液氧煤油发动机汽蚀故障主动控制策略仿真研究

陈一丹; 陈宏玉; 王升

doi:10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210609

液氧煤油发动机汽蚀故障主动控制策略仿真研究

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210609

中国航天科技集团有限公司西安航天动力研究所，西安 710100

基金项目: 液体火箭发动机技术重点实验室基金（6142704180308）

详细信息

作者简介:
陈一丹（1997-），男，硕士生，主要从事液氧煤油发动机系统仿真研究

中图分类号: V430
计量
- 文章访问数: 550
- HTML浏览量: 302
- PDF量: 244
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-10-24
- 网络出版日期: 2023-03-04

Simulation of active control strategy for cavitation failure of LOX/kerosene engine

Xi’an Aerospace Propulsion Institute， China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation，Xi’an 710100，China

摘要

摘要:
以氧化剂预压泵入口压力作为监测对象，在氧化剂主泵汽蚀故障时通过动作流量调节器减少进入预燃室的燃料流量，进而稳定混合比、抑制燃气温升，达到避免过高燃气温度造成灾难性后果的目的。设置燃料路流量调控为98.8%、97.2%、89.5%和74.5%的额定流量和0、0.15、0.23 s和0.30 s四种调控延时的控制策略，通过仿真研究其有效性。结果表明：汽蚀故障下燃料最佳节流量是保持混合比为额定值的取值；最大允许时间延时随着汽蚀故障严重程度的增加而降低。当贮箱压力在0.10 s内降低至额定压力的53%、43%和33%时，最大允许动作延时分别为0.23、0.17 s和0.13 s；最佳控制时间延时参考值为0.09 s，增大延时导致部分组件参数出现超调，减小延时会存在发动机熄火的风险。
- 液氧煤油发动机 /
- 预燃室 /
- 汽蚀故障 /
- 健康监控 /
- 系统仿真
Abstract:
Taking the inlet pressure of the oxidizer boost pump as the monitoring object, the fuel flow rate into the gas generator can be reduced by the action flow regulator during the cavitation failure of the oxidizer main pump, then the mixture ratio can be stabilized and the combustion temperature can be suppressed, so as to avoid the catastrophic consequences of excessive gas temperature. The control strategies of 98.8%, 97.2%, 89.5% and 74.5% rated flow rate and the control delay of 0, 0.15, 0.23 s and 0.30 s were set up. The effectiveness was studied by simulation. The results showed that the optimum fuel flow rate under cavitation failure was used to keep the mixing ratio rating, and the maximum allowable time delay decreased with the increase of cavitation failure severity. When the tank pressure was reduced to 53%, 43% and 33% of the rated pressure within 0.10 s, the maximum allowable action delay was 0.23, 0.17 s and 0.13 s, respectively. The optimal control time delay reference was 0.09 s, increasing the delay led to overshoot of some component parameters, and reducing the delay led to the possibility of engine flameout.
- LOX/kerosene engine /
- gas generator /
- cavitation failure /
- health monitoring /
- system simulation

HTML

图 1 流量调节器

Figure 1. Flow regulator

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 燃烧室模型

Figure 2. Combustion component

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 汽蚀工况计算

Figure 3. Cavitation caculation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 系统仿真模型

Figure 4. System simulation model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 汽蚀故障仿真结果

Figure 5. Simulation result in cavitation condition

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 主动控制策略

Figure 6. Active control strategy

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 主要组件仿真结果

Figure 7. Simulation results of main components

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 增大贮箱压力跌落量的仿真结果

Figure 8. Simulation results for increasing tank pressure drop

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 策略与验证

Figure 9. Strategy and verification

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(21)

[1]	LUO X,JIN B,TSUJIMOTO Y. A review of cavitation in hydraulic machinery[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics,2016,28(3): 335-358. doi: 10.1016/S1001-6058(16)60638-8
[2]	WASHIO S. Recent developments in cavitation mechanisms: a guide for scientists and engineers[M]. Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2014.
[3]	KUMAR P,SAINI R P. Study of cavitation in hydro turbines: a review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2010,14(1): 374-383.
[4]	李建,安阳,石文靓. 助推分离对氧泵工作特性影响的模拟试验[J]. 火箭推进,2020,46(3): 49-55. LI Jian,AN Yang,SHI Wenjing. Effect of booster separation on operating characteristics of oxygen pump by simulation test[J]. Journal of Rocket Propulsion,2020,46(3): 49-55. (in Chinese)
[5]	晏政. 航天器推进系统基于定性模型的故障诊断方法研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2013. YAN Zheng. Investigation on model-based fault diagnosis methods for spacecraft propulsion system[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2013. (in Chinese)
[6]	聂侥. 基于过程神经网络的液体火箭发动机故障预测方法研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2017 NIE Yao. Investigation on fault prediction methods based on process neural network for liquid propellant rocket engines[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2017. (in Chinese)
[7]	李吉成. 液氧甲烷发动机故障检测与隔离方法研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2015. LI Jicheng. Study on fault detection and isolation methods for LOX/methane rocket engine[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2015. (in Chinese)
[8]	黄强. 高压补燃液氧煤油发动机故障检测与诊断技术研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2012. HUANG Qiang. Study on the techniques of fault detection and diagnosis for high pressure staged conbustion LOX/kerosene rocket engine[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2012. (in Chinese)
[9]	WU J J, CHENG Y Q, CUI X. Research status of the health monitoring technology for liquid rocket engines[J]. Aerospace Shanghai, 2020, 37(1): 1-10.
[10]	JUNG T. Static characteristics of a flow regulator for a liquid rocket engine[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets,2011,48(3): 541-544. doi: 10.2514/1.52130
[11]	刘红军. 稳流型流量调节器动态响应特性研究[J]. 推进技术,1999,20(1): 60-64. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4055.1999.01.014 LIU Hongjun. Investigation on dynamic response characteristics of a output-flow-stabilized regulator[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology,1999,20(1): 60-64. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4055.1999.01.014
[12]	陈宏玉,刘红军,陈建华. 补燃发动机强迫启动过程[J]. 航空动力学报,2015,30(12): 3010-3016. CHEN Hongyu,LIU Hongjun,CHEN Jianhua. Forced start-up procedure of a staged combustion cycle engine[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2015,30(12): 3010-3016. (in Chinese)
[13]	FRANCESCO D M. Modelling and simulation of liquid rocket engine ignition transients[D]. Rome: Sapienza University of Rome, 2011.
[14]	WATANABE D, IMAI K, OGAWARA A, et al. Cooling analysis for rocket engine combustion chamber with high fidelity simulation[R]. AIAA-2013-3844, 2013.
[15]	BELIAEV E N, CHEVANOV V K, CHERVAKOV V V. Mathematical modeling of working processes of liquid propellant rocket engines[M]. Москва: Издательство МАИ-ПРИНТ, 1999: 11-14. (in Russian)
[16]	RAMESH D, ALIMOHAMMDI H. Simulation of cavitation process in oxidizer pump of a liquid rocket engine[R]. AIAA-2009-4958, 2009.
[17]	BELYAEV E N, CHVANOV V K, CHERVAKOV V V. The outflow of a two-phase gas-liquid mixture from the mixing head of a gas generator when starting a liquid-propellant rocket engine[J]. High Temperature, 2005, 43(3): 446-451.
[18]	周晨初,李舒欣,陈宏玉,等. 液体火箭发动机关机水机特性仿真[J]. 火箭推进,2021,47(1): 70-75. ZHOU Chenchu,LI Shuxin,CHEN Hongyu,et al. Simulation on water hammer during liquid rocket engine shutdown[J]. Journal of Rocket Propulsion,2021,47(1): 70-75. (in Chinese)
[19]	LI P F, LEI F P, ZHOU L X, et al. Investigation of real-fluid characteristics in high-pressure liquid rocket engines[C]//67th International Astronautical Congress. Guadalajara, Mexico: International Astronautical Congress, 2016: 42-52.
[20]	任孝文,陈宏玉,李平,等. 弱可压缩流体与可压缩流体模型的管路水击研究[J]. 推进技术,2020,41(8): 1880-1886. REN Xiaowen,CHEN Hongyu,LI Ping,et al. Investigation on water hammer in pipes by slightly compressible fluid model and compressible fluid models[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology,2020,41(8): 1880-1886. (in Chinese)
[21]	张贵田. 高压补燃液氧煤油发动机[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2005.