留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

结构参数对泵喷推进潜艇水力与声学性能的影响

郭荣 李舟睿 张人会 王乾年 罗鑫

郭荣, 李舟睿, 张人会, 等. 结构参数对泵喷推进潜艇水力与声学性能的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(6):20220935 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220935
引用本文: 郭荣, 李舟睿, 张人会, 等. 结构参数对泵喷推进潜艇水力与声学性能的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(6):20220935 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220935
GUO Rong, LI Zhourui, ZHANG Renhui, et al. Influence of structural parameters on hydrodynamic and acoustic performance of the pump-jet propelled submarine[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(6):20220935 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220935
Citation: GUO Rong, LI Zhourui, ZHANG Renhui, et al. Influence of structural parameters on hydrodynamic and acoustic performance of the pump-jet propelled submarine[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(6):20220935 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220935

结构参数对泵喷推进潜艇水力与声学性能的影响

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220935
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(52009050); 中央引导地方科技发展资金项目(23ZYQA0320); 兰州理工大学红柳优秀青年人才支持计划项目
详细信息
    作者简介:

    郭荣(1987-),男,副教授、硕士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为水力机械内部复杂流动及其诱导噪声

  • 中图分类号: V231.9

Influence of structural parameters on hydrodynamic and acoustic performance of the pump-jet propelled submarine

  • 摘要:

    为研究结构参数对巡航状态下泵喷推进潜艇水力性能和声学性能的影响,采用分离涡模型(DES)进行全流域非定常数值计算,输出流场脉动信息作为声源,运用声学有限元方法(FEM)预测流动噪声。在水槽试验台进行试验研究,采集噪声与推力信息,并对数值计算的结果进行验证。结果表明:较少的叶轮叶片数、导叶叶片数和较小的喷管进出口面积比有利于泵喷内部流动状况改善;泵喷总推力随叶轮叶片数或导叶叶片数的增加而降低、随喷管进出口面积比的增加而上升,敞水效率均随3种结构参数的增加而降低;叶轮叶片数增加引起各类流动噪声均呈现整体上升趋势,而导叶叶片数和喷管进出口面积比增加对不同噪声的影响规律各有不同;结构参数改变时,各类流动噪声的指向性分布规律基本一致。

     

  • 图 1  泵喷推进器和潜艇模型

    Figure 1.  Pump-jet propulsor and submarine model

    图 2  计算域

    Figure 2.  Computational domain

    图 3  无关性验证

    Figure 3.  Independence verification

    图 4  泵喷推进器叶轮、导叶和喷管网格示意图

    Figure 4.  Mesh renderings of impeller, guide vane, and nozzle of pump-jet

    图 5  观测点及观测面

    Figure 5.  Observation point and observation surface

    图 6  循环水槽试验台

    1 计速仪;2 数据收集系统;3 电动机转速控制器;4 推力监测器;5 潜艇;6 泵喷推进器;7 内部水循环水池;8 水下噪声监测装置。

    Figure 6.  Circulating water channel test-bed

    图 7  数值模拟与试验推力对比图

    Figure 7.  Comparison of CFD and experiment thrust performance

    图 8  试验与数值计算噪声对比

    Figure 8.  Noise comparison of experiment and numerical simulation

    图 9  3种不同叶片数的叶轮

    Figure 9.  Impellers with three different blade numbers

    图 10  不同叶轮叶片数时泵喷推进器内外涡量场和流线

    Figure 10.  Vorticity field and streamline diagrams of pump-jet propulsor at different impeller blade numbers

    图 11  不同叶轮叶片数时泵喷推进潜艇水力性能变图

    Figure 11.  Variation diagram of hydrdynamic performance of pump-jet propelled submarine with different impeller blade numbers

    图 12  不同叶轮叶片数时泵喷推进器叶轮与导叶表面压力系数曲线

    Figure 12.  Pressure coefficient curve of impeller and guide vane of pump jet propulsor with different impeller blade numbers

    图 13  不同叶轮叶片数时4类噪声声压级频响曲线

    Figure 13.  Sound pressure level frequency response curves of four types of noise with different impeller blade numbers

    图 14  叶频处不同叶轮叶片数的各噪声声压级指向性图

    Figure 14.  Sound pressure level directivity diagram of various noises at BPF with different impeller blade numbers

    图 15  3种不同叶片数的导叶

    Figure 15.  Guide vane with three different blade numbers

    图 16  不同导叶叶片数时泵喷推进器内外涡量场和流线分布图

    Figure 16.  Vorticity field and streamline diagrams of pump-jet propulsor at different guide vane blade numbers

    图 17  不同导叶叶片数时泵喷推进潜艇水动力性能变化图

    Figure 17.  Variation diagram of hydrdynamic performance of pump-jet propelled submarine with different guide vane blade numbers

    图 18  不同导叶叶片数时泵喷推进器叶轮与导叶表面压力系数曲线

    Figure 18.  Pressure coefficient curve of impeller and guide vane surface of pump-jet propulsor with different guide vane blade numbers

    图 19  不同导叶叶片数时四类噪声声压级频响曲线

    Figure 19.  Sound pressure level frequency response curves of four types of noise with different guide vane blade numbers

    图 20  叶频处不同导叶叶片数的各噪声声压级指向性图

    Figure 20.  Sound pressure level directivity diagram of various noises at BPF with different guide vane blade numbers

    图 21  3种不同进出口面积比的喷管

    Figure 21.  Nozzle with three different area ratio of import and export

    图 22  不同喷管进出口面积比下泵喷推进器内外涡量场和流线分布图

    Figure 22.  Vorticity field and streamline diagrams of pump-jet propulsor at different area ratio of nozzle import and export

    图 23  喷管进出口面积比不同时泵喷推进潜艇水动力性能变化图

    Figure 23.  Variation diagram of hydrdynamic performance of pump-jet propelled submarine with different area ratio of nozzle import and export

    图 24  喷管进出口面积比不同时泵喷推进器叶轮与导叶表面压力系数曲线

    Figure 24.  Pressure coefficient curve of impeller and guide vane surface of pump-jet with different area ratio of nozzle import and export

    图 25  喷管进出口面积比不同时4类噪声声压级频响曲线

    Figure 25.  Lp frequency response curves of four types of noise with different area ratio of nozzle import and export

    图 26  叶频处喷管进出口面积比不同时各噪声声压级指向性图

    Figure 26.  Lp directivity diagram of various noises at BPF with different area ratio of nozzle import and export

    表  1  泵喷推进器结构参数

    Table  1.   Structural parameters of pump-jet propulsor

    参数 数值
    叶轮进口直径d1/mm 83
    叶轮出口直径d2/mm 83
    导叶进口直径d3/mm 83
    导叶出口直径d4/mm 77
    叶轮叶片数Z1/片 4
    导叶叶片数Z2/片 7
    喷管进、出口面积比A0 7.5
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  主要部件y+值范围

    Table  2.   y+ range of main components

    过流部件 范围
    叶轮 0.81~5.98
    导叶 0.83~5.97
    喷管 0.91~3.97
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 王立祥,施丹. 具有巨大潜在市场的喷水推进技术[J]. 上海造船,2000,16(2): 42-48. WANG Lixiang,SHI Dan. Water jet propulsion technology with huge potential market[J]. Shanghai Shipbuilding,2000,16(2): 42-48. (in Chinese

    WANG Lixiang, SHI Dan. Water jet propulsion technology with huge potential market[J]. Shanghai Shipbuilding, 2000, 16(2): 42-48. (in Chinese)
    [2] LI Han,PAN Guang,HUANG Qiaogao. Transient analysis of the fluid flow on a pumpjet propulsor[J]. Ocean Engineering,2019,191: 106520. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106520
    [3] LU Lin,PAN Guang,SAHOO P K. CFD prediction and simulation of a pumpjet propulsor[J]. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering,2016,8(1): 110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2015.10.001
    [4] PARK W G,JANG J H,CHUN H H,et al. Numerical flow and performance analysis of waterjet propulsion system[J]. Ocean Engineering,2005,32(14/15): 1740-1761.
    [5] PARK W G,YUN H S,CHUN H H,et al. Numerical flow simulation of flush type intake duct of waterjet[J]. Ocean Engineering,2005,32(17/18): 2107-2120.
    [6] MOTALLEBI-NEJAD M,BAKHTIARI M,GHASSEMI H,et al. Numerical analysis of ducted propeller and pumpjet propulsion system using periodic computational domain[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology,2017,22(3): 559-573. doi: 10.1007/s00773-017-0438-x
    [7] 张明宇,俞伟强,石钰. 泵喷推进器抗空化性能分析[J]. 船舶工程,2021,43(1): 50-55. ZHANG Mingyu,YU Weiqiang,SHI Yu. Anti-cavitation performance analysis of pumpjet propulsor[J]. Ship Engineering,2021,43(1): 50-55. (in Chinese

    ZHANG Mingyu, YU Weiqiang, SHI Yu. Anti-cavitation performance analysis of pumpjet propulsor[J]. Ship Engineering, 2021, 43(1): 50-55. (in Chinese)
    [8] 谷浪,王超,胡健,等. 采用带梢隙涡模型的面元法预报泵喷水动力性能[J]. 中国造船,2017,58(4): 14-23. GU Lang,WANG Chao,HU Jian,et al. Hydrodynamic performance prediction of pumpjet using surface panel method together with tip gap vortex model[J]. Shipbuilding of China,2017,58(4): 14-23. (in Chinese doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4882.2017.04.002

    GU Lang, WANG Chao, HU Jian, et al. Hydrodynamic performance prediction of pumpjet using surface panel method together with tip gap vortex model[J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2017, 58(4): 14-23. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4882.2017.04.002
    [9] XIONG Ziying,RUI Wei,LU Linzhang,et al. Experimental investigation of broadband thrust and loading noise from pumpjet due to turbulence ingestion[J]. Ocean Engineering,2022,255: 111408. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111408
    [10] 李星升,关静岩. 泵喷推进器在某水下航行器降噪方面的应用[J]. 数字海洋与水下攻防,2018,1(1): 51-56. LI Xingsheng,GUAN Jingyan. Application of pump-jet propulsor in noise reduction of underwater vehicle[J]. Digital Ocean & Underwater Warfare,2018,1(1): 51-56. (in Chinese

    LI Xingsheng, GUAN Jingyan. Application of pump-jet propulsor in noise reduction of underwater vehicle[J]. Digital Ocean & Underwater Warfare, 2018, 1(1): 51-56. (in Chinese)
    [11] 黄修长,苏智伟,师帅康,等. 泵喷分布式脉动压力激励下泵喷艇体耦合系统振动声辐射[J]. 振动与冲击,2021,40(18): 1-9. HUANG Xiuchang,SU Zhiwei,SHI Shuaikang,et al. Vibro-acoustic responses of a coupled pump-jet suboff system under distributed unsteady hydrodynamics by a pump-jet[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock,2021,40(18): 1-9. (in Chinese

    HUANG Xiuchang, SU Zhiwei, SHI Shuaikang, et al. Vibro-acoustic responses of a coupled pump-jet suboff system under distributed unsteady hydrodynamics by a pump-jet[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40(18): 1-9. (in Chinese)
    [12] 武建国,武天龙,张敏革,等. 泵喷推进器扭矩自平衡优化分析[J]. 舰船科学技术,2022,44(12): 10-15. WU Jianguo,WU Tianlong,ZHANG Minge,et al. Torque self-balancing optimization analysis of pump-jet propeller[J]. Ship Science and Technology,2022,44(12): 10-15. (in Chinese

    WU Jianguo, WU Tianlong, ZHANG Minge, et al. Torque self-balancing optimization analysis of pump-jet propeller[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2022, 44(12): 10-15. (in Chinese)
    [13] 刘厚林,刘遇谱,谈明高,等. 无轴泵喷推进器运行特性的试验研究[J]. 中国造船,2022,63(3): 149-158. LIU Houlin,LIU Yupu,TAN Minggao,et al. Experimental research on operation performance of hub-less pump-jet thruster[J]. Shipbuilding of China,2022,63(3): 149-158. (in Chinese

    LIU Houlin, LIU Yupu, TAN Minggao, et al. Experimental research on operation performance of hub-less pump-jet thruster[J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2022, 63(3): 149-158. (in Chinese)
    [14] 李福正,黄桥高,潘光,等. 前置泵喷推进器叶片数对水动力及空化性能的影响研究[J]. 中国造船,2022,63(3): 191-204. LI Fuzheng,HUANG Qiaogao,PAN Guang,et al. Influence of blade numbers of pump-jet propulsor on its open-water performance[J]. Shipbuilding of China,2022,63(3): 191-204. (in Chinese

    LI Fuzheng, HUANG Qiaogao, PAN Guang, et al. Influence of blade numbers of pump-jet propulsor on its open-water performance[J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2022, 63(3): 191-204. (in Chinese)
    [15] 李福正,黄桥高,潘光,等. 定子叶片数对泵喷推进器空化性能的影响[J]. 装备环境工程,2022,19(5): 56-64. LI Fuzheng,HUANG Qiaogao,PAN Guang,et al. Effect of stator blade number on cavitation performance of pump-jet propulsor[J]. Equipment Environmental Engineering,2022,19(5): 56-64. (in Chinese

    LI Fuzheng, HUANG Qiaogao, PAN Guang, et al. Effect of stator blade number on cavitation performance of pump-jet propulsor[J]. Equipment Environmental Engineering, 2022, 19(5): 56-64. (in Chinese)
    [16] SHI Shuaikang,HUANG Xiuchang,RAO Zhiqiang,et al. Numerical analysis on flow noise and structure-borne noise of fully appended SUBOFF propelled by a pump-jet[J]. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements,2022,138: 140-158. doi: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2022.02.012
    [17] 曹奇宏,张冠军. 泵喷推进器的流激声振特性研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版),2023,47(3): 460-464. CAO Qihong, ZHANG Guanjun. Research on flow-induced acoustic and vibration characteristics of pump-jet propeller[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science and Engineering),2023,47(3): 460-464. (in Chinese

    CAO Qihong, ZHANG Guanjun. Research on flow-induced acoustic and vibration characteristics of pump-jet propeller[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science and Engineering), 2023, 47(3): 460-464. (in Chinese)
    [18] 白日,龚京风,赵胜,等. 泵喷推进器水动力噪声数值模拟方法研究现状[J]. 舰船电子工程,2020,40(5): 180-183,196. BAI Ri,GONG Jingfeng,ZHAO Sheng,et al. Research status of numerical simulation method for hydrodynamic noise of pump-jet propulsor[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering,2020,40(5): 180-183,196. (in Chinese

    BAI Ri, GONG Jingfeng, ZHAO Sheng, et al. Research status of numerical simulation method for hydrodynamic noise of pump-jet propulsor[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2020, 40(5): 180-183, 196. (in Chinese)
    [19] 关醒凡. 现代泵理论与设计[M]. 北京: 中国宇航出版社,2011. GUAN Xingfan. Modern pumps theory and design[M]. Beijing: China Astronautic Pulishing House,2011. (in Chinese

    GUAN Xingfan. Modern pumps theory and design[M]. Beijing: China Astronautic Pulishing House, 2011. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中
图(26) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  418
  • HTML浏览量:  324
  • PDF量:  40
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-12-06
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-03-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回