留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

航空发动机高压转子连接部件松动故障动力学特性研究

张庆山 胡振辉 洪军 裴世源

张庆山, 胡振辉, 洪军, 等. 航空发动机高压转子连接部件松动故障动力学特性研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2024, 39(3):20210395 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210395
引用本文: 张庆山, 胡振辉, 洪军, 等. 航空发动机高压转子连接部件松动故障动力学特性研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2024, 39(3):20210395 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210395
ZHANG Qingshan, HU Zhenhui, HONG Jun, et al. Research on dynamic characteristics of aero-engine high-pressure rotor connection component loosening fault[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2024, 39(3):20210395 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210395
Citation: ZHANG Qingshan, HU Zhenhui, HONG Jun, et al. Research on dynamic characteristics of aero-engine high-pressure rotor connection component loosening fault[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2024, 39(3):20210395 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210395

航空发动机高压转子连接部件松动故障动力学特性研究

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210395
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(NSFC_51975456); 国家科技重大专项(2017-Ⅶ-0010-0105)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    张庆山(1997-),男,硕士,主要从事转子动力学研究。E-mail:zhangqsxy@163.com

    通讯作者:

    裴世源(1983-),男,副研究员、硕士生导师,博士,主要从事高效与智能数值算法研究和工业软件开发等。E-mail:peishiyuan@xjtu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: V231.96

Research on dynamic characteristics of aero-engine high-pressure rotor connection component loosening fault

  • 摘要:

    针对航空发动机高压转子在实际工作过程中存在的连接部件松动现象,建立了考虑松动故障特性的高压转子Timoshenko梁模型,探讨了结合面刚度、转速、松动螺栓数量、松动故障位置、拧紧力矩对转子动力学的影响,并对理论分析结果进行了试验验证。结果表明:故障系统升速过程中呈现出明显亚临界共振现象,且临界峰值转速提前;松动螺栓数量越多,系统倍周期分岔现象越明显;松动故障位于转子跨距中间时对系统动力学的影响较大;螺栓拧紧力矩减小,系统第二阶临界峰值转速提前;试验数据与理论分析结果比较吻合,提出的理论方法具有一定的准确性和适用性。研究结果为航空发动机高压转子连接部件松动故障的进一步研究提供了理论和试验基础。

     

  • 图 1  航空发动机高压转子二维结构(单位:mm)

    Figure 1.  Two-dimensional structure of high-pressure rotors in aircraft engines (unit:mm)

    图 2  高压转子Timoshenko梁有限元模型

    Figure 2.  Finite element model of Timoshenko beam for high-pressure rotor

    图 3  结合面开闭区域示意图

    Figure 3.  Diagram of the open and close area in the joint surface

    图 4  结合面坐标系示意图

    Figure 4.  Schematic diagram of the joint surface coordinate system

    图 5  高压转子ANSYS有限元模型

    Figure 5.  ANSYS finite element model of high-pressure rotor

    图 6  松动单元各项刚度变化曲线

    Figure 6.  Variation curve of stiffness of loose element

    图 7  两种工况下左轴承处y方向稳态响应

    Figure 7.  Steady-state response in the y-direction at the left bearing under two working conditions

    图 8  无松动故障时的动力学响应

    Figure 8.  Dynamic response without loose fault

    图 9  有松动故障时的动力学响应

    Figure 9.  Dynamic response with loose fault

    图 10  转子速度为3 141.7 r/ min(1/3倍临界转速)时,左轴承处y方向振动响应

    Figure 10.  Vibration response in the y direction at left bearing when the rotor speed is 3 141.7 r/min (1/3 times the critical speed)

    图 12  转子速度为15 000 r/ min(大于失稳转速)时,左轴承处y方向振动响应

    Figure 12.  Vibration response in the y direction at left bearing when the rotor speed is 15 000 r/min (greater than the unstable speed)

    图 11  转子速度为4 712.5 r/ min(1/2倍临界转速)时,左轴承处y方向振动响应

    Figure 11.  Vibration response in the y direction at left bearing when the rotor speed is 4 712.5 r/min (1/2 times the critical speed)

    图 13  松动螺栓1/12圈时的动力学响应

    Figure 13.  Dynamic response when the loose bolts is 1/12 turns

    图 14  松动螺栓1/6圈时的动力学响应

    Figure 14.  Dynamic response when the loose bolts is 1/6 turns

    图 15  松动螺栓1/12圈时,亚临界转速、转速为15 000 r/min时左轴承处轴心轨迹

    Figure 15.  Axis center trajectory at left bearing at a subcritical speed of 15 000 r/min when the loose bolts is 1/12 turns

    图 16  松动螺栓1/6圈时,亚临界转速、转速为15 000 r/min时左轴承处轴心轨迹

    Figure 16.  A xis center trajectory at the left bearing at a subcritical speed of 15 000 r/min when the loose bolts is 1/6 turns

    图 17  不同松动位置下转速-幅值曲线

    Figure 17.  Speed-amplitude curve in different loose positions

    图 18  松动螺栓1/6圈时的动力学响应

    Figure 18.  Dynamic response when the loose bolts is 1/6 turns

    图 19  松动故障位于二级盘和三级圆盘

    Figure 19.  Loose fault located in secondary and tertiary disc

    图 20  松动故障位于一级盘和二级盘

    Figure 20.  Loose fault located in primary and secondary disc

    图 21  松动故障位于前轴颈和一级盘

    Figure 21.  Loose fault located in front journal and primary disc

    图 22  不同螺栓拧紧力矩下的动力学响应

    Figure 22.  Dynamic response under different tightening torque

    图 23  高压转子试验台

    Figure 23.  High-pressure rotor experiment platform

    图 24  理论与试验对比(定量)

    Figure 24.  Comparison between theory and experiment (quantitative)

    图 25  理论与试验对比(定性)

    Figure 25.  Comparison between theory and experiment (qualitative)

    表  1  高压转子参数一览表

    Table  1.   List of high-pressure rotor parameters

    参数 数值
    弹性模量/1011 (N/m2 2.1
    轴承刚度/107 (N/m) 80(左)、4.01 (右)
    轴承阻尼/(N·s/m) 500
    密度/(kg/m3 7810
    泊松比 0.3
    不平衡质量/(g·mm) 300(相位角为0°)
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  两种模型固有频率对比

    Table  2.   Comparison of natural frequencies in two models

    固有频率/Hz第1阶第2阶第3阶第4阶
    ANSYS156.03456.781121.151892.26
    Timoshenko158.07461.011128.281903.68
    误差/%1.290.920.630.60
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  两种模型临界转速对比

    Table  3.   Comparison of critical speeds in two models

    临界转速/(r/min) 第1阶 第2阶 第3阶
    ANSYS有限元模型 9501 28662 86441
    Timoshenko梁 9620 29002 87323
    误差/% 1.25 1.17 1.01
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  一个周期内结合面开闭变化规律

    Table  4.   Variation law of the opening and closing of the joint surface within a cycle

    松动螺栓数量/圈 高压转子旋转角度ψ/(°)
    全部闭合 逐渐张开 全部张开 逐渐闭合 全部闭合
    1/12 0~63 63~127 127~233 233~297 297~360
    1/9 0~54 54~136 136~224 224~306 306~360
    1/6 0~43 43~149 149~211 211~317 317~360
    1/4 0~31 32~158 158~203 203~329 329~360
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 焦华宾,莫松. 航空涡轮发动机现状及未来发展综述[J]. 航空制造技术,2015,58(12): 62-65. JIAO Huabin,MO Song. Present status and development trend of aircraft turbine engine[J]. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology,2015,58(12): 62-65. (in Chinese

    JIAO Huabin, MO Song. Present status and development trend of aircraft turbine engine[J]. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 58(12): 62-65. (in Chinese)
    [2] 陈果,李成刚,王德友. 航空发动机转子-滚动轴承-支承-机匣耦合系统的碰摩故障分析与验证[J]. 航空动力学报,2008,23(7): 1304-1311. CHEN Guo,LI Chenggang,WANG Deyou. Nonlinear dynamic analysis and experiment verification of rubbing faults of rotor-ball bearing-support-stator coupling system for aero-engine[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2008,23(7): 1304-1311. (in Chinese

    CHEN Guo, LI Chenggang, WANG Deyou. Nonlinear dynamic analysis and experiment verification of rubbing faults of rotor-ball bearing-support-stator coupling system for aero-engine[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2008, 23(7): 1304-1311. (in Chinese)
    [3] 王军,洪杰,陈萌,等. 航空发动机转子系统动力特性的非概率分析[J]. 航空动力学报,2012,27(1): 75-81. WANG Jun,HONG Jie,CHEN Meng,et al. Non-probabilistic analysis on aero-engine rotordynamics[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2012,27(1): 75-81. (in Chinese

    WANG Jun, HONG Jie, CHEN Meng, et al. Non-probabilistic analysis on aero-engine rotordynamics[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2012, 27(1): 75-81. (in Chinese)
    [4] 刘展翅,廖明夫,丛佩红,等. 航空发动机转子挤压油膜阻尼器设计方法[J]. 航空动力学报,2015,30(11): 2762-2770. LIU Zhanchi,LIAO Mingfu,CONG Peihong,et al. Design method of squeeze film damper for aero-engine rotors[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2015,30(11): 2762-2770. (in Chinese

    LIU Zhanchi, LIAO Mingfu, CONG Peihong, et al. Design method of squeeze film damper for aero-engine rotors[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2015, 30(11): 2762-2770. (in Chinese)
    [5] 魏企业,石宏,孙方成,等. 航空发动机转子装配螺栓自动拧紧机设计与分析[J]. 机械,2017,44(6): 67-70. WEI Qiye,SHI Hong,SUN Fangcheng,et al. Design and analysis of aero engine rotor automatic bolt tightening machine structure[J]. Machinery,2017,44(6): 67-70. (in Chinese

    WEI Qiye, SHI Hong, SUN Fangcheng, et al. Design and analysis of aero engine rotor automatic bolt tightening machine structure[J]. Machinery, 2017, 44(6): 67-70. (in Chinese)
    [6] IZUMI S,YOKOYAMA T,IWASAKI A,et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of tightening and loosening mechanism of threaded fastener[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis,2005,12(4): 604-615. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2004.09.009
    [7] ZHOU Xingjie,FU Xuyun,ZHAO Minghang,et al. Regression model for civil aero-engine gas path parameter deviation based on deep domain-adaptation with Res-BP neural network[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics,2021,34(1): 79-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2020.08.051
    [8] WANG Furui,HUO Linsheng,SONG Gangbing. A piezoelectric active sensing method for quantitative monitoring of bolt loosening using energy dissipation caused by tangential damping based on the fractal contact theory[J]. Smart Materials and Structures,2018,27(1): 015023. doi: 10.1088/1361-665X/aa9a65
    [9] WANG Furui,SONG Gangbing. Bolt early looseness monitoring using modified vibro-acoustic modulation by time-reversal[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2019,130: 349-360. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.036
    [10] REN Lihua,YE Zhifeng,ZHAO Yongping. A modeling method for aero-engine by combining stochastic gradient descent with support vector regression[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology,2020,99: 105775. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.105775
    [11] ZADOKS R I,YU X. An investigation of the self-loosening behavior of bolts under transverse vibration[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration,1997,208(2): 189-209. doi: 10.1006/jsvi.1997.1173
    [12] KEINER H,GADALA M S,TANG C W. Validity of bolt-removal and gap-insertion techniques to experimentally simulate the vibration of a cracked rotor[J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures,2004,27(6): 449-458.
    [13] LIU Yongmeng,ZHANG Maowei,SUN Chuanzhi,et al. A method to minimize stage-by-stage initial unbalance in the aero engine assembly of multistage rotors[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology,2019,85: 270-276. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.12.007
    [14] ZHANG Mengyang,SHEN Yanfeng,XIAO Li,et al. Application of subharmonic resonance for the detection of bolted joint looseness[J]. Nonlinear Dynamics,2017,88(3): 1643-1653. doi: 10.1007/s11071-017-3336-1
    [15] 刘卓乾. 航空发动机螺栓连接转子的振动特性研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学,2016. LIU Zhuoqian. Studies on vibration characteristic of aero-engine rotor with bolt joint[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University,2016. (in Chinese

    LIU Zhuoqian. Studies on vibration characteristic of aero-engine rotor with bolt joint[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2016. (in Chinese)
    [16] 马跃,吴甜,孙新,等. 轮盘-轴组件结合面螺栓等效刚度及其对动力学性能影响的研究[J]. 风机技术,2019,61(2): 75-81. MA Yue,WU Tian,SUN Xin,et al. Study on equivalent stiffness of joint surface bolts of discshaft assembly and its effect on dynamic performance[J]. Chinese Journal of Turbomachinery,2019,61(2): 75-81. (in Chinese

    MA Yue, WU Tian, SUN Xin, et al. Study on equivalent stiffness of joint surface bolts of discshaft assembly and its effect on dynamic performance[J]. Chinese Journal of Turbomachinery, 2019, 61(2): 75-81. (in Chinese)
    [17] AMERINI F,MEO M. Structural health monitoring of bolted joints using linear and nonlinear acoustic/ultrasound methods[J]. Structural Health Monitoring,2011,10(6): 659-672. doi: 10.1177/1475921710395810
    [18] BECHT P,DECKERS E,CLAEYS C,et al. Loose bolt detection in a complex assembly using a vibro-acoustic sensor array[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2019,130: 433-451. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.05.019
    [19] 孟春晓,张文胜,马辉,等. 螺栓连接鼓筒转子结构动力学特性分析[J]. 振动工程学报,2019,32(3): 517-525. MENG Chunxiao,ZHANG Wensheng,MA Hui,et al. Analysis of dynamic characteristics of a bolted drum rotor structure[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering,2019,32(3): 517-525. (in Chinese

    MENG Chunxiao, ZHANG Wensheng, MA Hui, et al. Analysis of dynamic characteristics of a bolted drum rotor structure[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2019, 32(3): 517-525. (in Chinese)
    [20] QIN Zhaoye,HAN Qinkai,CHU Fulei. Bolt loosening at rotating joint interface and its influence on rotor dynamics[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis,2016,59: 456-466. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.11.002
    [21] CHEN Renxiang,CHEN Siyang,YANG Lixia,et al. Looseness diagnosis method for connecting bolt of fan foundation based on sensitive mixed-domain features of excitation-response and manifold learning[J]. Neurocomputing,2017,219: 376-388. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.09.041
  • 加载中
图(25) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  560
  • HTML浏览量:  395
  • PDF量:  108
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-07-26
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-11-29

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回