来流总温对双模态燃烧室模态转换边界的影响

浮强; 宋文艳; 石德永; 王艳华

doi:10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2019.05.018

来流总温对双模态燃烧室模态转换边界的影响

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2019.05.018

西北工业大学动力与能源学院,西安 710072

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(51506177)

计量
- 文章访问数: 811
- HTML浏览量: 199
- PDF量: 432
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-11-07
- 刊出日期: 2019-05-28

Effects of incoming flow total temperature on mode transition boundary in dual mode scramjet combustor

摘要

摘要: 针对煤油燃料双模态超声速燃烧室，开展了来流总温对燃烧室模态转换边界影响的试验研究。试验采用甲烷燃烧加热直连式试验系统，隔离段进口马赫数保持2.0不变，总压为1.05 MPa，来流总温分别为885、1 085、1 285 K。试验中采集了燃烧室沿程壁面压力，并采用一维分析方法得到了燃烧室的工作模态。试验结果表明:来流总温不同时，燃烧室壁面峰值压力位置相同，同时压力峰值与隔离段壁面压力分布和激波串起始位置存在一一对应关系；来流总温上升导致燃烧室超燃-亚燃模态转换时的当量油气比上升；在燃烧室当量油气比不变的条件下，来流总温上升能够导致燃烧室壁面压力下降，隔离段内激波串长度缩短。
- 超燃冲压动机 /
- 双模态 /
- 燃烧室 /
- 模态转换边界 /
- 煤油燃料
Abstract: To estimate the effects of incoming flow total temperatures on mode transition boundary in a kerosene-fueled dual mode combustor, an test study was conducted using a direct-connected methane combustion heating test facility. The values of incoming flow total pressure at the isolator inlet should be kept at 1.05 MPa, the Mach number was about 2.0, the incoming flow total temperatures were 885, 1 085, 1 285 K, respectively. Combustor wall pressures were measured by pressure sensors; the mode of combustion was identified by calculating the Mach number at the isolator exit using a one-dimensional model. Test results indicated that, the locations of the combustor peak wall pressure were the same at different incoming flow total temperatures; there was a one-to-one relationship between the combustor peak pressure value, isolator near wall pressure distribution and shock train leading edge location; with the increase of incoming flow total temperature, the equivalence ratio of mode transition from supersonic to subsonic combustion rose up; under the same kerosene equivalence ratio, as the incoming flow total temperature increased, the combustor wall pressure dropped, the length of shock train got shorter.
- scramjet /
- dual mode /
- combustor /
- mode transition boundary /
- kerosene fuel

HTML

参考文献(19)

[1]	ANDREADIS D.Scramjet engines enabling the seamless integration of air & space operations［J］.Industrial Physicist,2004,10(4):24-27.
[2]	TURNERJ C，SMART M K.Mode change characteristics of a three-dimensional scramjet at Mach 8［J］.Journal of Propulsion and Power,2013,29(4):982-990.
[3]	FOTIA M L.Experimental study of shock-train/combustion coupling and flame dynamics in a heated supersonic flow［D］.Ann Arbor,US:The University of Michigan,2012.
[4]	WALTRUP P J,BILLIG F S.Structure of shock waves in cylindrical ducts［J］.AIAA Journal,1973,11(10):1404-1418.
[5]	田野,肖保国,张顺平,等.双模态冲压发动机燃烧性能初步研究［J］.航空动力学报,2016,31(12):2921-2927.TIAN Ye,XIAO Baoguo,ZHANG Shunping,et al.Preliminary study on combustion performance of dual-mode scramjet engine［J］.Journal of Aerospace Power,2016,31(12):2921-2927.(in Chinese)
[6]	李俊红,潘宏禄,沈清,等.超燃冲压发动机燃烧室的燃烧特性［J］.航空动力学报,2014,29(1):14-22.LI Junhong,PAN Honglu,SHEN Qing,et al.Combustion characteristics of scramjet combustor［J］.Journal of Aerospace Power,2014,29(1):14-22.(in Chinese)
[7]	MATSUO K,MIYAZATO Y，KIM H D.Shock train and pseudo-shock phenomena in internal gas flows［J］.Progress in Aerospace Sciences,1999,35(1):33-100.
[8]	GNANI F,ZARE-BEHTASH H,KONTIS K.Pseudo-shock waves and their interactions in high-speed intakes［J］.Progress in Aerospace Sciences,2016,82:36-56.
[9]	FOTIA M L,DRISCOLL J F.Isolator-combustor interactions in a direct-connect ramjet-scramjet experiment［J］.Journal of Propulsion and Power,2012,28（1）：83-95.
[10]	FOTIA M L,DRISCOLL J F.Ram-scram transition and flame/shock-train interactions in a model scramjet experiment［J］.Journal of Propulsion and Power,2013,29(1):261-273.
[11]	MASUMOTO R,TOMIOKA S,KUDO K,et al.Experimental study on combustion modes in a supersonic combustor［J］.Journal of Propulsion and Power,2011,27(2):346-355.
[12]	SHCHETINKOV E S.Piecewise-one-dimensional models of supersonic combustion and pseudo shock in a duct［J］.Combustion,Explosion and Shock Waves,1975,9(4):409-417.
[13]	VINOGRADOV V A,SERGEY A.Experimental investigation of kerosene fuel combustion in supersonic flow［J］.Journal of Propulsion and Power,1995,11(1):130-134.
[14]	王宇航,宋文艳,白菡尘,等.反压诱导方式对超燃冲压发动机隔离段流动特性影响［J］.航空动力学报,2016,31(11):2595-2603.WANG Yuhang,SONG Wenyan,BAI Hanchen,et al.Effects of back pressure induction methods on scramjet isolator flow characteristics［J］.Journal of Aerospace Power,2016,31(11):2595-2603.(in Chinese)
[15]	张岩,朱韶华,刘刚,等.双模态冲压发动机中的模态转换研究综述［J］.推进技术,2013,34(12):1719-1727.ZHANG Yan，ZHU Shaohua，LIU Gang,et al.An overview on mode transition in dual mode ramjet［J］.Journal of Propulsion Technology,2013,34(12):1719-1727.(in Chinese)
[16]	ZHANG Yan,CHEN Bing,LIU Gang,et al.Influencing factors on the mode transition in a dual-mode scramjet［J］.Acta Astronautica,2014,103:1-15.
[17]	李大鹏.煤油双模态冲压发动机燃烧室工作过程研究［D］.长沙: 国防科学技术大学，2006.LI Dapeng.Study of kerosenen fueled dual-mode ramjet combustor operation process［D］.Changsha:National University of Defense Technology,2006.(in Chinese)
[18]	肖保国，晏至辉，田野，等.超燃发动机燃烧模态判别准则初步研究［J］.推进技术,2015,36(8):1121-1126.XIAO Baoguo，YAN Zhihui，TIAN Ye,et al.Preliminary study on criterion of indentifying combustion mode for scramjet［J］.Journal of Propulsion Technology,2015,36(8):1121-1126.(in Chinese)
[19]	黄兴.超燃冲压发动机特性计算与一体化设计技术研究［D］.西安:西北工业大学,2014.HUANG Xing.The characteristic simulation of scramjet and the integration design research［D］.Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University,2014.(in Chinese)