留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于机器学习的煤油液滴蒸发模型探索

王方 韩琪炜 蔡江涛 李典望 甘甜 金捷

王方, 韩琪炜, 蔡江涛, 等. 基于机器学习的煤油液滴蒸发模型探索[J]. 航空动力学报, 2023, 38(8):1956-1964 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220590
引用本文: 王方, 韩琪炜, 蔡江涛, 等. 基于机器学习的煤油液滴蒸发模型探索[J]. 航空动力学报, 2023, 38(8):1956-1964 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220590
WANG Fang, HAN Qiwei, CAI Jiangtao, et al. Investigation of kerosene droplet evaporation model based on machine learning[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2023, 38(8):1956-1964 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220590
Citation: WANG Fang, HAN Qiwei, CAI Jiangtao, et al. Investigation of kerosene droplet evaporation model based on machine learning[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2023, 38(8):1956-1964 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220590

基于机器学习的煤油液滴蒸发模型探索

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220590
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(91741125,12172345,92041001)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    王方(1973-),女,副教授,博士,主要从事两相湍流流动及燃烧研究

  • 中图分类号: V231.2

Investigation of kerosene droplet evaporation model based on machine learning

  • 摘要:

    基于厚交换层液滴蒸发理论以及煤油的实验数据,通过机器学习理论中的线性回归、随机森林、支持向量机、极致梯度提升回归和全连接神经网络方法构建煤油液滴的蒸发模型,检验新构建模型的适用范围和精度。对比实验数据和传统模型、机器学习蒸发模型的预测结果,发现随机森林方法和极致梯度提升回归方法生成的蒸发模型不能合理外推,支持向量机方法的外推效果欠佳。线性回归的厚交换层模型和全连接神经网络模型的整体效果更好,与训练数据的均方误差分别为2.71×10−2和1.81×10−3。基于深度学习模型良好的预测效果,可以构建基于实验数据的、可以合理外推的“数字蒸发模型”,可能有更好的现实适应能力。机器学习液滴蒸发模型丰富了现有液滴蒸发模型,为机器学习液滴蒸发模型研究打基础。

     

  • 图 1  液滴直径平方与时间的关系[3]

    Figure 1.  Relations between square of droplet diameter and time[3]

    图 2  煤油蒸发实验点数据

    Figure 2.  Experimental data of kerosene evaporation

    图 3  部分煤油训练数据与验证数据

    Figure 3.  Partial training data and validation data of kerosene

    图 4  各模型预测值与实验点数据比较

    Figure 4.  Comparison among model predictions and experimental data

    图 5  液滴静止时不同环境温度下各模型的预测值

    Figure 5.  Predictions of models under different ambient temperatures when the droplet is stationary

    图 6  环境温度为573 K下各模型的预测值

    Figure 6.  Predictions of models when the ambient temperature is 573 K

    图 7  环境温度为673 K下各模型的预测值

    Figure 7.  Predictions of models when the ambient temperature is 673 K

    图 8  采用独热编码的机器学习模型对煤油蒸发常数的预测结果

    Figure 8.  Prediction of evaporation constant of kerosene using a machine learning model with unique heat coding

    图 9  蒸发数据特征的相关性矩阵热力图

    Figure 9.  Heatmap of correlation matrix of evaporation data

    图 10  增加物性特征的机器学习模型对煤油蒸发常数的预测结果

    Figure 10.  Kerosene evaporation constant predictions of machine learning models with more physical properties

    图 11  全连接神经网络模型简图

    Figure 11.  Sketch of fully-connection network model

    图 12  深度学习模型对煤油蒸发常数的预测结果

    Figure 12.  Prediction results of kerosene evaporation constant using deep learning models

    表  1  NC-TEL拟合结果与误差

    Table  1.   Performance of NC-TEL regression

    模型$\hat{\zeta }$$\hat{\delta }$训练组
    MSE/$ {10}^{-2} $
    验证组
    MSE/$ {10}^{-3} $
    线性回归0.1586.27$ 2.71 $$ 2.33 $
    线性SVM回归0.2465.47$ 3.16 $$ 7.48 $
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  机器学习模型误差

    Table  2.   Errors of machine learning models

    模型MSE/$ {10}^{-3} $
    独热编码
    训练
    独热编码
    验证
    增加物性
    训练
    增加物性
    验证
    随机森林$ 0.264 $$ 6.05 $$ 0.282 $$ 5.91 $
    SVM$ 2.00 $$ 6.00 $$ 1.47 $$ 6.92 $
    XGBoost$0.048\;6$$ 9.69 $$0.044\;6$$ 9.29 $
    SGD$ 5.09 $$ 5.98 $$ 3.15 $$ 6.07 $
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  模型预测结果总结

    Table  3.   Summary of model prediction results

    模型训练组
    MSE/$ {10}^{-3} $
    验证组
    MSE/$ {10}^{-3} $
    外推能力
    线性回归$ 27.1 $$ 2.33 $
    随机森林$ 0.282 $$ 5.91 $
    SVM$ 1.47 $$ 6.92 $
    XGBoost$0.044\;6$$ 9.29 $
    SGD$ 3.15 $$ 6.07 $一般
    全连接网络$ 1.81 $$ 4.19 $
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] GODSAVE G A E. Studies of the combustion of drops in a fuel spray: the burning of single drops of fuel[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion,1953,4(1): 818-830. doi: 10.1016/S0082-0784(53)80107-4
    [2] SPALDING D B. Combustion of liquid fuels[J]. Nature,1950,165: 160. doi: 10.1038/165160a0
    [3] NOBLE W S. What is a support vector machine?[J]. Nature Biotechnology,2006,24(12): 1565-1567. doi: 10.1038/nbt1206-1565
    [4] ABRAMZON B,SIRIGNANO W A. Droplet vaporization model for spray combustion calculations[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,1989,32(9): 1605-1618. doi: 10.1016/0017-9310(89)90043-4
    [5] PENG F, AGGARWAL S K. A review of droplet dynamics and vaporization modeling for engineering calculations[R]. ASME 94-GT-215,1994.
    [6] RANZ W E. Evaporation from drops: Part Ⅱ[J]. Chemical Engineering Progress,1952,48(4): 173-180.
    [7] 周力行. 燃烧理论和化学流体力学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1986.
    [8] WANG Fang,LIU Rui,LI Min,et al. Kerosene evaporation rate in high temperature air stationary and convective environment[J]. Fuel,2018,211: 582-590. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.062
    [9] GHASSEMI H,BAEK S W,KHAN Q S. Experimental study on evaporation of kerosene droplets at elevated pressures and temperatures[J]. Combustion Science and Technology,2006,178(9): 1669-1684. doi: 10.1080/00102200600582392
    [10] SVETNIK V,LIAW A,TONG C,et al. Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling[J]. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences,2003,43(6): 1947-1958. doi: 10.1021/ci034160g
    [11] BOTTOU L. Large-scale machine learning with stochastic gradient descent[R]. Paris, France: 19th International Conference on Computational Statistics, 2010.
    [12] GLOROT X, BENGIO Y. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks[R]. Sardinia, Italy: 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2010.
    [13] SAZHIN S S. Advanced models of fuel droplet heating and evaporation[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science,2006,32(2): 162-214. doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2005.11.001
    [14] Ansys Inc. Ansys fluent theory guide[M]. Canonsburg, US: Ansys Inc. , 2020.
    [15] CHEN T, GUESTRIN C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system[R]. San Francisco, US: 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016.
    [16] KHAN Q, BAEK S W, LEE S Y. Effect of droplet initial diameter on droplet vaporization regimes for kerosene fuel droplet[R]. Reno, US: 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2007.
    [17] WANG Fang,YAO Jie,YANG Shaofeng,et al. A new stationary droplet evaporation model and its validation[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics,2017,30(4): 1407-1416. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2017.06.012
    [18] PINHEIRO A P,VEDOVOTO J M,NETO A D S,et al. Ethanol droplet evaporation: effects of ambient temperature, pressure and fuel vapor concentration[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2019,143: 118472.1-118472.12.
    [19] HASHIMOTO N,NOMURA H,SUZUKI M,et al. Evaporation characteristics of a palm methyl ester droplet at high ambient temperatures[J]. Fuel,2015,143: 202-210. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.11.057
  • 加载中
图(12) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  637
  • HTML浏览量:  542
  • PDF量:  75
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-08-14
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-06-05

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回