留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于KG-KGCN的某型动力装置风险分析方法

陈国兵 曾国庆 王越 王学峰 谢旭阳 杨自春

陈国兵, 曾国庆, 王越, 等. 基于KG-KGCN的某型动力装置风险分析方法[J]. 航空动力学报, 2023, 38(10):2516-2526 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220007
引用本文: 陈国兵, 曾国庆, 王越, 等. 基于KG-KGCN的某型动力装置风险分析方法[J]. 航空动力学报, 2023, 38(10):2516-2526 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220007
CHEN Guobing, ZENG Guoqing, WANG Yue, et al. Risk analysis method of a certain type of power plant based on KG-KGCN[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2023, 38(10):2516-2526 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220007
Citation: CHEN Guobing, ZENG Guoqing, WANG Yue, et al. Risk analysis method of a certain type of power plant based on KG-KGCN[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2023, 38(10):2516-2526 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220007

基于KG-KGCN的某型动力装置风险分析方法

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220007
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(51609251)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    陈国兵(1982-),男,教授、博士生导师,博士,主要从事舰船动力及热力设备的科学管理研究。E-mail:chenguob@163.com

    通讯作者:

    杨自春(1967-),男,教授、博士生导师,博士,主要从事舰船动力及热力设备的科学管理研究。E-mail:yangzichun11@sina.com

  • 中图分类号: V240.2;TP391

Risk analysis method of a certain type of power plant based on KG-KGCN

  • 摘要:

    针对动力装置危险因素众多、风险数据繁杂且利用率不高等问题,以故障模式、影响及危害性分析等数据为基础,提出基于知识图谱和图神经网络的系统风险分析方法及算法,利用事件的知识完成链接预测,推理出引发事件的原因及影响等,以实现其精准的统计分析。本文以某型发动机为对象,对其进行风险分析和推理。结果表明:该方法有效解决了传统方法存在的表单繁琐、分析单一等问题,结果更加准确和全面,可使分析效率提升60%以上;并可及时开展风险推理和预测,实现从事后分析向主动预防的转变,为动力装置的智能运维提供了有力支持。

     

  • 图 1  系统风险知识图谱构建

    Figure 1.  Process of building knowledge graph of system risk

    图 2  实体及其关系结构图

    Figure 2.  Entities and relationships structure diagram

    图 3  KGCN的知识图谱推理过程

    Figure 3.  Reasoning process of knowledge graph of KGCN

    图 4  知识图谱实体两层感受野[14]

    Figure 4.  Two-layer of receptive fields of the entity in the knowledge graph[14]

    图 5  系统风险分析知识图谱统计与查询流程

    Figure 5.  Process of system risk analysis knowledge graph statistical and query

    图 6  基于KGCN的推理过程

    Figure 6.  Reasoning process based on KGCN

    图 7  KG-KGCN系统风险分析

    Figure 7.  Model of KG-KGCN system risk analysis

    图 8  发动机FMECA层次约定

    Figure 8.  Conventional level of engine FMECA

    图 9  发动机FMECA整体知识图谱

    Figure 9.  Overall knowledge graph of engine FMECA

    图 10  知识图谱结构模型

    Figure 10.  Structure model of knowledge graph

    图 11  下传动箱故障零件统计图谱

    Figure 11.  Faulty parts statistics graph in the lower gearbox

    图 12  分系统设备统计图谱

    Figure 12.  Equipment statistics graph of the part system

    图 13  子系统与模块之间查询界面

    Figure 13.  Interface of knowledge graph query between subsystems and modules

    图 14  低压压气机转子具体故障查询结果界面

    Figure 14.  Interface of query results of specific faults of the low-pressure compressor rotor

    图 15  放气阀漏气事件推理结果

    Figure 15.  Inference result of the air release valve leakage event

    图 16  高压压气机静子放气阀漏气故障树

    Figure 16.  FTA of the air release valve leakage event

    表  1  不同类型实体及其关系

    Table  1.   Different types of entities and their relationships

    模型
    数据
    数据
    结构
    作用对象范围
    实体标签可被标记多个
    类别标签
    系统、故障模式、
    故障原因、故障影响
    属性可存储多个相关属性编号、工况、严酷度等
    关系类型所属关系类型导致关系、包含关系
    属性存储关系属性关系名称、关系ID
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] BAHREBAR S,BLAABJERG F,WANG Huai,et al. A novel type-2 fuzzy logic for improved risk analysis of proton exchange membrane fuel cells in marine power systems application[J]. Energies,2018,11(4): 721. doi: 10.3390/en11040721
    [2] MORENO V C,COZZANI V. Integrated hazard identification within the risk management of industrial biological processes[J]. Safety Science,2018,103: 340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.004
    [3] DUNJÓ J,FTHENAKIS V,VÍLCHEZ J A,et al. Hazard and operability (HAZOP) analysis. A literature review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2010,173(1/2/3): 19-32.
    [4] 徐立,邓儒超,徐楚,等. 船舶核动力装置二回路故障分析及安全性研究[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报,2015,36(1): 130-133.

    XU Li,DENG Ruchao,XU Chu,et al. Failure analysis and safety studies of the second loop system of civil marine nuclear power plant[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University,2015,36(1): 130-133. (in Chinese)
    [5] 屠秋野,张伟,蔡元虎,等. 民用航空动力技术风险评估的量化方法[J]. 航空动力学报,2010,25(11): 2403-2408.

    TU Qiuye,ZHANG Wei,CAI Yuanhu,et al. Quantity method of technical risk assessment for civil aero-engine[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2010,25(11): 2403-2408. (in Chinese)
    [6] AMIT S. Introducing the knowledge graph: things, not strings[EB/OL]. [2022-02-15].https: //www.blog.google/products/se-arch/introducing-knowledge-graph-things-not.
    [7] KRIZHANOVSKY A A,SMIRNOV A V. An approach to automated construction of a general-purpose lexical ontology based on Wiktionary[J]. Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International,2013,52(2): 215-225. doi: 10.1134/S1064230713020068
    [8] 魏卉子. 煤矿安全融合知识图谱构建研究[D]. 江苏 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2020.

    WEI Huizi. Study on the construction of coal mine safety integration knowledge map[D]. Xuzhou Jiangsu: China University of Mining and Technology, 2020. (in Chinese)
    [9] IYYER M, BOYD-GRABER J, CLAUDINO L, et al. A neural network for factoid question answering over paragraphs[C]//Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). Stroudsburg, US: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2014: 633-644.
    [10] 邱凌,张安思,李少波,等. 航空制造知识图谱构建研究综述[J]. 计算机应用研究,2022,39(4): 968-977.

    QIU Ling,ZHANG Ansi,LI Shaobo,et al. Survey on building knowledge graphs for aerospace manufacturing[J]. Application Research of Computers,2022,39(4): 968-977. (in Chinese)
    [11] 郭静. 基于知识图谱的航空安全事件关联分析方法研究[D]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2020.

    GUO Jing. Research on the correlation analysis of aviation safety incidents based on knowledge graph[D]. Tianjin: Civil Aviation University of China, 2020. (in Chinese)
    [12] 杜党党,贾晓亮,王卓. 基于故障彩色图谱的航空发动机故障模式识别[J]. 计算机集成制造系统,2018,24(9): 2297-2305.

    DU Dangdang,JIA Xiaoliang,WANG Zhuo. Fault model identification method for aero engines based on fault color picture[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems,2018,24(9): 2297-2305. (in Chinese)
    [13] BRUNA J, ZAREMBA W, SZLAM A, et al. Spectral networks and locally connected networks on graphs[EB/OL]. [2021-12-08]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6203
    [14] WANG Hongwei, ZHAO Miao, XIE Xing, et al. Knowledge graph convolutional networks for recommender systems[C]//Proceedings of the 19th World Wide Web Conference. New York: ACM, 2019: 3307-3313.
    [15] ZHANG Ya,LU Mingming,LI Haifeng. Urban traffic flow forecast based on FastGCRNN[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation,2020,2020: 1-9.
    [16] KAPOOR A, BEN Xue, LIU Luyang, et al. Examining COVID-19 forecasting using spatio-temporal graph neural networks[EB/OL]. [2021-12-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.03113
    [17] 刘欢,李晓戈,胡立坤,等. 基于知识图谱驱动的图神经网络推荐模型[J]. 计算机应用,2021,41(7): 1865-1870.

    LIU Huan,LI Xiaoge,HU Likun,et al. Knowledge graph driven recommendation model of graph neural network[J]. Journal of Computer Applications,2021,41(7): 1865-1870. (in Chinese)
    [18] 史运涛,党亚光,雷振伍,等. 基于图神经网络的社区户内燃气系统动态风险评估[J]. 安全与环境工程,2021,28(5): 1-9.

    SHI Yuntao,DANG Yaguang,LEI Zhenwu,et al. Dynamic risk assessment of community indoor gas system based on graph neural network[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering,2021,28(5): 1-9. (in Chinese)
    [19] 孟寒姣. 基于知识图谱的铁路电务事故智能问答系统的设计与实现[D]. 石家庄: 河北科技大学, 2020.

    MENG Hanjiao. Design and implementation of intelligent question answering system for railway electrical accidents based on knowledge graph[D]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei University of Science and Technology, 2020. (in Chinese)
    [20] 何巍. 社交媒体数据可视化分析综述[J]. 科学技术与工程,2020,20(32): 13085-13090.

    HE Wei. An overview on social media visual analytics[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2020,20(32): 13085-13090. (in Chinese)
    [21] 王红,林海舟,卢林燕. 基于Att_GCN模型的知识图谱推理算法[J]. 计算机工程与应用,2020,56(9): 183-189.

    WANG Hong,LIN Haizhou,LU Linyan. Knowledge graph inference algorithm based on Att_GCN model[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications,2020,56(9): 183-189. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中
图(16) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  525
  • HTML浏览量:  340
  • PDF量:  54
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-01-05
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-06-09

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回