Influence of geometric parameters of nacelle pressure relief door on flow characteristics
-
摘要:
运用CFD仿真计算了不同倒圆角、铰链、长宽比的泄压门排放系数，并从流动层面深入剖析了以上几何参数对流动特性的影响机理，其结果可供短舱泄压工程设计参考。研究显示，倒圆角仅略增大排放系数。此外，不同铰链泄压门的排放特性不同，鹅颈式优于枢轴式和合页式，原因是铰链安装形式导致外侧迎流面的流动及出流通道变化。鹅颈式出流通道最大，部分气流从安装缝隙流出，故出流能力最强；合页式外部来流冲击门板后向两侧绕流而阻挡出流，故排放能力最弱；枢轴式外侧来流对出流引射作用较合页式强，但因出流通道较鹅颈式小，故出流能力小于鹅颈式。长宽比大时排放系数大，原因是长宽比大时外侧来流向门板两侧绕流减弱，出流处易形成卷吸涡而增强出流。
Abstract:A method of CFD simulation was used to calculate the discharge flow ratio of different fillets, hinge forms, and aspect ratios. Impact mechanism of different pressure relief flow was also researched. These results could support the engineering design of nacelle pressure relief door. The research showed that the fillet only increased the discharge flow ratio slightly. In addition, pressure relief doors of different hinges had different discharge flow ratios, the goose neck type was superior to the pivot hinge type and the page hinge type, due to the hinge installation which caused the changes of the outside heading flow and the exhaust channel. Specifically, the pressure relief door with goose neck hinge had the strongest discharge capacity owing to the largest exhaust channel, and some air flowed from the installation slot. However, the external flow hit the page hinge type and then blocked the flow from both sides, which caused the weakest discharge capacity. The external flow of the pivot hinge type had stronger ejection effect on the discharge flow, causing stronger discharge capacity than the page hinge type. However, the discharge capacity of the pivot hinge type was weaker than the goose neck type because of the smaller exhaust channel. The pressure relief door with larger aspect ratio had larger discharge flow ratio, due to the reduced winding flow of the external air and the increased exhaust flow owing to the coiled vortex.
-
Key words:
- nacelle /
- pressure relief door /
- fillet /
- aspect ratio /
- hinge /
- discharge flow ratio
-
图 5 不同长宽比泄压门示意图
Figure 5. Figure of pressure relief doors with different aspect ratios
图 9 倒圆角影响下的泄压门压力系数分布云图
Figure 9. Figure of pressure coefficient distribution with/without fillet
图 10 铰链形式影响下马赫数分布云图
Figure 10. Figure of Mach number distribution of different hinge lines
图 11 铰链形式影响下的泄压门压力系数分布云图
Figure 11. Figure of pressure coefficient distribution of pressure relief door with different hinge lines
图 12 铰链影响下的泄压门流线示意图
Figure 12. Figure of flow chart of pressure relief door with different hinge lines
图 13 长宽比影响下马赫数分布云图
Figure 13. Figure of Mach number distribution with different aspect ratio
图 14 长宽比的影响的泄压门压力系数分布云图
Figure 14. Figure of pressure coefficient distribution of pressure relief door with different aspect ratios
表 1 不同铰链形式泄压门的排放系数（θ =38.6°）
Table 1. Discharge coefficient of pressure relief door with different hinge lines （θ =38.6°）
铰链形式 排放系数 鹅颈式 0.6817 合页式 0.4487 枢轴式 0.5002 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 不同长宽比的泄压门的排放系数（θ =30°）
Table 2. Discharge coefficient of pressure relief door with different length ratios （θ =30°）
长宽比 排放系数 0.5 0.588 1.0 0.682 1.5 0.826
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] BENARD E,WATTERSON J K,GAULT R,et al. Review and experimental survey of flapped exhaust performance[J]. Journal of Aircraft,2008,45(1): 349-352. doi: 10.2514/1.34238 [2] 王晨臣,潘俊,王洋洋. 飞机发动机短舱泄压过程研究[J]. 航空科学技术,2021,32(4): 29-34.WANG Chenchen,PAN Jun,WANG Yangyang. Research on pressure relief process in aircraft engine nacelle[J]. Aeronautical Science & Technology,2021,32(4): 29-34. (in Chinese) [3] 杨眉,许璠璠,宁宝军,等. 航空发动机燃烧室机匣破裂安全性预测方法[J]. 航空科学技术,2018,29(5): 18-24.YANG Mei,XU Fanfan,NING Baojun,et al. Predicting method of burst security of aero-engine combustor case[J]. Aeronautical Science & Technology,2018,29(5): 18-24. (in Chinese) [4] 郭政波,刘振刚,杨雄. 航空发动机进口测头装机的强度及气动分析[J]. 航空科学技术,2018,29(11): 32-37.GUO Zhengbo,LIU Zhengang,YANG Xiong. Strength and aerodynamics analysis of aero-engine inlet probe installation[J]. Aeronautical Science & Technology,2018,29(11): 32-37. (in Chinese) [5] 中国民用航空总局. 中国民用航空规章第25部运输类飞机适航标准: CAR-25-R4[S]．北京: 中国民用航空总局, 2011: 118. [6] PRATT P R, WATTERSON J K, BENARD E, et al. Performance of a flapped duct exhausting into a compressible external flow[R]. Yokohama, Japan: 24th International Congress of The Aeronautical Sciences, 2004. [7] SCHOTT T. Computational analysis of aircraft pressure relief doors[D]. Fort Collins, US: Colorado State University, 2016. [8] VICK A R. An investigation of discharge and thrust characteristics of flapped outlets for stream Mach numbers from 0.4 to 1.30[R]. NACA TN4007, 1957. [9] DEWEY P E. A preliminary investigation of aerodynamic characteristics of small inclined air outlets at transonic Mach numbers[R]. NACA TN3442, 1953. [10] VICK A, DEWEY P E. An investigation of the discharge and drag characteristics of auxiliary-air outlets discharging into a transonic stream[R]. NACA TN3466, 1955. [11] YOUNG A D, PATTERSON J H, JONES J L. Aircraft excrescence drag[R]. AGARD TR AG-264, 1981. [12] VEDESHKIN G, DUBOVITSKIY A, BONDARENKO D, et al. Experimental investigations of hydraulic performance in aviation engine compartment[R]. Brisbane, Astralia: 28th International Con-gress of the Aeronautical Sciences, 2012. [13] VERSEUX O, SOMMERER Y. New challenges for engine nacelle compartments pressure and thermal loads management with aircraft engine evolution[R]. Beijing: 29th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, 2014. [14] 王晨臣,冯诗愚,彭孝天,等. 发动机短舱泄压过程瞬态仿真[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报,2019,45(11): 2284-2290.WANG Chenchen,FENG Shiyu,PENG Xiaotian,et al. Transient simulation on pressure relief process of engine nacelle[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2019,45(11): 2284-2290. (in Chinese) [15] 王晨臣,冯诗愚,彭孝天,等. 开启方式对短舱泄压门性能特性影响[J]. 航空动力学报,2019,34(5): 1069-1075.WANG Chenchen,FENG Shiyu,PENG Xiaotian,et al. Influence of opening mode on performance characteristics of nacelle pressure relief door[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2019,34(5): 1069-1075. (in Chinese) [16] FENG Shiyu,WANG Chenchen,PENG Xiaotian,et al. Influence of the pressure relief door area and aspect ratio on discharge and force characteristics[J]. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology,2019,92(2): 107-116. [17] 牟斌. 流动控制数值模拟研究[D]. 四川 绵阳: 中国空气动力研究与发展中心, 2006.MOU Bin. Study on numerical simulation of flow control[D]. Mianyang Sichuan: China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, 2006. (in Chinese) [18] 肖中云. 旋翼流场数值模拟方法研究[D]. 四川 绵阳: 中国空气动力研究与发展中心, 2007.XIAO Zhongyun. Investigation of computational modeling techniques for rotor flowfields[D]. Mianyang Sichuan: China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, 2007. (in Chinese) [19] 肖中云,江雄,牟斌,等. 并行环境下外挂物动态分离过程的数值模拟[J]. 航空学报,2010,31(8): 1509-1516.XIAO Zhongyun,JIANG Xiong,MOU Bin,et al. Numerical simulation of dynamic process of store separation in parallel environment[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2010,31(8): 1509-1516. (in Chinese) [20] 王建涛,易贤,肖中云,等. ARJ21-700飞机冰脱落数值模拟[J]. 空气动力学学报,2013,31(4): 430-436.WANG Jiantao,YI Xian,XIAO Zhongyun,et al. Numerical simulation of ice shedding from ARJ21-700[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica,2013,31(4): 430-436. (in Chinese) [21] 余永刚,周铸,黄江涛,等. 单通道客机气动标模CHN-T1设计[J]. 空气动力学学报,2018,36(3): 505-513.YU Yonggang,ZHOU Zhu,HUANG Jiangtao,et al. Aerodynamic design of a standard model CHN-T1for single-aisle passenger aircraft[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica,2018,36(3): 505-513. (in Chinese) [22] 马率,邱名,王建涛,等. CFD在螺旋桨飞机滑流影响研究中的应用[J]. 航空学报,2019,40(4): 622365.MA Shuai,QIU Ming,WANG Jiantao,et al. Application of CFD in slipstream effect on propeller aircraft research[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2019,40(4): 622365. (in Chinese) -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 67
- HTML浏览量: 51
- PDF量: 21
- 被引次数: 0