留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

横掠叉排管束传热特性的数值研究

覃扬佳 庄来鹤 刘启航 刘志伟 闻洁

覃扬佳, 庄来鹤, 刘启航, 等. 横掠叉排管束传热特性的数值研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2023, 38(11):2718-2728 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220102
引用本文: 覃扬佳, 庄来鹤, 刘启航, 等. 横掠叉排管束传热特性的数值研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2023, 38(11):2718-2728 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220102
QIN Yangjia, ZHUANG Laihe, LIU Qihang, et al. Numerical investigation on heat transfer characteristics of staggered tube bundles in cross flow[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2023, 38(11):2718-2728 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220102
Citation: QIN Yangjia, ZHUANG Laihe, LIU Qihang, et al. Numerical investigation on heat transfer characteristics of staggered tube bundles in cross flow[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2023, 38(11):2718-2728 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220102

横掠叉排管束传热特性的数值研究

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220102
基金项目: 航空发动机气动热力国家级重点实验室(2022-JCJQ-LB-062-0407)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    覃扬佳(1997-),男,博士生,主要研究方向为换热器传热机理与强化

    通讯作者:

    闻洁(1964-),女,研究员,博士,主要研究方向为传热传质、发动机整机综合热管理、发动机高温部件冷却。E-mail:wenjie@buaa.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: V231.1

Numerical investigation on heat transfer characteristics of staggered tube bundles in cross flow

  • 摘要:

    为验证基于大管径实验数据的经典传热关联式在小尺度管束传热问题上的适用性,针对横掠叉排管束的管外流动换热特性进行了数值研究。在建立了确定变几何结构合理网格密度的方法基础上,探究了大参数范围内管径、管间距比和雷诺数对管外传热努塞尔数和流动特征的影响规律。结果表明:①管排流动马赫数小于0.1时,雷诺数不变,管径对管外努塞尔数影响很小,不同管径对应的管外流动特征差别很小;②管间距比通过改变管外的流动特征来影响管外努塞尔数,且雷诺数和管径不变时,努塞尔数分布在特定管间距比范围内存在峰值区;③需要更为具体的分段函数来拟合传热关联式以准确预测努塞尔数。

     

  • 图 1  叉排管束

    Figure 1.  Staggered tube bundle

    图 2  CFD计算域和网格

    Figure 2.  CFD computational domain and mesh

    图 3  Nu随网格单元尺寸的变化(σ1-σ2-D=2.1-2.1-16.4 mm)

    Figure 3.  Variation of Nu with mesh element size (σ1-σ2-D =2.1-2.1-16.4 mm)

    图 4  不同管排结构下Nu随网格单元尺寸的变化

    Figure 4.  Variation of Nu with mesh element size with different tube bundle structures

    图 5  数值结果与茹氏实验数据的比较

    Figure 5.  Comparison between the numerical results and Zukauskas’ experimental data

    图 6  Nu随管径的变化(常物性)

    Figure 6.  Variation of Nu with tube diameter (constant property)

    图 7  管束附近的无量纲流场(Re=5000, σ1-σ2=2.1-2.1)

    Figure 7.  Dimensionless velocity field around the tube bundle (Re=5000, σ1-σ2=2.1-2.1)

    图 8  管束附近的无量纲流场(Re=5000, σ1-σ2=1.25-1.25)

    Figure 8.  Dimensionless velocity field around the tube bundle (Re=5000, σ1-σ2=1.25-1.25)

    图 9  Nu随管径的变化(变物性)

    Figure 9.  Variation of Nu with tube diameter (variable property)

    图 10  管束沿程马赫数分布(Re=7000, σ1-σ2=2.1-2.1)

    Figure 10.  Mach number distribution along the tube bundle (Re=7000, σ1-σ2=2.1-2.1)

    图 11  管束沿程静温分布(Re=7000, σ1-σ2=2.1-2.1)

    Figure 11.  Static temperature distribution along the tube bundle (Re=7000, σ1-σ2=2.1-2.1)

    图 12  Nu随管间距比的变化( CFD)

    Figure 12.  Variation of Nu with tube pitch ratios (CFD)

    图 13  Nu随管间距比的变化(文献[32])

    Figure 13.  Variation of Nu with tube pitch ratios (Ref.[32])

    图 14  Nu随管间距比的变化(茹氏公式)

    Figure 14.  Variation of Nu with tube pitch ratios (Zukauskas correlation)

    图 15  典型管间距比下的无量纲速度场(Re=7000)

    Figure 15.  Variation of dimensionless velocity field with some typical tube pitch ratios (Re=7000)

    图 16  典型管间距比下的无量纲湍流强度场(Re=7000)

    Figure 16.  Variation of dimensionless turbulent intensity field with some tube pitch ratios (Re=7000)

    图 17  管束周向无量纲速度型随管间距比的变化(Re=5000)

    Figure 17.  Variation of tube bundle circumferential dimensionless velocity profile with tube pitch ratios (Re=5000)

    表  1  模型参数

    Table  1.   Model parameters

    参数数值
    管径D/mm0.5~16.4
    横向管间距比${\sigma _1}$1.1~4.2
    纵向管间距比${\sigma _2}$1.1~4.2
    雷诺数$Re$1000~7000
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  确定的另外两种结构的网格尺寸

    Table  2.   Mesh element sizes for two other structures

    σ1-σ2-D/mm网格单元尺寸/mm
    2.1-2.1-50.105
    1.25-1.25-50.0625
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  数值结果与茹氏实验数据的偏差

    Table  3.   Discrepancy between the numerical results and Zukauskas’ experimental data

    图号σ1-σ2平均偏差/%实验数据来源
    图5(a)2-1.56.52文献[17]
    图5(b)2-210.4文献[31]
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  不同管径的对数换热温差

    Table  4.   Log-mean temperature difference at various tube diameters

    D/mm进口静温/K出口静温/K对数温差/K
    0.5287.18310.4243.32
    1287.45313.7841.14
    3288.00313.6840.98
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  典型管间距比下的Nu预测对比

    Table  5.   Comparison of Nu with some typical tube pitch ratios

    图号σ1-σ2Nu
    CFD文献[32]茹氏公式
    图15(a)1.4-1.456.166.663.0
    图15(b)2.6-2.661.967.763.0
    图15(c)4.1-4.159.260.963.0
    图15(d)2.6-1.179.084.172.0
    图15(e)4.1-1.151.667.372.0
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] SEKULIC D P. Compact heat exchangers[M]. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2018: 1501-1520.
    [2] XU G,ZHUANG L,DONG B,et al. Optimization design with an advanced genetic algorithm for a compact air-air heat exchanger applied in aero engine[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2020,158: 119952. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119952
    [3] 庄来鹤,徐国强,闻洁,等. 基于典型飞行任务的CCA技术优势分析[J]. 航空动力学报,2022,37(7): 1363-1378. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210265

    ZHUANG Laihe,XU Guoqiang,WEN Jie,et al. Superiority analysis of introducing CCA technology into aero-engine under typical flight mission[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2022,37(7): 1363-1378. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20210265
    [4] BRUENING G B, CHANG W S. Cooled cooling air systems for turbine thermal management[R]. ASME Paper 99-GT-014, 1999.
    [5] KIM C S,KIM H J,CHO J R,et al. Manufacturing and mechanical evaluation of cooled cooling air (CCA) heat exchanger for aero engine[J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing,2016,17(9): 1195-1200. doi: 10.1007/s12541-016-0143-4
    [6] WANG C C,HSIEH Y,LIN Y. Performance of plate finned tube heat exchangers under dehumidifying conditions[J]. Journal of Heat Transfer,1997,119(1): 109-117. doi: 10.1115/1.2824075
    [7] TANG S,YANG K T. Thermal performance of a single-row fin-and-tube heat exchanger[J]. Journal of Thermal Science,2005,14(2): 172-180. doi: 10.1007/s11630-005-0029-8
    [8] TAHSEEN T A,ISHAK M,RAHMAN M M. An overview on thermal and fluid flow characteristics in a plain plate finned and un-finned tube banks heat exchanger[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2015,43: 363-380. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.070
    [9] AHMED G R,YOVANOVICH M M. Analytical method for forced convection from flat plates, circular cylinders, and spheres[J]. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer,1995,9(3): 516-523. doi: 10.2514/3.695
    [10] KHAN W A,CULHAM J R,YOVANOVICH M M. Analytical model for convection heat transfer from tube banks[J]. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer,2006,20(4): 720-727. doi: 10.2514/1.15453
    [11] KHAN W A. Modeling of fluid flow and heat transfer for optimization of pin-fin heat sinks[D]. Waterloo, Canada: University of Waterloo, 2004.
    [12] WUNG T S,CHEN C J. Finite analytic solution of convective heat transfer for tube arrays in crossflow: Part Ⅰ flow field analysis[J]. Journal of Heat Transfer,1989,111(3): 633-640. doi: 10.1115/1.3250729
    [13] CHEN C J,WUNG T S. Finite analytic solution of convective heat transfer for tube arrays in crossflow: Part Ⅱ heat transfer analysis[J]. Journal of Heat Transfer,1989,111(3): 641-648. doi: 10.1115/1.3250730
    [14] DHAUBHADEL M N,REDDY J N,TELIONIS D P. Finite-element analysis of fluid flow and heat transfer for staggered bundles of cylinders in cross flow[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids,1987,7(12): 1325-1342. doi: 10.1002/fld.1650071204
    [15] COLBURN A P. A method of correlating forced convection heat-transfer data and a comparison with fluid friction[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,1964,7(12): 1359-1384. doi: 10.1016/0017-9310(64)90125-5
    [16] GRIMISON E D. Correlation and utilization of new data on flow resistance and heat transfer cross-flow of gases over tube banks[J]. Journal of Heat Transfer,1937,59: 583-594.
    [17] ZUKAUSKAS A. Heat transfer from tubes in crossflow[J]. Advances in Heat Transfer,1987,18: 87-157.
    [18] BORRAJO-PELÁEZ R,ORTEGA-CASANOVA J,CEJUDO-LÓPEZ J M. A three-dimensional numerical study and comparison between the air side model and the air/water side model of a plain fin-and-tube heat exchanger[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2010,30(13): 1608-1615. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.03.018
    [19] XIE G,SUNDEN B,WANG Q,et al. Performance predictions of laminar and turbulent heat transfer and fluid flow of heat exchangers having large tube-diameter and large tube-row by artificial neural networks[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2009,52(11/12): 2484-2497.
    [20] ZHANG Y,CHEN Z. The effect of a gap between layers on the heat transfer performance of aligned tube banks[J]. Heat Transfer Engineering,1992,13(2): 33-41. doi: 10.1080/01457639208939773
    [21] CHANG N C,LI C J,WANG C C. Performance of bare-tube bundle having small diameter tube: with and without partial bypass[J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer,2015,67: 73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2015.07.006
    [22] BACELLAR D,AUTE V,HUANG Z,et al. Airside friction and heat transfer characteristics for staggered tube bundle in crossflow configuration with diameters from 0.5 mm to 2.0 mm[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2016,98: 448-454. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.02.072
    [23] JEONG J H,NAM K W,MIN J K,et al. The effects of the evaluation method on the average heat transfer coefficient for a mini-channel tube bundle[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2011,54(25/26): 5481-5490.
    [24] CHEN K,GUO L,XIE X,et al. Experimental investigation on enhanced thermal performance of staggered tube bundles wrapped with metallic foam[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2018,122: 459-468. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.01.115
    [25] XIE J,LI S,YAN H,et al. Numerical analysis on thermal–hydraulic performances of staggered tube bundles for an aero-engine compact precooler[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry,2020,141(1): 387-399. doi: 10.1007/s10973-020-09672-1
    [26] KIM T. Effect of longitudinal pitch on convective heat transfer in crossflow over in-line tube banks[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy,2013,57: 209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2013.01.060
    [27] PASINATO H D,DORELLA J J,GOROSITO A R. Fluid flow and heat transfer numerical prediction of cross flow heat exchanger[J]. Mecánica Computacional,2016,34(27): 1891-1905.
    [28] LEMMON E W, HUBER M L, MCLINDEN M O. NIST reference fluid thermodynamic and transport properties: Version 9.1[DB/OL].[2022-03-02]. Gaithersburg, Maryland: National Institute of Standards and Technology Standard Reference Data Program, 2013.https: //www.nist.gov/srd/refprop
    [29] MENTER F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications[J]. AIAA Journal,1994,32(8): 1598-1605. doi: 10.2514/3.12149
    [30] ATLAR M,GÖREN Ö. Effect of turbulence modelling on the computation of the near-wake flow of a circular cylinder[J]. Ocean Engineering,2010,37(4): 387-399. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.12.007
    [31] ZUKAUSKAS A, ULINSKAS R. Heat transfer in tube banks in crossflow[M]. New York: Hemisphere Publishing, 1988.
    [32] 吴味隆. 锅炉及锅炉房设备[M]. 4版. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2006: 204-205.
    [33] HU J C,ZHOU Y. Flow structure behind two staggered circular cylinders. Part 1 downstream evolution and classification[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics,2008,607: 51-80. doi: 10.1017/S0022112008001808
    [34] HU J C,ZHOU Y. Flow structure behind two staggered circular cylinders: Part 2 heat and momentum transport[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics,2008,607: 81-107. doi: 10.1017/S002211200800181X
  • 加载中
图(17) / 表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  751
  • HTML浏览量:  538
  • PDF量:  105
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-03-03
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-04-20

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回