Numerical study using DES for inserting plate with variable distortion ratio of dynamic to steady
-
摘要:
针对常规可移动式插板产生的总压畸变稳态分量和动态分量比值较为固定,无法可调,不能真实反映不同进气条件下的复杂总压畸变的动稳态比例的现状,提出了一种改进型插板,采用对常规插板开孔和开齿等方法,通过不同的参数化设计,通过更换插板在发动机进口截面产生不同稳态畸变和动态畸变比值的总压畸变,采用分离涡模拟的方法对改进型插板进行了数值仿真,结果表明:在边缘开孔或开齿会改变插板后涡结构,但不会改变动稳态畸变比例。在插板上均匀开孔或开齿,既会改变板后涡结构,也会降低动稳态畸变比例,而且随着孔齿数量或尺寸的增加,分离区得到更多的射流能量,动稳态畸变比例降低。变齿数插板畸变比例可在0.14~0.50范围内变化。
-
关键词:
- 进气畸变 /
- 总压畸变 /
- 动稳态畸变比例 /
- 插板装置 /
- 分离涡模拟(DES)
Abstract:In view of the problems of conventional inserting plate, including: producing the total pressure distortion of steady and dynamic components ratio was relatively fixed, not adjustable, cannot really reflect the different inlet conditions and complex total pressure distortion ratio of the status quo. An improved inserting plate, using the opening holes and jags method was proposed, inserted through different parametric design, by changing the inserting plate on the engine inlet. The total pressure distortion with different dynamic and steady distortion ratio was generated by using the delayed-eddy-simulation method. Results showed that the fringe holes and the fringe jags can change the vortex behind the plate but cannot change the ratio of dynamic to steady distortion. The uniform holes and jags changed the vortex topology and the ratio, and as the size of hole and jags increased, the energy from the jet and the ratio of dynamic to steady distortion decreased. Therefore, the distortion ratio of the variable number of jags can vary from 0.14 to 0.50.
-
表 1 边缘孔插板畸变比例
Table 1. Distortion rate of the inserting plate with marginal holes
类型 $\Delta \overline{ {\mathrm{\sigma } }}_{\mathrm{o} }$/10−4 $\varepsilon$/10−4 $\varepsilon /W$ 常规插板 7.29 8.25 0.53 孔径为20 mm的插板 7.44 7.77 0.51 孔径为40 mm的插板 7.59 7.38 0.49 表 2 边缘齿插板畸变比例
Table 2. Distortion rate of the inserting plate with marginal jags
类型 $\Delta \overline{ {\mathrm{\sigma } }}_{\mathrm{o} }$/10−4 $ {\varepsilon } $ /10−4 $ \varepsilon /W $ 常规插板 7.29 8.25 0.53 20 mm×20 mm方形齿插板 7.19 7.81 0.52 10 mm×40 mm方形齿插板 7.2 7.88 0.52 表 3 边缘缝隙插板畸变比例
Table 3. Distortion rate of the inserting plate with marginal crack
类型 $\Delta \overline{ {\mathrm{\sigma } }}_{\mathrm{o} }$/10−4 $ \varepsilon $/10−4 $ \varepsilon /W $ 常规插板 7.29 8.25 0.53 20 mm的边缘缝隙插板 7.19 7.81 0.52 表 4 变齿数插板畸变比例
Table 4. Distortion rate of the inserting plate with mutable jags
插板类型 $\Delta \overline{ {\mathrm{\sigma } }}_{\mathrm{o} }$/10−4 $ {\varepsilon } $ /10−4 $ \varepsilon /W $ 1齿板 7.01 7.2 0.50 2齿板 6.71 6.76 0.50 7齿板 7.19 4.98 0.41 13齿板 7.6 1.31 0.14 -
[1] 中国航空工业第一集团公司. 航空涡轮喷气和涡轮风扇发动机进口总压畸变评定指南: GJB/Z64A-2004 [S]. 北京: 国防科工委军标出版发行部, 2004: 1-15. [2] 屠宝锋, 胡骏, 王英锋. 航空发动机气动稳定性评定流程和方法[M]. 北京: 北京航空航天大学出版社, 2021. [3] 程邦勤,陶增元,李军. 某型涡扇发动机进气总压畸变的试验研究[J]. 推进技术,2003,24(1): 21-23. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4055.2003.01.006CHENG Bangqin,TAO Zengyuan,LI Jun. Aerodynamic stability analysis of inlet pressure distortion for turbofan[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology,2003,24(1): 21-23. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4055.2003.01.006 [4] 郑学伟,张百灵,江勇. 进气道插板式总压畸变试验的数值模拟[J]. 仿真技术,2009,25(1): 155-157.ZHENG Xuewei,ZHANG Bailing,JIANG Yong. Numerical simulation of total pressure distortion test of inlet insert plate[J]. Simulation Technology,2009,25(1): 155-157. (in Chinese) [5] 孙鹏,高海洋. 插板式畸变发生器后非均匀流场结构数值模拟[J]. 推进技术,2013,34(2): 173-180.SUN Peng,GAO Haiyang. Numerical simulation of non-uniform flow field structure behind plug-in plate distortion generator[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology,2013,34(2): 173-180. (in Chinese) [6] 李文峰,马利东. 某涡扇发动机压力畸变评定技术[J]. 西北工业大学学报,2003,21(5): 540-543. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2758.2003.05.008LI Wenfeng,MA Lidong. Pressure distortion assessment technique for a turbofan engine[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University,2003,21(5): 540-543. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2758.2003.05.008 [7] 李亮, 胡骏. 插板到压气机进口距离对压气机稳定性影响的实验研究[R]. 贵州: 中国航空学会第7届动力年会, 2010. [8] 李亮,胡骏. 多种形式插板的压气机进气总压畸变实验[J]. 航空动力学报,2009,24(4): 925-930.LI Liang,HU Jun. Experimental study of the inlet total-pressure distortion on four kinds of the interceptors[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2009,24(4): 925-930. (in Chinese) [9] 李亮. 进口总压畸变稳定性评定方法研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2008.LI Liang. Stability assessment study of a compressor inlet total-pressure-distortion[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2008. (in Chinese) [10] 罗标能. 压气机进口插板总压畸变稳定性研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2006.LUO Biaoneng. Study on total pressure distortion stability of compressor inlet insert plate[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006. (in Chinese) [11] 李名魁,张发启. 插板式畸变发生器出口动态压力信号的功率谱分析[J]. 燃气涡轮试验与研究,2002,15(4): 17-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2620.2002.04.004LI Mingkui,ZHANG Faqi,WANG Rugen. Power spectrum analysis of dynamic pressure signal by inlet flat baffle[J]. Gas Turbine Test and Research,2002,15(4): 17-20. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2620.2002.04.004 [12] 程邦勤,陶增元,李军. 某型涡扇发动机进气畸变压力脉动分析[J]. 航空动力学报,2003,18(1): 197-201.CHENG Bangqin,TAO Zengyuan,LI Jun. Pulsatile analysis of inlet pressure distortion in turbofan engine[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2003,18(1): 197-201. (in Chinese) [13] 甘甜,王如根,张杰,等. 不同湍流模型对插板式进气畸变的数值模拟[J]. 推进技术,2014,25(7): 891-896.GAN Tian,WANG Rugen,ZHANG Jie,et al. Numerical simulation of inlet distortion with interceptor with different turbulence models[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology,2014,25(7): 891-896. (in Chinese) [14] 刘阳, 陈杰, 黄国平. 管道内插板后流动结构分析[R]. 广东 深圳: 第11届全国流体力学学术会议论文摘要集, 2020. [15] MENTER F R, KUNTZ M. Development and application of a zonal DES turbulence model for CFX-5[R]. CFX-VAL17/0703, 2003. [16] SPALART P R, JOU W, STRELETS M, et al. Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach[R]. Ruston, US: Louisiana Tech University, 1997. [17] DAVIDSON L. Fluid mechanics, turbulent flow and turbulence modeling[EB/OL]. [2022-01-10]. http://www.tf- d.chalmers.se/˜lada. [18] MENTER F R. Best practice: scale-resolving simulations in ANSYS CFD [EB/OL]. [2022-01-11]. https://www.ansys.com/resource-center/technical-paper/best-practice-scale-resolving-simulations-in-ansys-cfd. [19] GERASIMOV A. Quick guide to setting up LES type simulations[EB/OL]. [2022-01-11]. https://www.tfd.chalmers.se/~lada/comp_turb_model/postscript_files/Quick_Guide_to_Setting_Up_LES_version_1.4_for_Lars.pdf. [20] ANSYS Corporation. CFX users manual[R]. Canonsburg, US: ANSYS Corporation, 2021. [21] HUNT J, WRAY A, MOIN P. Eddies, streams and convergence zones in turbulent flows[R]. San Francisco, US: Centre for Turbulence Research Proceedings of the Summer Program, 1988. [22] 刘超群. Liutex-涡定义和第三代涡识别方法[J]. 空气动力学报,2020,38(3): 413-478.LIU Chaoqun. Liutex-third generation of vortex definition and identification methods[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinaca,2020,38(3): 413-478. (in Chinese)