留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

分叉进气道吞雨特性数值模拟

邱宇宸 李博 徐猛 许尹 姜东晨

邱宇宸, 李博, 徐猛, 等. 分叉进气道吞雨特性数值模拟[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(4):20220789 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220789
引用本文: 邱宇宸, 李博, 徐猛, 等. 分叉进气道吞雨特性数值模拟[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(4):20220789 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220789
QIU Yuchen, LI Bo, XU Meng, et al. Numerical simulation of rain ingestion characteristics of bifurcated intake[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(4):20220789 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220789
Citation: QIU Yuchen, LI Bo, XU Meng, et al. Numerical simulation of rain ingestion characteristics of bifurcated intake[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(4):20220789 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220789

分叉进气道吞雨特性数值模拟

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220789
详细信息
    作者简介:

    邱宇宸(1997-),男,硕士生,主要从事飞行器进气道设计和研究。E-mail:QiuYuChen@nuaa.edu.cn

    通讯作者:

    李博(1974-),男,副教授、硕士生导师,博士,主要从事飞行器进气道设计及螺旋桨设计与仿真研究。E-mail:leebo@nuaa.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: V231.3

Numerical simulation of rain ingestion characteristics of bifurcated intake

  • 摘要:

    使用数值模拟方法对一种带旁通道的分叉进气道进行不同雨水含量、不同来流速度下的吞雨特性开展研究。结果表明:吞雨总是使进气道流场畸变指数增加;在雨滴粒径均匀情况下,雨滴分离效率随雨滴粒径增加先减少后增加。雨滴粒径变化对流场总压恢复系数影响并不大,随着雨滴粒径增加,流场总压畸变指数先增后减;来流速度与流场中低速区共同影响雨滴运动轨迹。来流速度越大,旁通道排雨量越大,但主流道的吞雨量随着来流速度增加呈现出减少-增加-减少的趋势。

     

  • 图 1  涡桨发动机短舱螺旋桨模型

    Figure 1.  Nacelle and propeller model of turboprop engine

    图 2  进气道模型

    Figure 2.  Intake model

    图 3  边界条件

    Figure 3.  Boundary conditions

    图 4  Z=0.1 m截面马赫数云图

    Figure 4.  Mach number contours of Z=0.1 m section

    图 5  不同雨滴直径下的分离效率

    Figure 5.  Separation efficiency of different raindrop diameters

    图 6  不同来流速度、雨水含量下雨滴的分离效率

    Figure 6.  Separation efficiency of different inflow velocity and rainwater content

    图 7  主流出口质量流量

    Figure 7.  Mass flow of mainstream outlet

    图 8  旁通道出口质量流量

    Figure 8.  Mass flow of bypass outlet

    图 9  雨滴轨迹图

    Figure 9.  Raindrop trajectories

    图 10  不同来流速度、雨水含量下的总压恢复系数

    Figure 10.  Total pressure recovery coefficient of different inflow velocities and rainwater contents

    图 11  不同来流速度、雨水含量下的流场畸变指数

    Figure 11.  Distortion index of different inflow velocities and rainwater contents

    表  1  不同网格数量计算结果

    Table  1.   Calculation results of different grids

    网格数量/万 主流道雨滴质量流量/(g/s)
    1000 31.54
    1200 32.35
    1400 34.72
    1600 35.27
    1800 35.31
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  主流道出口的气动性能参数

    Table  2.   Aerodynamic performance parameters of main outlet

    v/(m/s) σ $ {C}_{\mathrm{d}60} $ $ \varphi $
    50 0.981 0.601 1.154
    75 0.984 0.592 0.930
    100 0.990 0.582 0.759
    125 0.984 0.547 0.653
    150 0.984 0.538 0.582
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  不同直径雨滴的分离效率

    Table  3.   Separation efficiency of raindrops of different diameters

    de/mm η/% de/mm η/%
    0.5 94.42 1.3 93.92
    0.6 93.94 1.4 94.15
    0.7 93.33 1.5 94.33
    0.8 92.97 1.6 94.48
    0.9 93.08 1.7 94.65
    1.0 93.12 1.8 94.82
    1.1 93.76 1.9 95.00
    1.2 93.85 2.0 95.10
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 王春晓,邓潇. 民用大涵道比涡扇发动机吸雨能力评估的方法研究[J]. 民用飞机设计与研究,2013(增刊2): 1-3,50. WANG Chunxiao,DENG Xiao. A method for estimating rain ingestion effect on high bypass ratio turbofan engine performance[J]. Civil Aircraft Design & Research,2013(Suppl. 2): 1-3,50. (in Chinese

    WANG Chunxiao, DENG Xiao. A method for estimating rain ingestion effect on high bypass ratio turbofan engine performance[J]. Civil Aircraft Design & Research, 2013(Suppl. 2): 1-3, 50. (in Chinese)
    [2] THEOKLIS N. Water ingestion effects on gas turbine engine performance[D]. Cranfield,UK: Cranfield University,2008.
    [3] 王丰产,孙有朝,吴海桥,等. 大型民用航空发动机吸雨和吸雹适航验证方法研究[C]//2010年航空器适航与空中交通管理学术年会论文集,北京: 中国航空学会,2010: 43-49.
    [4] European Aviation Safety Agency. Certification specifications including airworthiness codes and acceptable means of compliance for engines: EASA-CS-E[S]. European Union: European Aviation Safety Agency, 2003: 151-161.

    European Aviation Safety Agency. Certification specifications including airworthiness codes and acceptable means of compliance for engines: EASA-CS-E[S]. European Union: European Aviation Safety Agency, 2003: 151-161.
    [5] Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration. Airworthiness standards: aircraft engines: FAR-33[S]. Washington, US: Department of Transportation, 2010: 870-871.
    [6] KISSEL G J. Rain and hail extremes at altitude[J]. Journal of Aircraft,1980,17(7): 464-467. doi: 10.2514/3.57926
    [7] MURTHY S,EHRESMAN C. Effects of water ingestion into jet engine[R]. AIAA1984-542,1984.
    [8] MURTHY S. Effect of heavy rain on aviation engines[R]. AIAA1989-799,1989.
    [9] MURTHY S. Dynamic performance of high bypass ratio turbine engines with water ingestion[R]. West Lafayette, US: Purdue University, 1996.
    [10] ROUMELIOTIS I, MATHIOUDAKIS K. Evaluation of interstage water injection effect on compressor and engine performance[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2006, 128(4): 849-856.
    [11] NIKOLAIDIS T, PILIDIS P, TEIXEIRA J A,et al. Water film formation on an axial flow compressor rotor blade[C]//Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2008: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Berlin, Germany: ASME, 2008: 79-87.
    [12] ZHENG Q, SUN Y F, LI S Y,et al. Thermodynamic anal-yses of wet compression process in the compressor of gas turbine[C]//Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2002: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Amsterdam, Netherlands: ASME, 2002: 487-496.
    [13] ZHENG Q, LI M H, SUN Y F. Thermodynamic perfor-mance of wet compression and regenerative (WCR) gas turbine[C]//Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2003: Collo-cated with the 2003 International Joint Power Generation Conference. Atlanta, US: ASME, 2003: 813-820.
    [14] LI M H, ZHENG Q. Wet compression system stability analysis: Part Ⅰ wet compression Moore Greitzer transient model[C]//Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2004: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Vienna, Austria: ASME, 2004: 703-712.
    [15] ZHENG Q, LI M H. Wet compression system stability analysis: Part Ⅱ simulations and bifurcation analy-sis[C]//Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2004: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Vienna, Austria: ASME, 2004: 713-721.
    [16] 侯圣文,郑旭,马树波,等. 降雨环境下进气道吸雨数值计算分析[J]. 风机技术,2020,62(6): 35-44. HOU Shengwen,ZHENG Xu,MA Shubo,et al. Numerical calculation and analysis of inlet water ingestion[J]. Chinese Journal of Turbomachinery,2020,62(6): 35-44. (in Chinese

    HOU Shengwen, ZHENG Xu, MA Shubo, et al. Numerical calculation and analysis of inlet water ingestion[J]. Chinese Journal of Turbomachinery, 2020, 62(6): 35-44. (in Chinese)
    [17] 王司昭,邢菲,吴松霖,等. 极端降雨条件下航空发动机吞雨的数值研究[J]. 推进技术,2023,44(1): 210843. WANG Sizhao,XING Fei,WU Songlin,et al. Numerical study on aero-engine swallowing rain under extreme rainfall conditions[J]. Propulsion Technology,2023,44(1): 210843. (in Chinese

    WANG Sizhao, XING Fei, WU Songlin, et al. Numerical study on aero-engine swallowing rain under extreme rainfall conditions[J]. Propulsion Technology, 2023, 44(1): 210843. (in Chinese)
    [18] 张琦,朱焕娜,孙科,等. 航空发动机吸雨试验中进气道内水滴粒径变化[J]. 科学技术与工程,2022,22(18): 8133-8138. ZHANG Qi,ZHU Huanna,SUN Ke,et al. Variation of water droplet size in inlet of aeroengine rain ingestion test[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2022,22(18): 8133-8138. (in Chinese doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2022.18.051

    ZHANG Qi, ZHU Huanna, SUN Ke, et al. Variation of water droplet size in inlet of aeroengine rain ingestion test[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2022, 22(18): 8133-8138. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2022.18.051
    [19] MARSHALL J S. The distribution of raindrops with size[J]. Journal of Meteorology,1948,5(4): 165-166. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1948)005<0165:TDORWS>2.0.CO;2
    [20] CHARLES W J. Water ingestion in jet engines[D]. Cambridge,UK: University of Cambridge,2003.
    [21] SISSENWINE N. Extremes of hydrometeors at altitude for MIL-STD-210B[R]. Hanscom Air Force Base, US: Cambridge Research Laboratories, 1972.
  • 加载中
图(11) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  324
  • HTML浏览量:  223
  • PDF量:  33
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-10-13
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-04-26

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回