留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

旋转桨叶表面压力反演试验

卫凯 徐琛 燕群 徐健 王龙

卫凯, 徐琛, 燕群, 等. 旋转桨叶表面压力反演试验[J]. 航空动力学报, 2023, 38(4):949-954 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220645
引用本文: 卫凯, 徐琛, 燕群, 等. 旋转桨叶表面压力反演试验[J]. 航空动力学报, 2023, 38(4):949-954 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220645
WEI Kai, XU Chen, YAN Qun, et al. Inversion test of rotating blade surface pressure[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2023, 38(4):949-954 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220645
Citation: WEI Kai, XU Chen, YAN Qun, et al. Inversion test of rotating blade surface pressure[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2023, 38(4):949-954 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220645

旋转桨叶表面压力反演试验

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220645
基金项目: 工业和信息化部资助项目(MJZ-2016-F-11)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    卫凯(1990-),男,工程师,硕士,主要从事航空发动机噪声控制研究

  • 中图分类号: V231.3

Inversion test of rotating blade surface pressure

  • 摘要:

    为了验证旋转桨叶表面压力的反演计算方法,搭建了旋转桨叶表面压力反演试验平台,对一套二叶螺旋桨的表面压力开展了反演试验。通过传声器阵列测量螺旋桨的远场噪声,利用Kulite压力传感器和离线式采集器测量桨叶表面的静压,并与计算结果进行对比。结果表明:在所研究的工况范围内,计算结果与试验结果吻合较好,趋势基本一致;其中两个测点的试验结果与计算结果误差在1%以内,精度很高;另两个测点的对比差值较大,主要是压力传感器安装工艺误差所导致的。

     

  • 图 1  试验现场照

    Figure 1.  Test site photo

    图 2  反演桨转接盘局部照

    Figure 2.  Photo of adapter for inversion propeller

    图 3  传声器阵列空间布局示意图

    Figure 3.  Schematic diagram of microphone array layout

    图 4  桨叶表面压力测点位置示意图

    Figure 4.  Schematic diagram of position of pressure measurement points on blade

    图 5  2000 r/min远场噪声频谱

    Figure 5.  Spectra of far-field noise with 2000 r/min

    图 6  2000 r/min 1#传声器的噪声时频分布

    Figure 6.  Time-frequency distribution of 1# microphone with 2000 r/min

    图 7  2000 r/min桨叶表面压力计算结果与试验结果对比

    Figure 7.  Comparison of calculation results and test results of blade surface pressure with 2000 r/min

    图 8  2350 r/min桨叶表面压力计算结果与试验结果对比

    Figure 8.  Comparison of calculation results and test results of blade surface pressure with 2350 r/min

    表  1  2000 r/min桨叶表面压力计算结果与试验结果数据

    Table  1.   Data of calculation results and test results of blade surface pressure with 2000 r/min

    测点表面压力/kPa误差/%
    试验结果计算结果
    1#102.106101.0131.07
    2#101.068101.1850.12
    3#100.285101.5891.3
    4#106.371105.9360.41
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  2350 r/min桨叶表面压力计算结果与试验结果数据

    Table  2.   Data of calculation results and test results of blade surface pressure with 2350 r/min

    测点表面压力/kPa误差/%
    试验结果计算结果
    1#102.005100.1151.85
    2#100.349100.3210.02
    3# 99.258100.8971.65
    4#106.065106.8260.22
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 胡骏. 航空叶片机原理[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2014.
    [2] 张帅,张强波,董江,等. 考虑流固耦合效应的航空发动机风扇叶片应力数值模拟与试验测量研究[J]. 推进技术,2022,43(2): 331-340. doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.200175

    ZHANG Shuai,ZHANG Qiangbo,DONG Jiang,et al. Numerical simulation and experimental measurement of aero-engine fan blades stress considering influence of fluid-structure interaction[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology,2022,43(2): 331-340. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.200175
    [3] 李萍,乔宝英,汪洋. 桨叶表面压力测量技术综述[J]. 直升机技术,2006,146(2): 58-61.

    LI Ping,QIAO Baoying,WANG Yang. Overview of blade surface pressure measurement technology[J]. Helicopter Technique,2006,146(2): 58-61. (in Chinese)
    [4] 阎超,于剑,徐晶磊. CFD模拟方法的发展成就与展望[J]. 力学进展,2011,41(5): 562-589. doi: 10.6052/1000-0992-2011-5-lxjzJ2010-082

    YAN Chao,YU Jian,XU Jinglei. On the achievements and prospects for the methods of computational fluid dynamics[J]. Advances In Mechanics,2011,41(5): 562-589. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/1000-0992-2011-5-lxjzJ2010-082
    [5] 王维,杨永,夏贞锋. 不同螺旋桨滑流数值模拟方法对比研究[J]. 航空计算技术,2012,42(5): 80-86. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-654X.2012.05.020

    WANG Wei,YANG Yong,XIA Zhenfeng. Study on comparison of different numerical simulation methods concerning propeller slipstream[J]. Aeronautical Computing Technique,2012,42(5): 80-86. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-654X.2012.05.020
    [6] 战培国,杨炯. 国外风洞试验的新机制、新概念、新技术[J]. 流体力学实验与测量,2004,18(4): 1-6.

    ZHAN Peiguo,YANG Jiong. New systems, concepts and techniques in the area of foreign wind tunnel test[J]. Experiments and Measurements in Fluid Mechanics,2004,18(4): 1-6. (in Chinese)
    [7] TAKAO M,HIDEYUKI K. Surface pressure measurement on a rotating blade of field horizontal axial wind turbine in yawed condition[J]. Mechanical Systems Machine Elements and Manufacturing,2005,48(1): 156-163.
    [8] 王庆伟,刘波,薄相峰. 轴流压气机转子叶片表面静压分布实验[J]. 推进技术,2011,32(5): 611-616. doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2011.05.006

    WANG Qingwei,LIU Bo,BO Xiangfeng. Experiment of the static pressure on the rotating blade surface in an axial compressor[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology,2011,32(5): 611-616. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2011.05.006
    [9] 王庆伟,刘波,侯为民. 压气机转子叶片表面动态压力测量的探索[J]. 航空动力学报,2010,25(10): 2327-2332. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2010.10.027

    WANG Qingwei,LIU Bo,HOU Weimin. Tentative research about pressure measurement on one point of compressor rotor blade surface[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2010,25(10): 2327-2332. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2010.10.027
    [10] 梁晨,牛夕莹,林枫,等. 某型涡轮动叶气动性能的实验研究[J]. 热能与动力工程,2012,27(4): 405-410.

    LIANG Chen,NIU Xiying,LIN Feng,et al. Tentative research about pressure measurement on one point of compressor rotor blade surface[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power,2012,27(4): 405-410. (in Chinese)
    [11] 闫清东,宋泽民,魏巍. 液力变矩器导轮叶片表面压力测量与分析[J]. 机械工程学报,2019,55(10): 115-121. doi: 10.3901/JME.2019.10.115

    YAN Qingdong,SONG Zeming,WEI Wei. Pressure measurement and analysis of stator blade surface of hydrodynamic torque converter[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2019,55(10): 115-121. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3901/JME.2019.10.115
    [12] 江露生,曹亚雄,刘婷. 共轴刚性旋翼悬停状态桨叶表面压力测量试验与计算研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报,2021,47(12): 2484-2493. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2020.0669

    JIANG Lusheng,CAO Yaxiong,LIU Ting. Experiment and computational study on blade surface pressure measurement of coaxial rigid rotor in hovering state[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2021,47(12): 2484-2493. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2020.0669
    [13] 林敬周,解福田,钟俊. 高超声速风洞压敏漆试验技术[J]. 航空学报,2017,38(7): 120890.1-120890.9.

    LIN Jingzhou,XIE Futian,ZHONG Jun. Pressure sensitive paint test technique in hypersonic wind tunnel[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2017,38(7): 120890.1-120890.9. (in Chinese)
    [14] LI X D, ZHOU S. An inversion model for subsonic moving sound source reconstruction[R]. AIAA 95-0120, 1995.
    [15] LI X D,ZHOU S. Spatial transformation of the discrete sound field from a propeller[J]. AIAA Journal,1996,34(6): 1097-1102. doi: 10.2514/3.13198
    [16] LUO J,LI X D. An inverse aeroacoustic problem on rotor wake/stator interaction[J]. Journal of Sound and Virbration,2002,254(2): 219-229. doi: 10.1006/jsvi.2001.3671
    [17] 罗俊,李晓东. 转子/静子干涉气动声学反问题研究[J]. 航空动力学报,2001,16(2): 279-282. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2001.03.015

    LUO Jun,LI Xiaodong. An inverse aeroacoustic problem on rotor/stator interaction[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2001,16(2): 279-282. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2001.03.015
    [18] 赵庆贺,李晓东. 悬停状态下旋翼噪声声源反演的正则化方法[J]. 航空动力学报,2019,34(4): 838-846. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2019.04.013

    ZHAO Qinghe,LI Xiaodong. Regularization method for subsonic hovering rotor sound source reconstruction[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2019,34(4): 838-846. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2019.04.013
    [19] 乔渭阳, 王良锋. 航空发动机气动声学[M]. 西安: 西北工业大学出版社, 2016.
    [20] WILLIAMS F J E,HAWKINGS D I. Sound generated by turbulence and surface in arbirary motion[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London,1969,264(5): 321-342.
    [21] FARASSAT F. Linear acoustic formulas for calculation of rotating blade noise[J]. AIAA Journal,1981,19(9): 1122-1130. doi: 10.2514/3.60051
  • 加载中
图(8) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  108
  • HTML浏览量:  42
  • PDF量:  50
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-08-31
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-02-21

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回