Spatial distribution of propane laminar pre-mixed flame temperature and equivalence ratio based on LIBS
-
摘要:
激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBS)是监测燃烧过程关键参数的重要手段之一。为此搭建了LIBS三维可移动实验测量平台,结合等离子体能量和光谱研究了丙烷层流预混火焰的空间结构,得到了不同当量比和不同高度的温度趋势和当量比空间分布。结果表明:本生灯火焰预混燃烧区厚度随高度增加而增加;H、N、O的谱线强度和等离子体能量变化趋势一致,说明粒子体积分数是影响等离子体能量的主因。通过标定H656和N746的谱线强度比值与当量比的关系得到了局部当量比的空间分布。
Abstract:Laser induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is one of the important means to monitor the key parameters of combustion process. A three-dimensional movable experimental measurement platform of LIBS was built, then the spatial structure of propane laminar premixed flame was studied by combining plasma energy and spectroscopy, and the temperature trends and equivalence ratio spatial distributions with different equivalence ratios and heights were obtained. The results showed that the thickness of premixed combustion zone of Bunsen flame increased with the increase of height, and the spectral line intensity of H, N and O was consistent with the change trend of plasma energy, indicating that the particle volume fraction is the main factor affecting plasma energy. Then the spatial distribution of local equivalent ratio was obtained by calibrating the relationship between H656/N746 and equivalence ratio.
-
Key words:
- propane /
- Bunsen burner /
- premixed flame /
- laser induced breakdown spectroscopy /
- temperature /
- equivalence ratio
-
表 1 实验工况表
Table 1. Experimental conditions
流量/(L/min) 高度H/mm 当量比φ 4 4.0, 6.5, 9.0 0.9, 1.0, 1.45 表 2 谱线强度比值与φ线性拟合参数
Table 2. Linear fitting parameters of line intensities ratio with φ
H/mm R2 μ H656/N742 μ H656/N744 μ H656/N746 μ H656/O778 4.0 0.96119 0.96891 0.98113 0.96934 6.5 0.99486 0.98832 0.99459 0.96742 9.0 0.97017 0.98799 0.98261 0.82648 表 3 μ H656/N746与φ线性拟合参数表
Table 3. Linear fitting parameters of μ H656/N746 with φ
H/mm R2 b a 4.0 0.98113 2.18485 2.56087 6.5 0.99459 2.22861 2.57575 9.0 0.98261 2.67172 2.03759 注:表中a、b分别为方程y=a+bx的截距和斜率。 -
[1] BARLOW R S,CARTER C D. Raman/Rayleigh/LIF measurements of nitric oxide formation in turbulent hydrogen jet flames[J]. Combustion and Flame,1994,97(3/4): 261-280. [2] 刘晶儒,胡志云,张振荣,等. 激光光谱技术在燃烧流场诊断中的应用[J]. 光学精密工程,2011,19(2): 284-296. doi: 10.3788/OPE.20111902.0284LIU Jingru,HU Zhiyun,ZHANG Zhenrong,et al. Laser spectroscopy applied to combustion diagnostics[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering,2011,19(2): 284-296. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3788/OPE.20111902.0284 [3] SINGH S,MARK P B,ROLF D R. Mixing and flame structures inferred from OH-PLIF for conventional and low-temperature diesel engine combustion[J]. Combustion and Flame,2009,156(10): 1898-1908. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.07.019 [4] DONG H,SATIJA A,GOREJAY P,et al. Experimental study of CO2 diluted, piloted, turbulent CH4/air premixed flames using high-repetition-rate OH PLIF[J]. Combustion and Flame,2018,193: 145-156. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.03.012 [5] KUENNE G,SEFFRIN F,FUEST F,et al. Experimental and numerical analysis of a lean premixed stratified burner using 1D Raman/Rayleigh scattering and large eddy simulation[J]. Combustion and Flame,2012,159(8): 2669-2689. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.02.010 [6] QU Zhechao,HOLMGREN P,SKOGLUND N. Distribution of temperature, H2O and atomic potassium during entrained flow biomass combustion-coupling in situ TDLAS with modeling approaches and ash chemistry[J]. Combustion and Flame,2018,188: 488-497. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.10.013 [7] MATTHIAS M S,SCHULZ S,STELZNER B. Determination of temperature and water-concentration in fuel-rich oxy-fuel methane flames applying TDLAS[J]. Combustion and Flame,2020,214: 336-345. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.01.003 [8] HYUNG M J, JOHN H K, LEE S H. Towards simplified monitoring of instantaneous fuel concentration in both liquid and gas fueled flames using a combustor injectable LIBS plug[J]. Energy, 2018, 160: 225-232. [9] KIM J H,LEE S H,DO H,et al. Instantaneous monitoring of local fuel concentration in a liquid hydrocarbon-fueled flame using a LIBS plug[J]. Energy,2017,140(1): 18-26. [10] WU Yue,GRAGSTON M,ZHANG Zhili. High-pressure 1D fuel/air-ratio measurements with LIBS[J]. Combustion and Flame,2018,198: 120-129. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.09.009 [11] PHUOC T X,WHITE F P. Laser-induced spark for measurements of the fuel-to-air ratio of a combustible mixture[J]. Fuel,2002,81(13): 1761-1765. doi: 10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00105-9 [12] STAVROPOULOS P,MICHALAKOU A,SKEVIS G,et al. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy as an analytical tool for equivalence ratio measurement in methane-air premixed flames[J]. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy,2005,60(7): 1092-1097. [13] LEE T W,HEGDE N. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for in situ diagnostics of combustion parameters including temperature[J]. Combustion and Flame,2005,142(3): 314-316. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.05.003 [14] KIEFER J, JOHANNES W T. Laser-induced breakdown flame thermometry[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2012, 159(12): 3576-3582. [15] TIAN Zhaohua, DONG Meirong. Spatially resolved laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy in laminar premixed methane-air flames[J]. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 2017, 136: 8-15. [16] WOOD R W. Self-reversal of the red hydrogen line[J]. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science,1926,2(10): 876-880. doi: 10.1080/14786442608564117 [17] DAVIS J P,SMITH A L. Laser-induced plasma formation in Xe, Ar, N2, and O2 at the first four Nd: YAG harmonics[J]. Applied Optics,1991,30: 4358-4364. doi: 10.1364/AO.30.004358 [18] ZHANG Z,HUANG S. Influence of the pressure and temperature on laser induced breakdown spectroscopy for gas concentration measurements[J]. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy,2019,155: 24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2019.03.008 [19] SURMICK D M,PARIGGER C G. Electron density determination of aluminium laser-induced plasma[J]. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics,2015,48(11): 115701.1-115701.6. doi: 10.1088/0953-4075/48/11/115701