小样本无失效寿命试验数据的轴承可靠性评估

王瑞祥; 许凌天; 陈晓阳; 王鹏; 陈世金

doi:10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20200522

小样本无失效寿命试验数据的轴承可靠性评估

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20200522

1.
上海大学机电工程与自动化学院，上海 200444
2.
中国人民解放军陆军装备部驻上海地区航空军事代表室，上海 200233

基金项目: 国家“十二五”基础科研项目上海大学子项（D.50-0109-15-001）

详细信息

作者简介:
王瑞祥（1994-），男，硕士生，主要研究方向为小样本无失效轴承可靠性评估。

中图分类号: V241;TH133.33
计量
- 文章访问数: 439
- HTML浏览量: 175
- PDF量: 146
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-12-07
- 刊出日期: 2021-11-28

Reliability evaluation of bearings based on small samples and zero-failure life test data

1.
School of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation，Shanghai University， Shanghai 200444，China
2.
Shanghai Aviation Military Representative Office of;the Army Equipment Department，People's Liberation Army，Shanghai 200233，China

摘要

摘要: 针对小样本无失效寿命试验数据可靠性问题提出了评估模型。模型采用Bayes理论构造服从原始样本的抽样函数，结合Bootstrap法生成大量服从抽样函数的随机数作为增广样本，再通过最佳线性不变估计法分析原始样本及增广样本得到Weibull分布双参数估计值作为可靠性评估结果。通过Monte-Carlo法仿真生成服从Weibull分布的随机数，分别采用该模型、配分布曲线法及现有Bayes理论对此随机数做评估，对比发现：该模型得到的参数估计较现有Bayes理论和配分布曲线法更接近Weibull双参数真值，且形状参数和尺度参数估计值的相对误差均低于10%，验证了模型分析小样本无失效数据进行可靠性评估的可行性。借助文献实例对模型进行分析，对比得出模型能得到较现有Bayes理论和配分布曲线法更符合工程实际的评估结果；模型在小样本情况下的双侧可靠度置信区间长度低于现有Bayes理论和配分布曲线法，有效提高了小样本无失效数据可靠性评估精度。
- 小样本无失效 /
- 可靠性评估 /
- Bayes理论 /
- Bootstrap法 /
- 置信区间
Abstract: A reliability evaluation model of small samples and zero-failure life data was proposed.The Bayes theory was used to construct a sampling function subjecting to the original small samples.The Bootstrap method was used to generate a large of random numbers subjecting to the sampling function as augmented samples.Both of the original and augmented samples were analyzed by the best linear invariant estimation method to obtain the two-parameter estimation value of Weibull distribution for reliability evaluation.The Monte-Carlo method was used to generate random numbers subjecting to the Weibull distribution.These random numbers were evaluated by the model，the match distribution curve method and the existing Bayes theory respectively.The results showed that the parameter estimates obtained by the model were closer to the Weibull two-parameter true value than the existing Bayes theory and the match distribution curve method.Meanwhile，the relative error of the estimated value of the shape parameter and the scale parameter was less than 10%，indicating the feasibility of the model to analyze the small sample of zero-failure data for reliability evaluation.The model was verified with examples in reference，and the results showed that the reliability evaluation obtained by the model was closer to that used in actual engineering practice than the other two methods；moreover the model's two-sided reliability confidence interval length was smaller than the other two methods，effectively improving the accuracy of reliability evaluation of small samples and zero-failure data .
- small samples and zero-failure /
- reliability evaluation /
- Bayes theory /
- Bootstrap method /
- confidence interval

HTML

参考文献(25)

[1]	石长伟,刘志明.小样本评估方法[J].质量与可靠性,2006（6）:24-26.
[2]	MARTZ H F,WALLER R A.A Bayesian zero-failure （BAZE） reliability demonstration tension procedure[J].Journal of Quality Technology,1976,11（3）:128-137.
[3]	ERTO P,GIORGIO M.Modified “practical Bayes-estimators”:reliability theory[J].IEEE Transactions on Reliability,1996,45（1）:132-137.
[4]	KWON Y I.Design of Bayesian zero-failure reliability demonstration test for products with Weibull lifetime distribution[J].Journal of Applied Reliability,2014,14（4）:220-224.
[5]	KWON Y I.The effect of scale parameter in designing reliability demonstration test for lognormal lifetime distribution[J].Journal of Applied Reliability,2014,14（1）:53-57.
[6]	韩明.状态概率的E-Bayes估计与多层Bayes估计[J].运筹与管理,2006,15（5）:70-74.
[7]	韩明.失效概率的E-Bayes估计及其性质[J].数学物理学报,2007,27（3）:488-495.
[8]	傅惠民,张勇波.Weibull分布定时无失效数据可靠性分析方法[J].航空动力学报,2010,25（12）:2807-2810.
[9]	李海洋,谢里阳,刘杰,等.无失效数据场合智能换刀机器人中轴承的可靠性评估[J].机械工程学报,2019,55（2）:186-194.
[10]	LI H,XIE L,LI M,et al.Reliability assessment of high-quality and long-life products based on zero-failure data[J].Quality and Reliability Engineering International,2019,35（1）:470-482.
[11]	YIN Y C,HUANG H Z,PENG W,et al.An E-Bayesian method for reliability analysis of exponentially distributed products with zero-failure data[J].Eksploatacjai Niezawodnosc :Maintenance and Reliability,2016,18（3）:445-449.
[12]	茆诗松,夏剑锋,管文琪.轴承寿命试验中无失效数据的处理[J].应用概率统计,1993，9（3）:326-331.
[13]	肖支才,高华明,丁通,等.自助法在小样本数据均值估计中的应用[J].海军航空工程学院学报,2009,24（5）:563-567,572.
[14]	贾祥,王小林,郭波.极少失效数据和无失效数据的可靠性评估[J].机械工程学报,2016,52（2）:182-188.
[15]	LI D C,LIN L S.A new approach to assess product lifetime performance for small data sets[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2013,230（2）:290-298.
[16]	丛伟,陈晓阳,王志坚,等.Weibull分布产品小样本定时截尾试验方案下的可靠性评估[J].中国机械工程,2013,24（14）:1891-1896.
[17]	高攀东,沈雪瑾,陈晓阳,等.基于自助法的小样本Weibull分布可靠性分析[J].机械设计与研究,2015,31（2）:164-167.
[18]	赵宇.可靠性数据分析[M].北京：国防工业出版社,2011.
[19]	BERGER J O.Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis[M].New York:Springer-Verlag,1985.
[20]	高攀东,沈雪瑾,陈晓阳,等.无失效数据下航空轴承的可靠性分析[J].航空动力学报,2015,30（8）:1980-1987.
[21]	中国电子技术标准化研究所.可靠性试验用表[M].北京：国防工业出版社,1987.
[22]	秦荦晟,陈晓阳,沈雪瑾.小样本下基于竞争失效的轴承可靠性评估[J].振动与冲击,2017,36（23）:248-254.
[23]	宁江凡,鄢小清,张士峰.液体火箭发动机无失效条件下的可靠性分析方法[J].国防科技大学学报,2006,28（5）:22-25.
[24]	STENSRUD E,FOSS T,KITCHENHAM B,et al.An empirical validation of the relationship between the magnitude of relative error and project size[C]∥Proceedings the 8th IEEE Symposium on Software Metrics.Ottawa,ON,Canada :IEEE,2002:3-12.
[25]	JIANG Renbin,JIANG Danyu.Fiducial lower confidence limits of reliability for a standby system based on zero-failure data[J].Journal of Zhejiang University Science,2010,37（6）:629-632.