Forced response analysis of mistuned bladed disk with aerodynamic damping
-
摘要:
基于与影响系数法相结合的基础失调模型(FMM)分析多种人为失调在叠加随机失调前、后的强迫响应。采用有限元和计算流体力学方法分别计算得到协调叶盘的模态和气动力影响系数,构建考虑气动阻尼的基础失调模型。通过求解矩阵特征值得到失调叶盘的模态频率、振型和阻尼比,进而采用模态叠加法得到失调叶盘在行波激励下的强迫响应。结果表明:失调叶盘的强迫响应在考虑气动阻尼后明显减小。以交替失调叶盘为例,在适当范围内增大失调量可以减小强迫响应,该模型的相邻叶片频率差宜取6%,对应失调量为4.32。此外,增大间隔一个叶片的相邻叶片频率差有利于进一步减小强迫响应。
-
关键词:
- 强迫响应 /
- 叶盘 /
- 人为失调 /
- 基础失调模型(FMM) /
- 气动阻尼
Abstract:The forced response of the mistuned bladed disk was analyzed by use of the fundamental mistuning model (FMM) combined with the influence coefficient method. The finite element method and computational fluid dynamics method were used to obtain the modal results and aerodynamic influence coefficients of the tuned bladed disk, and then the FMM considering aerodynamic damping was constructed. The modal frequency, mode shape and damping ratio of the mistuned bladed disk were obtained by solving the matrix eigenvalues, and then the modal superposition method was used to calculate the forced response of the mistuned bladed disk under traveling wave excitation. The above method was used to calculate the forced responses of various intentional mistuned bladed disks before and after the superposition of random mistuning. Results indicated that the forced response of the mistuned bladed disk decreased significantly after considering aerodynamic damping. Taking the alternating mistuned bladed disk as an example, the forced response can be reduced by increasing the mistuning value within an appropriate range. The frequency difference between adjacent blades of the model should be 6%, and the corresponding mistuning value was 4.32. In addition, increasing the frequency difference between adjacent blades with an interval of one blade can further reduce the forced response.
-
表 1 叶片的气动力影响系数
Table 1. Aerodynamic influence coefficients of the blades
叶片编号$ n $ 实部$ {a_r}^n $/
(N/m)虚部$ {a_i}^n $/
(N/m)气动力幅值/
(N/m)N−4 305.7 329.4 449.5 N−3 −56.1 −2710.8 2711.4 N−2 1587.2 −553.9 1681.1 N−1 96068.9 87834.8 130169.9 0 12764.0 −314417.7 314676.7 1 30406.2 190507.5 192918.8 2 −16868.0 16008.8 23255.3 3 −3644.7 6388.2 7354.8 4 557.7 −258.7 614.8 表 2 含两种频率叶片的人为失调叶盘分布特征参数
Table 2. Distribution characteristic parameters of intentional mistuned bladed disk with two blade frequency types
叶盘类型 失调量$ \delta $ 频率邻差$\,{\beta _0}$ 频率间
一邻差$\,{\beta _1}$频率间
二邻差$\,{\beta _2}$交替失调 4.32 5.89 1.63 5.66 单个失调 1.16 1.63 1.63 1.63 扇区失调 4.16 1.63 2.31 2.83 表 3 含两种频率叶片的人为失调叶盘强迫响应最大值
Table 3. Maximum forced response of the intentional mistuned bladed disks with two blade frequency types
叶盘类型 强迫响应/10−5 叠加随机失调的
强迫响应/10−5协调 1.85 3.99 交替失调 0.77 1.91 单个失调 2.77 4.55 扇区失调 1.87 2.54 表 4 不同失调量的交替失调叶盘强迫响应最大值
Table 4. Maximum forced response of the alternating mistuned bladed disks with different mistuning value
失调量 强迫响应/10−5 叠加随机失调的
强迫响应/10−50 1.85 3.99 0.72 1.81 3.68 2.16 1.21 3.29 4.32 0.77 1.91 6.48 0.73 1.55 表 5 不同种数的频率叶片的交替失调叶盘分布特征参数
Table 5. Distribution parameters of the alternating mistuned bladed disk with different number of blade frequency types
叶盘类型 失调量$ \delta $ 频率邻差$\,{\beta _0}$ 频率间
一邻差$\,{\beta _1}$频率间
二邻差$\,{\beta _2}$交替失调
(两种频率叶片)4.32 5.89 1.63 5.66 交替失调
(3种频率叶片)3.87 4.24 4.24 0.00 交替失调
(4种频率叶片)3.81 3.40 3.89 3.27 表 6 不同种数频率叶片的交替失调叶盘强迫响应最大值
Table 6. Maximum forced response of the alternating mistuned bladed disks with different number of blade frequency types
叶盘类型 强迫响应/10−5 叠加随机失调的
强迫响应/10−5交替失调
(两种频率叶片)0.77 1.91 交替失调
(3种频率叶片)0.44 1.53 交替失调
(4种频率叶片)0.89 1.69 -
[1] 白斌,白广忱,童晓晨,等. 整体叶盘结构失谐振动的国内外研究状况[J]. 航空动力学报,2014,29(1): 91-103. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2014.01.012BAI Bin,BAI Guangchen,TONG Xiaochen,et al. Research on vibration problem of integral mistuned bladed disk assemblies at home and abroad[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2014,29(1): 91-103. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2014.01.012 [2] WHITEHEAD D S. Effect of mistuning on the vibration of turbomachinery blades induced by wake[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science,1966,8(1): 15-21. doi: 10.1243/JMES_JOUR_1966_008_004_02 [3] GRIFFIN J H,HOOSAC T M. Model development and statistical investigation of turbine blade mistuning[J]. Journal of Vibration, Acoustics, Stress and Reliability in Design,1984,106(2): 204-210. doi: 10.1115/1.3269170 [4] CASTANIER M P,PIERRE C. Investigation of the combined effects of intentional and random mistuning on the forced response of bladed disks[R]. Cleveland,US: the 34th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit,1998. [5] CASTANIER M P,PIERRE C. Using intentional mistuning in the design of turbomachinery rotors[J]. AIAA Journal,2002,40(10): 2077-2086. doi: 10.2514/2.1542 [6] 郑赟,王静. 错频对叶片的气动弹性稳定性影响[J]. 航空动力学报,2013,28(5): 1029-1036. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2013.05.012ZHENH Yun,WANG Jing. Influence of frequency mistuning on aeroelastic stability of blade[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2013,28(5): 1029-1036. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2013.05.012 [7] FEINER D M,GRIFFIN J H. A Fundamental model of mistuning for a single family of modes[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery,2002,124(10): 597-605. [8] FEINER D M,GRIFFIN J H. Mistuning identification of bladed disk using a fundamental mistuning model: Part Ⅰ theory[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery,2004,126(1): 150-158. doi: 10.1115/1.1643913 [9] FEINER D M,GRIFFIN J H. Mistuning identification of bladed disk using a fundamental mistuning model: Part Ⅱ application[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery,2004,126(1): 159-165. doi: 10.1115/1.1643914 [10] WANG Y R,FU Z Z,JIANG X H,et al. A. Mistuning effects on aero-elastic stability of axial compressor rotor blades[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power,2015,137(10): 102504.1-102504.12. [11] FU Z Z,WANG Y R. Mistuning and structural coupling effects on flutter of turbomachinery blades[R]. Zhuhai,Guangdong:International Conference on Structural Engineering,Vibration and Aerospace Engineering,2013. [12] CRAWLEY E F,HALL K C. Optimization and mechanisms of mistuning in cascades[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power,1985,107(2): 418-426. doi: 10.1115/1.3239742 [13] CASTANIER M P,PIERRE C. Modeling and analysis of mistuned bladed disk vibration: status and emerging directions[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power,2006,22(3): 384-396. [14] YANG M T,GRIFFIN J H. A reduced-order model of mistuning using a subset of nominal system modes[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power,2001,123(10): 893-900. [15] BEIROW B,KÜHHORN A,FIGASCHEWSKY F,et al. Forced response reduction of a bladed disk by means of intentional mistuning[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power,2002,124(7): 586-597. [16] KÜHHORN A,FIGASCHEWSKY F,BEIROW B,et al. Design and analysis of an intentional mistuning experiment reducing flutter susceptibility and minimizing forced response of a jet engine fan[R]. Charlotte,Canada:ASME Turbo Expo:Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition,2017. [17] BEIROW B,KÜHHORN A,FIGASCHEWSKY F,et al. Vibration analysis of a mistuned axial turbine bladed disk[R]. Phoenix,US:ASME Turbo Expo:Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition,2019. [18] MARTEL C,CORRAL R. Asymptotic description of maximum mistuning amplification of bladed disk forced response[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power,2009,131(2): 435-446. [19] MARTEL C,JOSÉ J. Intentional mistuning effect in the forced response of rotors with aerodynamic damping[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration,2018,433(27): 212-229. [20] FANG M C,WANG Y R. Intentional mistuning effect on the blisk vibration with aerodynamic damping[J]. AIAA Journal,2022,60(6): 3884-3893. doi: 10.2514/1.J060797 [21] HANAMURA Y,TANAKA H,YAMAGUCHI K. A simplified method to measure unsteady force acting on the vibrating blades in cascade[J]. Bulletin of Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers,1980,23(180): 880-887. doi: 10.1299/jsme1958.23.880