基于改进Gappy POD方法的压气机叶栅气动外形反设计方法

刘汉儒; 马岩; 赵星宇; 王掩刚; 胡佳伟; 李丽丽; 蒋永松

doi:10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210139

基于改进Gappy POD方法的压气机叶栅气动外形反设计方法

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210139

1.
西北工业大学长三角研究院，江苏太仓 215400
2.
西北工业大学动力与能源学院，西安 710129
3.
中国航空发动机集团有限公司沈阳发动机研究所，沈阳 110015

基金项目: 国家科技重大专项（2017-Ⅱ-0009-0023）；太仓市大院大所创新引领专项项目（TC2019DYDS09）

详细信息

作者简介:
刘汉儒（1985-），男，副教授，博士，主要从事叶轮机械气动热力学、气动降维计算方法、气动噪声等方面研究。

中图分类号: V231.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 236
- HTML浏览量: 53
- PDF量: 77
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-04-05
- 刊出日期: 2022-03-28

Inverse design for aerodynamic shape of compressor cascade based on improved Gappy POD method

1.
Yangtze River Delta Research Institute，Northwestern Polytechnical University，Taicang Jiangsu 215400，China
2.
School of Power and Energy，Northwestern Polytechnical University，Xi'an 710129，China
3.
Shenyang Engine Research Institute，Aero Engine Corporation of China，Shenyang 110015，China

摘要

摘要: 针对压气机叶栅气动高效反设计，建立了基于Gappy proper orthogonal demcomposition（Gappy POD）的气动外形反设计框架。通过Kriging代理模型优化获得某型压气机叶栅的气动优化结果，并以此作为反设计目标基础。为进一步提高基本Gappy POD反设计的效率及精度，发展了基于自适应快照替换优化和修正目标压力系数分布的两种改进方法，并对基本Gappy POD结合两种改进策略的反设计精度和效率进行了详细对比。结果表明:基于自适应快照替换优化流程的反设计框架使得反设计精度明显提高，叶片表面压力系数分布方均根误差从6.49×10^-3降低到1.29×10^-3，而通过修正目标压力系数分布则提高了单次反设计精度。将两种改进策略同时结合改进Gappy POD，能够获得在同等设计精度下更快的收敛速度，可为压缩系统几何部件反设计提供新的高效方法。
- 压气机叶栅 /
- 气动反设计 /
- 改进Gappy POD /
- 快照替换优化 /
- 压力系数分布修正
Abstract: In view of the high-efficiency aerodynamic inverse design of the compressor cascade，an inverse design framework of the aerodynamic shape based on Gappy proper orthogonal decomposition （Gappy POD） was established.A certain type of compressor cascade was optimized through the Kriging surrogate model to obtain the aerodynamic optimization results，which were used as the basis of the inverse design goals.To further enhance the efficiency and accuracy，two improved methods based on adaptive snapshot replacement optimization and correction of the target pressure coefficient distribution were developed.The efficiency and accuracy of the basic Gappy POD combining these two improvement strategies were compared.Results showed that，the inverse design framework based on the adaptive snapshot replacement optimization process significantly improved the accuracy， and the root mean square error of the pressure coefficient distribution on the blade surface was reduced from 6.49×10^-3 to 1.29×10^-3.Correcting the target pressure coefficient distribution could improve the accuracy of the single inverse design.Combining the two improvement strategies for Gappy POD can achieve faster convergence speed with the same design accuracy，which can provide a new and efficient method for the reverse design of the geometric components of turbomachinery.
- compressor cascade /
- aerodynamic inverse design /
- improved Gappy POD /
- snapshot replacement optimization /
- pressure coefficient distribution correction

HTML

参考文献(23)

[1]	伊卫林.风扇/压气机三维气动优化设计方法及其应用研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学，2006.
[2]	王晓锋,席光.基于Kriging模型的翼型气动性能优化设计[J].航空学报，2005，26（5）:545-549.
[3]	邱亚松.基于数据降维技术的气动外形设计方法[D].西安:西北工业大学，2014.
[4]	AUBRY N，HOLMES P，LUMLEY J，et al.The dynamics of coherent structures in the wall region of a turbulent boundary layer[J].Journal of Fluid Mechanics，1988,192:115-173.
[5]	邱亚松,白俊强,华俊.基于本征正交分解和代理模型的流场预测方法[J].航空学报，2013,34（6）:1249-1260.
[6]	陈刚,李跃明,闫桂荣,等.基于POD降阶模型的气动弹性快速预测方法研究[J].宇航学报，2009,30（5）:1765-1769,1796.
[7]	赵松原,黄明恪.模拟退火算法和POD降阶模态计算在翼型反设计中的应用[J].空气动力学学报，2007，25（2）:236-240.
[8]	刘浩,徐敏,叶茂.基于特征正交分解的跨声速流场重构和翼型反设计方法研究[J].空气动力学学报，2012,30（4）:539-545.
[9]	寇家庆,张伟伟,高传强.基于POD和DMD方法的跨声速抖振模态分析[J].航空学报，2016,37（9）:2679-2689.
[10]	THOMAS A，FORREST L，BRINA A，et al.A reduced-order model for turbomachinery flows using proper orthogonal decomposition[R].ASME Paper GT2013-94914，2013.
[11]	KATO H，FUNAZAKI K.POD-driven adaptive sampling for efficient surrogate modeling and its application to supersonic turbine optimization[R].ASME Paper GT2014-27229，2014.
[12]	LUO Jiaqi，ZHU Yalu，TANG Xiao，et al.Flow reconstructions and aerodynamic shape optimization of turbomachinery blades by POD-based hybrid models[J].Technological Sciences，2017,60（11）:1658-1673.
[13]	LUO Jiaqi.Design optimization of the last stage of a 4.5-stage compressor using a POD-based hybrid model[J].Aerospace Science and Technology，2018,76:303-314.
[14]	EVERSON R，SIROVICH L.Karhunen-Loeve procedure for Gappy data[J].Journal of the Optical Society of America A:Optics Image Science and Vision，1995,12（8）:1657-1664.
[15]	SIROVICH L.Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures:Ⅰ coherent structures[J].Quarterly of Applied Mathematics，1987,45（3）:561-571.
[16]	NATHAN E M，LAWRENCE S U.An application of Gappy POD for subsonic cavity flow PIV data[J].Experiments in Fluids，2007,42（1）:79-91.
[17]	DANIELE V，GEORGR E K.Gappy data and reconstruction procedures for flow past a cylinder[J].Journal of Fluid Mechanics，2004,519:315-336.
[18]	GUO Rong，LI Rennian，ZHANG Renhui.Reconstruction and prediction of flow field fluctuation intensity and flow-induced noise in impeller domain of jet centrifugal pump using Gappy POD method[J].Energies，2019，12（1）:1-17.
[19]	MIFSUD M，VENDL A，HANSEN L U，et al.Fusing wind-tunnel measurements and CFD data using constrained Gappy proper orthogonal decomposition[J].Aerospace Science and Technology，2019，86:312-326.
[20]	JAMESON A.Aerodynamic design via control theory[J].Journal of Scientific Computing,1998,3（3）:233-260.
[21]	PAPADIMITRIOU D I，GIANNAKOGLOU K C.A continuous adjoint method with objective function derivatives based on boundary integrals，for inviscid and viscous flows[J].Computers and Fluids，2007,36（2）:325-341.
[22]	BUI-THANH T，DAMODARAN M，WILLCOX K.Aerodynamic data reconstruction and inverse design using proper orthogonal decomposition[J].AIAA Journal，2004,42（8）:1505-1516.
[23]	WANG Yangang，LI Yue，CHEN Junxu.Analysis of the unsteady flow in compressor cascade with POD method[R].ASME Paper GT2016-57638，2016.