BERNSDORF S,ROSE M G,ABHARI R S.Modeling of film cooling:Part Ⅰ experimental study of flow structure［J］.Jounal of Turbomachinery,2006,128(1):141-149.
[7]	WRIGHT L M,MCCLAIN S T,CLEMENSON M D.Effect of density ratio on flat plate film cooling with shaped holes using psp［J］.Journal of Turbomachinery,2011,133(4):041011.1-041011.8.
[8]	WRIGHT L M,MCCLAIN S T,BROWN C P,et al.Assessment of a double hole film cooling geometry using s-PIV and PSP［R］.ASME Paper GT2013-94614,2013.
[9]	CHEN A F,LI S J,HAN J C.Film cooling with forward and backward injection for cylindrical and fan-shaped holes using PSP measurement technique［R］.ASME Paper GT2014-26232,2014.
[10]	KUSTERER K,BOHN D,SUGIMOTO T,et al.Double-jet ejection of cooling air for improved film cooling［J］.Journal of Turbomachinery,2007,129(4):809-815.
[11]	KUSTERER K,ELYAS A,BOHN D,et al.Film cooling effectiveness comparison between shaped-and double jet film cooling holes in a row arrangment［R］.ASME Paper GT2010-22604,2010.
[12]	WANG Zhan,LIU Jianjun,AN Baitao,et al.Effects of axial row-spacing for double-jet film-cooling on the cooling effectiveness［R］.ASME Paper GT2011-46055,2011.
[13]	HAN Chang,REN Jing.Multi-parameter influence on combined-hole film cooling system［J］.International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2012,55(15):4232-4240.
[14]	HAN Chang,CHI Zhongran,REN Jing,et al.Optimal arrangement of combined-hole for improving film cooling effectiveness［R］.ASME Paper GT2013-94561,2013.
[15]	WANG Zhan,LIU Jianjun,ZHANG Chao.Impacts of geometric parameters of double-jet film cooling on anti-kidney vortex structure and cooling effectiveness［R］.ASME Paper GT2013-94038,2013.
[16]	HAN J C,RALLABANDI A.Turbine blade film cooling using PSP technique［J］.Frontiers in Heat and Mass Transfer (FHMT),2010,1(1):1-16.
[17]	KENDALL A,KOOCHESFAHANI M.A method for estimating wall friction in turbulent wall-bounded flows［J］.Experiments in Fluids,2008,44(5):773-780.
[18]	WRIGHT L M,MCCLAIN S T,CLEMENSON M D.Effect of freestream turbulence intensity on film cooling jet structure and surface effectiveness using PIV and PSP［J］.Journal of Turbomachinery,2011,133(4):041023.1-041023.8.
[19]	EBERLY M K,THOLE K A.Time-resolved film-cooling flows at high and low density ratios［J］.Journal of Turbomachinery,2014,136(6):061003.1-061003.8.
[20]	KLINE S J,MCCLINTOCK F.Describing uncertainties in single-sample experiments［J］.Mechanical Engineering,1953,75(1):3-8.
[21]	YAO Jiaxu,XU Jin,ZHANG Ke,et al.Interaction of flow and film-cooling effectiveness between double-jet film-cooling holes with various spanwise distances［R］.ASME Paper GT2017-63740,2017.