留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

航空发动机螺栓连接结构薄层单元静力学非线性模型修正

刘玉 赵迪文 艾延廷 付鹏哲 刘仕运

刘玉, 赵迪文, 艾延廷, 等. 航空发动机螺栓连接结构薄层单元静力学非线性模型修正[J]. 航空动力学报, 2023, 38(6):1480-1488 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220899
引用本文: 刘玉, 赵迪文, 艾延廷, 等. 航空发动机螺栓连接结构薄层单元静力学非线性模型修正[J]. 航空动力学报, 2023, 38(6):1480-1488 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220899
LIU Yu, ZHAO Diwen, AI Yanting, et al. Modification of static nonlinear model of thin layer element for aeroengine bolted structure[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2023, 38(6):1480-1488 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220899
Citation: LIU Yu, ZHAO Diwen, AI Yanting, et al. Modification of static nonlinear model of thin layer element for aeroengine bolted structure[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2023, 38(6):1480-1488 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220899

航空发动机螺栓连接结构薄层单元静力学非线性模型修正

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220899
基金项目: 辽宁省教育厅面上项目(JYT2020053); 沈阳航空航天大学博士启动基金(19YB39)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘玉(1989-),男,讲师,博士,主要从事航空发动机结构强度、力学振动研究

  • 中图分类号: V232

Modification of static nonlinear model of thin layer element for aeroengine bolted structure

  • 摘要:

    针对于航空发动机机匣带有止口的螺栓连接结构的非线性刚度特征提出一种新的非线性模拟方法以及模型修正方法。首先提出了一种非线性薄层单元方法对螺栓连接结构的非线性刚度特征进行模拟,并对模拟结果进行评估;然后,提出一种新的双加权响应面修正方法;最后,使用该修正方法对螺栓连接结构静力学非线性模型修正:结果表明:本文建立的非线性薄层单元简化模型可以预测实际螺栓连接结构考虑止口接触面粗糙度的非线性刚度特征;提出双加权响应面修正方法修正前后的刚度误差维持在3.5%以内,验证了建模以及修正方法的可行性。

     

  • 图 1  螺栓连接结构轴向刚度定义

    Figure 1.  Definition of axial stiffness of bolted structures

    图 2  带有止口的螺栓连接结构

    Figure 2.  Bolted structure with seam

    图 3  螺栓连接接触单元圆筒结构有限元模型

    Figure 3.  Finite element model of cylindrical structure with bolted contact element

    图 4  接触单元非线性刚度特征

    Figure 4.  Nonlinear stiffness characteristics of contact elements

    图 5  螺栓连接薄层单元圆筒结构有限元模型

    Figure 5.  Finite element model of cylinder structure with bolted thin layer element

    图 6  止口接触面非线性特征

    Figure 6.  Nonlinear characteristics of lip contact surface

    图 7  薄层单元非线性刚度特征

    Figure 7.  Nonlinear stiffness characteristics of thin layer element

    图 8  优化求解流程图

    Figure 8.  Optimization solution flow chart

    图 9  试验台和试验件

    Figure 9.  Test bench and test piece

    图 10  安装边静刚度曲线图

    Figure 10.  Curve of static stiffness of installation side

    图 11  刚度屈服前后一次修正响应面结果

    Figure 11.  Results of first modified response surface before and after yield of stiffness

    图 12  刚度屈服前后二次修正响应面结果

    Figure 12.  Results of secondary modified response surface before and after yield of stiffness

    图 13  预测刚度与试验刚度对比

    Figure 13.  Comparison of predicted stiffness and test stiffness

    表  1  材料参数

    Table  1.   Material parameters

    材料弹性模量/105 MPa泊松比
    GH7382.1450.26
    GH7061.9450.29
    GH41691.9990.3
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  修正后的材料参数

    Table  2.   Modified material parameters

    参数数值
    屈服前弹性模量$ {c_1} $/105 MPa2.7675
    屈服后弹性模量$ {c_{\text{2}}} $/105 MPa2.2668
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  修正前后的刚度误差分析

    Table  3.   Analysis of stiffness error before and after modification

    阶段刚度试验值/
    107 (N/m)
    刚度修正值/
    107 (N/m)
    误差/%
    屈服前1.9741.9683.03
    屈服后0.6850.6971.75
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] MOTTERSHEAD J E,FRISWELL M I. Model updating in structure dynamics: a survey[J]. Jounral of Sound and Vibration,1993,167(2): 347-375. doi: 10.1006/jsvi.1993.1340
    [2] IMREGUN M,SANLITURK K Y,EWINS D J. Finite element model updating using frequency response function data: Ⅱ case study on a medium-size finite element model[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,1995,9(2): 187-202. doi: 10.1006/mssp.1995.0015
    [3] MOTTERSHEAD J E. Model updating using robust estimation[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2002,16(1): 169-183. doi: 10.1006/mssp.2000.1375
    [4] WANG Weizhuo,MOTTERSHEAD J E,CHRISTOPHER M S,et al. Shape features and finite element model updating from full-field strain data[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures,2011,11(12): 1644-1657.
    [5] LEVIN R I,LIEVEN N A J. Dynamic finite element model updating using neural networks[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration,2011,210(5): 593-607.
    [6] MARES C,MOTTERSHEAD J E,FRISWELL M I. Result obtained by minimizing natural-frequency errors and using physical reasoning[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2003,17(1): 39-46. doi: 10.1006/mssp.2002.1537
    [7] 武威. 螺栓联接薄壁机匣结构刚度计算方法研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳航空航天大学, 2014.

    WU Wei. Research on calculation method of structural stiffness of bolted thin-walled casing[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Aerospace University, 2014. (in Chinese)
    [8] STENTSON P. Inversion of first perturbation theory and its application to structural design[J]. AIAA Journal,1976,4(14): 1126-1131.
    [9] KABE A M. Stiffness matrix adjustment using mode data[J]. AIAA Journal,1985,9(23): 1431-1436.
    [10] MOTTERSHEAD J E,MARES C,FRISWELL M I. Selection and updating of parameters for an aluminum space-frame model[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2000,14(6): 923-944. doi: 10.1006/mssp.2000.1303
    [11] MOTTERSHEAD J E,MICHAEL L,FRISWELL M I. The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: a tutorial[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2011,25(7): 2275-2296. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.10.012
    [12] REN Weixin,FANG Shengen,DENG Miaoyi. Response surface based finite-element-model updating using structural static responses[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics,2011,137(4): 248-257. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000223
    [13] 邓苗毅,任伟新,王复明. 基于静力响应面的结构有限元模型修正方法[J]. 实验力学,2008,23(2): 103-109.

    DENG Miaoyi,REN Weixin,WANG Fuming. Structural finite element model updating method based on static response surface[J]. Experimental Mechanics,2008,23(2): 103-109. (in Chinese)
    [14] 邓苗毅, 任伟新. 基于响应面方法的结构有限元模型修正研究进展[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2008(3): 42-45.

    DENG Miaoyi, REN Weixin. Research progress of structural finite element model updating based on response surface method[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2008(3): 42-45. (in Chinese)
    [15] 马双超, 臧朝平, 兰海波. 某航空发动机机匣的动力学模型修正[J]. 航空动力学报, 2013, 28(4): 878-884.

    MA Shuangchao, ZANG Chaoping, LAN Haibo. Dynamic model modification of an aeroengine casing[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2013, 28(4): 878-884. (in Chinese)
    [16] BERRIET R,COGAN S. Updating finite element models using static deformations[J]. Computers and Structures,1992,45(4): 649-654. doi: 10.1016/0045-7949(92)90483-G
    [17] 向天宇, 赵人达, 刘海波. 基于静力测试数据的预应力混凝土连续梁结构损伤识别[J]. 土木工程学报, 2003, 36(11): 79-82.

    XIANG Tianyu, ZHAO Renda, LIU Haibo. Damage identification of prestressed concrete continuous beam structure based on static test data[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering, 2003, 36(11): 79-82. (in Chinese)
    [18] 邱春图, 成万植. 借助静力试验实测值修正和确认全机有限元模型[J]. 飞机设计, 2004(2): 37-41.

    QIU Chuntu, CHENG Wanzhi. The finite element model of the whole machine is corrected and confirmed with the aid of the measured value of static test[J]. Aircraft Design, 2004(2): 37-41. (in Chinese)
    [19] LEE H A,KIM Y I,PARK G J. Structural optimization of a joined wing using equivalent static loads[J]. Journal of Aircraft,2007,44(4): 1302-1308. doi: 10.2514/1.26869
    [20] 邓苗毅,任伟新. 基于静力荷载试验的连续箱梁桥结构有限元模型修正[J]. 福州大学学报(自然科学版),2009(2): 261-266.

    DENG Miaoyi,REN Weixin. Modification of finite element model of continuous box girder bridge based on static load test[J]. Journal of Fuzhou University (Natural Science Edition),2009(2): 261-266. (in Chinese)
    [21] 翟学,王建军,翟庆刚,等. 航空发动机静子系统中螺栓连接结构的建模与修正[J]. 推进技术,2015,36(3): 450-457. doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2015.03.019

    ZHAI Xue,WANG Jianjun,ZHAI Qinggang,et al. Modeling and modification of bolted structure in aeroengine stator system[J]. Promotion Technology,2015,36(3): 450-457. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2015.03.019
    [22] ZHAI Xue,WANG Jianjun,YAO Xingyu. Parametric modeling and updating for bolted joints of aeroengine casings[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science,2015,9(23): 1-12.
    [23] SONG Y, HARTWIGSEN C J, MCFARLAND D M, et al. Simulation of dynamics of beam structures with bolted joints using adjusted Iwan beam elements[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2004, 273: 249-276.
    [24] 徐超, 杨旭辉, 张铎. 螺栓连接梁的非线性动力学响应分析[J]. 强度与环境, 2011, 38(2): 1-5.

    XU Chao, YANG Xuhui, ZHANG Duo. Study on nonlinear dynamic response of bolted jointed beam[J]. Structure and Environment Engineering, 2011, 38(2): 1-5. (in Chinese)
    [25] LIAO Jingping, ZHANG Jianfu, FENG Pingfa, et al. Interface contact pressure-based virtual gradient material model for the dynamic analysis of the bolted joint in machine tools[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2016, 30(10): 4511-4521.
    [26] BEAUDOIN M, BEHDINAN K. Analytical lump model for the nonlinear dynamic response of bolted flanges in aero-engine casings[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2019, 115: 14-28.
    [27] ZHAO Guang, XIONG Zhiliang, JIN Xin, et al. Prediction of contact stiffness in bolted interface with natural frequency experiment and FE analysis[J]. Tribology International, 2018, 127: 157-164.
    [28] 姜东, 吴邵庆, 史勤丰, 等. 基于各向同性本构关系薄层单元的螺栓连接参数识别[J]. 振动与冲击, 2014, 33(22): 35-40.

    JIANG Dong, WU Shaoqing, SHI Qinfeng, et al. Parameter identification of bolted-joint based on the model with thin-layer elements with isotropic constitutive relationship[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(22): 35-40. (in Chinese)
    [29] 姚星宇, 王建军, 翟学. 航空发动机螺栓连接薄层单元建模方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2015, 41(12): 2269-2279.

    YAO Xingyu, WANG Jianjun, ZHAI Xue. Modeling method of bolted joints of aero-engine based on thin-layer element[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2015, 41(12): 2269-2279. (in Chinese)
    [30] LIU Yu, WANG Jianjun, CHEN Liqiang. Dynamic characteristics of the flange joint with a snap in aero-engine[J]. International Journal of Acoustics and Vibrations, 2018, 23(2): 168-174.
    [31] LIU Y, ZHAO D, GUO X, et al. Stiffness and geometry characteristics of flange connection with bolt failure and its influence on rotor dynamics[EB/OL]. [2022-11-23]. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09544062221147405.
  • 加载中
图(13) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  498
  • HTML浏览量:  339
  • PDF量:  70
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-11-23
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-04-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回