留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

SABRE4氦循环分流比对设计点氢流量影响分析

郑尚喆 陈玉春 王治华 杜金峰 高远 黄新春

郑尚喆, 陈玉春, 王治华, 等. SABRE4氦循环分流比对设计点氢流量影响分析[J]. 航空动力学报, 2024, 39(11):20220774 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220774
引用本文: 郑尚喆, 陈玉春, 王治华, 等. SABRE4氦循环分流比对设计点氢流量影响分析[J]. 航空动力学报, 2024, 39(11):20220774 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220774
ZHENG Shangzhe, CHEN Yuchun, WANG Zhihua, et al. Influence of helium cycle flow ratio on SABRE4 design point hydrogen flow rate[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2024, 39(11):20220774 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220774
Citation: ZHENG Shangzhe, CHEN Yuchun, WANG Zhihua, et al. Influence of helium cycle flow ratio on SABRE4 design point hydrogen flow rate[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2024, 39(11):20220774 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220774

SABRE4氦循环分流比对设计点氢流量影响分析

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220774
详细信息
    作者简介:

    郑尚喆(1993-),男,博士生,主要从事组合发动机总体设计研究

    通讯作者:

    黄新春(1983-),男,副研究员,博士,主要从事微小型涡轮发动机设计制造及性能评估技术研究。E-mail:huangxinchun@nwpu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: V236

Influence of helium cycle flow ratio on SABRE4 design point hydrogen flow rate

  • 摘要:

    针对协同吸气式火箭发动机(synergistic air-breathing rocket engine,SABRE),建立了基于部件法的发动机设计点热力学计算模型,分析了SABRE循环所需的最少氢质量流量(简称流量)。以节省氢流量为目的,分别在SABRE3发动机构型基础上增加了两个氦循环支路,提出了两个SABRE4简化方案,结合两种简化方案,提出了SABRE4整体方案,分析了各氦循环支路分流比对发动机设计点重要参数以及设计点氢流量的影响。结果表明:最小氢流量与通过换热器3的氦流量成正比,要减小所需氢流量,需要减少通过换热器3的氦流量;较低的氦循环支路分流比一有利于氢流量的降低,但同时增大了氦压气机设计压比,较低的氦循环支路分流比二有利于氢流量的降低,且有利于降低氦压气机设计压比,分流比一、分流比二的降低都会导致换热器接近换热限制边界;在换热器1前氦气总温不超过310 K,且氦压气机压比不大于11.0的情况下,SABRE4方案最小氢流量为SABRE3氢流量的83.3%。

     

  • 图 1  SABRE3方案

    Figure 1.  Scheme of SABRE3

    图 2  SABRE4简化方案1

    Figure 2.  Simplified scheme 1 of SABRE4

    图 3  发动机参数与r1的关系

    Figure 3.  Engine parameters vs. r1

    图 4  氢流量与r1T272之间的关系

    Figure 4.  Hydrogen flow rate vs. r1 and T272

    图 5  SABRE4简化方案2

    Figure 5.  Simplified scheme 2 of SABRE4

    图 6  发动机参数与r2的关系

    Figure 6.  Engine parameters vs. r2

    图 7  SABRE4方案

    Figure 7.  Scheme of SABRE4

    图 8  T272=200 K时氢流量与氦压气机压比

    Figure 8.  Hydrogen flow rate and helium compressor pressure ratio at T272=200 K

    图 9  T272=300 K时氢流量与氦压气机压比

    Figure 9.  Hydrogen flow rate and helium compressor pressure ratio at T272=300 K

    图 10  T272=400 K时氢流量与氦压气机压比

    Figure 10.  Hydrogen flow rate and helium compressor pressure ratio at T272=400 K

    图 11  T272=500 K时氢流量与氦压气机压比

    Figure 11.  Hydrogen flow rate and helium compressor pressure ratio at T272=500 K

    图 12  最佳分流比r2,opt下的氢流量与氦压气机压比

    Figure 12.  Hydrogen flow rate and helium compressor pressure ratio at optimal flow ratio r2,opt

    图 13  SABRE4与SABRE4简化方案1的氢流量比较

    Figure 13.  Hydrogen flow rate comparison between SABRE4 and simplified scheme 1 of SABRE4

    表  1  SABRE4简化方案1省氢流量收益对比

    Table  1.   Hydrogen benefits of SABRE4 simplified scheme 1

    πC2 r1 $ {\dot m_{{{\text{H}}_{\text{2}}}}} $/(kg/s) $ ({\dot m_{{{\text{H}}_{\text{2}}}{\text{,S4}}}}/{\dot m_{{{\text{H}}_{\text{2}}}{\text{,S3}}}}) $/%
    20 0.705 5.535 83.7
    30 0.656 5.158 78.0
    40 0.630 4.950 75.0
    50 0.613 4.815 72.8
    60 0.600 4.760 71.9
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] CONCHIE P. The HOTOL space transportation system[R]. AIAA1986-786,1986.
    [2] HEMPSELL M,BOND A,BOND R,et al. Progress on the SKYLON and SABRE development programme[R]. Cape Town,South Africa: 62nd International Astronautical Congress. 2011.
    [3] HEMPSELL M. Progress on the SKYLON and SABRE[R]. Beijing,China: 64th International Astronautical Congress,2013.
    [4] HEMPSELL M,BOND A. SKYLON: an example of commercial launch system development[R]. Napoli,Italy: XXII Conference Presented at the Italian Association of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIDAA),2013.
    [5] VARVILL R,BOND A. The SKYLON spaceplane: progress to realisation[J]. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society,2008,61: 412-418.
    [6] MURRAY J,HEMPSELL C,BOND A. An experimental precooler for airbreathing rocket engines[J]. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society,2001,54(5/6): 199-209.
    [7] 牛文,李文杰. SKYLON飞行器与SABRE发动机研究[J]. 飞航导弹,2013(3): 70-75. NIU Wen,LI Wenjie. Research on SKYLON aircraft and SABRE engine[J]. Aerodynamic Missile Journal,2013(3): 70-75. (in Chinese

    NIU Wen, LI Wenjie. Research on SKYLON aircraft and SABRE engine[J]. Aerodynamic Missile Journal, 2013(3): 70-75. (in Chinese)
    [8] 张志刚,陈静敏,李志永,等. SABRE发动机吸气模式下氦气闭式循环特性分析[J]. 战术导弹技术,2016(2): 57-62. ZHANG Zhigang,CHEN Jingmin,LI Zhiyong,et al. Characteristic analysis of the helium closed cycle of SABRE in air-breathing mode[J]. Tactical Missile Technology,2016(2): 57-62. (in Chinese

    ZHANG Zhigang, CHEN Jingmin, LI Zhiyong, et al. Characteristic analysis of the helium closed cycle of SABRE in air-breathing mode[J]. Tactical Missile Technology, 2016(2): 57-62. (in Chinese)
    [9] 杨新垒,聂万胜,刘晓慧. SABRE吸气模式热力循环及预冷器性能分析[J]. 战术导弹技术,2018(1): 104-110. YANG Xinlei,NIE Wansheng,LIU Xiaohui. Performance analysis of thermodynamic cycle and pre-cooler in SABRE air-breathing mode[J]. Tactical Missile Technology,2018(1): 104-110. (in Chinese

    YANG Xinlei, NIE Wansheng, LIU Xiaohui. Performance analysis of thermodynamic cycle and pre-cooler in SABRE air-breathing mode[J]. Tactical Missile Technology, 2018(1): 104-110. (in Chinese)
    [10] YU Xuanfei,YU Wenli,WANG Cong,et al. Thermodynamic analysis of the influential mechanism of fuel properties on the performance of an indirect precooled hypersonic airbreathing engine and vehicle[J]. Energy Conversion and Management,2019,196: 1138-1152. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.06.049
    [11] YU Xuanfei,WANG Cong,YU Daren. Minimization of entropy generation of a closed Brayton cycle based precooling-compression system for advanced hypersonic airbreathing engine[J]. Energy Conversion and Management,2020,209: 112548. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112548
    [12] YU X,WANG C,QIN J,et al. Thermodynamic analysis of precooled airbreathing engine[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics,2018,39: 31-37.
    [13] YU Xuanfei,WANG Cong,YU Daren. Thermodynamic design and optimization of the multi-branch closed Brayton cycle based precooling-compression system for a novel hypersonic aeroengine[J]. Energy Conversion and Management,2020,205: 112412. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112412
    [14] 高远,陈玉春,王治华,等. 深冷组合循环发动机吸气模态循环分析与设计可行域研究[J]. 推进技术,2020,41(6): 1217-1226. GAO Yuan,CHEN Yuchun,WANG Zhihua,et al. Cycle analysis and design feasible region research of deeply precooled combined cycle engine in airbreathing mode[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology,2020,41(6): 1217-1226. (in Chinese

    GAO Yuan, CHEN Yuchun, WANG Zhihua, et al. Cycle analysis and design feasible region research of deeply precooled combined cycle engine in airbreathing mode[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2020, 41(6): 1217-1226. (in Chinese)
    [15] 高远,陈玉春,史新兴. 深冷组合发动机吸气模态最大状态控制规律研究[J]. 推进技术,2020,41(12): 2659-2669. GAO Yuan,CHEN Yuchun,SHI Xinxing. Maximum state control schedule research on deeply precooled combined cycle engine in airbreathing mode[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology,2020,41(12): 2659-2669. (in Chinese

    GAO Yuan, CHEN Yuchun, SHI Xinxing. Maximum state control schedule research on deeply precooled combined cycle engine in airbreathing mode[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2020, 41(12): 2659-2669. (in Chinese)
    [16] 唐靖博,杨庆春,徐旭. 预冷组合循环发动机吸气式模态建模与性能分析[J]. 推进技术,2022,43(9): 20-33. TANG Jingbo,YANG Qingchun,XU Xu. Modeling and performance analysis of precooled combined cycle engine in air-breathing mode[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology,2022,43(9): 20-33. (in Chinese

    TANG Jingbo, YANG Qingchun, XU Xu. Modeling and performance analysis of precooled combined cycle engine in air-breathing mode[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2022, 43(9): 20-33. (in Chinese)
    [17] 廉筱纯,吴虎. 航空发动机原理[M]. 西安: 西北工业大学出版社,2005.
    [18] 杨世铭,陶文铨. 传热学. 第4版[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社,2006.
    [19] 黄兴. 超燃冲压发动机特性计算与一体化设计技术研究[D]. 西北工业大学,2014. HUANG Xing. The characteristic simulation of scramjet and the integration design research[D]. Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University,2014. (in Chinese

    HUANG Xing. The characteristic simulation of scramjet and the integration design research[D]. Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2014. (in Chinese)
    [20] 航空发动机手册总编委会. 航空发动机设计手册: 第15分册[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社,2000.
    [21] 关醒凡. 现代泵理论与设计[M]. 北京: 中国宇航出版社,2011.
    [22] CHASE JR M W. NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables[M]. Fourth Edition. Melville,US: American Institute of Physics,1998.
    [23] Fernández-Villacé V. Simulation,design and analysis of air-breathing combined-cycle engines for high speed propulsion[D]. Brussels,Belgium: Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics,2013.
  • 加载中
图(13) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  461
  • HTML浏览量:  261
  • PDF量:  33
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-10-08
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-03-27

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回